H.R. 4634 (111th): Transparency in Job Loss from Fishery Closures Act of 2010

Introduced:
Feb 22, 2010 (111th Congress, 2009–2010)
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee)
Sponsor
Henry Brown Jr.
Representative for South Carolina's 1st congressional district
Party
Republican
Text
Read Text »
Last Updated
Feb 22, 2010
Length
4 pages
 
Status

This bill was introduced on February 22, 2010, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced Feb 22, 2010
Referred to Committee Feb 22, 2010
 
Full Title

To limit the authority of the Secretary of Commerce to implement certain fishery closures unless the Secretary certifies that closure is the only option available for maintaining a fishery at a sustainable level, and for other purposes.

Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
7 cosponsors (5R, 2D) (show)
Committees

House Natural Resources

Fisheries, Wildlife, Oceans and Insular Affairs

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


2/22/2010--Introduced.
Transparency in Job Loss from Fishery Closures Act of 2010 - Prohibits the Secretary of Commerce from implementing a closure of a fishery pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act that would have a direct or indirect effect of at least $50,000 on each of more than 25 small businesses that do business related to the recreational, charter, or commercial fishing industries involved in the fishery being closed, unless the Secretary has certified that:
(1) the closure is the only option available for maintaining the fishery at a sustainable level;
(2) the stock assessment of the fishery has been updated and peer reviewed within the preceding three years; and
(3) such assessment was developed using at least two models that were subjected to outside peer review.
Requires the Secretary to review, in order to meet such requirements, any fishery closure for which notice was published within 12 months prior to the date of enactment of this Act, and to include in such review the effects of the closure on coastal communities.
Directs the Secretary to report to Congress on fishery closures established within five years prior to the enactment of this Act.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.R. 4634 (111th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus