H.R. 6087 (112th): International Protecting Girls by Preventing Child Marriage Act of 2012

Introduced:
Jul 09, 2012 (112th Congress, 2011–2013)
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee)
Sponsor
Betty McCollum
Representative for Minnesota's 4th congressional district
Party
Democrat
Text
Read Text »
Last Updated
Jul 09, 2012
Length
11 pages
Related Bills
H.R. 2103 (111th) was a previous version of this bill.

Referred to Committee
Last Action: Apr 27, 2009

S. 414 (Related)
International Protecting Girls by Preventing Child Marriage Act of 2011

Passed Senate
Last Action: May 24, 2012

 
Status

This bill was introduced on July 9, 2012, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced Jul 09, 2012
Referred to Committee Jul 09, 2012
 
Full Title

To protect girls in developing countries through the prevention of child marriage, and for other purposes.

Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
29 cosponsors (27D, 2R) (show)
Committees

House Foreign Affairs

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


7/9/2012--Introduced.
International Protecting Girls by Preventing Child Marriage Act of 2012 - Defines "child marriage" as the marriage of a girl or boy not yet the minimum age for marriage stipulated in law in the country in which the girl or boy is a resident, or where there is no such law, under the age of 18.
Expresses the sense of Congress that: (1) child marriage is a violation of human rights and its prevention and elimination should be a U.S. foreign policy goal; and (2) expanding educational opportunities for girls, economic opportunities for women, and reducing maternal and child mortality are critical to achieving the Millennium Development Goals and U.S. global health and development objectives, including efforts to prevent HIV/AIDS.
Authorizes the President to provide assistance, including through multilateral, nongovernmental, and faith-based organizations, to prevent child marriage in developing countries and to promote the educational, health, economic, social, and legal empowerment of girls and women.
Directs the President to establish a multi-year strategy to prevent child marriage and promote the empowerment of girls at risk of child marriage in developing countries, and should include addressing the unique needs, vulnerabilities, and potential of girls under age 18 in developing countries.
Expresses the sense of Congress that the President and all relevant agencies should collect and make available data on the incidence of child marriage in countries that receive U.S. foreign or development assistance where the practice of child marriage is prevalent.
Amends the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to require that Department of State country reports on human rights practices include a description of the status of child marriage for each country in which child marriage is prevalent.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.R. 6087 (112th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus