S. 1824 (112th): Private Company Flexibility and Growth Act

Introduced:
Nov 08, 2011 (112th Congress, 2011–2013)
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee)
Sponsor
Patrick “Pat” Toomey
Junior Senator from Pennsylvania
Party
Republican
Text
Read Text »
Last Updated
Nov 08, 2011
Length
4 pages
Related Bills
H.R. 2167 (Related)
Private Company Flexibility and Growth Act

Reported by Committee
Last Action: Oct 26, 2011

S. 3492 (Related)
A bill to provide for exemptions from municipal advisor registration requirements.

Referred to Committee
Last Action: Aug 02, 2012

 
Status

This bill was introduced on November 8, 2011, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced Nov 08, 2011
Referred to Committee Nov 08, 2011
 
Full Title

A bill to amend the securities laws to establish certain thresholds for shareholder registration under that Act, and for other purposes.

Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
7 cosponsors (4D, 3R) (show)
Committees

Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

Securities, Insurance, and Investment

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

S. stands for Senate bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


11/8/2011--Introduced.
Private Company Flexibility and Growth Act - Amends the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to change the thresholds for total assets and for class of equity security holders of record which trigger the requirement for a securities issuer to register with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Increases the total assets threshold from $1 million to $10 million, and the class of equity security holders of record threshold from 500-750 to 2,000 persons.
Declares that, with respect to such registration requirement, the definition of "held of record" does not include securities held by persons who received them pursuant to an employee compensation plan in transactions exempted from specified registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 (exempt transactions). (Thus exempts securities held such persons from registration requirements.)
Directs the SEC to:
(1) revise the definition of "held of record" in accordance with this Act, and
(2) adopt safe harbor provisions issuers can follow to determine whether holders of securities have received securities pursuant to an employee compensation plan in an exempt transaction.
Requires termination of the registration of a class of security of a bank or bank holding company, and subjects to automatic suspension the related duty to file supplementary and periodic information with the SEC, if the number of holders of record of such class of security is reduced to less than 1,200 persons.
Excludes from the identity of municipal advisor (subject to registration requirements) any person appointed to or volunteering on a board, commission, committee, or similar function of a municipal entity.
Exempts also from registration requirements any banks, including agencies or branches of a foreign bank.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of S. 1824 (112th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus