GovTrack’s Bill Summary
We don’t have a summary available yet.
The bill’s title was written by its sponsor. H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.
This bill was introduced in a previous session of Congress and was passed by the House on July 23, 2012 but was never passed by the Senate.
Last updated Jul 24, 2012.
|Referred to Committee|
|Reported by Committee|
To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate a segment of the Beaver, Chipuxet, Queen, Wood, and Pawcatuck Rivers in the States of Connecticut and Rhode Island for study for potential addition to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other purposes.
GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here.
No summaries available.
Click a format for a citation suggestion:
H.R. 3388--112th Congress: Wood-Pawcatuck Watershed Protection Act. (2011). In www.GovTrack.us. Retrieved March 10, 2014, from http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/hr3388
“H.R. 3388--112th Congress: Wood-Pawcatuck Watershed Protection Act.” www.GovTrack.us. 2011. March 10, 2014 <http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/hr3388>
|title=H.R. 3388 (112th)
|accessdate=March 10, 2014
|author=112th Congress (2011)
|date=November 4, 2011
|quote=Wood-Pawcatuck Watershed Protection Act
We don’t have a summary available yet.
The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.
The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.
This summary can be found at http://www.gop.gov/bill/112/2/hr3388.
The Wild and Scenic Rivers System was created in 1968 with the intent of protecting the natural characteristics of the nation’s “outstanding,” free flowing rivers and their immediate surrounding environments from development. The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act provides three separate designations for rivers: wild, scenic, or recreational. According to the National Wild and Scenic River System, a river, or section of river, is designated wild if it is free of impoundments, has primitive shorelines, is only accessible by trails, and has unpolluted waters. Scenic rivers are meant to have largely undeveloped shorelines, may be accessible by roads in places, and are more developed than wild rivers. Rivers are designated as recreational if they are readily accessible by road, have some development along the shoreline, and may have had some impoundment or diversion (like a dam) in the past. If a river receives a Wild and Scenic River designation, no new dams may be constructed and federally assisted water resource development projects would not be allowed. Specifically, the designation prohibits federal construction of dams or other facilities that endanger the free flow and/or resource value of the river. In the past, some segments of rivers that Congress has included in the Wild and Scenic River System have been scrutinized because they seemingly lacked the essential natural qualities needed to be designated as a scenic river.
According to the Natural Resources Committee, during Full Committee consideration of the bill, the committee adopted an amendment offered by Congressman Rob Bishop (R-UT) to add several requirements to the study that will be undertaken by the National Park Service (NPS). NPS will be required to consider the effect of designation on commercial and recreational uses, such as hunting, fishing and boating. Also, the study must look at the impact on construction and maintenance of energy production and transmission. Finally, the amendment would require that the study identify private property within the study area and all authorities that could be utilized to condemn land.
H.R. 3582 would designate a segment of the Beaver, Chipuxet, Queen, Wood, and Pawcatuck Rivers in the States of Connecticut and Rhode Island for study for potential addition to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. The bill would require the National Park Service (NPS) to conduct a study of 86 miles of the Beaver, Chipuxet, Queen, Wood, and Pawcatuck Rivers in the States of Connecticut and Rhode Island for potential addition to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. The study would have to include all authorities that will authorize or require the Secretary to influence local land use decisions. The study would have to be complete within three years after funds were made available. According to CBO, implementing the legislation would cost about $400,000 over the next three years, assuming availability of appropriated funds.
According to CBO, “implementing the legislation would cost about $400,000 over the next three years, assuming the availability of appropriated funds.”
The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.
So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.
We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.
The bill contains the following citations to other parts of U.S. law:
The United States Code is the compilation of general and permanent laws enacted by Congress. Laws that are not permanent in nature, law that affect a single individual, family, or small group, regulations, case law, state law, and local law do not appear in the United States Code.