H.R. 1577: McLelland-Hasse Line of Duty Act

Introduced:
Apr 16, 2013
Status:
Referred to Committee
Prognosis
3% chance of being enacted
Track this bill
Sponsor
Ted Poe
Representative for Texas's 2nd congressional district
Party
Republican
Text
Read Text »
Last Updated
Apr 16, 2013
Length
19 pages
Related Bills
S. 698 (Related)
Line of Duty Act of 2013

Referred to Committee
Last Action: Apr 10, 2013

 
Status

This bill was assigned to a congressional committee on April 16, 2013, which will consider it before possibly sending it on to the House or Senate as a whole.

Progress
Introduced Apr 16, 2013
Referred to Committee Apr 16, 2013
Reported by Committee ...
Passed House ...
Passed Senate ...
Signed by the President ...
Prognosis

18% chance of getting past committee.
3% chance of being enacted.

Only 11% of bills made it past committee and only about 3% were enacted in 2011–2013. [show factors | methodology]

 
Full Title

To protect prosecutors, judges, law enforcement officers, and their families.

Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
2 cosponsors (2R) (show)
Committees

House Judiciary

Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


4/16/2013--Introduced.
McLelland-Hasse Line of Duty Act - Amends the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to:
(1) require the use of grant funds under the community-oriented policing services program to train and provide security details for prosecutors and judges, including their immediate families, involved in cases that raise substantial concerns of retaliation or intimidation through violent acts; and
(2) allow grants under the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program to fund prosecutorial and judicial security details and programs.
Amends the federal criminal code to make it unlawful to:
(1) kill, or attempt or conspire to kill, a U.S. judge, a federal law enforcement officer, or a federally funded public safety officer engaged in official duties or a former U.S. judge, federal law enforcement officer, or federal funded public safety officer on account of past performance of official duties; or
(2) travel in interstate commerce to avoid prosecution for such crimes.
Expands criminal penalties for assaulting or interfering with law enforcement officers and employees.
Permits judges, prosecutors, and law enforcement officials to carry firearms in federal facilities where such possession is otherwise authorized by law.
Limits damages and costs in legal actions against a judicial officer by an individual injured during the commission of a felony or a crime of violence.
Requires the Director of the Bureau of Prisons to ensure that each federal penal or correctional institution provides a secure firearms storage area for use by all employees who are authorized to carry a firearm.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.R. 1577 with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus