H.R. 6406 (112th): Non-Federal Employee Whistleblower Protection Act of 2012

Introduced:
Sep 13, 2012 (112th Congress, 2011–2013)
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee)
Sponsor
Jackie Speier
Representative for California's 12th congressional district
Party
Democrat
Text
Read Text »
Last Updated
Sep 13, 2012
Length
21 pages
Related Bills
S. 241 (Related)
Non-Federal Employee Whistleblower Protection Act of 2012

Reported by Committee
Last Action: Apr 25, 2012

 
Status

This bill was introduced on September 13, 2012, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced Sep 13, 2012
Referred to Committee Sep 13, 2012
 
Full Title

To expand whistleblower protections to non-Federal employees whose disclosures involve misuse of Federal funds.

Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
1 cosponsors (1R) (show)
Committees

House Armed Services

House Education and the Workforce

House Oversight and Government Reform

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


9/13/2012--Introduced.
Non-Federal Employee Whistleblower Protection Act of 2012 - Repeals and replaces provisions prohibiting reprisals against employees of civilian and defense contractors for disclosing to a federal official information relating to a substantial violation of law related to a public contract.
Prohibits an employee of any non-federal employer receiving covered funds (i.e., a contract, grant, or other payment any portion of which is provided by the federal government) from being discharged, demoted, or discriminated against as a reprisal for initiating or participating in any proceeding related to the misuse of federal funds, reasonably opposing the misuse of federal funds, or disclosing to specified federal agencies or officials information that the employee reasonably believes is evidence of:
(1) gross mismanagement of an agency contract or grant relating to covered funds;
(2) a gross waste of covered funds;
(3) a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety, or an abuse of authority, related to the implementation or use of covered funds; or
(4) a violation of a law, rule, or regulation related to an agency contract, subcontract, or grant relating to covered funds.
Sets forth provisions on:
(1) time limitations for determinations by inspector generals on whether to conduct or continue an investigation of a reprisal complaint,
(2) access by a complainant to the inspector general's investigative file,
(3) the standard of proof for showing the occurrence of a reprisal,
(4) agency actions to deny relief or remedy a reprisal,
(5) the exhaustion of administrative remedies authorizing civil action by a complainant, and
(6) nonenforceability of waivers and arbitration of disputes.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.R. 6406 (112th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus