S. 3382 (112th): Sunshine for Regulatory Decrees and Settlements Act of 2012

Introduced:
Jul 12, 2012 (112th Congress, 2011–2013)
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee)
Sponsor
Charles “Chuck” Grassley
Senior Senator from Iowa
Party
Republican
Text
Read Text »
Last Updated
Jul 12, 2012
Length
13 pages
Related Bills
S. 714 (113th) was a re-introduction of this bill in a later Congress.

Referred to Committee
Last Action: Apr 11, 2013

H.R. 3862 (Related)
Sunshine for Regulatory Decrees and Settlements Act of 2012

Reported by Committee
Last Action: Mar 27, 2012

 
Status

This bill was introduced on July 12, 2012, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced Jul 12, 2012
Referred to Committee Jul 12, 2012
 
Full Title

A bill to impose certain limitations on consent decrees and settlement agreements by agencies that require the agencies to take regulatory action in accordance with the terms thereof, and for other purposes.

Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
6 cosponsors (6R) (show)
Committees

Senate Judiciary

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

S. stands for Senate bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


7/12/2012--Introduced.
Sunshine for Regulatory Decrees and Settlements Act of 2012 - Defines a "covered civil action" as a civil action seeking to compel agency action and alleging that an agency is unlawfully withholding or unreasonably delaying an agency action relating to a regulatory action that would affect:
(1) the rights of private persons other than the person bringing the action; or
(2) a state, local, or tribal government.
Defines a "covered settlement agreement" as:
(1) a consent decree or settlement agreement entered into a covered civil action, and
(2) any other consent decree or settlement agreement that requires agency action relating to such a regulatory action.
Requires an agency against which a covered civil action is brought to publish the complaint in a readily accessible manner and to provide interested parties an opportunity to intervene and to conduct settlement negotiations through mediation.
Requires an agency seeking to enter a covered settlement agreement to publish such agreement in the Federal Register and online not later than 60 days before it is filed with the court. Provides for public comment and public hearings on such agreement.
Requires the Attorney General or an agency head, if an agency is litigating a matter independently, to certify to the court that the Attorney General or the agency head approves of any proposed covered settlement agreement that includes terms that:
(1) convert into a duty a discretionary authority of an agency to propose, promulgate, revise, or amend regulations;
(2) commit an agency to expend funds that have not been appropriated and budgeted;
(3) commit an agency to seek a particular appropriation or budget authorization;
(4) divest an agency of discretion committed to it by statute or the Constitution; or
(5) otherwise afford any relief that the court could not enter under its own authority.
Requires a court to grant de novo review of a covered settlement agreement if an agency files a motion to modify such agreement on the basis that its terms are no longer fully in the public interest due to the agency's obligations to fulfill other duties or due to changed facts and circumstances.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of S. 3382 (112th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus