H. R. 756
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
February 15, 2013
Mr. McCaul (for himself, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. Smith of Texas, Mr. Langevin, Mr. Meehan, Ms. Matsui, Mr. Hall, and Mr. Ben Ray Luján of New Mexico) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology
To advance cybersecurity research, development, and technical standards, and for other purposes.
This Act may be cited as the
Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of
Research and Development
In this title:
National coordination office
The term National Coordination Office means the National Coordination Office for the Networking and Information Technology Research and Development program.
The term Program means the Networking and Information Technology Research and Development program which has been established under section 101 of the High-Performance Computing Act of 1991 (15 U.S.C. 5511).
by amending paragraph (1) to read as follows:
Advancements in information and communications technology have resulted in a globally interconnected network of government, commercial, scientific, and education infrastructures, including critical infrastructures for electric power, natural gas and petroleum production and distribution, telecommunications, transportation, water supply, banking and finance, and emergency and government services.
in paragraph (2),
Exponential increases in interconnectivity have facilitated
enhanced communications, economic growth, and inserting
advancements have significantly contributed to the growth of the United States
by amending paragraph (3) to read as follows:
Policy Review published by the President in May, 2009, concluded that our
information technology and communications infrastructure is vulnerable and has
suffered intrusions that have allowed criminals to steal hundreds of
millions of dollars and nation-states and other entities to steal intellectual
property and sensitive military
by amending paragraph (6) to read as follows:
While African-Americans, Hispanics, and Native Americans constitute 33 percent of the college-age population, members of these minorities comprise less than 20 percent of bachelor degree recipients in the field of computer sciences.
Cybersecurity strategic research and development plan
Not later than 12 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the agencies identified in sub section 101(a)(3)(B)(i) through (x) of the High-Performance Computing Act of 1991 (15 U.S.C. 5511(a)(3)(B)(i) through (x)) or designated under section 101(a)(3)(B)(xi) of such Act, working through the National Science and Technology Council and with the assistance of the National Coordination Office, shall transmit to Congress a strategic plan based on an assessment of cybersecurity risk to guide the overall direction of Federal cybersecurity and information assurance research and development for information technology and networking systems. Once every 3 years after the initial strategic plan is transmitted to Congress under this section, such agencies shall prepare and transmit to Congress an update of such plan.
Contents of plan
The strategic plan required under subsection (a) shall—
specify and prioritize near-term, mid-term and long-term research objectives, including objectives associated with the research areas identified in section 4(a)(1) of the Cyber Security Research and Development Act (15 U.S.C. 7403(a)(1)) and how the near-term objectives complement research and development areas in which the private sector is actively engaged;
describe how the Program will focus on innovative, transformational technologies with the potential to enhance the security, reliability, resilience, and trustworthiness of the digital infrastructure, and to protect consumer privacy;
describe how the Program will foster the rapid transfer of research and development results into new cybersecurity technologies and applications for the timely benefit of society and the national interest, including through the dissemination of best practices and other outreach activities;
describe how the Program will establish and maintain a national research infrastructure for creating, testing, and evaluating the next generation of secure networking and information technology systems;
describe how the Program will facilitate access by academic researchers to the infrastructure described in paragraph (4), as well as to relevant data, including event data; and
describe how the Program will engage females and individuals identified in section 33 or 34 of the Science and Engineering Equal Opportunities Act (42 U.S.C. 1885a or 1885b) to foster a more diverse workforce in this area.
Development of roadmap
The agencies described in subsection (a) shall develop and annually update an implementation roadmap for the strategic plan required in this section. Such roadmap shall—
specify the role of each Federal agency in carrying out or sponsoring research and development to meet the research objectives of the strategic plan, including a description of how progress toward the research objectives will be evaluated;
specify the funding allocated to each major research objective of the strategic plan and the source of funding by agency for the current fiscal year; and
estimate the funding required for each major research objective of the strategic plan for the following 3 fiscal years.
In developing and updating the strategic plan under subsection (a), the agencies involved shall solicit recommendations and advice from—
the advisory committee established under section 101(b)(1) of the High-Performance Computing Act of 1991 (15 U.S.C. 5511(b)(1)); and
a wide range of stakeholders, including industry, academia, including representatives of minority serving institutions and community colleges, National Laboratories, and other relevant organizations and institutions.
Appending to report
The implementation roadmap required under subsection (c), and its annual updates, shall be appended to the report required under section 101(a)(2)(D) of the High-Performance Computing Act of 1991 (15 U.S.C. 5511(a)(2)(D)).
Social and behavioral research in cybersecurity
and usability after
to the structure;
(H), by striking
and after the semicolon;
(I), by striking the period at the end and inserting
by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
social and behavioral factors, including human-computer interactions, usability, and user motivations.
National Science Foundation cybersecurity research and development programs
Computer and network security research areas
(A) by inserting
identity management, after
(I), by inserting
, crimes against children, and organized crime
Computer and network security research grants
$90,000,000 for fiscal year 2014;
$90,000,000 for fiscal year 2015; and
$90,000,000 for fiscal year 2016.
Computer and network security research centers
in paragraph (4)—
(C), by striking
and after the semicolon;
subparagraph (D), by striking the period and inserting
by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
how the center will partner with government laboratories, for-profit entities, other institutions of higher education, or nonprofit research institutions.
$4,500,000 for fiscal year 2014;
$4,500,000 for fiscal year 2015; and
$4,500,000 for fiscal year 2016.
Computer and network security capacity building grants
$19,000,000 for fiscal year 2014;
$19,000,000 for fiscal year 2015; and
$19,000,000 for fiscal year 2016.
Scientific and advanced technology act grants
$2,500,000 for fiscal year 2014;
$2,500,000 for fiscal year 2015; and
$2,500,000 for fiscal year 2016.
Graduate traineeships in computer and network security
$24,000,000 for fiscal year 2014;
$24,000,000 for fiscal year 2015; and
$24,000,000 for fiscal year 2016.
Cyber security faculty development traineeship program
Federal cyber scholarship for service program
The Director of the National Science Foundation shall continue a Scholarship for Service program under section 5(a) of the Cyber Security Research and Development Act (15 U.S.C. 7404(a)) to recruit and train the next generation of Federal cybersecurity professionals and to increase the capacity of the higher education system to produce an information technology workforce with the skills necessary to enhance the security of the Nation’s communications and information infrastructure.
Characteristics of program
The program under this section shall—
provide, through qualified institutions of higher education, scholarships that provide tuition, fees, and a competitive stipend for up to 2 years to students pursing a bachelor’s or master’s degree and up to 3 years to students pursuing a doctoral degree in a cybersecurity field;
provide the scholarship recipients with summer internship opportunities or other meaningful temporary appointments in the Federal information technology workforce; and
increase the capacity of institutions of higher education throughout all regions of the United States to produce highly qualified cybersecurity professionals, through the award of competitive, merit-reviewed grants that support such activities as—
faculty professional development, including technical, hands-on experiences in the private sector or government, workshops, seminars, conferences, and other professional development opportunities that will result in improved instructional capabilities;
institutional partnerships, including minority serving institutions and community colleges; and
development of cybersecurity-related courses and curricula.
Scholarships under this section shall be available only to students who—
are citizens or permanent residents of the United States;
are full-time students in an eligible degree program, as determined by the Director, that is focused on computer security or information assurance at an awardee institution; and
accept the terms of a scholarship pursuant to this section.
shall be selected to receive scholarships primarily on the basis of academic
merit, with consideration given to financial need, to the goal of promoting the
participation of individuals identified in section 33 or 34 of the Science and
Engineering Equal Opportunities Act (42 U.S.C. 1885a or 1885b), and to
veterans. For purposes of this paragraph, the term
a person who—
served on active duty (other than active duty for training) in the Armed Forces of the United States for a period of more than 180 consecutive days, and who was discharged or released therefrom under conditions other than dishonorable; or
served on active duty (other than active duty for training) in the Armed Forces of the United States and was discharged or released from such service for a service-connected disability before serving 180 consecutive days.
service-connectedhas the meaning given such term under section 101 of title 38, United States Code.
If an individual receives a scholarship under this section, as a condition of receiving such scholarship, the individual upon completion of their degree must serve as a cybersecurity professional within the Federal workforce for a period of time as provided in paragraph (5). If a scholarship recipient is not offered employment by a Federal agency or a federally funded research and development center, the service requirement can be satisfied at the Director’s discretion by—
serving as a cybersecurity professional in a State, local, or tribal government agency; or
teaching cybersecurity courses at an institution of higher education.
Conditions of support
As a condition of acceptance of a scholarship under this section, a recipient shall agree to provide the awardee institution with annual verifiable documentation of employment and up-to-date contact information.
Length of service
The length of service required in exchange for a scholarship under this subsection shall be 1 year more than the number of years for which the scholarship was received.
Failure To complete service obligation
If an individual who has received a scholarship under this section—
fails to maintain an acceptable level of academic standing in the educational institution in which the individual is enrolled, as determined by the Director;
is dismissed from such educational institution for disciplinary reasons;
withdraws from the program for which the award was made before the completion of such program;
declares that the individual does not intend to fulfill the service obligation under this section; or
fails to fulfill the service obligation of the individual under this section,
As a condition of participating in the program, a qualified institution of higher education receiving a grant under this section shall—
enter into an agreement with the Director of the National Science Foundation to monitor the compliance of scholarship recipients with respect to their service obligation; and
provide to the Director, on an annual basis, post-award employment information required under subsection (c)(4) for scholarship recipients through the completion of their service obligation.
Amount of repayment
Less than one year of service
If a circumstance described in paragraph (1) occurs before the completion of 1 year of a service obligation under this section, the total amount of awards received by the individual under this section shall be repaid or such amount shall be treated as a loan to be repaid in accordance with subparagraph (C).
More than one year of service
If a circumstance described in subparagraph (D) or (E) of paragraph (1) occurs after the completion of 1 year of a service obligation under this section, the total amount of scholarship awards received by the individual under this section, reduced by the ratio of the number of years of service completed divided by the number of years of service required, shall be repaid or such amount shall be treated as a loan to be repaid in accordance with subparagraph (C).
A loan described in subparagraph (A) or (B) shall be treated as a Federal Direct Unsubsidized Stafford Loan under part D of title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087a and following), and shall be subject to repayment, together with interest thereon accruing from the date of the scholarship award, in accordance with terms and conditions specified by the Director (in consultation with the Secretary of Education) in regulations promulgated to carry out this paragraph.
Collection of repayment
In the event that a scholarship recipient is required to repay the scholarship under this subsection, the institution providing the scholarship shall—
be responsible for determining the repayment amounts and for notifying the recipient and the Director of the amount owed; and
collect such repayment amount within a period of time as determined under the agreement described in paragraph (2), or the repayment amount shall be treated as a loan in accordance with paragraph (3)(C).
Returned to treasury
Except as provided in subparagraph (C) of this paragraph, any such repayment shall be returned to the Treasury of the United States.
An institution of higher education may retain a percentage of any repayment the institution collects under this paragraph to defray administrative costs associated with the collection. The Director shall establish a single, fixed percentage that will apply to all eligible entities.
The Director may provide for the partial or total waiver or suspension of any service or payment obligation by an individual under this section whenever compliance by the individual with the obligation is impossible or would involve extreme hardship to the individual, or if enforcement of such obligation with respect to the individual would be unconscionable.
For purposes of any law or regulation governing the appointment of individuals in the Federal civil service, upon successful completion of their degree, students receiving a scholarship under this section shall be hired under the authority provided for in section 213.3102(r) of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations, and be exempted from competitive service. Upon fulfillment of the service term, such individuals shall be converted to a competitive service position without competition if the individual meets the requirements for that position.
Cybersecurity workforce assessment
Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act the President shall transmit to the Congress a report addressing the cybersecurity workforce needs of the Federal Government. The report shall include—
an examination of the current state of and the projected needs of the Federal cybersecurity workforce, including a comparison of the different agencies and departments, and an analysis of the capacity of such agencies and departments to meet those needs;
an analysis of the sources and availability of cybersecurity talent, a comparison of the skills and expertise sought by the Federal Government and the private sector, an examination of the current and future capacity of United States institutions of higher education, including community colleges, to provide current and future cybersecurity professionals, through education and training activities, with those skills sought by the Federal Government, State and local entities, and the private sector, and a description of how successful programs are engaging the talents of females and individuals identified in section 33 or 34 of the Science and Engineering Equal Opportunities Act (42 U.S.C. 1885a or 1885b);
an examination of the effectiveness of the National Centers of Academic Excellence in Information Assurance Education, the Centers of Academic Excellence in Research, and the Federal Cyber Scholarship for Service programs in promoting higher education and research in cybersecurity and information assurance and in producing a growing number of professionals with the necessary cybersecurity and information assurance expertise, including individuals from States or regions in which the unemployment rate exceeds the national average;
an analysis of any barriers to the Federal Government recruiting and hiring cybersecurity talent, including barriers relating to compensation, the hiring process, job classification, and hiring flexibilities; and
recommendations for Federal policies to ensure an adequate, well-trained Federal cybersecurity workforce.
Cybersecurity university-industry task force
Establishment of university-Industry task force
Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall convene a task force to explore mechanisms for carrying out collaborative research, development, education, and training activities for cybersecurity through a consortium or other appropriate entity with participants from institutions of higher education and industry.
The task force shall—
develop options for a collaborative model and an organizational structure for such entity under which the joint research and development activities could be planned, managed, and conducted effectively, including mechanisms for the allocation of resources among the participants in such entity for support of such activities;
propose a process for developing a research and development agenda for such entity, including guidelines to ensure an appropriate scope of work focused on nationally significant challenges and requiring collaboration;
define the roles and responsibilities for the participants from institutions of higher education and industry in such entity;
propose guidelines for assigning intellectual property rights and for the transfer of research and development results to the private sector; and
make recommendations for how such entity could be funded from Federal, State, and nongovernmental sources.
In establishing the task force under subsection (a), the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall appoint an equal number of individuals from institutions of higher education, including minority-serving institutions and community colleges, and from industry with knowledge and expertise in cybersecurity.
Not later than 12 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall transmit to the Congress a report describing the findings and recommendations of the task force.
The task force shall terminate upon transmittal of the report required under subsection (d).
Compensation and expenses
Members of the task force shall serve without compensation.
Cybersecurity automation and checklists for government systems
Section 8(c) of the Cyber Security Research and Development Act (15 U.S.C. 7406(c)) is amended to read as follows:
Security automation and checklists for government systems
The Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology shall develop, and revise as necessary, security automation standards, associated reference materials (including protocols), and checklists providing settings and option selections that minimize the security risks associated with each information technology hardware or software system and security tool that is, or is likely to become, widely used within the Federal Government in order to enable standardized and interoperable technologies, architectures, and frameworks for continuous monitoring of information security within the Federal Government.
Priorities for development
The Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology shall establish priorities for the development of standards, reference materials, and checklists under this subsection on the basis of—
the security risks associated with the use of the system;
the number of agencies that use a particular system or security tool;
the usefulness of the standards, reference materials, or checklists to Federal agencies that are users or potential users of the system;
the effectiveness of the associated standard, reference material, or checklist in creating or enabling continuous monitoring of information security; or
such other factors as the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology determines to be appropriate.
The Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology may exclude from the application of paragraph (1) any information technology hardware or software system or security tool for which such Director determines that the development of a standard, reference material, or checklist is inappropriate because of the infrequency of use of the system, the obsolescence of the system, or the inutility or impracticability of developing a standard, reference material, or checklist for the system.
Dissemination of standards and related materials
The Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology shall ensure that Federal agencies are informed of the availability of any standard, reference material, checklist, or other item developed under this subsection.
