S. 962 (111th): Enhanced Partnership with Pakistan Act of 2009

Introduced:
May 04, 2009 (111th Congress, 2009–2010)
Status:
Died (Passed Senate)
See Instead:

S. 1707 (same title)
Signed by the President — Oct 15, 2009

H.R. 3642 (same title)
Referred to Committee — Sep 24, 2009

Sponsor
John Kerry
Senator from Massachusetts
Party
Democrat
Text
Read Text »
Last Updated
Jun 24, 2009
Length
34 pages
Related Bills
S. 1707 (Related)
Enhanced Partnership with Pakistan Act of 2009

Signed by the President
Oct 15, 2009

H.R. 3642 (Related)
Enhanced Partnership with Pakistan Act of 2009

Referred to Committee
Last Action: Sep 24, 2009

 
Status

This bill was introduced in a previous session of Congress and was passed by the Senate on June 24, 2009 but was never passed by the House.

Progress
Introduced May 04, 2009
Referred to Committee May 04, 2009
Reported by Committee Jun 16, 2009
Passed Senate Jun 24, 2009
 
Full Title

A bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal years 2009 through 2013 to promote an enhanced strategic partnership with Pakistan and its people, and for other purposes.

Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
11 cosponsors (10D, 1R) (show)
Committees

Senate Foreign Relations

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

S. stands for Senate bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


6/24/2009--Passed Senate amended.
Enhanced Partnership with Pakistan Act of 2009 -
Section 4 -
States that it is U.S. policy to:
(1) support the consolidation of democracy in Pakistan;
(2) build a long-term relationship with Pakistan;
(3) further the economic development of Pakistan by expanding bilateral engagement with the government of Pakistan;
(4) work with Pakistan and the countries bordering Pakistan to facilitate regional peace;
(5) work with the government of Pakistan to prevent Pakistani territory from being used as a base or conduit for terrorist attacks;
(6) expand people-to-people engagement between the United States and Pakistan through increased educational, technical, and cultural exchanges; and
(7) encourage the development of local capacity to measure the progress of donor expenditures and better hold the government of Pakistan accountable for fund expenditures.
Section 5 -
Authorizes FY2009-FY2013 appropriations for assistance to Pakistan under the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961. States that specified funds should be obligated for police reform and equipping.
Prohibits funds from being made available to Pakistan unless the Pakistan Assistance Strategy Report has been submitted to the Senate Committees on Appropriations and Foreign Relations and the House Committees on Appropriations and Foreign Affairs (Committees).
Limits funds to Pakistan after FY2009 unless the President's Special Representative to Afghanistan and Pakistan certifies to the Committees that assistance to Pakistan has made or is making substantial progress toward achieving U.S. assistance objectives.
Authorizes the Secretary of State to waive such funding restrictions for reasons of U.S. national security.
Expresses the sense of Congress that:
(1) subject to an improving political and economic climate in Pakistan specified FY2014-FY2018 funds should be authorized for Pakistan;
(2) security assistance should be provided in close coordination with the government of Pakistan and be geared toward bolstering counterinsurgency capabilities to defeat the Taliban-backed insurgency and deny popular support to al Qaeda and other Pakistan-based foreign terrorist organizations; and
(3) the government of Pakistan should allocate a greater portion of its budget to education, health, and other priorities described in this section.
Provides that funds should be used for projects to benefit the people of Pakistan, including projects that promote: (1) democratic governance, police reform, and anticorruption efforts; (2) judicial enhancement; (3) efforts against the narcotics trade; (4) economic freedom and growth; (5) investments in people, and particularly, women and children; (6) education and public health; and (7) regional development.
Encourages the utilization of Pakistani firms and community and local nongovernmental organizations in Pakistan to provide such assistance.
Authorizes the use of funds for operational and audit expenses.
Sets forth notification and Pakistan Assistance Strategy Report and Government Accountability Office (GAO) reporting requirements.
Directs the President to consult with the Committees regarding assistance and policy strategies not later than 15 days before obligating any assistance under this section.
Section 6 -
Limits certain military assistance (as of FY2010) and arms transfers (as of FY2012) to Pakistan until the Secretary certifies to the Committees that Pakistan's security forces: (1) are making concerted efforts to prevent al Qaeda and the Taliban and their associated groups from operating in, or basing attacks into Afghanistan from, Pakistan's territory; and (2) are not materially interfering in Pakistan's political or judicial processes.
Authorizes the Secretary to waive such funding restrictions for reasons of U.S. national security.
Directs the Secretary to report annually to the Committees regarding the progress of Pakistan's security forces.
Section 7 -
Expresses the sense of Congress that:
(1) coalition support funds are critical components of the global fight against terrorism and the primary support for military operations of the government of Pakistan to destroy the terrorist threat;
(2) the Pakistan reimbursement claims process for coalition support funds requires increased oversight and accountability;
(3) more specific guidance should be generated for officials associated with counterterrorism program oversight within the U.S. Embassy in Pakistan, the United States Central Command, the Department of Defense (DOD), the Department of State, and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB); and
(4) the Secretary of Defense should report semiannually to the Committees and to the House and Senate Armed Services Committees on the use of Coalition Support Funds.
Section 8 -
Directs the Secretary to: (1) develop a comprehensive, cross-border strategy for working with the government of Pakistan, the government of Afghanistan, the North Atlantic Treaty Alliance (NATO), and other allies to implement counterterrorism and counterinsurgency measurers along the border areas of Pakistan and Afghanistan; and (2) submit a related report to the Committees.
Section 9 -
Expresses the sense of Congress that the United States should: (1) recognize the bold political steps the Pakistan electorate has taken to elect a new civilian government; (2) expand its engagement with the government and people of Pakistan in areas of particular interest and importance to the people of Pakistan; (3) continue to build a reciprocal security relationship with Pakistan; and (4) explore means to utilize the expertise of the Pakistani-American community.
Section 10 -
States that with specified exceptions this Act shall remain in force after September 30, 2013.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of S. 962 (111th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus