S. 3399 (112th): National Park Service Study Act of 2012

Jul 18, 2012 (112th Congress, 2011–2013)
Died (Referred to Committee) in a previous session of Congress
See Instead:

H.R. 6175 (same title)
Referred to Committee — Jul 24, 2012

This bill was introduced on July 18, 2012, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Jul 18, 2012
Jeff Bingaman
Senator from New Mexico
Read Text »
Last Updated
Jul 18, 2012
9 pages
Related Bills
H.R. 6175 (Related)
National Park Service Study Act of 2012

Referred to Committee
Last Action: Jul 24, 2012

Full Title

A bill to authorize studies of certain areas for possible inclusion in the National Park System, and for other purposes.


No summaries available.


Senate Energy and Natural Resources

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.


Get a bill status widget for your website »


Click a format for a citation suggestion:


S. stands for Senate bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.

National Park Service Study Act of 2012 - Directs the Secretary of the Interior to conduct special resource studies of:
(1) the Kau coast, on the island of Hawaii;
(2) on request, the island of Rota in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands;
(3) sites in Alaska associated with the forced abandonment of the Aleut villages of Makushin, Kashega, and Biorka around Unalaska Island and Attu on Attu Island during World War II;
(4) the five relocation sites in Alaska at Funter Bay, Burnett Inlet, Killisnoo, Ward Lake and the Wrangell Institute;
(5) specified World War II Japanese American Relocation Center sites;
(6) American Latino sites in the San Luis Valley and Central Sangre de Cristo Mountains in Colorado and New Mexico;
(7) the town of Goldfield and outlying mining sites in Nevada;
(8) the Hudson River Valley in New York;
(9) the Norman Studios in Jacksonville, Florida, at which African-American casts and crews were used in the production of silent films;
(10) the Mobile-Tensaw River Delta in Alabama; and
(11) Galveston Bay in Texas.
Requires updates of: (1) the study authorized by the National Park Service Studies Act of 1999 relating to World War II sites, Republic of Palau; and (2) the 1979 study entitled "Vermejo Ranch, New Mexico/Colorado: Study of Management Options."
Directs the Secretary to:
(1) study alternatives for commemorating and interpreting the role of the Buffalo Soldiers in the early years of the National Parks,
(2) conduct a national historic landmark theme study to identify sites and resources in the southern United States that are significant to the Reconstruction era, and
(3) study the feasibility of including 45 miles of the Chattahoochee River and land along the river corridor within the boundary of the Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area located in Georgia.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.

No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of S. 3399 (112th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus