H.R. 2173 (112th): Advancing Offshore Wind Production Act

Introduced:
Jun 14, 2011 (112th Congress, 2011–2013)
Status:
Died (Reported by Committee)
Sponsor
Robert Wittman
Representative for Virginia's 1st congressional district
Party
Republican
Text
Read Text »
Last Updated
Oct 14, 2011
Length
8 pages
Related Bills
H.R. 1398 (113th) was a re-introduction of this bill in a later Congress.

Referred to Committee
Last Action: Mar 21, 2013

S. 3445 (Related)
Domestic Energy and Jobs Act

Referred to Committee
Last Action: Jul 26, 2012

 
Status

This bill was introduced on July 13, 2011, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced Jun 14, 2011
Referred to Committee Jun 14, 2011
Reported by Committee Jul 13, 2011
 
Full Title

To facilitate the development of offshore wind energy resources.

Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
10 cosponsors (10R) (show)
Committees

House Natural Resources

Energy and Mineral Resources

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


10/14/2011--Reported to House amended.
Advancing Offshore Wind Production Act - Exempts any project determined by the Secretary of the Interior to be an offshore meteorological site testing and monitoring project from environmental impact statement requirements under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA).
Defines an "offshore meteorological site testing and monitoring project" as a project that is administered by the Department of the Interior and carried out on or in the waters of the Outer Continental Shelf to test or monitor weather (including wind, tidal, current, and solar energy) using towers, buoys, or other temporary ocean infrastructure and that:
(1) causes less than one acre of surface or seafloor disruption at the location of each meteorological tower or other device and no more than five acres of surface or seafloor disruption within the proposed area affected by the project (including hazards to navigation),
(2) is decommissioned within five years of its commencement, and
(3) provides meteorological information to the Secretary of the Interior.
Directs the Secretary to:
(1) require that any applicant seeking to conduct an offshore meteorological site testing and monitoring project on the outer Continental Shelf obtain a permit and right of way for the project;
(2) decide whether to issue such a permit and right of way within 30 days after receiving an application;
(3) provide an opportunity for submission of comments by the public;
(4) consult with the Secretary of Defense (DOD), the Commandant of the Coast Guard, and the heads of other federal, state, and local agencies that would be affected by issuance of the permit and right of way; and
(5) provide an applicant the opportunity to remedy deficiencies in a permit application that was denied.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.R. 2173 (112th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus