H.R. 595 (111th): American Steel First Act of 2009

Jan 15, 2009 (111th Congress, 2009–2010)
Died (Referred to Committee)
Peter Visclosky
Representative for Indiana's 1st congressional district
Read Text »
Last Updated
Jan 15, 2009
11 pages
Related Bills
H.R. 5935 (110th) was a previous version of this bill.

Reported by Committee
Last Action: Jun 26, 2008

H.R. 1703 (112th) was a re-introduction of this bill in a later Congress.

Referred to Committee
Last Action: May 03, 2011


This bill was introduced on January 15, 2009, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Introduced Jan 15, 2009
Referred to Committee Jan 15, 2009
Full Title

To require certain Federal agencies to use iron and steel produced in the United States in carrying out projects for the construction, alteration, or repair of a public building or public work, and for other purposes.


No summaries available.

Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.


Get a bill status widget for your website »


Click a format for a citation suggestion:


H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.

American Steel First Act of 2009 - Prohibits heads of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Department of Defense (DOD), and the Department of Transportation (DOT) from obligating or expending funds or providing financial assistance for projects for the construction, alteration, maintenance, or repair of a public building or public work unless all of the iron and steel used in such project is produced in the United States.
Waives such prohibition in cases where:
(1) the prohibition would be inconsistent with the public interest;
(2) iron and steel are not produced in the United States in sufficient and reasonably available quantities of a satisfactory quality; or
(3) inclusion of iron and steel produced in the United States will increase the cost of the overall project contract by more than 25%.
Prohibits waivers by a department head for products produced in a foreign country that is determined by the U.S. Trade Representative to have violated the terms of an agreement with the United States by discriminating against products covered by the agreement that are produced in the United States.
Prohibits such department heads from imposing financial assistance restrictions on: (1) states that impose more stringent requirements on the use of iron and steel in foreign countries in projects carried out with such assistance; or (2) recipients that comply with such state imposed requirements.
Makes any person who intentionally labels or represents a product used in a project under this Act as "Made in America" when it is not ineligible for another department contract from for six years.
Requires the Secretary of Transportation to: (1) publish a justification for a waiver of the prohibition against obligating funds to carry out the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982, highway projects, public transportation projects, or aviation programs unless the steel, iron, and manufactured products used are produced in the United States; and (2) provide for public notice and comment for such waiver.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.

No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.R. 595 (111th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus