S. 1153: Invasive Fish and Wildlife Prevention Act

Jun 12, 2013
Referred to Committee
3% chance of being enacted
Track this bill
Kirsten Gillibrand
Junior Senator from New York
Read Text »
Last Updated
Jun 12, 2013
39 pages
Related Bills
H.R. 996 (Related)
Invasive Fish and Wildlife Prevention Act

Referred to Committee
Last Action: Mar 06, 2013


This bill was assigned to a congressional committee on June 12, 2013, which will consider it before possibly sending it on to the House or Senate as a whole.

Introduced Jun 12, 2013
Referred to Committee Jun 12, 2013
Reported by Committee ...
Passed Senate ...
Passed House ...
Signed by the President ...

18% chance of getting past committee.
3% chance of being enacted.

Only 11% of bills made it past committee and only about 3% were enacted in 2011–2013. [show factors | methodology]

Full Title

A bill to establish an improved regulatory process for injurious wildlife to prevent the introduction and establishment in the United States of nonnative wildlife and wild animal pathogens and parasites that are likely to cause harm.


No summaries available.

2 cosponsors (2D) (show)

Senate Environment and Public Works

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.


Get a bill status widget for your website »


Click a format for a citation suggestion:


S. stands for Senate bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.

Invasive Fish and Wildlife Prevention Act - Authorizes any person, entity, or the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to propose the regulation of nonnative wildlife taxa. Requires the Director to determine whether the proposal should be approved within 180 days.
Requires the Director to promulgate regulations to:
(1) specify the criteria for regulating a nonnative taxon as an Injurious I taxon or Injurious II taxon that is injurious to humans, agriculture, horticulture, forestry, wildlife, or wildlife resources;
(2) establish a process for assessing and analyzing the risks of taxa that may have been imported into or found in interstate commerce; and
(3) designate a wildlife taxon that was previously designated as injurious by statue or the Secretary of the Interior as an Injurious I or Injurious II taxon.
Requires the Secretary, not later than three years after enactment of this Act, to:
(1) define the phrase "non-native wildlife taxa novel to the United States";
(2) establish a process to ensure that all such taxa are thereafter reviewed by the Director to determine whether they should be regulated as Injurious I or Injurious II taxa prior to allowing their importation; and
(3) seek to avoid, in promulgating such regulation, creating a new incentive for animal importers to import novel taxa prior to the effective date of such regulation.
Requires the Director, prior to designating a taxon as an Injurious I or Injurious II taxon, to prepare a risk determination.
Authorizes the Director to immediately and temporarily designate a nonnative wildlife taxon as Injurious I if an emergency exists because such unregulated taxon poses an imminent threat of harm to individuals in, or wildlife of, the United States or to the U.S. economy or environment.
Requires the Director to:
(1) establish an electronic, publicly available database that describes all quantities of imports of all live wildlife and the regulatory status of such wildlife;
(2) monitor and report on the identities and quantities of nonnative wildlife taxa being imported; and
(3) make more rapid determinations on proposals for regulation of importations or shipments of injurious mammals, birds, fish, amphibia, and reptiles under the Lacey Act by requiring the Secretary to forego time-consuming optional administrative steps that are not essential and by authorizing the Secretary to forego economic impact analyses.
Gives the Secretary the primary authority to prevent the importation of, and interstate commerce in, wildlife pathogens and harmful parasites. Requires the Secretary to promulgate regulations to impose import restrictions to prevent the importation of, and commerce in, such pathogens and parasites. Establishes exemptions to such requirement.
Prohibits any person from:
(1) importing or knowingly possessing such an Injurious I or Injurious II taxon, or the descendant of such an animal, that was imported in violation of this Act;
(2) engaging in interstate commerce for or knowingly possessing such an animal that was transported in interstate commerce in violation of this Act; and
(3) releasing any such taxon into the wild.
Sets forth exemptions from such prohibitions.
Authorizes the Director to issue permits to qualified institutions to authorize actions otherwise prohibited for such taxon.
Establishes civil and criminal penalties for violations of this Act.
Requires the Secretary to adopt a fee to be charged on imported live wildlife shipments, excluding shipments made by qualified institutions for scientific, veterinary, or medical research, education, conservation outreach, or display purposes.
Establishes the Injurious Wildlife Prevention Fund to carry out this Act.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.

No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of S. 1153 with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus