H.Res. 1413 (111th): Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the holding in Miranda v. Arizona may be interpreted to provide for the admissibility of a terrorist suspect’s responses in an interrogation without administration of the Miranda warnings, to the extent that the interrogation is carried out to acquire information concerning other threats to public safety.

Introduced:

May 27, 2010
111th Congress, 2009–2010

Status:
Died in a previous Congress

This resolution was introduced on May 27, 2010, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Sponsor:

Todd Tiahrt

Representative for Kansas's 4th congressional district

Republican

Text:

Read Text »
Last Updated: May 27, 2010
Length: 2 pages

About the resolution

Summary (CRS)
5/27/2010--Introduced.Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that the public safety exception to the holding in Miranda v. Arizona may be interpreted to allow the admission into evidence in ... Read more >
What is a resolution?

The “H.Res.” in “H.Res. 1413” means this is a House simple resolution in the United States Congress. A simple resolution is used for matters that affect just one chamber of Congress, often to change the rules of the chamber to set the manner of debate for a related bill. It must be agreed to in the chamber in which it was introduced. It is not voted on in the other chamber and does not have the force of law.

The resolution’s title was written by its sponsor.

History

Introduced
May 27, 2010

Details

Cosponsors
none
Committee Assignments

The committee chair determines whether a resolution will move past the committee stage.

Votes

There have been no votes related to this resolution.

Links & tools

Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion: