GovTrack’s Bill Summary
We don’t have a summary available yet.
The bill’s title was written by its sponsor. H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.
This bill was introduced in a previous session of Congress and was passed by the House on December 15, 2010 but was never passed by the Senate.
Last updated Dec 22, 2010.
|Referred to Committee|
GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here.
The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.
No summaries available.
Click a format for a citation suggestion:
H.R. 6494--111th Congress: To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 to improve the Littoral .... (2010). In www.GovTrack.us. Retrieved March 7, 2014, from http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr6494
“H.R. 6494--111th Congress: To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 to improve the Littoral ....” www.GovTrack.us. 2010. March 7, 2014 <http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr6494>
|title=H.R. 6494 (111th)
|accessdate=March 7, 2014
|author=111th Congress (2010)
|date=December 2, 2010
|quote=To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 to improve the Littoral ...
We don’t have a summary available yet.
The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.
The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.
This summary can be found at http://www.gop.gov/bill/111/2/hr6494.
The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) is a small, specialized surface-combat ship. The vessel was planned to be fast and relatively inexpensive—originally costing $220 million each—and meant to operate in coastal waters.
There are two competing versions of the LCS: Lockheed Martin's model being built in Wisconsin and General Dynamics' vessel built in Alabama. The Navy had planned to choose between the two contractors to build the next 10 LCS warships. However, the Navy recently asked Congress for authority to allow both companies to continue building the ships. The contractors' current bid prices were set to expire December 14, 2010, but this week the Navy announced the contractors had extended the deadline to December 30, 2010. The Navy claims that the bid costs are being kept confidential, even from Congress, because if Congress does not approve the two-shipyard plan, the service will have to select a single company. As a result, there is still a live competition and prices must be kept private.
Critics of the LCS, however, claim the ship is plagued by cost overruns and other problems. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report stating that the program faces technical risks because designs are not final and that future changes could cause costs to exceed Navy budgets. The GAO report, however, confirmed that having two shipyards working on the program could provide some insurance if one of the vessel versions does not work out as planned.
The FY 2010 Defense Authorization law (P.L. 111-84) authorized the purchase of only 10 ships, not the 20 envisioned by this legislation.
H.R. 6494 would amend the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2010 (P.L. 111-84) relating to the Navy's Littoral Combat Ship program to: increase from 10 to 20 the number of such ships authorized to be procured, including any ship control and weapons systems that the Secretary of the Navy determines necessary; allow one or more contracts to be entered into for such procurement; and require the government to be permitted to conduct a competition for an additional shipyard for ship construction.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has not produced a cost estimate for this bill as of press time.
The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.
So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.
We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.
The bill contains the following citations to other parts of U.S. law:
Slip laws refer to enacted bills and joint resolutions in their original form as enacted by Congress, that is, before other laws amend them. Slip laws are cited as “Public Law XXX-YYY”, where XXX is the number of the Congress in which the bill or resolution was introduced.
The United States Statutes at Large is the compilation of all laws enacted by Congress.