skip to main content

H.R. 872 (112th): Reducing Regulatory Burdens Act of 2011


The text of the bill below is as of Mar 29, 2011 (Reported by House Committee).


IB

Union Calendar No. 21

112th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 872

[Report No. 112–43, Parts I and II]

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

March 2, 2011

(for himself, Mrs. Schmidt, Mr. Baca, Mr. Mica, Mr. Lucas, Mr. Peterson, Mr. Simpson, Mr. Graves of Missouri, Mr. Ross of Arkansas, Mr. Neugebauer, Mr. Boswell, Mr. Crawford, Mr. Sablan, Mr. Herger, Mr. Kissell, Mr. Schilling, Mr. Costa, Mr. Tipton, Mr. Owens, Mr. Rooney, Mr. Cardoza, and Mr. Holden) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

March 29, 2011

Additional sponsors: Mr. Johnson of Illinois, Mr. Denham, Mr. Schrader, Mr. Conaway, Mrs. Lummis, Mr. McIntyre, Mrs. Ellmers, Mr. Gary G. Miller of California, Mr. Shuster, Mr. Walz of Minnesota, Mr. King of Iowa, Mr. Gibson, Mr. Cuellar, Mr. Huelskamp, Mr. Fincher, Mr. Duncan of Tennessee, Mr. Hultgren, Mr. Coble, Mrs. McMorris Rodgers, Mrs. Miller of Michigan, Mr. Jones, Mr. Bucshon, Mr. Flores, Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. DesJarlais, Mr. McGovern, Mrs. Roby, Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia, Mr. Ribble, Mr. Southerland, Mr. Courtney, Mrs. Hartzler, Mr. LoBiondo, Mr. Walden, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Smith of Nebraska, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. Stutzman, Mr. Labrador, Mr. Marino, Mrs. Myrick, Mrs. Noem, Ms. Sewell, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mr. Thompson of Mississippi, Ms. Jenkins, Mr. Pompeo, Mr. Flake, Mr. Johnson of Ohio, Mr. Olson, Mr. Schock, Mr. Long, Mr. Walberg, Mr. Critz, Mr. Nunes, Mr. Paul, Mr. Huizenga of Michigan, Mr. Bishop of Georgia, Mr. Costello, Mr. McKinley, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Landry, Mr. Coffman of Colorado, Mr. Thornberry, Mr. Bachus, Mr. Latta, Mr. Canseco, Mr. Altmire, Mr. Donnelly of Indiana, Mr. Griffin of Arkansas, Mr. Shimkus, Mrs. Emerson, Mr. Petri, Mr. Stivers, Mr. Farenthold, Mr. Michaud, Mr. Bartlett, Mr. Boren, Mr. Shuler, Mr. Sires, Mr. Tiberi, Mr. LaTourette, Mr. Austria, Mr. Scalise, Mr. Hurt, Mr. Bonner, Mr. Boustany, Mr. Cleaver, Mr. Forbes, Ms. Granger, Mr. Carter, Mr. McClintock, Mr. Rokita, Mr. Barrow, Mr. Kline, Mr. Rogers of Alabama, Mr. Barletta, Mr. Berg, Mr. Reed, Mr. Camp, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, Mr. Posey, Mr. Cravaack, Mr. Hastings of Washington, Mr. Cole, Mr. Pence, Ms. Foxx, Mr. Fortenberry, Mr. Mulvaney, Mr. Nunnelee, Mr. Gowdy, Mr. Palazzo, Mr. Dold, Mr. Dent, and Mr. McHenry

March 29, 2011

Reported from the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure with an amendment

Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic

March 29, 2011

Reported from the Committee on Agriculture with an amendment; committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed

Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in boldface roman

A BILL

To amend the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to clarify Congressional intent regarding the regulation of the use of pesticides in or near navigable waters, and for other purposes.


1.

Short title

This Act may be cited as the Reducing Regulatory Burdens Act of 2011.

2.

Use of registered pesticides

Section 3(f) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (7 U.S.C. 136a(f)) is amended by adding at the end the following:

(5)

Use of registered pesticides

Except as provided in section 402(s) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, the Administrator or a State may not require a permit under such Act for a discharge from a point source into navigable waters of a pesticide registered under this Act, or the residue of such a pesticide, resulting from the application of such pesticide.

.

3.

Discharges of pesticides

Section 402 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1342) is amended by adding at the end the following:

(s)

Discharges of pesticides

(1)

No permit requirement

Except as provided in paragraph (2), a permit shall not be required by the Administrator or a State under this Act for a discharge from a point source into navigable waters of a pesticide authorized for sale, distribution, or use under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, or the residue of such a pesticide, resulting from the application of such pesticide.

(2)

Exceptions

Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the following discharges containing a pesticide or pesticide residue:

(A)

A discharge resulting from the application of a pesticide in violation of a provision of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act that is relevant to protecting water quality, if—

(i)

the discharge would not have occurred but for the violation; or

(ii)

the amount of pesticide or pesticide residue contained in the discharge is greater than would have occurred without the violation.

(B)

Stormwater discharges regulated under subsection (p).

(C)

The following discharges regulated under this section:

(i)

Manufacturing or industrial effluent.

(ii)

Treatment works effluent.

(iii)

Discharges incidental to the normal operation of a vessel, including a discharge resulting from ballasting operations or vessel biofouling prevention.

.

1.

Short title

This Act may be cited as the Reducing Regulatory Burdens Act of 2011.

2.

Use of authorized pesticides

Section 3(f) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (7 U.S.C. 136a(f)) is amended by adding at the end the following:

(5)

Use of authorized pesticides

Except as provided in section 402(s) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, the Administrator or a State may not require a permit under such Act for a discharge from a point source into navigable waters of a pesticide authorized for sale, distribution, or use under this Act, or the residue of such a pesticide, resulting from the application of such pesticide.

.

3.

Discharges of pesticides

Section 402 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1342) is amended by adding at the end the following:

(s)

Discharges of pesticides

(1)

No permit requirement

Except as provided in paragraph (2), a permit shall not be required by the Administrator or a State under this Act for a discharge from a point source into navigable waters of a pesticide registered under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, or the residue of such a pesticide, resulting from the application of such pesticide.

(2)

Exceptions

Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the following discharges containing a pesticide or pesticide residue:

(A)

A discharge resulting from the application of a pesticide in violation of a provision of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act that is relevant to protecting water quality, if—

(i)

the discharge would not have occurred but for the violation; or

(ii)

the amount of pesticide or pesticide residue contained in the discharge is greater than would have occurred without the violation.

(B)

Stormwater discharges regulated under subsection (p).

(C)

Municipal or industrial discharges regulated under this section, including—

(i)

manufacturing or industrial effluent;

(ii)

treatment works effluent; and

(iii)

discharges incidental to the normal operation of a vessel, including a discharge resulting from ballasting operations or vessel biofouling prevention.

.

March 29, 2011

Reported from the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure with an amendment

March 29, 2011

Reported from the Committee on Agriculture with an amendment; committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed