GovTrack’s Bill Summary
We don’t have a summary available yet.
This bill passed in the House on March 4, 2014 and goes to the Senate next for consideration.
74% chance of being enacted.
The following factors determined this bill’s prognosis:
The sponsor is on a committee to which the bill has been referred, and the sponsor is a member of the majority party. ▲
A cosponsor is the ranking member of a committee to which the bill has been referred. ▲
The sponsor is in the majority party and at least one third of the bill's cosponsors are from the minority party. ▲
A cosponsor in the majority party has a high leadership score. ▲
The bill's companion S. 1610 was sponsored by a member of the other party. ▲
The bill was introduced in the first year of the Congress. ▼
6+ cosponsors serve on a committee to which the bill has been referred. ▼
There is at least one cosponsor from the majority party and one cosponsor outside of the majority party. ▲▼
Key: ▲ Correlated with successful bills. ▼ Correlated with unsuccessful bills. ▲▼ Correlated with bills that get past committee but are not enacted. Correlation may not indicate causation.
Last updated Mar 06, 2014.
|Referred to Committee|
|On House Schedule|
|Signed by the President||...|
To delay the implementation of certain provisions of the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012, and for other purposes.
The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.
No summaries available.
Click a format for a citation suggestion:
H.R. 3370--113th Congress: Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act of 2013. (2013). In www.GovTrack.us. Retrieved March 11, 2014, from http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/hr3370
“H.R. 3370--113th Congress: Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act of 2013.” www.GovTrack.us. 2013. March 11, 2014 <http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/hr3370>
|title=H.R. 3370 (113th)
|accessdate=March 11, 2014
|author=113th Congress (2013)
|date=October 29, 2013
|quote=Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act of 2013
We don’t have a summary available yet.
The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.
The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.
This summary can be found at http://www.gop.gov/bill/113/2/hr3370.
The economic implications of unaffordable flood insurance is devastating home values, small businesses, and entire communities around the country.
On July 6, 2012, the President signed H.R. 4348, MAP-21. Included in Title II of the bill was the text of the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform and Modernization Act. Among other things, Biggert-Waters reauthorized the NFIP through 2017 in addition to making a number of substantial reforms. “To achieve financial stability and ensure that flood insurance rates more accurately reflect actuarial risk of flooding, the new law gradually phased out subsidized premiums and grandfathered policies for approximately 19 percent of the programs total number of policy holders.” 
Yet, FEMA’s implementation of the NFIP has caused great concern. The House voted on June 6, 2013 to pass H.R. 2217, the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act. Included in the bill was language prohibiting the use of funds from administering or enforcing provisions regarding adjusted premium rates under the NFIP. (See Roll Call #211). Subsequent to this vote, FEMA released its Specific Rate Guidelines, confirming fears that homeowners and communities will face immediate and drastic rate increases.
On January 15, 2014, the House passed the House amendment to the Senate amendment to H.R. 3547, which among other things included language prohibiting funds from being used to implement, carry out , administer or enforce Section 1308 (H) of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 during the remainder of FY 2014. (See Roll Call #21).
 See http://www.crs.gov/pdfloader/R43395.
 Section 1308(h) requires FEMA to adjust premiums to reflect the current risk of flood to a property upon the effective date of a revised or updated Flood Insurance Rate Map. The provision includes grandfathered policies.
H.R. 3370 as amended recognizes the reality that some provisions of the Biggert Waters Flood Insurance Reform and Modernization Act of 2012 that result in increased premiums are problematic and proposes an alternative that puts the program on a sustainable path.
Specifically, the bill repeals certain premium rate increases and restores grandfathered rates and puts both on a sustainable path. H.R. 3370 sets out annual rate increases and premium surcharges to ensure that all risk categories reach actuarially sound rates. The bill requires FEMA to draft an affordability framework that proposes to address the issues of affordability of flood insurance sold under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP); authorizes FEMA to fiscally prepare the NFIP for extreme catastrophes; authorizes FEMA to provide for monthly or more frequent premium payment installment options; authorizes optional high-deductible policies; authorizes FEMA to consider flood mitigation activities when estimating and calculating risk premium rates; and returns the “substantial improvement threshold” to the historic 50 percent of a structure’s fair market value so that renovations can continue without penalty.
The bill expands the scope of the affordability study required under the Biggert-Waters; requires FEMA to certify in writing to Congress that it has implemented a flood mapping approach that results in technically credible flood hazard data; allows communities to be reimbursed for successful challenges to FEMA maps; prohibits FEMA from considering federal funding or participation when determining the level of protection that a project provides the community; clarifies a monthly reporting requirement regarding the NFIP Reserve Fund transactions; claries that FEMA shall continue to extend exceptions and variances for flood-proofed basements consistent with current regulations; exempts certain fees for certain map change requests; requires FEMA to study the viability of providing community based flood insurance policies; directs FEMA to designate a Flood Insurance Advocate to ensure fair treatment; removes the retroactive component of the NFIP escrow requirement contained in Biggert-Waters; requires FEMA to issue guidelines with one year of enactment for property owners that provide alternative methods of mitigation other than building elevation; requires FEMA to account for non structural flood mitigation features in Flood Insurance rate maps; and clarifies that any private flood insurance accepted by a state shall satisfy the mandatory purchase requirement of providing coverage within that state’s jurisdiction.
A CBO table can be found here.
The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.
So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.
We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.
The bill contains the following citations to other parts of U.S. law:
Slip laws refer to enacted bills and joint resolutions in their original form as enacted by Congress, that is, before other laws amend them. Slip laws are cited as “Public Law XXX-YYY”, where XXX is the number of the Congress in which the bill or resolution was introduced.
The United States Code is the compilation of general and permanent laws enacted by Congress. Laws that are not permanent in nature, law that affect a single individual, family, or small group, regulations, case law, state law, and local law do not appear in the United States Code.
The United States Statutes at Large is the compilation of all laws enacted by Congress.