GovTrack’s Bill Summary
We don’t have a summary available yet.
H.R. 320 (112th): Distinguished Flying Cross National Memorial Act
- Introduced:
- Jan 19, 2011 (112th Congress, 2011–2013)
- Sponsor:
- Rep. Ken Calvert [R-CA44]
- Status:
- Died (Passed House)
- See Instead:
- This bill was re-introduced as H.R. 330 on Jan 22, 2013. See H.R. 330 for current action on this subject.
The bill’s title was written by its sponsor. H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.
- Status
-
This bill was introduced in a previous session of Congress and was passed by the House on October 24, 2011 but was never passed by the Senate.
- Text
-
Last updated Oct 31, 2011.
4 pages
- Progress
-
Introduced Jan 19, 2011 Referred to Committee Jan 19, 2011 Reported by Committee Jun 15, 2011 Passed House Oct 24, 2011
- Full Title
To designate a Distinguished Flying Cross National Memorial at the March Field Air Museum in Riverside, California.
- Primary Source
-
THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)
GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here.
- Votes
-
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass
Oct 24, 2011 6:54 p.m.
Passed 392/1 - Cosponsors
-
26 cosponsors (21R, 5D) (show)
- Committees
-
Senate Energy and Natural Resources
The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.
- Summary
-
No summaries available.
- Widget
- Citation
-
Click a format for a citation suggestion:
Library of Congress Summary
The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.
10/24/2011--Passed House without amendment.
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced.
The expanded summary of the House reported version is repeated here.) Distinguished Flying Cross National Memorial Act - Designates a memorial located at March Field Air Museum in Riverside, California, as the Distinguished Flying Cross National Memorial, in honor of current and former members of the armed forces who have been awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross. Prohibits the designation of such memorial from being construed to require or permit federal funds to be used for any related purpose.
House Republican Conference Summary
The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.
This summary can be found at http://www.gop.gov/bill/112/1/hr320.
Background
According to findings listed in the bill, 126,318 members of the Armed Forces received the Distinguished Flying Cross during World War II, approximately 21,000 members received the medal during the Korean conflict, and 21,647 members received the medal during the Vietnam War. Since the end of the Vietnam War, more than 203 Armed Forces members have received the medal in times of conflict. According to House Report 112-170, the March Field Air Museum has commenced work on a memorial in Riverside, California, to honor recipients of the U.S. Air Force's Distinguished Flying Cross, a medal awarded to members of the U.S. armed services who have demonstrated “heroism or extraordinary achievement while participating in an aerial flight.”
Summary
H.R. 320 would designate the memorial to members of the Armed Forces who have been awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross, located at the March Field Air Museum in Riverside, California, as the Distinguished Flying Cross National Memorial. The bill would specify that the national memorial designated by this legislation would not be a unit of the National Park System, and the designation of the national memorial could not be construed to require or permit federal funds to be expended for any purpose related to the national memorial.
Cost
According to CBO, implementing H.R. 320 would “have no effect on discretionary spending because the proposed memorial would not be constructed or operated with federal funds.”
House Democratic Caucus Summary
The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.
So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.
We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.
Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.R. 320 (112th) with other GovTrack users.
comments powered by DisqusYour comments are not read by Congressional staff.