Agency use requirements
The development of standards, reference materials, and checklists under paragraph (1) for an information technology hardware or software system or tool does not—
require any Federal agency to select the specific settings or options recommended by the standard, reference material, or checklist for the system;
establish conditions or prerequisites for Federal agency procurement or deployment of any such system;
imply an endorsement of any such system by the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology; or
preclude any Federal agency from procuring or deploying other information technology hardware or software systems for which no such standard, reference material, or checklist has been developed or identified under paragraph (1).
National Institute of Standards and Technology cybersecurity research and development
Section 20 of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Act (15 U.S.C. 278g–3) is amended by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f), and by inserting after subsection (d) the following:
Intramural security research
As part of the research activities conducted in accordance with subsection (d)(3), the Institute shall—
conduct a research program to develop a unifying and standardized identity, privilege, and access control management framework for the execution of a wide variety of resource protection policies and that is amenable to implementation within a wide variety of existing and emerging computing environments;
carry out research associated with improving the security of information systems and networks;
carry out research associated with improving the testing, measurement, usability, and assurance of information systems and networks; and
carry out research associated with improving security of industrial control systems.
Advancement of Cybersecurity Technical Standards
In this title:
Director means the Director of the National Institute of
Standards and Technology.
Institute means the National Institute of Standards and
International cybersecurity technical standards
The Director, in coordination with appropriate Federal authorities, shall—
as appropriate, ensure coordination of Federal agencies engaged in the development of international technical standards related to information system security; and
not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, develop and transmit to the Congress a plan for ensuring such Federal agency coordination.
Consultation with the private sector
In carrying out the activities specified in subsection (a)(1), the Director shall ensure consultation with appropriate private sector stakeholders.
Cloud computing strategy
The Director, in collaboration with the Federal CIO Council, and in consultation with other relevant Federal agencies and stakeholders from the private sector, shall continue to develop and encourage the implementation of a comprehensive strategy for the use and adoption of cloud computing services by the Federal Government.
In carrying out the strategy developed under subsection (a), the Director shall give consideration to activities that—
accelerate the development, in collaboration with the private sector, of standards that address interoperability and portability of cloud computing services;
advance the development of conformance testing performed by the private sector in support of cloud computing standardization; and
support, in consultation with the private sector, the development of appropriate security frameworks and reference materials, and the identification of best practices, for use by Federal agencies to address security and privacy requirements to enable the use and adoption of cloud computing services, including activities—
to ensure the physical security of cloud computing data centers and the data stored in such centers;
to ensure secure access to the data stored in cloud computing data centers;
to develop security standards as required under section 20 of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Act (15 U.S.C. 278g–3); and
to support the development of the automation of continuous monitoring systems.
Promoting cybersecurity awareness and education
The Director, in collaboration with relevant Federal agencies, industry, educational institutions, National Laboratories, the National Coordination Office of the Networking and Information Technology Research and Development program, and other organizations, shall continue to coordinate a cybersecurity awareness and education program to increase knowledge, skills, and awareness of cybersecurity risks, consequences, and best practices through—
the widespread dissemination of cybersecurity technical standards and best practices identified by the Institute;
efforts to make cybersecurity best practices usable by individuals, small to medium-sized businesses, State, local, and tribal governments, and educational institutions; and
efforts to attract, recruit, and retain qualified professionals to the Federal cybersecurity workforce.
The Director shall, in cooperation with relevant Federal agencies and other stakeholders, develop and implement a strategic plan to guide Federal programs and activities in support of a comprehensive cybersecurity awareness and education program as described under subsection (a).
Report to congress
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act and every 5 years thereafter, the Director shall transmit the strategic plan required under subsection (b) to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate.
Identity management research and development
The Director shall continue a program to support the development of technical standards, metrology, testbeds, and conformance criteria, taking into account appropriate user concerns, to—
improve interoperability among identity management technologies;
strengthen authentication methods of identity management systems;
improve privacy protection in identity management systems, including health information technology systems, through authentication and security protocols; and
improve the usability of identity management systems.
No additional funds are authorized to carry out this title and the amendments made by this title or to carry out the amendments made by sections 109 and 110 of this Act. This title and the amendments made by this title and the amendments made by sections 109 and 110 of this Act shall be carried out using amounts otherwise authorized or appropriated.