GovTrack’s Bill Summary
We don’t have a summary available yet.
This bill was introduced in a previous session of Congress and was passed by the House on March 19, 2010 but was never passed by the Senate.
Last updated Mar 22, 2010.
|Referred to Committee|
|Reported by Committee|
To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource study to evaluate resources in the Hudson River Valley in the State of New York to determine the suitability and feasibility of establishing the site as a unit of the National Park System, and for other purposes.
GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here.
The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.
No summaries available.
Click a format for a citation suggestion:
H.R. 4003--111th Congress: Hudson River Valley Special Resource Study Act. (2009). In www.GovTrack.us. Retrieved March 12, 2014, from http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr4003
“H.R. 4003--111th Congress: Hudson River Valley Special Resource Study Act.” www.GovTrack.us. 2009. March 12, 2014 <http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr4003>
|title=H.R. 4003 (111th)
|accessdate=March 12, 2014
|author=111th Congress (2009)
|date=November 3, 2009
|quote=Hudson River Valley Special Resource Study Act
We don’t have a summary available yet.
The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.
The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.
This summary can be found at http://www.gop.gov/bill/111/2/hr4003.
The Hudson River has played an important role in the history of Native American communities and crucial events relating to the French and Indian War and the American Revolution and Robert Fulton's first successful steamboat voyage. The study would cover an area spanning nearly 200 miles in 12 counties. The passage of legislation in 1996 establishing the Hudson River Valley National Heritage Area provided a framework for additional heritage tourism opportunities in the river valley.
Carol W. LaGrasse, president of the Property Rights Foundation of America, testified before the Committee on Natural Resources, in opposition to the bill on January 21, 2010. Her concerns center around the problems associated with the National Park Service interfering with established legal access to private property should the area be deemed worthy of inclusion in the National Park System. She cited a similar situation in the Adirondack State Park.
Subcommittee Ranking Member Rob Bishop offered an amendment to the bill that would instruct the Secretary of the Interior to determine the effects of National Park Service designation on a variety of recreational, commercial, and energy concerns in the Hudson River Valley. Furthermore, the amendment would instruct the Secretary to determine any authorities that will compel or permit the Secretary to influence local land use decisions or place restrictions on non-federal land. The amendment was adopted by a roll call vote of 35-0.
H.R. 4003 would direct the Secretary of the Interior to complete a study of the Hudson River Valley to evaluate the national significance of the section of the Hudson River that flows from Rodgers Island at Fort Edward to the southern-most boundary of Westchester County, New York. The study will evaluate the suitability and feasibility of designating the area as a unit of the National Park System. Under the legislation, the Secretary would be required to report the findings of the study no later than 36 months after the date that funds are first made available. The Secretary would be required to determine the effects of National Park Service designation on a variety of recreational, commercial, and energy concerns in the Hudson River Valley.
CBO estimates that implementing H.R. 4003 would cost up to $500,000 over the next three years.
The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.
So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.
We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.
The bill contains the following citations to other parts of U.S. law:
Slip laws refer to enacted bills and joint resolutions in their original form as enacted by Congress, that is, before other laws amend them. Slip laws are cited as “Public Law XXX-YYY”, where XXX is the number of the Congress in which the bill or resolution was introduced.
The United States Code is the compilation of general and permanent laws enacted by Congress. Laws that are not permanent in nature, law that affect a single individual, family, or small group, regulations, case law, state law, and local law do not appear in the United States Code.