S. 1197 (112th): A bill to provide for a feasibility study before carrying out any Federal action relating to the Chicago Area Water System.

Introduced:
Jun 15, 2011 (112th Congress, 2011–2013)
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee)
Sponsor
Daniel Coats
Senior Senator from Indiana
Party
Republican
Text
Read Text »
Last Updated
Jun 15, 2011
Length
4 pages
Related Bills
H.R. 2432 (Related)
To provide for a feasibility study before carrying out any Federal action relating to ...

Referred to Committee
Last Action: Jul 06, 2011

 
Status

This bill was introduced on June 15, 2011, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced Jun 15, 2011
Referred to Committee Jun 15, 2011
 
Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
2 cosponsors (2R) (show)
Committees

Senate Environment and Public Works

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

S. stands for Senate bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


6/15/2011--Introduced.
Directs the Chief of Engineers, prior to any major federal action to prevent the introduction or establishment of a population of aquatic nuisance species between the Great Lakes and the Mississippi River Basins that would impact the flow of commerce or commercial activity within the Chicago Area Water [sic] System, to prepare an economic impact statement regarding:
(1) the impact on commerce and commercial activity and on jobs and job opportunities;
(2) any adverse economic effects that could not be avoided;
(3) alternatives to the proposed action;
(4) the relationship between any local short-term impacts on commerce or commercial activity and maintenance and enhancement of long-term productivity and environmental values; and
(5) any adverse impacts to public or private property, including damage relating to flooding or new water drainage patterns.
Allows such statement to be combined with a detailed statement of environmental impacts required to be prepared under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of S. 1197 (112th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus