S. 3590 (112th): Denali Commission Reauthorization Act of 2012

Introduced:
Sep 20, 2012 (112th Congress, 2011–2013)
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee) in a previous session of Congress

This bill was introduced on September 20, 2012, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Introduced
Sep 20, 2012
 
Sponsor
Mark Begich
Junior Senator from Alaska
Party
Democrat
Text
Read Text »
Last Updated
Sep 20, 2012
Length
15 pages
Related Bills
H.R. 6478 (identical)

Referred to Committee
Last Action: Sep 20, 2012

 
Full Title

A bill to amend the Denali Commission Act of 1998 to reauthorize and modify the membership of the Denali Commission, and for other purposes.

Summary

No summaries available.

 
Cosponsors
1 cosponsors (1R) (show)
Committees

Senate Environment and Public Works

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

S. stands for Senate bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


9/20/2012--Introduced.
Denali Commission Reauthorization Act of 2012 - Amends the Denali Commission Act of 1998 (the Act) to revise requirements concerning the composition of the membership of the Denali Commission. Appoints Commission members to four-year terms.
Directs the Commission, in carrying out construction projects or activities under the Act, to require a cost share of: (1) up to 50% of the total cost of the project or activity; or (2) up to 20% of the total cost of a project or activity carried out in a distressed community. Exempts preconstruction procedures from such cost share requirements.
Requires the Commission to seek comments from rural Alaska communities and other stakeholder groups regarding rural development needs.
Rewrites the duties of the Commission. Instructs Commission members to:
(1) advise the Commission regarding coordinated infrastructure planning among and for rural Alaskan communities, the state of Alaska, federal agencies, and other governmental and nongovernmental entities;
(2) annually establish a list of priorities of the Commission for such communities; and
(3) review ongoing and completed Commission-funded projects and programs.
Makes the Cochairperson responsible for Commission operational matters, including budgetary matters.
Revises requirements regarding demonstration health projects. Authorizes appropriations.
Rewrites provisions concerning the powers of the Commission.
Requires the Commission to use the services of the Inspector General of the Department of Commerce.
Makes permanent the authorization of appropriations for the Commission to carry out the Act.
Repeals provisions regarding: (1) the exemption of the Commission from the Federal Advisory Committee Act, and (2) the Economic Development Committee.
Requires the federal Cochairperson to establish a Budget Committee to serve the Commission.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of S. 3590 (112th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus