One Hundred Fourteenth Congress of the United States of America
2d Session
Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen
S. 2943
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
AN ACT
To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2017 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017
.
Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents
Divisions
This Act is organized into five divisions as follows:
Division A—Department of Defense Authorizations.
Division B—Military Construction Authorizations.
Division C—Department of Energy National Security Authorizations and Other Authorizations.
Division D—Funding Tables.
Division E—Uniform Code of Military Justice Reform.
Table of contents
The table of contents for this Act is as follows:
Sec. 1. Short title.
Sec. 2. Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents.
Sec. 3. Congressional defense committees.
Sec. 4. Budgetary effects of this Act.
Division A—Department of Defense Authorizations
Title I—Procurement
Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations
Sec. 101. Authorization of appropriations.
Subtitle B—Army Programs
Sec. 111. Multiyear procurement authority for AH–64E Apache helicopters.
Sec. 112. Multiyear procurement authority for UH–60M and HH–60M Black Hawk helicopters.
Sec. 113. Distributed Common Ground System–Army increment 1.
Sec. 114. Assessment of certain capabilities of the Department of the Army.
Subtitle C—Navy Programs
Sec. 121. Determination of vessel delivery dates.
Sec. 122. Incremental funding for detail design and construction of LHA replacement ship designated LHA 8.
Sec. 123. Littoral Combat Ship.
Sec. 124. Limitation on use of sole-source shipbuilding contracts for certain vessels.
Sec. 125. Limitation on availability of funds for the Advanced Arresting Gear Program.
Sec. 126. Limitation on availability of funds for procurement of U.S.S. Enterprise (CVN–80).
Sec. 127. Sense of Congress on aircraft carrier procurement schedules.
Sec. 128. Report on P–8 Poseidon aircraft.
Sec. 129. Design and construction of replacement dock landing ship designated LX(R) or amphibious transport dock designated LPD–29.
Subtitle D—Air Force Programs
Sec. 131. EC–130H Compass Call recapitalization program.
Sec. 132. Repeal of requirement to preserve certain retired C–5 aircraft.
Sec. 133. Repeal of requirement to preserve F–117 aircraft in recallable condition.
Sec. 134. Prohibition on availability of funds for retirement of A–10 aircraft.
Sec. 135. Limitation on availability of funds for destruction of A–10 aircraft in storage status.
Sec. 136. Prohibition on availability of funds for retirement of Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System aircraft.
Sec. 137. Elimination of annual report on aircraft inventory.
Subtitle E—Defense-wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters
Sec. 141. Standardization of 5.56mm rifle ammunition.
Sec. 142. Fire suppressant and fuel containment standards for certain vehicles.
Sec. 143. Limitation on availability of funds for destruction of certain cluster munitions.
Sec. 144. Report on Department of Defense munitions strategy for the combatant commands.
Sec. 145. Modifications to reporting on use of combat mission requirements funds.
Sec. 146. Report on alternative management structures for the F–35 joint strike fighter program.
Sec. 147. Comptroller General review of F–35 Lightning II aircraft sustainment support.
Sec. 148. Briefing on acquisition strategy for Ground Mobility Vehicle.
Sec. 149. Study and report on optimal mix of aircraft capabilities for the Armed Forces.
Title II—Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation
Subtitle A—Authorization of appropriations
Sec. 201. Authorization of appropriations.
Subtitle B—Program requirements, restrictions, and limitations
Sec. 211. Laboratory quality enhancement program.
Sec. 212. Modification of mechanisms to provide funds for defense laboratories for research and development of technologies for military missions.
Sec. 213. Making permanent authority for defense research and development rapid innovation program.
Sec. 214. Authorization for National Defense University and Defense Acquisition University to enter into cooperative research and development agreements.
Sec. 215. Manufacturing Engineering Education Grant Program.
Sec. 216. Notification requirement for certain rapid prototyping, experimentation, and demonstration activities.
Sec. 217. Increased micro-purchase threshold for research programs and entities.
Sec. 218. Improved biosafety for handling of select agents and toxins.
Sec. 219. Designation of Department of Defense senior official with principal responsibility for directed energy weapons.
Sec. 220. Restructuring of the distributed common ground system of the Army.
Sec. 221. Limitation on availability of funds for the countering weapons of mass destruction system Constellation.
Sec. 222. Limitation on availability of funds for Defense Innovation Unit Experimental.
Sec. 223. Limitation on availability of funds for Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System (JSTARS) recapitalization program.
Sec. 224. Acquisition program baseline and annual reports on follow-on modernization program for F–35 Joint Strike Fighter.
Subtitle C—Reports and other matters
Sec. 231. Strategy for assured access to trusted microelectronics.
Sec. 232. Pilot program on evaluation of commercial information technology.
Sec. 233. Pilot program for the enhancement of the research, development, test, and evaluation centers of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 234. Pilot program on modernization and fielding of electromagnetic spectrum warfare systems and electronic warfare capabilities.
Sec. 235. Pilot program on disclosure of certain sensitive information to federally funded research and development centers.
Sec. 236. Pilot program on enhanced interaction between the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and the service academies.
Sec. 237. Independent review of F/A–18 physiological episodes and corrective actions.
Sec. 238. B–21 bomber development program accountability matrices.
Sec. 239. Study on helicopter crash prevention and mitigation technology.
Sec. 240. Strategy for Improving Electronic and Electromagnetic Spectrum Warfare Capabilities.
Sec. 241. Sense of Congress on development and fielding of fifth generation airborne systems.
Title III—Operation and Maintenance
Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations
Sec. 301. Authorization of appropriations.
Subtitle B—Energy and Environment
Sec. 311. Modified reporting requirement related to installations energy management.
Sec. 312. Waiver authority for alternative fuel procurement requirement.
Sec. 313. Utility data management for military facilities.
Sec. 314. Alternative technologies for munitions disposal.
Sec. 315. Report on efforts to reduce high energy costs at military installations.
Sec. 316. Sense of Congress on funding decisions relating to climate change.
Subtitle C—Logistics and Sustainment
Sec. 321. Revision of deployability rating system and planning reform.
Sec. 322. Revision of guidance relating to corrosion control and prevention executives.
Sec. 323. Pilot program for inclusion of certain industrial plants in the Armament Retooling and Manufacturing Support Initiative.
Sec. 324. Repair, recapitalization, and certification of dry docks at naval shipyards.
Sec. 325. Private sector port loading assessment.
Sec. 326. Strategy on revitalizing Army organic industrial base.
Subtitle D—Reports
Sec. 331. Modifications to Quarterly Readiness Report to Congress.
Sec. 332. Report on average travel costs of members of the reserve components.
Sec. 333. Report on HH–60G sustainment and Combat Rescue Helicopter program.
Subtitle E—Other Matters
Sec. 341. Air navigation matters.
Sec. 342. Contract working dogs.
Sec. 343. Plan, funding documents, and management review relating to explosive ordnance disposal.
Sec. 344. Process for communicating availability of surplus ammunition.
Sec. 345. Mitigation of risks posed by window coverings with accessible cords in certain military housing units.
Sec. 346. Access to military installations by transportation companies.
Sec. 347. Access to wireless high-speed Internet and network connections for certain members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 348. Limitation on availability of funds for Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence.
Sec. 349. Limitation on development and fielding of new camouflage and utility uniforms.
Sec. 350. Plan for improved dedicated adversary air training enterprise of the Air Force.
Sec. 351. Independent review and assessment of the Ready Aircrew Program of the Air Force.
Sec. 352. Study on space-available travel system of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 353. Evaluation of motor carrier safety performance and safety technology.
Title IV—Military Personnel Authorizations
Subtitle A—Active Forces
Sec. 401. End strengths for active forces.
Sec. 402. Revisions in permanent active duty end strength minimum levels.
Subtitle B—Reserve Forces
Sec. 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve.
Sec. 412. End strengths for reserves on active duty in support of the reserves.
Sec. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status).
Sec. 414. Fiscal year 2017 limitation on number of non-dual status technicians.
Sec. 415. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty for operational support.
Sec. 416. Technical corrections to annual authorization for personnel strengths.
Subtitle C—Authorization of Appropriations
Sec. 421. Military personnel.
Title V—Military Personnel Policy
Subtitle A—Officer Personnel Policy
Sec. 501. Reduction in number of general and flag officers on active duty and authorized strength after December 31, 2022, of such general and flag officers.
Sec. 502. Repeal of statutory specification of general or flag officer grade for various positions in the Armed Forces.
Sec. 503. Number of Marine Corps general officers.
Sec. 504. Promotion eligibility period for officers whose confirmation of appointment is delayed due to nonavailability to the Senate of probative information under control of non-Department of Defense agencies.
Sec. 505. Continuation of certain officers on active duty without regard to requirement for retirement for years of service.
Sec. 506. Equal consideration of officers for early retirement or discharge.
Sec. 507. Modification of authority to drop from rolls a commissioned officer.
Sec. 508. Extension of force management authorities allowing enhanced flexibility for officer personnel management.
Sec. 509. Pilot programs on direct commissions to cyber positions.
Sec. 510. Length of joint duty assignments.
Sec. 510A. Revision of definitions used for joint officer management.
Subtitle B—Reserve Component Management
Sec. 511. Authority for temporary waiver of limitation on term of service of Vice Chief of the National Guard Bureau.
Sec. 512. Rights and protections available to military technicians.
Sec. 513. Inapplicability of certain laws to National Guard technicians performing active Guard and Reserve duty.
Sec. 514. Extension of removal of restrictions on the transfer of officers between the active and inactive National Guard.
Sec. 515. Extension of temporary authority to use Air Force reserve component personnel to provide training and instruction regarding pilot training.
Sec. 516. Expansion of eligibility for deputy commander of combatant command having United States among geographic area of responsibility to include officers of the Reserves.
Subtitle C—General Service Authorities
Sec. 521. Matters relating to provision of leave for members of the Armed Forces, including prohibition on leave not expressly authorized by law.
Sec. 522. Transfer of provision relating to expenses incurred in connection with leave canceled due to contingency operations.
Sec. 523. Expansion of authority to execute certain military instruments.
Sec. 524. Medical examination before administrative separation for members with post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury in connection with sexual assault.
Sec. 525. Reduction of tenure on the temporary disability retired list.
Sec. 526. Technical correction to voluntary separation pay and benefits.
Sec. 527. Consolidation of Army marketing and pilot program on consolidated Army recruiting.
Subtitle D—Member Whistleblower Protections and Correction of Military Records
Sec. 531. Improvements to whistleblower protection procedures.
Sec. 532. Modification of whistleblower protection authorities to restrict contrary findings of prohibited personnel action by the Secretary concerned.
Sec. 533. Availability of certain Correction of Military Records and Discharge Review Board information through the Internet.
Sec. 534. Improvements to authorities and procedures for the correction of military records.
Sec. 535. Treatment by discharge review boards of claims asserting post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury in connection with combat or sexual trauma as a basis for review of discharge.
Sec. 536. Comptroller General of the United States review of integrity of Department of Defense whistleblower program.
Subtitle E—Military Justice and Legal Assistance Matters
Sec. 541. United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.
Sec. 542. Effective prosecution and defense in courts-martial and pilot programs on professional military justice development for judge advocates.
Sec. 543. Inclusion in annual reports on sexual assault prevention and response efforts of the Armed Forces of information on complaints of retaliation in connection with reports of sexual assault in the Armed Forces.
Sec. 544. Extension of the requirement for annual report regarding sexual assaults and coordination with release of Family Advocacy Program report.
Sec. 545. Metrics for evaluating the efforts of the Armed Forces to prevent and respond to retaliation in connection with reports of sexual assault in the Armed Forces.
Sec. 546. Training for Department of Defense personnel who investigate claims of retaliation.
Sec. 547. Notification to complainants of resolution of investigations into retaliation.
Sec. 548. Modification of definition of sexual harassment for purposes of investigations by commanding officers of complaints of harassment.
Sec. 549. Improved Department of Defense prevention of and response to hazing in the Armed Forces.
Subtitle F—National Commission on Military, National, and Public Service
Sec. 551. Purpose, scope, and definitions.
Sec. 552. Preliminary report on purpose and utility of registration system under Military Selective Service Act.
Sec. 553. National Commission on Military, National, and Public Service.
Sec. 554. Commission hearings and meetings.
Sec. 555. Principles and procedure for Commission recommendations.
Sec. 556. Executive Director and staff.
Sec. 557. Termination of Commission.
Subtitle G—Member Education, Training, Resilience, and Transition
Sec. 561. Modification of program to assist members of the Armed Forces in obtaining professional credentials.
Sec. 562. Inclusion of alcohol, prescription drug, opioid, and other substance abuse counseling as part of required preseparation counseling.
Sec. 563. Inclusion of information in Transition Assistance Program regarding effect of receipt of both veteran disability compensation and voluntary separation pay.
Sec. 564. Training under Transition Assistance Program on career and employment opportunities associated with transportation security cards.
Sec. 565. Extension of suicide prevention and resilience program.
Sec. 566. Congressional notification in advance of appointments to service academies.
Sec. 567. Report and guidance on Job Training, Employment Skills Training, Apprenticeships, and Internships and SkillBridge initiatives for members of the Armed Forces who are being separated.
Sec. 568. Military-to-mariner transition.
Subtitle H—Defense Dependents' Education and Military Family Readiness Matters
Sec. 571. Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that benefit dependents of members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense civilian employees.
Sec. 572. One-year extension of authorities relating to the transition and support of military dependent students to local educational agencies.
Sec. 573. Annual notice to members of the Armed Forces regarding child custody protections guaranteed by the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act.
Sec. 574. Requirement for annual Family Advocacy Program report regarding child abuse and domestic violence.
Sec. 575. Reporting on allegations of child abuse in military families and homes.
Sec. 576. Repeal of Advisory Council on Dependents’ Education.
Sec. 577. Support for programs providing camp experience for children of military families.
Sec. 578. Comptroller General of the United States assessment and report on Exceptional Family Member Programs.
Sec. 579. Impact aid amendments.
Subtitle I—Decorations and Awards
Sec. 581. Posthumous advancement of Colonel George E. Bud
Day, United States Air Force, on the retired list.
Sec. 582. Authorization for award of medals for acts of valor during certain contingency operations.
Sec. 583. Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor to Gary M. Rose and James C. McCloughan for acts of valor during the Vietnam War.
Sec. 584. Authorization for award of Distinguished-Service Cross to First Lieutenant Melvin M. Spruiell for acts of valor during World War II.
Sec. 585. Authorization for award of the Distinguished Service Cross to Chaplain (First Lieutenant) Joseph Verbis LaFleur for acts of valor during World War II.
Sec. 586. Review regarding award of Medal of Honor to certain Asian American and Native American Pacific Islander war veterans.
Subtitle J—Miscellaneous Reports and Other Matters
Sec. 591. Repeal of requirement for a chaplain at the United States Air Force Academy appointed by the President.
Sec. 592. Extension of limitation on reduction in number of military and civilian personnel assigned to duty with service review agencies.
Sec. 593. Annual reports on progress of the Army and the Marine Corps in integrating women into military occupational specialities and units recently opened to women.
Sec. 594. Report on feasability of electronic tracking of operational active-duty service performed by members of the Ready Reserve of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 595. Report on discharge by warrant officers of pilot and other flight officer positions in the Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force currently discharged by commissioned officers.
Sec. 596. Body mass index test.
Sec. 597. Report on career progression tracks of the Armed Forces for women in combat arms units.
Title VI—Compensation and Other Personnel Benefits
Subtitle A—Pay and Allowances
Sec. 601. Fiscal year 2017 increase in military basic pay.
Sec. 602. Publication by Department of Defense of actual rates of basic pay payable to members of the Armed Forces by pay grade for annual or other pay periods.
Sec. 603. Extension of authority to provide temporary increase in rates of basic allowance for housing under certain circumstances.
Sec. 604. Reports on a new single-salary pay system for members of the Armed Forces.
Subtitle B—Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays
Sec. 611. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for reserve forces.
Sec. 612. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for health care professionals.
Sec. 613. One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for nuclear officers.
Sec. 614. One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37 consolidated special pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities.
Sec. 615. One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of other title 37 bonuses and special pays.
Sec. 616. Aviation incentive pay and bonus matters.
Sec. 617. Conforming amendment to consolidation of special pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities.
Sec. 618. Technical amendments relating to 2008 consolidation of certain special pay authorities.
Subtitle C—Travel and Transportation Allowances
Sec. 621. Maximum reimbursement amount for travel expenses of members of the Reserves attending inactive duty training outside of normal commuting distances.
Subtitle D—Disability Pay, Retired Pay, and Survivor Benefits
Part I—Amendments in Connection with Retired Pay Reform
Sec. 631. Election period for members in the service academies and inactive Reserves to participate in the modernized retirement system.
Sec. 632. Effect of separation of members from the uniformed services on participation in the Thrift Savings Plan.
Sec. 633. Continuation pay for full Thrift Savings Plan members who have completed 8 to 12 years of service.
Sec. 634. Combat-related special compensation coordinating amendment.
Part II—Other Matters
Sec. 641. Use of member’s current pay grade and years of service and retired pay cost-of-living adjustments, rather than final retirement pay grade and years of service, in a division of property involving disposable retired pay.
Sec. 642. Equal benefits under Survivor Benefit Plan for survivors of reserve component members who die in the line of duty during inactive-duty training.
Sec. 643. Authority to deduct Survivor Benefit Plan premiums from combat-related special compensation when retired pay not sufficient.
Sec. 644. Extension of allowance covering monthly premium for Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance while in certain overseas areas to cover members in any combat zone or overseas direct support area.
Sec. 645. Authority for payment of pay and allowances and retired and retainer pay pursuant to power of attorney.
Sec. 646. Extension of authority to pay special survivor indemnity allowance under the Survivor Benefit Plan.
Sec. 647. Repeal of obsolete authority for combat-related injury rehabilitation pay.
Sec. 648. Independent assessment of the Survivor Benefit Plan.
Subtitle E—Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality Benefits and Operations
Sec. 661. Protection and enhancement of access to and savings at commissaries and exchanges.
Sec. 662. Acceptance of Military Star Card at commissaries.
Subtitle F—Other Matters
Sec. 671. Recovery of amounts owed to the United States by members of the uniformed services.
Sec. 672. Modification of flat rate per diem requirement for personnel on long-term temporary duty assignments.
Title VII—Health Care Provisions
Subtitle A—Reform of TRICARE and military health system
Sec. 701. TRICARE Select and other TRICARE reform.
Sec. 702. Reform of administration of the Defense Health Agency and military medical treatment facilities.
Sec. 703. Military medical treatment facilities.
Sec. 704. Access to urgent and primary care under TRICARE program.
Sec. 705. Value-based purchasing and acquisition of managed care support contracts for TRICARE program.
Sec. 706. Establishment of high performance military-civilian integrated health delivery systems.
Sec. 707. Joint Trauma System.
Sec. 708. Joint Trauma Education and Training Directorate.
Sec. 709. Standardized system for scheduling medical appointments at military treatment facilities.
Subtitle B—Other health care benefits
Sec. 711. Extended TRICARE program coverage for certain members of the National Guard and dependents during certain disaster response duty.
Sec. 712. Continuity of health care coverage for Reserve Components.
Sec. 713. Provision of hearing aids to dependents of retired members.
Sec. 714. Coverage of medically necessary food and vitamins for certain conditions under the TRICARE program.
Sec. 715. Eligibility of certain beneficiaries under the TRICARE program for participation in the Federal Employees Dental and Vision Insurance Program.
Sec. 716. Applied behavior analysis.
Sec. 717. Evaluation and treatment of veterans and civilians at military treatment facilities.
Sec. 718. Enhancement of use of telehealth services in military health system.
Sec. 719. Authorization of reimbursement by Department of Defense to entities carrying out State vaccination programs for costs of vaccines provided to covered beneficiaries.
Subtitle C—Health care administration
Sec. 721. Authority to convert military medical and dental positions to civilian medical and dental positions.
Sec. 722. Prospective payment of funds necessary to provide medical care for the Coast Guard.
Sec. 723. Reduction of administrative requirements relating to automatic renewal of enrollments in TRICARE Prime.
Sec. 724. Modification of authority of Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences to include undergraduate and other medical education and training programs.
Sec. 725. Adjustment of medical services, personnel authorized strengths, and infrastructure in military health system to maintain readiness and core competencies of health care providers.
Sec. 726. Program to eliminate variability in health outcomes and improve quality of health care services delivered in military medical treatment facilities.
Sec. 727. Acquisition strategy for health care professional staffing services.
Sec. 728. Adoption of core quality performance metrics.
Sec. 729. Improvement of health outcomes and control of costs of health care under TRICARE program through programs to involve covered beneficiaries.
Sec. 730. Accountability for the performance of the military health system of certain leaders within the system.
Sec. 731. Establishment of advisory committees for military treatment facilities.
Subtitle D—Reports and other matters
Sec. 741. Extension of authority for joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund and report on implementation of information technology capabilities.
Sec. 742. Pilot program on expansion of use of physician assistants to provide mental health care to members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 743. Pilot program for prescription drug acquisition cost parity in the TRICARE pharmacy benefits program.
Sec. 744. Pilot program on display of wait times at urgent care clinics and pharmacies of military medical treatment facilities.
Sec. 745. Requirement to review and monitor prescribing practices at military treatment facilities of pharmaceutical agents for treatment of post-traumatic stress.
Sec. 746. Department of Defense study on preventing the diversion of opioid medications.
Sec. 747. Incorporation into survey by Department of Defense of questions on experiences of members of the Armed Forces with family planning services and counseling.
Sec. 748. Assessment of transition to TRICARE program by families of members of reserve components called to active duty and elimination of certain charges for such families.
Sec. 749. Oversight of graduate medical education programs of military departments.
Sec. 750. Study on health of helicopter and tiltrotor pilots.
Sec. 751. Comptroller General reports on health care delivery and waste in military health system.
Title VIII—Acquisition Policy, Acquisition Management, and Related Matters
Subtitle A—Acquisition Policy and Management
Sec. 801. Rapid acquisition authority amendments.
Sec. 802. Authority for temporary service of Principal Military Deputies to the Assistant Secretaries of the military departments for acquisition as Acting Assistant Secretaries.
Sec. 803. Modernization of services acquisition.
Sec. 804. Defense Modernization Account amendments.
Subtitle B—Department of Defense Acquisition Agility
Sec. 805. Modular open system approach in development of major weapon systems.
Sec. 806. Development, prototyping, and deployment of weapon system components or technology.
Sec. 807. Cost, schedule, and performance of major defense acquisition programs.
Sec. 808. Transparency in major defense acquisition programs.
Sec. 809. Amendments relating to technical data rights.
Subtitle C—Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures, and Limitations
Sec. 811. Modified restrictions on undefinitized contractual actions.
Sec. 812. Amendments relating to inventory and tracking of purchases of services.
Sec. 813. Use of lowest price technically acceptable source selection process.
Sec. 814. Procurement of personal protective equipment.
Sec. 815. Amendments related to detection and avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts.
Sec. 816. Amendments to special emergency procurement authority.
Sec. 817. Compliance with domestic source requirements for footwear furnished to enlisted members of the Armed Forces upon their initial entry into the Armed Forces.
Sec. 818. Extension of authority for enhanced transfer of technology developed at Department of Defense laboratories.
Sec. 819. Modified notification requirement for exercise of waiver authority to acquire vital national security capabilities.
Sec. 820. Defense cost accounting standards.
Sec. 821. Increased micro-purchase threshold applicable to Department of Defense procurements.
Sec. 822. Enhanced competition requirements.
Sec. 823. Revision to effective date of senior executive benchmark compensation for allowable cost limitations.
Sec. 824. Treatment of independent research and development costs on certain contracts.
Sec. 825. Exception to requirement to include cost or price to the Government as a factor in the evaluation of proposals for certain multiple-award task or delivery order contracts.
Sec. 826. Extension of program for comprehensive small business contracting plans.
Sec. 827. Treatment of side-by-side testing of certain equipment, munitions, and technologies manufactured and developed under cooperative research and development agreements as use of competitive procedures.
Sec. 828. Defense Acquisition Challenge Program amendments.
Sec. 829. Preference for fixed-price contracts.
Sec. 830. Requirement to use firm fixed-price contracts for foreign military sales.
Sec. 831. Preference for performance-based contract payments.
Sec. 832. Contractor incentives to achieve savings and improve mission performance.
Sec. 833. Sunset and repeal of certain contracting provisions.
Sec. 834. Flexibility in contracting award program.
Sec. 835. Protection of task order competition.
Sec. 836. Contract closeout authority.
Sec. 837. Closeout of old Department of the Navy contracts.
Subtitle D—Provisions Relating to Major Defense Acquisition Programs
Sec. 841. Change in date of submission to Congress of Selected Acquisition Reports.
Sec. 842. Amendments relating to independent cost estimation and cost analysis.
Sec. 843. Revisions to Milestone B determinations.
Sec. 844. Review and report on sustainment planning in the acquisition process.
Sec. 845. Revision to distribution of annual report on operational test and evaluation.
Sec. 846. Repeal of major automated information systems provisions.
Sec. 847. Revisions to definition of major defense acquisition program.
Sec. 848. Acquisition strategy.
Sec. 849. Improved life-cycle cost control.
Sec. 850. Authority to designate increments or blocks of items delivered under major defense acquisition programs as major subprograms for purposes of acquisition reporting.
Sec. 851. Reporting of small business participation on Department of Defense programs.
Sec. 852. Waiver of congressional notification for acquisition of tactical missiles and munitions greater than quantity specified in law.
Sec. 853. Multiple program multiyear contract pilot demonstration program.
Sec. 854. Key performance parameter reduction pilot program.
Sec. 855. Mission integration management.
Subtitle E—Provisions Relating to Acquisition Workforce
Sec. 861. Project management.
Sec. 862. Authority to waive tenure requirement for program managers for program definition and program execution periods.
Sec. 863. Purposes for which the Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund may be used; advisory panel amendments.
Sec. 864. Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund determination adjustment.
Sec. 865. Limitations on funds used for staff augmentation contracts at management headquarters of the Department of Defense and the military departments.
Sec. 866. Senior Military Acquisition Advisors in the Defense Acquisition Corps.
Sec. 867. Authority of the Secretary of Defense under the acquisition demonstration project.
Subtitle F—Provisions Relating to Commercial Items
Sec. 871. Market research for determination of price reasonableness in acquisition of commercial items.
Sec. 872. Value analysis for the determination of price reasonableness.
Sec. 873. Clarification of requirements relating to commercial item determinations.
Sec. 874. Inapplicability of certain laws and regulations to the acquisition of commercial items and commercially available off-the-shelf items.
Sec. 875. Use of commercial or non-Government standards in lieu of military specifications and standards.
Sec. 876. Preference for commercial services.
Sec. 877. Treatment of commingled items purchased by contractors as commercial items.
Sec. 878. Treatment of services provided by nontraditional contractors as commercial items.
Sec. 879. Defense pilot program for authority to acquire innovative commercial items, technologies, and services using general solicitation competitive procedures.
Sec. 880. Pilot programs for authority to acquire innovative commercial items using general solicitation competitive procedures.
Subtitle G—Industrial Base Matters
Sec. 881. Greater integration of the national technology and industrial base.
Sec. 882. Integration of civil and military roles in attaining national technology and industrial base objectives.
Sec. 883. Pilot program for distribution support and services for weapon systems contractors.
Sec. 884. Nontraditional and small contractor innovation prototyping program.
Subtitle H—Other Matters
Sec. 885. Report on bid protests.
Sec. 886. Review and report on indefinite delivery contracts.
Sec. 887. Review and report on contractual flow-down provisions.
Sec. 888. Requirement and review relating to use of brand names or brand-name or equivalent descriptions in solicitations.
Sec. 889. Inclusion of information on common grounds for sustaining bid protests in annual Government Accountability Office reports to Congress.
Sec. 890. Study and report on contracts awarded to minority-owned and women-owned businesses.
Sec. 891. Authority to provide reimbursable auditing services to certain non-Defense Agencies.
Sec. 892. Selection of service providers for auditing services and audit readiness services.
Sec. 893. Amendments to contractor business system requirements.
Sec. 894. Improved management practices to reduce cost and improve performance of certain Department of Defense organizations.
Sec. 895. Exemption from requirement for capital planning and investment control for information technology equipment included as integral part of a weapon or weapon system.
Sec. 896. Modifications to pilot program for streamlining awards for innovative technology projects.
Sec. 897. Rapid prototyping funds for the military departments.
Sec. 898. Establishment of Panel on Department of Defense and AbilityOne Contracting Oversight, Accountability, and Integrity; Defense Acquisition University training.
Sec. 899. Coast Guard major acquisition programs.
Sec. 899A. Enhanced authority to acquire products and services produced in Africa in support of certain activities.
Title IX—Department of Defense Organization and Management
Subtitle A—Office of the Secretary of Defense and Related Matters
Sec. 901. Organization of the Office of the Secretary of Defense.
Sec. 902. Responsibilities and reporting of the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 903. Maximum number of personnel in the Office of the Secretary of Defense and other Department of Defense headquarters offices.
Sec. 904. Repeal of Financial Management Modernization Executive Committee.
Subtitle B—Organization and Management of the Department of Defense Generally
Sec. 911. Organizational strategy for the Department of Defense.
Sec. 912. Policy, organization, and management goals and priorities of the Secretary of Defense for the Department of Defense.
Sec. 913. Secretary of Defense delivery unit.
Sec. 914. Performance of civilian functions by military personnel.
Sec. 915. Repeal of requirements relating to efficiencies plan for the civilian personnel workforce and service contractor workforce of the Department of Defense.
Subtitle C—Joint Chiefs of Staff and Combatant Command Matters
Sec. 921. Joint Chiefs of Staff and related combatant command matters.
Sec. 922. Organization of the Department of Defense for management of special operations forces and special operations.
Sec. 923. Establishment of unified combatant command for cyber operations.
Sec. 924. Assigned forces of the combatant commands.
Sec. 925. Modifications to the requirements process.
Sec. 926. Review of combatant command organization.
Subtitle D—Organization and Management of Other Department of Defense Offices and Elements
Sec. 931. Qualifications for appointment of the Secretaries of the military departments.
Sec. 932. Enhanced personnel management authorities for the Chief of the National Guard Bureau.
Sec. 933. Reorganization and redesignation of Office of Family Policy and Office of Community Support for Military Families with Special Needs.
Sec. 934. Redesignation of Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition as Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics.
Subtitle E—Strategies, Reports, and Related Matters
Sec. 941. National defense strategy.
Sec. 942. Commission on the National Defense Strategy for the United States.
Sec. 943. Reform of the national military strategy.
Sec. 944. Form of annual national security strategy report.
Sec. 945. Modification to independent study of national security strategy formulation process.
Subtitle F—Other Matters
Sec. 951. Enhanced security programs for Department of Defense personnel and innovation initiatives.
Sec. 952. Modification of authority of the Secretary of Defense relating to protection of the Pentagon Reservation and other Department of Defense facilities in the National Capital Region.
Sec. 953. Modifications to requirements for accounting for members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense civilian employees listed as missing.
Sec. 954. Modifications to corrosion report.
Title X—General Provisions
Subtitle A—Financial Matters
Sec. 1001. General transfer authority.
Sec. 1002. Report on auditable financial statements.
Sec. 1003. Increased use of commercial data integration and analysis products for the purpose of preparing financial statement audits.
Sec. 1004. Sense of Congress on sequestration.
Sec. 1005. Requirement to transfer funds from Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund to the Treasury.
Subtitle B—Counterdrug Activities
Sec. 1011. Codification and modification of authority to provide support for counterdrug activities and activities to counter transnational organized crime of civilian law enforcement agencies.
Sec. 1012. Secretary of Defense review of curricula and program structures of National Guard counterdrug schools.
Sec. 1013. Extension of authority to support unified counterdrug and counterterrorism campaign in Colombia.
Sec. 1014. Enhancement of information sharing and coordination of military training between Department of Homeland Security and Department of Defense.
Subtitle C—Naval Vessels and Shipyards
Sec. 1021. Definition of short-term work with respect to overhaul, repair, or maintenance of naval vessels.
Sec. 1022. Warranty requirements for shipbuilding contracts.
Sec. 1023. National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund.
Sec. 1024. Availability of funds for retirement or inactivation of Ticonderoga-class cruisers or dock landing ships.
Subtitle D—Counterterrorism
Sec. 1031. Frequency of counterterrorism operations briefings.
Sec. 1032. Prohibition on use of funds for transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cub, to the United States.
Sec. 1033. Prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify facilities in the United States to house detainees transferred from United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Sec. 1034. Prohibition on use of funds for transfer or release to certain countries of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Sec. 1035. Prohibition on use of funds for realignment of forces at or closure of United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Sec. 1036. Congressional notification requirements for sensitive military operations.
Subtitle E—Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations
Sec. 1041. Expanded authority for transportation by the Department of Defense of non-Department of Defense personnel and cargo.
Sec. 1042. Reduction in minimum number of Navy carrier air wings and carrier air wing headquarters required to be maintained.
Sec. 1043. Modification to support for non-Federal development and testing of material for chemical agent defense.
Sec. 1044. Protection of certain Federal spectrum operations.
Sec. 1045. Prohibition on use of funds for retirement of legacy maritime mine countermeasures platforms.
Sec. 1046. Extension of authority of Secretary of Transportation to issue non-premium aviation insurance.
Sec. 1047. Evaluation of Navy alternate combination cover and unisex combination cover.
Sec. 1048. Independent evaluation of Department of Defense excess property program.
Sec. 1049. Waiver of certain polygraph examination requirements.
Sec. 1050. Use of Transportation Worker Identification Credential to gain access at Department of Defense installations.
Sec. 1051. Limitation on availability of funds for destruction of certain landmines and briefing on development of replacement anti-personnel landmine munitions.
Sec. 1052. Transition of Air Force to operation of remotely piloted aircraft by enlisted personnel.
Sec. 1053. Prohibition on divestment of Marine Corps Search and Rescue Units.
Sec. 1054. Support for the Associate Director of the Central Intelligence Agency for Military Affairs.
Sec. 1055. Notification on the provision of defense sensitive support.
Sec. 1056. Prohibition on enforcement of military commission rulings preventing members of the Armed Forces from carrying out otherwise lawful duties based on member sex.
Subtitle F—Studies and Reports
Sec. 1061. Temporary continuation of certain Department of Defense reporting requirements.
Sec. 1062. Reports on programs managed under alternative compensatory control measures in the Department of Defense.
Sec. 1063. Matters for inclusion in report on designation of countries for which rewards may be paid under Department of Defense rewards program.
Sec. 1064. Annual reports on unfunded priorities of the Armed Forces and the combatant commands and annual report on combatant command requirements.
Sec. 1065. Management and reviews of electromagnetic spectrum.
Sec. 1066. Requirement for notice and reporting to Committees on Armed Services on certain expenditures of funds by Defense Intelligence Agency.
Sec. 1067. Congressional notification of biological select agent and toxin theft, loss, or release involving the Department of Defense.
Sec. 1068. Report on service-provided support and enabling capabilities to United States special operations forces.
Sec. 1069. Report on citizen security responsibilities in the Northern Triangle of Central America.
Sec. 1070. Report on counterproliferation activities and programs.
Sec. 1071. Report on testing and integration of minehunting sonar systems to improve Littoral Combat Ship minehunting capabilities.
Sec. 1072. Quarterly reports on parachute jumps conducted at Fort Bragg and Pope Army Airfield and Air Force support for such jumps.
Sec. 1073. Study on military helicopter noise.
Sec. 1074. Independent review of United States military strategy and force posture in the United States Pacific Command area of responsibility.
Sec. 1075. Assessment of the joint ground forces of the Armed Forces.
Subtitle G—Other Matters
Sec. 1081. Technical and clerical amendments.
Sec. 1082. Increase in maximum amount available for equipment, services, and supplies provided for humanitarian demining assistance.
Sec. 1083. Liquidation of unpaid credits accrued as a result of transactions under a cross-servicing agreement.
Sec. 1084. Modification of requirements relating to management of military technicians.
Sec. 1085. Streamlining of the National Security Council.
Sec. 1086. National biodefense strategy.
Sec. 1087. Global Cultural Knowledge Network.
Sec. 1088. Sense of Congress regarding Connecticut’s Submarine Century.
Sec. 1089. Sense of Congress regarding the reporting of the MV–22 mishap in Marana, Arizona, on April 8, 2000.
Sec. 1090. Cost of Wars.
Sec. 1091. Reconnaissance Strike Group matters.
Sec. 1092. Border security metrics.
Sec. 1093. Program to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier.
Sec. 1094. Sense of Congress regarding the OCONUS basing of the KC–46A aircraft.
Sec. 1095. Designation of a Department of Defense Strategic Arctic Port.
Sec. 1096. Recovery of excess rifles, ammunition, and parts granted to foreign countries and transfer to certain persons.
Title XI—Civilian Personnel Matters
Subtitle A—Department of Defense Matters Generally
Sec. 1101. Civilian personnel management.
Sec. 1102. Repeal of requirement for annual strategic workforce plan for the Department of Defense.
Sec. 1103. Training for employment personnel of Department of Defense on matters relating to authorities for recruitment and retention at United States Cyber Command.
Sec. 1104. Public-private talent exchange.
Sec. 1105. Temporary and term appointments in the competitive service in the Department of Defense.
Sec. 1106. Direct-hire authority for the Department of Defense for post-secondary students and recent graduates.
Sec. 1107. Temporary increase in maximum amount of voluntary separation incentive pay authorized for civilian employees of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 1108. Extension of rate of overtime pay for Department of the Navy employees performing work aboard or dockside in support of the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier forward deployed in Japan.
Sec. 1109. Limitation on number of DOD SES positions.
Sec. 1110. Direct hire authority for financial management experts in the Department of Defense workforce.
Sec. 1111. Repeal of certain basis for appointment of a retired member of the Armed Forces to Department of Defense position within 180 days of retirement.
Subtitle B—Department of Defense Science and Technology Laboratories and Related Matters
Sec. 1121. Permanent personnel management authority for the Department of Defense for experts in science and engineering.
Sec. 1122. Codification and modification of certain authorities for certain positions at Department of Defense research and engineering laboratories.
Sec. 1123. Modification to information technology personnel exchange program.
Sec. 1124. Pilot program on enhanced pay authority for certain research and technology positions in the science and technology reinvention laboratories of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 1125. Temporary direct hire authority for domestic defense industrial base facilities, the Major Range and Test Facilities Base, and the Office of the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation.
Subtitle C—Governmentwide Matters
Sec. 1131. Elimination of two-year eligibility limitation for noncompetitive appointment of spouses of members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 1132. Temporary personnel flexibilities for domestic defense industrial base facilities and Major Range and Test Facilities Base civilian personnel.
Sec. 1133. One-year extension of temporary authority to grant allowances, benefits, and gratuities to civilian personnel on official duty in a combat zone.
Sec. 1134. Advance payments for employees relocating within the United States and its territories.
Sec. 1135. Eligibility of employees in a time-limited appointment to compete for a permanent appointment at any Federal agency.
Sec. 1136. Review of official personnel file of former Federal employees before rehiring.
Sec. 1137. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium pay and aggregate limitation on pay for Federal civilian employees working overseas.
Sec. 1138. Administrative leave.
Sec. 1139. Direct hiring for Federal wage schedule employees.
Sec. 1140. Record of investigation of personnel action in separated employee’s official personnel file.
Title XII—Matters relating to foreign nations
Subtitle A—Assistance and training
Sec. 1201. One-year extension of logistical support for coalition forces supporting certain United States military operations.
Sec. 1202. Special Defense Acquisition Fund matters.
Sec. 1203. Codification of authority for support of special operations to combat terrorism.
Sec. 1204. Independent evaluation of strategic framework for Department of Defense security cooperation.
Sec. 1205. Sense of Congress regarding an assessment, monitoring, and evaluation framework for security cooperation.
Subtitle B—Matters relating to Afghanistan and Pakistan
Sec. 1211. Extension and modification of Commanders’ Emergency Response Program.
Sec. 1212. Extension of authority to acquire products and services produced in countries along a major route of supply to Afghanistan.
Sec. 1213. Extension and modification of authority to transfer defense articles and provide defense services to the military and security forces of Afghanistan.
Sec. 1214. Special immigrant status for certain Afghans.
Sec. 1215. Modification to semiannual report on enhancing security and stability in Afghanistan.
Sec. 1216. Prohibition on use of funds for certain programs and projects of the Department of Defense in Afghanistan that cannot be safely accessed by United States Government personnel.
Sec. 1217. Improvement of oversight of United States Government efforts in Afghanistan.
Sec. 1218. Extension and modification of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations.
Subtitle C—Matters relating to Syria, Iraq, and Iran
Sec. 1221. Modification and extension of authority to provide assistance to the vetted Syrian opposition.
Sec. 1222. Modification and extension of authority to provide assistance to counter the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant.
Sec. 1223. Extension and modification of authority to support operations and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq.
Sec. 1224. Limitation on provision of man-portable air defense systems to the vetted Syrian opposition during fiscal year 2017.
Sec. 1225. Modification of annual report on military power of Iran.
Sec. 1226. Quarterly report on confirmed ballistic missile launches from Iran.
Subtitle D—Matters relating to the Russian Federation
Sec. 1231. Military response options to Russian Federation violation of INF Treaty.
Sec. 1232. Limitation on military cooperation between the United States and the Russian Federation.
Sec. 1233. Extension and modification of authority on training for Eastern European national military forces in the course of multilateral exercises.
Sec. 1234. Prohibition on availability of funds relating to sovereignty of the Russian Federation over Crimea.
Sec. 1235. Annual report on military and security developments involving the Russian Federation.
Sec. 1236. Limitation on use of funds to vote to approve or otherwise adopt any implementing decision of the Open Skies Consultative Commission and related requirements.
Sec. 1237. Extension and enhancement of Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative.
Sec. 1238. Reports on INF Treaty and Open Skies Treaty.
Subtitle E—Reform of Department of Defense Security Cooperation
Sec. 1241. Enactment of new chapter for defense security cooperation.
Sec. 1242. Military-to-military exchanges.
Sec. 1243. Consolidation and revision of authorities for payment of personnel expenses necessary for theater security cooperation.
Sec. 1244. Transfer and revision of certain authorities on payment of expenses of training and exercises with friendly foreign forces.
Sec. 1245. Transfer and revision of authority to provide operational support to forces of friendly foreign countries.
Sec. 1246. Department of Defense State Partnership Program.
Sec. 1247. Transfer of authority on Regional Defense Combating Terrorism Fellowship Program.
Sec. 1248. Consolidation of authorities for service academy international engagement.
Sec. 1249. Consolidated annual budget for security cooperation programs and activities of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 1250. Department of Defense security cooperation workforce development.
Sec. 1251. Reporting requirements.
Sec. 1252. Quadrennial review of security sector assistance programs and authorities of the United States Government.
Sec. 1253. Other conforming amendments and authority for administration.
Subtitle F—Human rights sanctions
Sec. 1261. Short title.
Sec. 1262. Definitions.
Sec. 1263. Authorization of imposition of sanctions.
Sec. 1264. Reports to Congress.
Sec. 1265. Sunset.
Subtitle G—Miscellaneous reports
Sec. 1271. Modification of annual report on military and security developments involving the People’s Republic of China.
Sec. 1272. Monitoring and evaluation of overseas humanitarian, disaster, and civic aid programs of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 1273. Strategy for United States defense interests in Africa.
Sec. 1274. Report on the potential for cooperation between the United States and Israel on directed energy capabilities.
Sec. 1275. Annual update of Department of Defense Freedom of Navigation Report.
Sec. 1276. Assessment of proliferation of certain remotely piloted aircraft systems.
Subtitle H—Other matters
Sec. 1281. Enhancement of interagency support during contingency operations and transition periods.
Sec. 1282. Two-year extension and modification of authorization of non-conventional assisted recovery capabilities.
Sec. 1283. Authority to destroy certain specified World War II-era United States-origin chemical munitions located on San Jose Island, Republic of Panama.
Sec. 1284. Sense of Congress on military exchanges between the United States and Taiwan.
Sec. 1285. Limitation on availability of funds to implement the Arms Trade Treaty.
Sec. 1286. Prohibition on use of funds to invite, assist, or otherwise assure the participation of Cuba in certain joint or multilateral exercises.
Sec. 1287. Global Engagement Center.
Sec. 1288. Modification of United States International Broadcasting Act of 1994.
Sec. 1289. Redesignation of South China Sea Initiative.
Sec. 1290. Measures against persons involved in activities that violate arms control treaties or agreements with the United States.
Sec. 1291. Agreements with foreign governments to develop land-based water resources in support of and in preparation for contingency operations.
Sec. 1292. Enhancing defense and security cooperation with India.
Sec. 1293. Coordination of efforts to develop free trade agreements with sub-Saharan African countries.
Sec. 1294. Extension and expansion of authority to support border security operations of certain foreign countries.
Sec. 1295. Modification and clarification of United States-Israel anti-tunnel cooperation authority.
Sec. 1296. Maintenance of prohibition on procurement by Department of Defense of People’s Republic of China-origin items that meet the definition of goods and services controlled as munitions items when moved to the “600 series” of the Commerce Control List.
Sec. 1297. International sales process improvements.
Sec. 1298. Efforts to end modern slavery.
Title XIII—Cooperative Threat Reduction
Sec. 1301. Specification of Cooperative Threat Reduction funds.
Sec. 1302. Funding allocations.
Sec. 1303. Limitation on availability of funds for Cooperative Threat Reduction in People’s Republic of China.
Title XIV—Other Authorizations
Subtitle A—Military Programs
Sec. 1401. Working capital funds.
Sec. 1402. Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense.
Sec. 1403. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide.
Sec. 1404. Defense Inspector General.
Sec. 1405. Defense Health Program.
Subtitle B—National Defense Stockpile
Sec. 1411. Authority to dispose of certain materials from and to acquire additional materials for the National Defense Stockpile.
Sec. 1412. National Defense Stockpile matters.
Subtitle C—Chemical Demilitarization Matters
Sec. 1421. National Academies of Sciences study on conventional munitions demilitarization alternative technologies.
Subtitle D—Other Matters
Sec. 1431. Authority for transfer of funds to joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois.
Sec. 1432. Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home.
Title XV—Authorization of Additional Appropriations for Overseas Contingency Operations
Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations
Sec. 1501. Purpose and treatment of certain authorizations of appropriations.
Sec. 1502. Procurement.
Sec. 1503. Research, development, test, and evaluation.
Sec. 1504. Operation and maintenance.
Sec. 1505. Military personnel.
Sec. 1506. Working capital funds.
Sec. 1507. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide.
Sec. 1508. Defense Inspector General.
Sec. 1509. Defense Health program.
Subtitle B—Financial Matters
Sec. 1511. Treatment as additional authorizations.
Sec. 1512. Special transfer authority.
Subtitle C—Limitations, Reports, and Other Matters
Sec. 1521. Afghanistan Security Forces Fund.
Sec. 1522. Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund.
Sec. 1523. Extension of authority to use Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund for training of foreign security forces to defeat improvised explosive devices.
Sec. 1524. Overseas contingency operations.
Sec. 1525. Extension and modification of authorities on Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund.
Title XVI—Strategic Programs, Cyber, and Intelligence Matters
Subtitle A—Space Activities
Sec. 1601. Repeal of provision permitting the use of rocket engines from the Russian Federation for the evolved expendable launch vehicle program.
Sec. 1602. Exception to the prohibition on contracting with Russian suppliers of rocket engines for the evolved expendable launch vehicle program.
Sec. 1603. Rocket propulsion system to replace RD–180.
Sec. 1604. Plan for use of allied launch vehicles.
Sec. 1605. Analysis of alternatives for wide-band communications.
Sec. 1606. Modification of pilot program for acquisition of commercial satellite communication services.
Sec. 1607. Space-based environmental monitoring.
Sec. 1608. Prohibition on use of certain non-allied positioning, navigation, and timing systems.
Sec. 1609. Limitation of availability of funds for the Joint Space Operations Center Mission System.
Sec. 1610. Limitations on availability of funds for the Global Positioning System Next Generation Operational Control System.
Sec. 1611. Availability of funds for certain secure voice conferencing capabilities.
Sec. 1612. Space-based infrared system and advanced extremely high frequency program.
Sec. 1613. Pilot program on commercial weather data.
Sec. 1614. Plans on transfer of acquisition and funding authority of certain weather missions to National Reconnaissance Office.
Sec. 1615. Five-year plan for Joint Interagency Combined Space Operations Center.
Sec. 1616. Organization and management of national security space activities of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 1617. Review of charter of Operationally Responsive Space Program Office.
Sec. 1618. Backup and complementary positioning, navigation, and timing capabilities of Global Positioning System.
Sec. 1619. Report on use of spacecraft assets of the space-based infrared system wide-field-of-view program.
Sec. 1620. Provision of certain information to Government Accountability Office by National Reconnaissance Office.
Sec. 1621. Cost-benefit analysis of commercial use of excess ballistic missile solid rocket motors.
Sec. 1622. Independent assessment of Global Positioning System Next Generation Operational Control System.
Subtitle B—Defense Intelligence and Intelligence-Related Activities
Sec. 1631. Report on United States Central Command Intelligence Fusion Center.
Sec. 1632. Prohibition on availability of funds for certain relocation activities for NATO Intelligence Fusion Cell.
Sec. 1633. Survey and review of Defense Intelligence Enterprise.
Subtitle C—Cyberspace-Related Matters
Sec. 1641. Special emergency procurement authority to facilitate the defense against or recovery from a cyber attack.
Sec. 1642. Limitation on termination of dual-hat arrangement for Commander of the United States Cyber Command.
Sec. 1643. Cyber mission forces matters.
Sec. 1644. Requirement to enter into agreements relating to use of cyber opposition forces.
Sec. 1645. Cyber protection support for Department of Defense personnel in positions highly vulnerable to cyber attack.
Sec. 1646. Limitation on full deployment of joint regional security stacks.
Sec. 1647. Advisory committee on industrial security and industrial base policy.
Sec. 1648. Change in name of National Defense University’s Information Resources Management College to College of Information and Cyberspace.
Sec. 1649. Evaluation of cyber vulnerabilities of F–35 aircraft and support systems.
Sec. 1650. Evaluation of cyber vulnerabilities of Department of Defense critical infrastructure.
Sec. 1651. Strategy to incorporate Army reserve component cyber protection teams into Department of Defense cyber mission force.
Sec. 1652. Strategic Plan for the Defense Information Systems Agency.
Sec. 1653. Plan for information security continuous monitoring capability and comply-to-connect policy; limitation on software licensing.
Sec. 1654. Reports on deterrence of adversaries in cyberspace.
Sec. 1655. Sense of Congress on cyber resiliency of the networks and communications systems of the National Guard.
Subtitle D—Nuclear Forces
Sec. 1661. Improvements to Council on Oversight of National Leadership Command, Control, and Communications System.
Sec. 1662. Treatment of certain sensitive information by State and local governments.
Sec. 1663. Procurement authority for certain parts of intercontinental ballistic missile fuzes.
Sec. 1664. Prohibition on availability of funds for mobile variant of ground-based strategic deterrent missile.
Sec. 1665. Limitation on availability of funds for extension of New START Treaty.
Sec. 1666. Certifications regarding integrated tactical warning and attack assessment mission of the Air Force.
Sec. 1667. Matters relating to intercontinental ballistic missiles.
Sec. 1668. Requests for forces to meet security requirements for land-based nuclear forces.
Sec. 1669. Report on Russian and Chinese political and military leadership survivability, command and control, and continuity of government programs and activities.
Sec. 1670. Review by Comptroller General of the United States of recommendations relating to nuclear enterprise of Department of Defense.
Sec. 1671. Sense of Congress on nuclear deterrence.
Sec. 1672. Sense of Congress on importance of independent nuclear deterrent of United Kingdom.
Subtitle E—Missile Defense Programs
Sec. 1681. National missile defense policy.
Sec. 1682. Extensions of prohibitions relating to missile defense information and systems.
Sec. 1683. Non-terrestrial missile defense intercept and defeat capability for the ballistic missile defense system.
Sec. 1684. Review of the missile defeat policy and strategy of the United States.
Sec. 1685. Maximizing Aegis Ashore capability and developing medium range discrimination radar.
Sec. 1686. Technical authority for integrated air and missile defense activities and programs.
Sec. 1687. Hypersonic defense capability development.
Sec. 1688. Conventional Prompt Global Strike weapons system.
Sec. 1689. Required testing by Missile Defense Agency of ground-based midcourse defense element of ballistic missile defense system.
Sec. 1690. Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system and Israeli cooperative missile defense program codevelopment and coproduction.
Sec. 1691. Limitations on availability of funds for lower tier air and missile defense capability of the Army.
Sec. 1692. Pilot program on loss of unclassified, controlled technical information.
Sec. 1693. Plan for procurement of medium-range discrimination radar to improve homeland missile defense.
Sec. 1694. Review of Missile Defense Agency budget submissions for ground-based midcourse defense and evaluation of alternative ground-based interceptor deployments.
Sec. 1695. Semiannual notifications on missile defense tests and costs.
Sec. 1696. Reports on unfunded priorities of the Missile Defense Agency.
Subtitle F—Other matters
Sec. 1697. Protection of certain facilities and assets from unmanned aircraft.
Sec. 1698. Harmful interference to Department of Defense Global Positioning System.
Title XVII—Guam World War II Loyalty Recognition Act
Sec. 1701. Short title.
Sec. 1702. Recognition of the suffering and loyalty of the residents of Guam.
Sec. 1703. Guam World War II Claims Fund.
Sec. 1704. Payments for Guam World War II claims.
Sec. 1705. Adjudication.
Sec. 1706. Grants program to memorialize the occupation of Guam during World War II.
Sec. 1707. Authorization of appropriations.
Title XVIII—Matters Relating to Small Business Procurement
Subtitle A—Improving Transparency and Clarity for Small Businesses
Sec. 1801. Plain language rewrite of requirements for small business procurements.
Sec. 1802. Transparency in small business goals.
Subtitle B—Clarifying the Roles of Small Business Advocates
Sec. 1811. Scope of review by procurement center representatives.
Sec. 1812. Duties of the Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization.
Sec. 1813. Improving contractor compliance.
Sec. 1814. Improving education on small business regulations.
Subtitle C—Strengthening Opportunities for Competition in Subcontracting
Sec. 1821. Good faith in subcontracting.
Sec. 1822. Pilot program to provide opportunities for qualified subcontractors to obtain past performance ratings.
Sec. 1823. Amendments to the Mentor-Protege Program of the Department of Defense.
Subtitle D—Miscellaneous Provisions
Sec. 1831. Improvements to size standards for small agricultural producers.
Sec. 1832. Uniformity in service-disabled veteran definitions.
Sec. 1833. Office of Hearings and Appeals.
Sec. 1834. Extension of SBIR and STTR programs.
Sec. 1835. Issuance of guidance on small business matters.
Subtitle E—Improving Cyber Preparedness for Small Businesses
Sec. 1841. Small Business Development Center Cyber Strategy and outreach.
Sec. 1842. Role of small business development centers in cybersecurity and preparedness.
Sec. 1843. Additional cybersecurity assistance for small business development centers.
Sec. 1844. Prohibition on additional funds.
Title XIX—Department of Homeland Security Coordination
Sec. 1901. Department of Homeland Security coordination.
Sec. 1902. Office of Strategy, Policy, and Plans of the Department of Homeland Security.
Sec. 1903. Management and execution.
Sec. 1904. Chief Human Capital Officer of the Department of Homeland Security.
Sec. 1905. Department of Homeland Security transparency.
Sec. 1906. Transparency in research and development.
Sec. 1907. United States Government review of certain foreign fighters.
Sec. 1908. National strategy to combat terrorist travel.
Sec. 1909. National Operations Center.
Sec. 1910. Department of Homeland Security strategy for international programs.
Sec. 1911. State and high-risk urban area working groups.
Sec. 1912. Cybersecurity strategy for the Department of Homeland Security.
Sec. 1913. EMP and GMD planning, research and development, and protection and preparedness.
Division B—Military construction authorizations
Sec. 2001. Short title.
Sec. 2002. Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified by law.
Sec. 2003. Effective date.
Title XXI—Army military construction
Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2102. Family housing.
Sec. 2103. Authorization of appropriations, Army.
Sec. 2104. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2014 project.
Sec. 2105. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2013 projects.
Sec. 2106. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2014 projects.
Title XXII—Navy military construction
Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2202. Family housing.
Sec. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units.
Sec. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy.
Sec. 2205. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2014 project.
Sec. 2206. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2013 projects.
Sec. 2207. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2014 projects.
Sec. 2208. Status of net negative
policy regarding Navy acreage on Guam.
Title XXIII—Air Force Military Construction
Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2302. Family housing.
Sec. 2303. Improvements to military family housing units.
Sec. 2304. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force.
Sec. 2305. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2016 project.
Sec. 2306. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2013 project.
Sec. 2307. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2014 project.
Sec. 2308. Restriction on acquisition of property in Northern Mariana Islands.
Title XXIV—Defense Agencies Military Construction
Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2402. Authorized energy conservation projects.
Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies.
Sec. 2404. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2014 project.
Sec. 2405. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2013 projects.
Sec. 2406. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2014 projects.
Title XXV—International programs
Subtitle A—North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program
Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO.
Subtitle B—Host country In-Kind contributions
Sec. 2511. Republic of Korea funded construction projects.
Title XXVI—Guard and Reserve Forces Facilities
Subtitle A—Project Authorizations and Authorization of Appropriations
Sec. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve.
Subtitle B—Other matters
Sec. 2611. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2014 project.
Sec. 2612. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2015 project.
Sec. 2613. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2016 project.
Sec. 2614. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2013 project.
Sec. 2615. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2014 projects.
Title XXVII—Base realignment and closure activities
Sec. 2701. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2014 projects.
Sec. 2702. Prohibition on conducting additional Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) round.
Title XXVIII—Military Construction General Provisions
Subtitle A—Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing
Sec. 2801. Modification of criteria for treatment of laboratory revitalization projects as minor military construction projects.
Sec. 2802. Classification of facility conversion projects as repair projects.
Sec. 2803. Limited authority for scope of work increase.
Sec. 2804. Extension of temporary, limited authority to use operation and maintenance funds for construction projects outside the United States.
Sec. 2805. Authority to expand energy conservation construction program to include energy resiliency projects.
Sec. 2806. Additional entities eligible for participation in defense laboratory modernization pilot program.
Sec. 2807. Extension of temporary authority for acceptance and use of contributions for certain construction, maintenance, and repair projects mutually beneficial to the Department of Defense and Kuwait military forces.
Subtitle B—Real Property and Facilities Administration
Sec. 2811. Acceptance of military construction projects as payments in-kind and in-kind contributions.
Sec. 2812. Allotment of space and provision of services to WIC offices operating on military installations.
Sec. 2813. Sense of Congress regarding inclusion of stormwater systems and components
within the meaning of wastewater system
under the Department of Defense authority for conveyance of utility systems.
Sec. 2814. Assessment of public schools on Department of Defense installations.
Sec. 2815. Prior certification required for use of Department of Defense facilities by other Federal agencies for temporary housing support.
Subtitle C—Land Conveyances
Sec. 2821. Land conveyance, High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program facility and adjacent property, Gakona, Alaska.
Sec. 2822. Land conveyance, Campion Air Force Radar Station, Galena, Alaska.
Sec. 2823. Lease, Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska.
Sec. 2824. Transfer of administrative jurisdictions, Navajo Army Depot, Arizona.
Sec. 2825. Exchange of property interests, San Diego Unified Port District, California.
Sec. 2826. Release of property interests retained in connection with land conveyance, Eglin Air Force Base, Florida.
Sec. 2827. Land exchange, Fort Hood, Texas.
Sec. 2828. Land Conveyance, P–36 Warehouse, Colbern United States Army Reserve Center, Laredo, Texas.
Sec. 2829. Land conveyance, St. George National Guard Armory, St. George, Utah.
Sec. 2829A. Land acquisitions, Arlington County, Virginia.
Sec. 2829B. Release of restrictions, Richland Innovation Center, Richland, Washington.
Sec. 2829C. Modification of land conveyance, Rocky Mountain Arsenal National Wildlife Refuge.
Sec. 2829D. Closure of St. Marys Airport.
Sec. 2829E. Transfer of Fort Belvoir Mark Center Campus from the Secretary of the Army to the Secretary of Defense and applicability of certain provisions of law relating to the Pentagon Reservation.
Sec. 2829F. Return of certain lands at Fort Wingate, New Mexico, to the original inhabitants.
Subtitle D—Military Memorials, Monuments, and Museums
Sec. 2831. Cyber Center for Education and Innovation-Home of the National Cryptologic Museum.
Sec. 2832. Renaming site of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park, Ohio.
Sec. 2833. Women’s military service memorials and museums.
Sec. 2834. Petersburg National Battlefield boundary modification.
Subtitle E—Designations and Other Matters
Sec. 2841. Designation of portion of Moffett Federal Airfield, California, as Moffett Air National Guard Base.
Sec. 2842. Redesignation of Mike O’Callaghan Federal Medical Center.
Sec. 2843. Replenishment of Sierra Vista subwatershed regional aquifer, Arizona.
Sec. 2844. Limited exceptions to restriction on development of public infrastructure in connection with realignment of Marine Corps forces in Asia-Pacific region.
Sec. 2845. Duration of withdrawal and reservation of public land, Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California.
Title XXIX—Overseas Contingency Operations Military Construction
Sec. 2901. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2902. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2903. Authorization of appropriations.
Title XXX—Utah Test and Training Range and Related Matters
Subtitle A—Authorization for temporary closure of certain public land adjacent to the Utah Test and Training Range
Sec. 3001. Definitions.
Sec. 3002. Memorandum of agreement.
Sec. 3003. Temporary closures.
Sec. 3004. Liability.
Sec. 3005. Community resource advisory group.
Sec. 3006. Savings clauses.
Subtitle B—Bureau of Land Management land exchange with State of Utah
Sec. 3011. Definitions.
Sec. 3012. Exchange of Federal land and non-Federal land.
Sec. 3013. Status and management of non-Federal land acquired by the United States.
Sec. 3014. Hazardous substances.
Division C—Department of Energy National Security Authorizations and Other Authorizations
Title XXXI—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS
Subtitle A—National Security Programs and Authorizations
Sec. 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration.
Sec. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup.
Sec. 3103. Other defense activities.
Sec. 3104. Nuclear energy.
Subtitle B—Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations
Sec. 3111. Independent acquisition project reviews of capital assets acquisition projects.
Sec. 3112. Protection of certain nuclear facilities and assets from unmanned aircraft.
Sec. 3113. Common financial reporting system for the nuclear security enterprise.
Sec. 3114. Rough estimate of total life cycle cost of tank waste cleanup at Hanford Nuclear Reservation.
Sec. 3115. Annual certification of shipments to Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.
Sec. 3116. Disposition of weapons-usable plutonium.
Sec. 3117. Design basis threat.
Sec. 3118. Industry best practices in operations at National Nuclear Security Administration facilities and sites.
Sec. 3119. Pilot program on unavailability for overhead costs of amounts specified for laboratory-directed research and development.
Sec. 3120. Research and development of advanced naval nuclear fuel system based on low-enriched uranium.
Sec. 3121. Increase in certain limitations applicable to funds for conceptual and construction design of the Department of Energy.
Sec. 3122. Prohibition on availability of funds for programs in Russian Federation.
Sec. 3123. Limitation on availability of funds for Federal salaries and expenses.
Sec. 3124. Limitation on availability of funds for defense environmental cleanup program direction.
Sec. 3125. Limitation on availability of funds for acceleration of nuclear weapons dismantlement.
Subtitle C—Plans and reports
Sec. 3131. Independent assessment of technology development under defense environmental cleanup program.
Sec. 3132. Updated plan for verification and monitoring of proliferation of nuclear weapons and fissile material.
Sec. 3133. Report on the use of highly-enriched uranium for naval reactors.
Sec. 3134. Analysis of approaches for supplemental treatment of low-activity waste at Hanford Nuclear Reservation.
Sec. 3135. Clarification of annual report and certification on status of security of atomic energy defense facilities.
Sec. 3136. Report on service support contracts and authority for appointment of certain personnel.
Sec. 3137. Elimination of certain reporting requirements.
Sec. 3138. Report on United States nuclear deterrence.
Title XXXII—DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD
Sec. 3201. Authorization.
Title XXXIV—NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVES
Sec. 3401. Authorization of appropriations.
Title XXXV—Maritime Matters
Subtitle A—Maritime Administration, Coast Guard, and Shipping Matters
Sec. 3501. Authorization of the Maritime Administration.
Sec. 3502. Authority to extend certain age restrictions relating to vessels in the Maritime Security Fleet.
Sec. 3503. Corrections to provisions enacted by Coast Guard Authorization Acts.
Sec. 3504. Status of National Defense Reserve Fleet vessels.
Sec. 3505. NDRF national security multi-mission vessel.
Sec. 3506. Superintendent of United States Merchant Marine Academy.
Sec. 3507. Use of National Defense Reserve Fleet scrapping proceeds.
Sec. 3508. Floating dry docks.
Sec. 3509. Transportation worker identification credentials for individuals undergoing separation, discharge, or release from the Armed Forces.
Sec. 3510. Actions to address sexual harassment and sexual assault at the United States Merchant Marine Academy.
Sec. 3511. Sexual assault response coordinators and sexual assault victim advocates.
Sec. 3512. Report from the Department of Transportation Inspector General.
Sec. 3513. Sexual assault prevention and response working group.
Sec. 3514. Sea Year compliance.
Sec. 3515. State maritime academy physical standards and reporting.
Sec. 3516. Appointments.
Sec. 3517. Maritime workforce working group.
Sec. 3518. Maritime extreme weather task force.
Sec. 3519. Workforce plans and onboarding policies.
Sec. 3520. Drug and alcohol policy.
Sec. 3521. Vessel transfers.
Sec. 3522. Clarifying amendment; continuation boards.
Sec. 3523. Polar icebreaker recapitalization plan.
Sec. 3524. GAO report on icebreaking capability in United States.
Subtitle B—Pribilof Islands Transition Completion
Sec. 3531. Short title.
Sec. 3532. Conveyance of property.
Sec. 3533. Transfer, use, and disposal of tract 43.
Subtitle C—Sexual harassment and assault prevention at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Sec. 3541. Actions to address sexual harassment at National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Sec. 3542. Actions to address sexual assault at National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Sec. 3543. Rights of the victim of a sexual assault.
Sec. 3544. Change of station.
Sec. 3545. Applicability of policies to crews of vessels secured by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration under contract.
Sec. 3546. Annual report on sexual assaults in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Sec. 3547. Sexual assault defined.
Division D—Funding Tables
Sec. 4001. Authorization of amounts in funding tables.
Title XLI—PROCUREMENT
Sec. 4101. Procurement.
Sec. 4102. Procurement for overseas contingency operations.
Sec. 4103. Procurement for overseas contingency operations for base requirements.
Title XLII—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION
Sec. 4201. Research, development, test, and evaluation.
Sec. 4202. Research, development, test, and evaluation for overseas contingency operations.
Sec. 4203. Research, development, test, and evaluation for overseas contingency operations for base requirements.
Title XLIII—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
Sec. 4301. Operation and maintenance.
Sec. 4302. Operation and maintenance for overseas contingency operations.
Sec. 4303. Operation and maintenance for overseas contingency operations for base requirements.
Title XLIV—MILITARY PERSONNEL
Sec. 4401. Military personnel.
Sec. 4402. Military personnel for overseas contingency operations.
Sec. 4403. Military personnel for overseas contingency operations for base requirements.
Title XLV—OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS
Sec. 4501. Other authorizations.
Sec. 4502. Other authorizations for overseas contingency operations.
Sec. 4503. Other authorizations for overseas contingency operations for base requirements.
Title XLVI—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
Sec. 4601. Military construction.
Sec. 4602. Military construction for overseas contingency operations.
Sec. 4603. Military construction for overseas contingency operations for base requirements.
Title XLVII—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS
Sec. 4701. Department of Energy national security programs.
Division E—Uniform Code of Military Justice Reform
Sec. 5001. Short title.
Title LI—General Provisions
Sec. 5101. Definitions.
Sec. 5102. Clarification of persons subject to UCMJ while on inactive-duty training.
Sec. 5103. Staff judge advocate disqualification due to prior involvement in case.
Sec. 5104. Conforming amendment relating to military magistrates.
Sec. 5105. Rights of victim.
Title LII—Apprehension and Restraint
Sec. 5121. Restraint of persons charged.
Sec. 5122. Modification of prohibition of confinement of members of the Armed Forces with enemy prisoners and certain others.
Title LIII—Non-Judicial Punishment
Sec. 5141. Modification of confinement as non-judicial punishment.
Title LIV—Court-Martial Jurisdiction
Sec. 5161. Courts-martial classified.
Sec. 5162. Jurisdiction of general courts-martial.
Sec. 5163. Jurisdiction of special courts-martial.
Sec. 5164. Summary court-martial as non-criminal forum.
Title LV—Composition of Courts-Martial
Sec. 5181. Technical amendment relating to persons authorized to convene general courts-martial.
Sec. 5182. Who may serve on courts-martial and related matters.
Sec. 5183. Number of court-martial members in capital cases.
Sec. 5184. Detailing, qualifications, and other matters relating to military judges.
Sec. 5185. Military magistrates.
Sec. 5186. Qualifications of trial counsel and defense counsel.
Sec. 5187. Assembly and impaneling of members and related matters.
Title LVI—Pre-Trial Procedure
Sec. 5201. Charges and specifications.
Sec. 5202. Certain proceedings conducted before referral.
Sec. 5203. Preliminary hearing required before referral to general court-martial.
Sec. 5204. Disposition guidance.
Sec. 5205. Advice to convening authority before referral for trial.
Sec. 5206. Service of charges and commencement of trial.
Title LVII—Trial Procedure
Sec. 5221. Duties of assistant defense counsel.
Sec. 5222. Sessions.
Sec. 5223. Technical amendment relating to continuances.
Sec. 5224. Conforming amendments relating to challenges.
Sec. 5225. Statute of limitations.
Sec. 5226. Former jeopardy.
Sec. 5227. Pleas of the accused.
Sec. 5228. Subpoena and other process.
Sec. 5229. Refusal of person not subject to UCMJ to appear, testify, or produce evidence.
Sec. 5230. Contempt.
Sec. 5231. Depositions.
Sec. 5232. Admissibility of sworn testimony by audiotape or videotape from records of courts of inquiry.
Sec. 5233. Conforming amendment relating to defense of lack of mental responsibility.
Sec. 5234. Voting and rulings.
Sec. 5235. Votes required for conviction, sentencing, and other matters.
Sec. 5236. Findings and sentencing.
Sec. 5237. Plea agreements.
Sec. 5238. Record of trial.
Title LVIII—Sentences
Sec. 5301. Sentencing.
Sec. 5302. Effective date of sentences.
Sec. 5303. Sentence of reduction in enlisted grade.
Title LIX—Post-Trial Procedure and Review of Courts-Martial
Sec. 5321. Post-trial processing in general and special courts-martial.
Sec. 5322. Limited authority to act on sentence in specified post-trial circumstances.
Sec. 5323. Post-trial actions in summary courts-martial and certain general and special courts-martial.
Sec. 5324. Entry of judgment.
Sec. 5325. Waiver of right to appeal and withdrawal of appeal.
Sec. 5326. Appeal by the United States.
Sec. 5327. Rehearings.
Sec. 5328. Judge advocate review of finding of guilty in summary court-martial.
Sec. 5329. Transmittal and review of records.
Sec. 5330. Courts of Criminal Appeals.
Sec. 5331. Review by Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.
Sec. 5332. Supreme Court review.
Sec. 5333. Review by Judge Advocate General.
Sec. 5334. Appellate defense counsel in death penalty cases.
Sec. 5335. Authority for hearing on vacation of suspension of sentence to be conducted by qualified judge advocate.
Sec. 5336. Extension of time for petition for new trial.
Sec. 5337. Restoration.
Sec. 5338. Leave requirements pending review of certain court-martial convictions.
Title LX—Punitive Articles
Sec. 5401. Reorganization of punitive articles.
Sec. 5402. Conviction of offense charged, lesser included offenses, and attempts.
Sec. 5403. Soliciting commission of offenses.
Sec. 5404. Malingering.
Sec. 5405. Breach of medical quarantine.
Sec. 5406. Missing movement; jumping from vessel.
Sec. 5407. Offenses against correctional custody and restriction.
Sec. 5408. Disrespect toward superior commissioned officer; assault of superior commissioned officer.
Sec. 5409. Willfully disobeying superior commissioned officer.
Sec. 5410. Prohibited activities with military recruit or trainee by person in position of special trust.
Sec. 5411. Offenses by sentinel or lookout.
Sec. 5412. Disrespect toward sentinel or lookout.
Sec. 5413. Release of prisoner without authority; drinking with prisoner.
Sec. 5414. Penalty for acting as a spy.
Sec. 5415. Public records offenses.
Sec. 5416. False or unauthorized pass offenses.
Sec. 5417. Impersonation offenses.
Sec. 5418. Insignia offenses.
Sec. 5419. False official statements; false swearing.
Sec. 5420. Parole violation.
Sec. 5421. Wrongful taking, opening, etc. of mail matter.
Sec. 5422. Improper hazarding of vessel or aircraft.
Sec. 5423. Leaving scene of vehicle accident.
Sec. 5424. Drunkenness and other incapacitation offenses.
Sec. 5425. Lower blood alcohol content limits for conviction of drunken or reckless operation of vehicle, aircraft, or vessel.
Sec. 5426. Endangerment offenses.
Sec. 5427. Communicating threats.
Sec. 5428. Technical amendment relating to murder.
Sec. 5429. Child endangerment.
Sec. 5430. Rape and sexual assault offenses.
Sec. 5431. Deposit of obscene matter in the mail.
Sec. 5432. Fraudulent use of credit cards, debit cards, and other access devices.
Sec. 5433. False pretenses to obtain services.
Sec. 5434. Robbery.
Sec. 5435. Receiving stolen property.
Sec. 5436. Offenses concerning Government computers.
Sec. 5437. Bribery.
Sec. 5438. Graft.
Sec. 5439. Kidnapping.
Sec. 5440. Arson; burning property with intent to defraud.
Sec. 5441. Assault.
Sec. 5442. Burglary and unlawful entry.
Sec. 5443. Stalking.
Sec. 5444. Subornation of perjury.
Sec. 5445. Obstructing justice.
Sec. 5446. Misprision of serious offense.
Sec. 5447. Wrongful refusal to testify.
Sec. 5448. Prevention of authorized seizure of property.
Sec. 5449. Wrongful interference with adverse administrative proceeding.
Sec. 5450. Retaliation.
Sec. 5451. Extraterritorial application of certain offenses.
Sec. 5452. Table of sections.
Title LXI—Miscellaneous Provisions
Sec. 5501. Technical amendments relating to courts of inquiry.
Sec. 5502. Technical amendment to Article 136.
Sec. 5503. Articles of Uniform Code of Military Justice to be explained to officers upon commissioning.
Sec. 5504. Military justice case management; data collection and accessibility.
Title LXII—Military Justice Review Panel and Annual Reports
Sec. 5521. Military Justice Review Panel.
Sec. 5522. Annual reports.
Title LXIII—Conforming Amendments and Effective Dates
Sec. 5541. Amendments to UCMJ subchapter tables of sections.
Sec. 5542. Effective dates.
Congressional defense committees
In this Act, the term congressional defense committees
has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code.
Budgetary effects of this Act
The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purposes of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the latest statement titled Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation
for this Act, jointly submitted for printing in the Congressional Record by the Chairmen of the House and Senate Budget Committees, provided that such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage in the House acting first on the conference report or amendment between the Houses.
Department of Defense Authorizations
Procurement
Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations
Sec. 101. Authorization of appropriations.
Subtitle B—Army Programs
Sec. 111. Multiyear procurement authority for AH–64E Apache helicopters.
Sec. 112. Multiyear procurement authority for UH–60M and HH–60M Black Hawk helicopters.
Sec. 113. Distributed Common Ground System–Army increment 1.
Sec. 114. Assessment of certain capabilities of the Department of the Army.
Subtitle C—Navy Programs
Sec. 121. Determination of vessel delivery dates.
Sec. 122. Incremental funding for detail design and construction of LHA replacement ship designated LHA 8.
Sec. 123. Littoral Combat Ship.
Sec. 124. Limitation on use of sole-source shipbuilding contracts for certain vessels.
Sec. 125. Limitation on availability of funds for the Advanced Arresting Gear Program.
Sec. 126. Limitation on availability of funds for procurement of U.S.S. Enterprise (CVN–80).
Sec. 127. Sense of Congress on aircraft carrier procurement schedules.
Sec. 128. Report on P–8 Poseidon aircraft.
Sec. 129. Design and construction of replacement dock landing ship designated LX(R) or amphibious transport dock designated LPD–29.
Subtitle D—Air Force Programs
Sec. 131. EC–130H Compass Call recapitalization program.
Sec. 132. Repeal of requirement to preserve certain retired C–5 aircraft.
Sec. 133. Repeal of requirement to preserve F–117 aircraft in recallable condition.
Sec. 134. Prohibition on availability of funds for retirement of A–10 aircraft.
Sec. 135. Limitation on availability of funds for destruction of A–10 aircraft in storage status.
Sec. 136. Prohibition on availability of funds for retirement of Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System aircraft.
Sec. 137. Elimination of annual report on aircraft inventory.
Subtitle E—Defense-wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters
Sec. 141. Standardization of 5.56mm rifle ammunition.
Sec. 142. Fire suppressant and fuel containment standards for certain vehicles.
Sec. 143. Limitation on availability of funds for destruction of certain cluster munitions.
Sec. 144. Report on Department of Defense munitions strategy for the combatant commands.
Sec. 145. Modifications to reporting on use of combat mission requirements funds.
Sec. 146. Report on alternative management structures for the F–35 joint strike fighter program.
Sec. 147. Comptroller General review of F–35 Lightning II aircraft sustainment support.
Sec. 148. Briefing on acquisition strategy for Ground Mobility Vehicle.
Sec. 149. Study and report on optimal mix of aircraft capabilities for the Armed Forces.
Authorization of Appropriations
Authorization of appropriations
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2017 for procurement for the Army, the Navy and the Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as specified in the funding table in section 4101.
Army Programs
Multiyear procurement authority for AH–64E Apache helicopters
Authority for multiyear procurement
Subject to section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Army may enter into one or more multiyear contracts, beginning with the fiscal year 2017 program year, for the procurement of AH–64E Apache helicopters.
Condition for out-year contract payments
A contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2017 is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for such later fiscal year.
Multiyear procurement authority for UH–60M and HH–60M Black Hawk helicopters
Authority for multiyear procurement
Subject to section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Army may enter into one or more multiyear contracts, beginning with the fiscal year 2017 program year, for the procurement of UH–60M and HH–60M Black Hawk helicopters.
Condition for out-year contract payments
A contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2017 is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for such later fiscal year.
Distributed Common Ground System–Army increment 1
Training for operators
The Secretary of the Army shall take such actions as may be necessary to improve and tailor training for covered units in the versions of increment 1 that are in use on the date of the enactment of this Act.
Fielding of capability
In general
The Secretary shall rapidly identify and field a capability for fixed and deployable multi-source ground processing systems for covered units.
Commercially available capabilities
In carrying out paragraph (1), the Secretary shall procure commercially available off-the-shelf technologies that—
meet essential tactical requirements for processing, analyzing, and displaying intelligence information;
can integrate and communicate with covered units at the tactical unit level and at higher unit levels;
are substantially easier for personnel to use than the Distributed Common Ground System–Army; and
require less training than the Distributed Common Ground System–Army.
Limitation on the award of contract
The Secretary may not enter into a contract for the design, development, or procurement of any data architecture, data integration, or cloud
capability, or any data analysis or data visualization and workflow capability (including warfighting function tools relating to increment 1 of the Distributed Common Ground System–Army) for covered units unless the contract—
is awarded not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act;
is awarded in accordance with applicable law and regulations providing for the use of competitive procedures or procedures applicable to the procurement of commercial items including parts 12 and 15 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation;
is a fixed-price contract; and
provides that the technology to be procured under the contract will—
begin initial fielding rapidly after the contract award;
achieve initial operating capability not later than nine months after the date on which the contract is awarded; and
achieve full operating capability not later than 18 months after the date on which the contract is awarded.
Waiver
In general
The Secretary of Defense may waive the limitation in subsection (c) if the Secretary submits to the appropriate congressional committees a written statement declaring that such limitation would adversely affect ongoing operational activities.
Nondelegation
The Secretary of Defense may not delegate the waiver authority under paragraph (1).
Definitions
In this section:
Appropriate congressional committees
The term appropriate congressional committees
means—
the congressional defense committees;
the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.
Covered units
The term covered units
means military units that use increment 1 of the Distributed Common Ground System–Army, including tactical units and operators at the division, brigade, and battalion levels, and tactical units below the battalion level.
Assessment of certain capabilities of the Department of the Army
Assessment
The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of the Army and the Chief of Staff of the Army, shall conduct an assessment of the following capabilities with respect to the Department of the Army:
The capacity of AH–64 Apache-equipped attack reconnaissance battalions to meet future needs.
Air defense artillery capacity and responsiveness, including—
the capacity of short-range air defense artillery to address existing and emerging threats, including threats posed by unmanned aerial systems, cruise missiles, and manned aircraft; and
the potential for commercial off-the-shelf solutions.
Chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear capabilities and modernization needs.
Field artillery capabilities, including—
modernization needs;
munitions inventory shortfalls; and
changes in doctrine and war plans consistent with the Memorandum of the Secretary of Defense dated June 19, 2008, regarding the Department of Defense policy on cluster munitions and unintended harm to civilians.
Fuel distribution and water purification capacity and responsiveness.
Watercraft and port-opening capabilities and responsiveness.
Transportation capacity and responsiveness, particularly with respect to the transportation of fuel, water, and cargo.
Military police capacity.
Tactical mobility and tactical wheeled vehicle capacity, including heavy equipment prime movers.
Report
Not later than April 1, 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes—
the assessment conducted under subsection (a);
recommendations for reducing or eliminating shortfalls in responsiveness and capacity with respect to each of the capabilities described in such subsection; and
an estimate of the costs of implementing such recommendations.
Form
The report under subsection (b) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
Navy Programs
Determination of vessel delivery dates
Determination of vessel delivery dates
In general
Chapter 633 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 7300 the following new section:
Determination of vessel delivery dates
In general
The delivery of a covered vessel shall be deemed to occur on the date on which—
the Secretary of the Navy determines that the vessel is assembled and complete; and
custody of the vessel and all systems contained in the vessel transfers to the Navy.
Inclusion in budget and acquisition reports
The delivery dates of covered vessels shall be included—
in the materials submitted to Congress by the Secretary of Defense in support of the budget of the President for each fiscal year (as submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code); and
in any relevant Selected Acquisition Report submitted to Congress under section 2432 of this title.
Covered vessel defined
In this section, the term covered vessel
means any vessel of the Navy that is under construction on or after the date of the enactment of this section using amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for shipbuilding and conversion, Navy.
.
Clerical amendment
The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 7300 the following new item:
7301. Determination of vessel delivery dates.
.
Certification
In general
Not later than January 1, 2017, the Secretary of the Navy shall certify to the congressional defense committees that the delivery dates of the following vessels have been adjusted in accordance with section 7301 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a):
The U.S.S. John F. Kennedy (CVN–79).
The U.S.S. Zumwalt (DDG–1000).
The U.S.S. Michael Monsoor (DDG–1001).
The U.S.S. Lyndon B. Johnson (DDG–1002).
Any other vessel of the Navy that is under construction on the date of the enactment of this Act.
Contents
The certification under paragraph (1) shall include—
an identification of each vessel for which the delivery date was adjusted; and
the delivery date of each such vessel, as so adjusted.
Incremental funding for detail design and construction of LHA replacement ship designated LHA 8
Authority To use incremental funding
The Secretary of the Navy may enter into and incrementally fund a contract for detail design and construction of the LHA Replacement ship designated LHA 8 and, subject to subsection (b), funds for payments under the contract may be provided from amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy, for fiscal years 2017 and 2018.
Condition for out-year contract payments
A contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract for any subsequent fiscal year is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for such subsequent fiscal year.
Littoral Combat Ship
Report on Littoral Combat Ship mission packages
In general
The Secretary of Defense shall include in the materials submitted in support of the budget of the President (as submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code) for each fiscal year through fiscal year 2022 a report on Littoral Combat Ship mission packages.
Elements
Each report under paragraph (1) shall include, with respect to each Littoral Combat Ship mission package and increment, the following:
A description of the status of and plans for development, production, and sustainment, including—
projected unit costs compared to originally estimated unit costs for each system that comprises the mission package;
projected development costs, procurement costs, and 20-year sustainment costs compared to original estimates of such costs for each system that comprises the mission package;
demonstrated performance compared to required performance for each system that comprises the mission package and for the mission package as a whole;
problems relating to realized and potential costs, schedule, or performance; and
any development plans, production plans, or sustainment and mitigation plans that may be implemented to address such problems.
A description, including dates, of each developmental test, operational test, integrated test, and follow-on test event that is—
completed in the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year covered by the report; and
expected to be completed in the fiscal year covered by the report and any of the following five fiscal years.
The date on which initial operational capability is expected to be attained and a description of the performance level criteria that must be demonstrated to declare that such capability has been attained.
A description of—
the systems that attained initial operational capability in the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year covered by the report; and
the performance level demonstrated by such systems compared to the performance level required of such systems.
The acquisition inventory objective for each system.
An identification of—
each location (including the city, State, and country) to which systems were delivered in the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year covered by the report; and
the quantity of systems delivered to each such location.
An identification of—
each location (including the city, State, and country) to which systems are projected to be delivered in the fiscal year covered by the report and any of the following five fiscal years; and
the quantity of systems projected to be delivered to each such location.
Certification of Littoral Combat Ship mission package program of record
In general
The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall include in the materials submitted in support of the budget of the President (as submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code) for fiscal year 2018 the certification described in paragraph (2).
Certification
The certification described in this paragraph is a certification with respect to Littoral Combat Ship mission packages that includes, as of the fiscal year covered by the certification, the program of record quantity for—
surface warfare mission packages;
anti-submarine warfare mission packages; and
mine countermeasures mission packages.
Limitations
Limitation on deviation from acquisition strategy
In general
The Secretary of Defense may not revise or deviate from revision three of the Littoral Combat Ship acquisition strategy, until the date on which the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees the certification described in subparagraph (B).
Certification
The certification described in this subparagraph is a certification that includes—
the rationale of the Secretary for revising or deviating from revision three of the Littoral Combat Ship acquisition strategy;
a description of each such revision or deviation; and
the Littoral Combat Ship acquisition strategy that is in effect following the implementation of such revisions or deviations.
Limitation on selection of single contractor
The Secretary of Defense may not select only a single prime contractor to construct the Littoral Combat Ship or any successor frigate class ship unless such selection—
is conducted using competitive procedures and for the limited purpose of awarding a contract or contracts for—
an engineering change proposal for a frigate class ship; or
the construction of a frigate class ship; and
occurs only after a frigate design has—
reached sufficient maturity and completed a preliminary design review; or
demonstrated an equivalent level of design completeness.
Definitions
In this section:
Littoral combat ship mission package
The term Littoral Combat Ship mission package
means a mission module for a Littoral Combat Ship combined with the crew detachment and support aircraft for such ship.
Mission module
The term mission module
means the mission systems (including vehicles, communications, sensors, and weapons systems) combined with support equipment (including support containers and standard interfaces) and software (including software relating to the computing environment and multiple vehicle communications system of the mission package).
Revision three
The term revision three of the Littoral Combat Ship acquisition strategy
means the third revision of the Littoral Combat Ship acquisition strategy approved by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics on March 29, 2016.
Repeal of quarterly reporting requirement
Section 126 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1657) is amended—
by striking subsection (b); and
by striking (a) Designation required.—
.
Limitation on use of sole-source shipbuilding contracts for certain vessels
Limitation
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2017 for joint high speed vessels or expeditionary fast transports may be used to enter into or prepare to enter into a contract on a sole-source basis for the construction of such vessels or transports unless the Secretary of the Navy submits to the congressional defense committees the certification described in subsection (b) and the report described in subsection (c).
Certification
The certification described in this subsection is a certification by the Secretary of the Navy that—
awarding a contract for the construction of one or more joint high speed vessels or expeditionary fast transports on a sole-source basis is in the national security interests of the United States;
the construction of the vessels or transports will not result in exceeding the requirement for the ship class, as described in the most recent Navy force structure assessment;
the contract will be a fixed-price contract;
the price of the contract will be fair and reasonable, as determined by the service acquisition executive of the Navy; and
the contract will provide for the United States to have Government purpose rights in the data for the ship design.
Report
The report described in this subsection is a report that includes—
an explanation of the rationale for awarding a contract for the construction of joint high speed vessels or expeditionary fast transports on a sole-source basis; and
a description of—
actions that may be carried out to ensure that, if additional ships in the class are procured after the award of the contract referred to in paragraph (1), the contracts for the ships shall be awarded using competitive procedures; and
with respect to each such action, an implementation schedule and any associated cost savings, as compared to a contract awarded on a sole-source basis.
Limitation on availability of funds for the Advanced Arresting Gear Program
Advanced arresting gear for U.S.S. Enterprise
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the research and development, design, procurement, or advanced procurement of materials for advanced arresting gear for the U.S.S. Enterprise (CVN–80) may be obligated or expended until the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees the report described in section 2432 of title 10, United States Code, for the most recently concluded fiscal quarter for the Advanced Arresting Gear Program in accordance with subsection (c)(1).
Advanced arresting gear for U.S.S. John F. Kennedy
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the research and development, design, procurement, or advanced procurement of materials for advanced arresting gear for the U.S.S. John F. Kennedy (CVN–79) may be obligated or expended unless—
the decision to install advanced arresting gear on the vessel is determined by the milestone decision authority for the Program; and
the milestone decision authority for the Program submits notification of such determination to the congressional defense committees.
Additional requirements
Treatment of Baseline Estimate
The Secretary of Defense shall deem the Baseline Estimate for the Advanced Arresting Gear Program for fiscal year 2009 as the original Baseline Estimate for the Program.
Unit cost reports and critical cost growth
Subject to subparagraph (B), the Secretary shall carry out sections 2433 and 2433a of title 10, United States Code, with respect to the Advanced Arresting Gear Program, as if the Department had submitted a Selected Acquisition Report for the Program that included the Baseline Estimate for the Program for fiscal year 2009 as the original Baseline Estimate, except that the Secretary shall not carry out subparagraph (B) or subparagraph (C) of section 2433a(c)(1) of such title with respect to the Program.
In carrying out the review required by section 2433a of such title, the Secretary shall not approve a contract, enter into a new contract, exercise an option under a contract, or otherwise extend the scope of a contract for advanced arresting gear for the U.S.S. Enterprise (CVN–80), except to the extent determined necessary by the milestone decision authority, on a non-delegable basis, to ensure that the Program can be restructured as intended by the Secretary without unnecessarily wasting resources.
Definitions
In this section:
Baseline Estimate
The term Baseline Estimate
has the meaning given the term in section 2433(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code.
Mileston Decision Authority
The term milestone decision authority
has the meaning given the term in section 2366b(g)(3) of title 10, United States Code.
Original Baseline Estimate
The term original Baseline Estimate
has the meaning given the term in section 2435(d)(1) of title 10, United States Code.
Selected Acquisition Report
The term Selected Acquisition Report
means a Selected Acquisition Report submitted to Congress under section 2432 of title 10, United States Code.
Limitation on availability of funds for procurement of U.S.S. Enterprise (CVN–80)
Limitation
Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for advance procurement or procurement for the U.S.S. Enterprise (CVN–80), not more than 25 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of the Navy and the Chief of Naval Operations jointly submit to the congressional defense committees the report under subsection (b).
Initial report on CVN–79 and CVN–80
Not later than December 1, 2016, the Secretary of the Navy and the Chief of Naval Operations shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes a description of actions that may be carried out (including de-scoping requirements, if necessary) to achieve a ship end cost of—
not more than $12,000,000,000 for the CVN–80; and
not more than $11,000,000,000 for the U.S.S. John F. Kennedy (CVN–79).
Annual report on CVN–79 and CVN–80
In general
Together with the budget of the President for each fiscal year through fiscal year 2021 (as submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code) the Secretary of the Navy and the Chief of Naval Operations shall submit a report on the efforts of the Navy to achieve the ship end costs described in subsection (b) for the CVN–79 and CVN–80.
Elements
The report under paragraph (1) shall include, with respect to the procurement of the CVN–79 and the CVN–80, the following:
A description of the progress made toward achieving the ship end costs described in subsection (b), including realized cost savings.
A description of low value-added or unnecessary elements of program cost that have been reduced or eliminated.
Cost savings estimates for current and planned initiatives.
A schedule that includes—
a plan for spending with phasing of key obligations and outlays;
decision points describing when savings may be realized; and
key events that must occur to execute initiatives and achieve savings.
Instances of lower Government estimates used in contract negotiations.
A description of risks that may result from achieving the procurement end costs specified in subsection (b).
A description of incentives or rewards provided or planned to be provided to prime contractors for meeting the procurement end costs specified in subsection (b).
Sense of Congress on aircraft carrier procurement schedules
Findings
Congress finds the following:
In the Congressional Budget Office report titled An Analysis of the Navy’s Fiscal Year 2016 Shipbuilding Plan
, the Office stated as follows: To prevent the carrier force from declining to 10 ships in the 2040s, 1 short of its inventory goal of 11, the Navy could accelerate purchases after 2018 to 1 every four years, rather than 1 every five years
.
In a report submitted to Congress on March 17, 2015, the Secretary of the Navy indicated the Department of the Navy has a requirement of 11 aircraft carriers.
Sense of congress
It is the sense of Congress that—
the plan of the Department of the Navy to schedule the procurement of one aircraft carrier every five years will reduce the overall aircraft carrier inventory to 10 aircraft carriers, a level insufficient to meet peacetime and war plan requirements; and
to accommodate the required aircraft carrier force structure, the Department of the Navy should—
begin to program construction for the next aircraft carrier to be built after the U.S.S. Enterprise (CVN–80) in fiscal year 2022; and
program the required advance procurement activities to accommodate the construction of such carrier.
Report on P–8 Poseidon aircraft
Report required
Not later than October 1, 2017, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on potential upgrades to the capabilities of the P–8 Poseidon aircraft.
Elements
The report under subsection (a) shall include, with respect to the P–8 Poseidon aircraft, the following:
A review of potential upgrades to the sensors onboard the aircraft, including upgrades to intelligence sensors, surveillance sensors, and reconnaissance sensors such as those being fielded on MQ–4 Global Hawk aircraft platforms.
An assessment of the ability of the Navy to use long-range multispectral imaging systems onboard the aircraft that are similar to such systems being used onboard the MQ–4 Global Hawk aircraft.
Design and construction of replacement dock landing ship designated LX(R) or amphibious transport dock designated LPD–29
In general
The Secretary of the Navy may enter into a contract, beginning with the fiscal year 2017 program year, for the design and construction of the replacement dock landing ship designated LX(R) or the amphibious transport dock designated LPD–29 using amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy.
Use of incremental funding
With respect to the contract entered into under subsection (a), the Secretary may use incremental funding to make payments under the contract.
Condition for out-year contract payments
The contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under such contract for any fiscal year after fiscal year 2017 is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for such fiscal year.
Air Force Programs
EC–130H Compass Call recapitalization program
Authorization
Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of the Air Force may carry out a program to transfer the primary mission equipment of the EC–130H Compass Call aircraft fleet to an aircraft platform that the Secretary determines—
is more operationally effective and survivable than the existing EC–130H Compass Call aircraft platform; and
meets the requirements of the combatant commands.
Limitation
Except as provided in paragraph (2), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 or any other fiscal year for procurement may be obligated or expended on the program under subsection (a) until the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force determines that there is a high likelihood that the program will meet the requirements of the combatant commands.
The limitation in paragraph (1)—
shall not apply to the development and procurement of the first two aircraft under the program; and
shall not limit the authority of the Secretary to enter into a contract that may include an option for the future production of aircraft under the program if—
the exercise of such option is at the discretion of the Secretary; and
such option is not exercised until the Secretary determines that there is a high likelihood that the program will meet the requirements of the combatant commands.
Repeal of requirement to preserve certain retired C–5 aircraft
Section 141 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1659) is amended by striking subsection (d).
Repeal of requirement to preserve F–117 aircraft in recallable condition
Section 136 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2114) is amended by striking subsection (b).
Prohibition on availability of funds for retirement of A–10 aircraft
Prohibition on availability of funds for retirement
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage or on backup aircraft inventory status any A–10 aircraft.
Additional limitation on retirement
In addition to the prohibition in subsection (a), the Secretary of the Air Force may not retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage or on backup aircraft inventory status any A–10 aircraft until a period of 90 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees the report under subsection (e)(2).
Prohibition on significant reductions in manning levels
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to make significant reductions to manning levels with respect to any A–10 aircraft squadrons or divisions.
Minimum inventory requirement
The Secretary of the Air Force shall ensure the Air Force maintains a minimum of 171 A–10 aircraft designated as primary mission aircraft inventory until a period of 90 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees the report under subsection (e)(2).
Reports required
The Director of Operational Test and Evaluation shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes—
the results and findings of the initial operational test and evaluation of the F–35 aircraft program; and
a comparison test and evaluation that examines the capabilities of the F–35A and A–10C aircraft in conducting close air support, combat search and rescue, and forward air controller airborne missions.
Not later than 180 days after the date of the submission of the report under paragraph (1), the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes—
the views of the Secretary with respect to the results of the initial operational test and evaluation of the F–35 aircraft program as summarized in the report under paragraph (1), including any issues or concerns of the Secretary with respect to such results;
a plan for addressing any deficiencies and carrying out any corrective actions identified in such report; and
short-term and long-term strategies for preserving the capability of the Air Force to conduct close air support, combat search and rescue, and forward air controller airborne missions.
Special rule
Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary of the Air Force may carry out the transition of the A–10 unit at Fort Wayne Air National Guard Base, Indiana, to an F–16 unit as described by the Secretary in the Force Structure Actions map submitted in support of the budget of the President for fiscal year 2017 (as submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code).
Subsections (a) through (e) shall apply with respect to any A–10 aircraft affected by the transition described in paragraph (1).
Limitation on availability of funds for destruction of A–10 aircraft in storage status
Limitation
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the Air Force for fiscal year 2017 or any fiscal year thereafter may be obligated or expended to scrap, destroy, or otherwise dispose of any potential donor A–10 aircraft until the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional defense committees the report required under section 134(e)(2).
Notification and certification
Not later than 45 days before taking any action to scrap, destroy, or otherwise dispose of any A–10 aircraft in any storage status in the 309th Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group, the Secretary of the Air Force shall—
notify the congressional defense committees of the intent of the Secretary to take such action; and
certify that the A–10 aircraft subject to such action does not have serviceable wings or other components that could be used to prevent the permanent removal of any active inventory A–10 aircraft from flyable status.
Plan to prevent removal A–10 aircraft from flyable status
The Secretary of the Air Force shall—
include with the materials submitted to Congress in support of the budget of the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2018 (as submitted with the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code) a plan to prevent the permanent removal of any active inventory A–10 aircraft from flyable status due to unserviceable wings or any other required component during the period covered by the future years defense plan submitted to Congress under section 221 of title 10, United States Code; and
carry out such plan to prevent the permanent removal of any active inventory A–10 aircraft from flyable status.
Potential donor A–10 aircraft defined
In this section, the term potential donor A–10 aircraft
means any A–10 aircraft in any storage status in the 309th Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group that has serviceable wings or other components that could be used to prevent any active inventory A–10 aircraft from being permanently removed from flyable status due to unserviceable wings or other components.
Prohibition on availability of funds for retirement of Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System aircraft
Prohibition
Except as provided by subsection (b) and in addition to the prohibition under section 144 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 758), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2018 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to retire, or prepare to retire, any Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System aircraft.
Exception
The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not apply to individual Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System aircraft that the Secretary of the Air Force determines, on a case-by-case basis, to be non-operational because of mishaps, other damage, or being uneconomical to repair.
Elimination of annual report on aircraft inventory
Section 231a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
by striking subsection (e); and
by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (e).
Defense-wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters
Standardization of 5.56mm rifle ammunition
Report
If, on the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Army and the Marine Corps are using in combat two different types of enhanced 5.56mm rifle ammunition, the Secretary of Defense shall, on such date, submit to the congressional defense committees a report explaining the reasons that the Army and the Marine Corps are using different types of such ammunition.
Standardization requirement
Except as provided in subsection (c), not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the Army and the Marine Corps are using in combat one standard type of enhanced 5.56mm rifle ammunition.
Exception
Subsection (b) shall not apply in a case in which the Secretary of Defense—
determines that a state of emergency requires the Army and the Marine Corps to use in combat different types of enhanced 5.56mm rifle ammunition; and
certifies to the congressional defense committees that such a determination has been made.
Fire suppressant and fuel containment standards for certain vehicles
Guidance required
The Secretary of the Army shall issue guidance regarding fire suppressant and fuel containment standards for covered vehicles of the Army.
The Secretary of the Navy shall issue guidance regarding fire suppressant and fuel containment standards for covered vehicles of the Marine Corps.
Elements
The guidance regarding fire suppressant and fuel containment standards issued pursuant to subsection (a) shall—
meet the survivability requirements applicable to each class of covered vehicles;
include standards for vehicle armor, vehicle fire suppression systems, and fuel containment technologies in covered vehicles; and
balance cost, survivability, and mobility.
Report to congress
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Navy shall each submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes—
the policy guidance established pursuant to subsection (a), set forth separately for each class of covered vehicle; and
any other information the Secretaries determine to be appropriate.
Covered vehicles
In this section, the term covered vehicles
means ground vehicles acquired on or after October 1, 2018, under a major defense acquisition program (as such term is defined in section 2430 of title 10, United States Code), including light tactical vehicles, medium tactical vehicles, heavy tactical vehicles, and ground combat vehicles.
Limitation on availability of funds for destruction of certain cluster munitions
Limitation
Except as provided in subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended for the destruction of cluster munitions until the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits the report required by subsection (c).
Exception for safety
The limitation under subsection (a) shall not apply to the destruction of cluster munitions that the Secretary determines—
are unserviceable as a result of an inspection, test, field incident, or other significant failure to meet performance or logistics requirements; or
are unsafe or could pose a safety risk if not demilitarized or destroyed.
Report required
In general
Not later than March 1, 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes each of the following elements:
A description of the policy of the Department of Defense regarding the use of cluster munitions, including an explanation of the process through which commanders may seek waivers to use such munitions.
A 10-year projection of the requirements and inventory levels for all cluster munitions that takes into account future production of cluster munitions, any plans for demilitarization of such munitions, any plans for the recapitalization of such munitions, the age of the munitions, storage and safety considerations, and other factors that will affect the size of the inventory.
A 10-year projection for the cost to achieve the inventory levels projected in subparagraph (B), including the cost for potential demilitarization or disposal of such munitions.
A 10-year projection for the cost to develop and produce new cluster munitions that comply with the Memorandum of the Secretary of Defense dated June 19, 2008, regarding the Department of Defense policy on cluster munitions and unintended harm to civilians that the Secretary determines are necessary to meet the demands of current operational plans.
An assessment, by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, of the effects of the projected cluster inventory on operational plans.
Any other matters that the Secretary determines should be included in the report.
Form of report
The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
Cluster munitions defined
In this section, the term cluster munitions
includes systems delivered by aircraft, cruise missiles, artillery, mortars, missiles, tanks, rocket launchers, or naval guns that deploy payloads of explosive submunitions that detonate via target acquisition, impact, or altitude, or that self-destruct.
Report on Department of Defense munitions strategy for the combatant commands
Report required
Not later than April 1, 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the munitions strategy for the combatant commands for the six-year period beginning on January 1, 2017.
Elements
The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
For each year covered by the report, an identification of the munitions requirements of the combatant commands, including—
plans, programming, and budgeting for each type of munition; and
the inventory of each type of munition.
An assessment of any gaps and shortfalls with respect to munitions determined to be essential to the ability of the combatant commands to fulfill mission requirements.
An assessment of how current and planned munitions programs may affect operational concepts and capabilities of the combatant commands.
An identification of limitations in relevant industrial bases and a description of necessary munitions investments.
An assessment of how munitions capability and capacity may be affected by changes consistent with the memorandum of the Secretary of Defense dated June 19, 2008, regarding the policy of the Department of Defense on cluster munitions and unintended harm to civilians.
Any other matters the Secretary determines appropriate.
Modifications to reporting on use of combat mission requirements funds
Section 123 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4158; 10 U.S.C. 167 note) is amended—
in the section heading, by striking Quarterly
and inserting Annual
;
in the subsection heading of subsection (a), by striking Quarterly
and inserting Annual
; and
by striking quarter
each place it appears and inserting year
.
Report on alternative management structures for the F–35 joint strike fighter program
In general
Not later than March 31, 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on potential alternative management structures for the F–35 joint strike fighter program.
Elements
The report under subsection (a) shall include the following:
An analysis of potential alternative management structures for the F–35 joint strike fighter program, including—
continuation of the joint program office for the program;
the establishment of separate program offices for the program in the Department of the Air Force and the Department of the Navy;
the establishment of separate program offices for each variant of the F–35A, F–35B, and F–35C;
division of responsibilities for the program between a joint program office and the military departments; and
such other alternative management structures as the Secretary determines to be appropriate.
An evaluation of the benefits and drawbacks of each alternative management structure analyzed in the report with respect to—
cost;
alignment of responsibility and accountability; and
the adequacy of representation from military departments and program partners.
Form
The report under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
Comptroller General review of F–35 Lightning II aircraft sustainment support
Review
Not later than September 30, 2017, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the sustainment support structure for the F–35 Lightning II aircraft program.
Elements
The review under subsection (a) shall include, with respect to the F–35 Lightning II aircraft program, the following:
The status of the sustainment support strategy for the program, including goals for personnel training, required infrastructure, and fleet readiness.
Approaches, including performance-based logistics, considered in developing the sustainment support strategy for the program.
Other information regarding sustainment and logistics support for the program that the Comptroller General determines to be of critical importance to the long-term viability of the program.
Briefing on acquisition strategy for Ground Mobility Vehicle
Briefing required
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, in consultation with the Secretary of the Army, shall provide a briefing to the congressional defense committees on the acquisition strategy for the Ground Mobility Vehicle for use with the Global Response Force of the 82nd Airborne Division.
Elements
The briefing under subsection (a) shall include an assessment of the following:
The feasability of acquiring the Ground Mobility Vehicle—
as a commercially available off-the-shelf item (as such term is defined in section 104 of title 41, United States Code); or
as a modified version of such an item.
Whether acquiring the Ground Mobility Vehicle in a manner described in paragraph (1) would satisfy the requirements of the program and reduce the life-cycle cost of the program.
Whether the acquisition strategy for the Ground Mobility Vehicle meets the focus areas specified in the most recent version of the Better Buying Power initiative of the Secretary of Defense.
Whether including an active safety system in the Ground Mobility Vehicle, such as the electronic stability control system used on the joint light tactical vehicle, would reduce the risk of vehicle rollover.
Study and report on optimal mix of aircraft capabilities for the Armed Forces
Study
In general
The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a study to determine—
an optimal mix of short-range fighter-class strike aircraft and long-range strike aircraft for the use of the Armed Forces during the covered period;
an optimal mix of manned aerial platforms and unmanned aerial platforms for the use of the Armed Forces during such period; and
an optimal mix of other aircraft and capabilities for the use of the Armed Forces during such period, including—
long-range, medium-range, and short-range intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, or strike aircraft, or combination of such aircraft;
aircraft with varying observability characteristics;
land-based and sea-based aircraft;
advanced legacy fourth-generation aircraft platforms of proven design;
next generation air superiority capabilities; and
advanced technology innovations.
Considerations
In making the determinations under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall consider defense strategy, critical assumptions, priorities, force size, and cost.
Report
In general
Not later than April 14, 2017, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes the following:
The results of the study conducted under subsection (a).
A discussion of the specific assumptions, observations, conclusions, and recommendations of the study.
A description of the modeling and analysis techniques used for the study.
A plan for fielding complementary aircraft and capabilities identified as an optimal mix in the study under subsection (a).
A plan to meet objectives and fulfill the warfighting capability and capacity requirements of the combatant commands using the aircraft and capabilities described in subsection (a).
Form
The report under paragraph (1) may be submitted in classified form, but shall include an unclassified executive summary.
Nonduplication of effort
If any information required under paragraph (1) has been included in another report or notification previously submitted to any of the appropriate congressional committees by law, the Secretary may provide a list of such reports and notifications at the time of submitting the report required under such paragraph instead of including such information in such report.
Definitions
ln this subsection:
The term appropriate congressional committees
means the congressional defense committees, the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.
The term covered period
means the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on January 1, 2030.
Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation
Subtitle A—Authorization of appropriations
Sec. 201. Authorization of appropriations.
Subtitle B—Program requirements, restrictions, and limitations
Sec. 211. Laboratory quality enhancement program.
Sec. 212. Modification of mechanisms to provide funds for defense laboratories for research and development of technologies for military missions.
Sec. 213. Making permanent authority for defense research and development rapid innovation program.
Sec. 214. Authorization for National Defense University and Defense Acquisition University to enter into cooperative research and development agreements.
Sec. 215. Manufacturing Engineering Education Grant Program.
Sec. 216. Notification requirement for certain rapid prototyping, experimentation, and demonstration activities.
Sec. 217. Increased micro-purchase threshold for research programs and entities.
Sec. 218. Improved biosafety for handling of select agents and toxins.
Sec. 219. Designation of Department of Defense senior official with principal responsibility for directed energy weapons.
Sec. 220. Restructuring of the distributed common ground system of the Army.
Sec. 221. Limitation on availability of funds for the countering weapons of mass destruction system Constellation.
Sec. 222. Limitation on availability of funds for Defense Innovation Unit Experimental.
Sec. 223. Limitation on availability of funds for Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System (JSTARS) recapitalization program.
Sec. 224. Acquisition program baseline and annual reports on follow-on modernization program for F–35 Joint Strike Fighter.
Subtitle C—Reports and other matters
Sec. 231. Strategy for assured access to trusted microelectronics.
Sec. 232. Pilot program on evaluation of commercial information technology.
Sec. 233. Pilot program for the enhancement of the research, development, test, and evaluation centers of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 234. Pilot program on modernization and fielding of electromagnetic spectrum warfare systems and electronic warfare capabilities.
Sec. 235. Pilot program on disclosure of certain sensitive information to federally funded research and development centers.
Sec. 236. Pilot program on enhanced interaction between the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and the service academies.
Sec. 237. Independent review of F/A–18 physiological episodes and corrective actions.
Sec. 238. B–21 bomber development program accountability matrices.
Sec. 239. Study on helicopter crash prevention and mitigation technology.
Sec. 240. Strategy for Improving Electronic and Electromagnetic Spectrum Warfare Capabilities.
Sec. 241. Sense of Congress on development and fielding of fifth generation airborne systems.
Authorization of appropriations
Authorization of appropriations
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2017 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation, as specified in the funding table in section 4201.
Program requirements, restrictions, and limitations
Laboratory quality enhancement program
In general
The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, shall carry out a program to be known as the Laboratory Quality Enhancement Program
under which the Secretary shall establish the panels described in subsection (b) and direct such panels—
to review and make recommendations to the Secretary with respect to—
existing policies and practices affecting the science and technology reinvention laboratories to improve the mission effectiveness of such laboratories; and
new initiatives proposed by the science and technology reinvention laboratories;
to support implementation of current and future initiatives affecting the science and technology reinvention laboratories; and
to conduct assessments or data analysis on such other issues as the Secretary determines to be appropriate.
Panels
The panels described in this subsection are:
A panel on personnel, workforce development, and talent management.
A panel on facilities, equipment, and infrastructure.
A panel on research strategy, technology transfer, and industry and university partnerships.
A panel on governance and oversight processes.
Composition of panels
Each panel described in paragraphs (1) through (3) of subsection (b) may be composed of subject matter and technical management experts from—
laboratories and research centers of the Army, Navy, and Air Force;
appropriate Defense Agencies;
the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering; and
such other entities as the Secretary determines to be appropriate.
The panel described in subsection (b)(4) shall be composed of—
the Director of the Army Research Laboratory;
the Director of the Air Force Research Laboratory;
the Director of the Naval Research Laboratory;
the Director of the Engineer Research and Development Center of the Army Corps of Engineers; and
such other members as the Secretary determines to be appropriate.
Governance of panels
The chairperson of each panel shall be selected by its members.
Each panel, in coordination with the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, shall transmit to the Science and Technology Executive Committee of the Department of Defense such information or findings on topics requiring decision or approval as the panel considers appropriate.
Discharge of certain authorities to conduct personnel demonstration projects
Subparagraph (C) of section 342(b)(3) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995 (Public Law 103–337; 108 Stat. 2721), as added by section 1114(a) of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 114 Stat. 1654A–315), is amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: through the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering (who shall place an emphasis in the exercise of such authorities on enhancing efficient operations of the laboratory and who may, in exercising such authorities, request administrative support from science and technology reinvention laboratories to review, research, and adjudicate personnel demonstration project proposals)
.
Science and technology reinvention laboratory defined
In this section, the term science and technology reinvention laboratory means a science and technology reinvention laboratory designated under section 1105 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note), as amended.
Modification of mechanisms to provide funds for defense laboratories for research and development of technologies for military missions
Amount authorized under current mechanism
Paragraph (1) of subsection (a) of section 219 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended in the matter before subparagraph (A) by striking not more than three percent
and inserting not less than two percent and not more than four percent
.
Additional mechanism to provide funds
Such subsection is further amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
Fee
After consultation with the science and technology executive of the military department concerned, the director of a defense laboratory may charge customer activities a fixed percentage fee, in addition to normal costs of performance, in order to obtain funds to carry out activities authorized by this subsection. The fixed fee may not exceed four percent of costs.
.
Modification of cost limit compliance for infrastructure projects
Subsection (b)(4) of such section is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
Section 2802 of such title, with respect to construction projects that exceed the cost specified in subsection (a)(2) of section 2805 of such title for certain unspecified minor military construction projects for laboratories.
.
Repeal of sunset
Such section is amended by striking subsection (d).
Making permanent authority for defense research and development rapid innovation program
Section 1073 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 2359 note) is amended—
in subsection (d), by striking for each of fiscal years 2011 through 2023 may be used for any such fiscal year
and inserting for a fiscal year may be used for such fiscal year
; and
by striking subsection (f).
Authorization for National Defense University and Defense Acquisition University to enter into cooperative research and development agreements
National Defense University
Section 2165 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
Cooperative research and development agreements
In engaging in research and development projects pursuant to subsection (a) of section 2358 of this title by a contract, cooperative agreement, or grant pursuant to subsection (b)(1) of such section, the Secretary may enter into such contract or cooperative agreement or award such grant through the National Defense University.
The National Defense University shall be considered a Government-operated Federal laboratory for purposes of section 12 of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3710a).
.
Defense Acquisition University
Section 1746 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
Cooperative research and development agreements
In engaging in research and development projects pursuant to subsection (a) of section 2358 of this title by a contract, cooperative agreement, or grant pursuant to subsection (b)(1) of such section, the Secretary may enter into such contract or cooperative agreement or award such grant through the Defense Acquisition University.
The Defense Acquisition University shall be considered a Government-operated Federal laboratory for purposes of section 12 of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3710a).
.
Manufacturing Engineering Education Grant Program
Section 2196 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
Manufacturing engineering education program
Establishment of Manufacturing Engineering Education Program
The Secretary of Defense shall establish a program under which the Secretary makes grants or other awards to support—
the enhancement of existing programs in manufacturing engineering education to further a mission of the department; or
the establishment of new programs in manufacturing engineering education that meet such requirements.
Grants and awards under this section may be made to industry, not-for-profit institutions, institutions of higher education, or to consortia of such institutions or industry.
The Secretary shall establish the program in consultation with the Secretary of Education, the Director of the National Science Foundation, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, and the secretaries of such other relevant Federal agencies as the Secretary considers appropriate.
The Secretary shall ensure that the program is coordinated with Department programs associated with advanced manufacturing.
The program shall be known as the Manufacturing Engineering Education Program
.
Geographical distribution of grants and awards
In awarding grants and other awards under this subsection, the Secretary shall, to the maximum extent practicable, avoid geographical concentration of awards.
Covered programs
A program of engineering education supported pursuant to this section shall meet the requirements of this section.
Components of program
The program of education for which such a grant is made shall be a consolidated and integrated multidisciplinary program of education with an emphasis on the following components:
Multidisciplinary instruction that encompasses the total manufacturing engineering enterprise and that may include—
manufacturing engineering education and training through classroom activities, laboratory activities, thesis projects, individual or team projects, internships, cooperative work-study programs, and interactions with industrial facilities, consortia, or such other activities and organizations in the United States and foreign countries as the Secretary considers appropriate;
faculty development programs;
recruitment of educators highly qualified in manufacturing engineering to teach or develop manufacturing engineering courses;
presentation of seminars, workshops, and training for the development of specific manufacturing engineering skills;
activities involving interaction between students and industry, including programs for visiting scholars, personnel exchange, or industry executives;
development of new, or updating and modification of existing, manufacturing curriculum, course offerings, and education programs;
establishment of programs in manufacturing workforce training;
establishment of joint manufacturing engineering programs with defense laboratories and depots; and
expansion of manufacturing training and education programs and outreach for members of the armed forces, dependents and children of such members, veterans, and employees of the Department of Defense.
Opportunities for students to obtain work experience in manufacturing through such activities as internships, summer job placements, or cooperative work-study programs.
Faculty and student engagement with industry that is directly related to, and supportive of, the education of students in manufacturing engineering because of—
the increased understanding of manufacturing engineering challenges and potential solutions; and
the enhanced quality and effectiveness of the instruction that result from that increased understanding.
Proposals
The Secretary of Defense shall solicit proposals for grants and other awards to be made pursuant to this section for the support of programs of manufacturing engineering education that are consistent with the purposes of this section.
Merit competition
Applications for awards shall be evaluated on the basis of merit pursuant to competitive procedures prescribed by the Secretary.
Selection criteria
The Secretary may select a proposal for an award pursuant to this section if the proposal, at a minimum, does each of the following:
Contains innovative approaches for improving engineering education in manufacturing technology.
Demonstrates a strong commitment by the proponents to apply the resources necessary to achieve the objectives for which the award is to be made.
Provides for effective engagement with industry or government organizations that supports the instruction to be provided in the proposed program and is likely to improve manufacturing engineering and technology.
Demonstrates a significant level of involvement of United States industry in the proposed instructional and research activities.
Is likely to attract superior students and promote careers in manufacturing engineering.
Proposes to involve fully qualified personnel who are experienced in manufacturing engineering education and technology.
Proposes a program that, within three years after the award is made, is likely to attract from sources other than the Federal Government the financial and other support necessary to sustain such program.
Proposes to achieve a significant level of participation by women, members of minority groups, and individuals with disabilities through active recruitment of students from among such persons.
Trains students in advanced manufacturing and in relevant emerging technologies and production processes.
Institution of higher education defined
In this section, the term institution of higher education has the meaning given such term in section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001(a)).
.
Notification requirement for certain rapid prototyping, experimentation, and demonstration activities
Notice required
The Secretary of the Navy shall not initiate a covered activity until a period of 10 business days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees the notice described in subsection (b) with respect to such activity.
Elements of notice
The notice described in this subsection is a written notice of the intention of the Secretary to initiate a covered activity. Each such notice shall include the following:
A description of the activity.
Estimated costs and funding sources for the activity, including a description of any cost-sharing or in-kind support arrangements with other participants.
A description of any transition agreement, including the identity of any partner organization that may receive the results of the covered activity under such an agreement.
Identification of major milestones and the anticipated date of completion of the activity.
Covered activity
In this section, the term covered activity means a rapid prototyping, experimentation, or demonstration activity carried out under program element 0603382N.
Sunset
The requirements of this section shall terminate five years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
Increased micro-purchase threshold for research programs and entities
Increased micro-purchase threshold for basic research programs and activities of the Department of Defense science and technology reinvention laboratories
In general
Chapter 137 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 821(a), is further amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Micro-purchase threshold for basic research programs and activities of the Department of Defense science and technology reinvention laboratories
Notwithstanding subsection (a) of section 1902 of title 41, the micro-purchase threshold for the Department of Defense for purposes of such section is $10,000 for purposes of basic research programs and for the activities of the Department of Defense science and technology reinvention laboratories.
.
Clerical amendment
The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter, as amended by section 821b, is further amended by adding at the end the following new item:
2339. Micro-purchase threshold for basic research programs and activities of the Department of Defense science and technology reinvention laboratories.
.
Increased micro-purchase threshold for universities, independent research institutes, and nonprofit research organizations
Section 1902 of title 41, United States Code, is amended—
in subsection (a)—
by striking For purposes
and inserting (1) Except as provided in sections 2338 and 2339 of title 10 and paragraph (2) of this subsection, for purposes
; and
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
For purposes of this section, the micro-purchase threshold for procurement activities administered under sections 6303 through 6305 of title 31 by institutions of higher education (as defined in section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001(a)), or related or affiliated nonprofit entities, or by nonprofit research organizations or independent research institutes is—
$10,000; or
such higher threshold as determined appropriate by the head of the relevant executive agency and consistent with clean audit findings under chapter 75 of title 31, internal institutional risk assessment, or State law.
; and
in subsections (d) and (e), by striking not greater than $3,000
and inserting with a price not greater than the micro-purchase threshold
.
Improved biosafety for handling of select agents and toxins
Quality control and quality assurance program
The Secretary of Defense, acting through the executive agent for the biological select agent and toxin biosafety program of the Department of Defense, shall carry out a program to implement certain quality control and quality assurance measures at each covered facility.
Quality control and quality assurance measures
Subject to subsection (c), the quality control and quality assurance measures implemented at each covered facility under subsection (a) shall include the following:
Designation of an external manager to oversee quality assurance and quality control.
Environmental sampling and inspection.
Production procedures that prohibit operations where live biological select agents and toxins are used in the same laboratory where viability testing is conducted.
Production procedures that prohibit work on multiple organisms or multiple strains of one organism within the same biosafety cabinet.
A video surveillance program that uses video monitoring as a tool to improve laboratory practices in accordance with regulatory requirements.
Formal, recurring data reviews of production in an effort to identify data trends and nonconformance issues before such issues affect end products.
Validated protocols for production processes to ensure that process deviations are adequately vetted prior to implementation.
Maintenance and calibration procedures and schedules for all tools, equipment, and irradiators.
Waiver
In carrying out the program under subsection (a), the Secretary may waive any of the quality control and quality assurance measures required under subsection (b) in the interest of national defense.
Study and report required
Study
The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a study to evaluate—
the feasibility of consolidating covered facilities within a unified command to minimize risk;
opportunities to partner with industry for the production of biological select agents and toxins and related services in lieu of maintaining such capabilities within the Department of the Army; and
whether operations under the biological select agent and toxin production program should be transferred to another government or commercial laboratory that may be better suited to execute production for non-Department of Defense customers.
Report
Not later than February 1, 2017, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the results of the study under paragraph (1).
Comptroller general review
Not later than September 1, 2017, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the following:
A review of—
the actions taken by the Department of Defense to address the findings and recommendations of the report of the Department of the Army titled Individual and Institutional Accountability for the Shipment of Viable Bacillus Anthracis from Dugway Proving Grounds
, dated December 15, 2015, including any actions taken to address the culture of complacency in the biological select agent and toxin production program identified in such report; and
the progress of the Secretary in carrying out the program under subsection (a).
An analysis of the study and report under subsection (d).
Definitions
In this section:
The term biological select agent and toxin means any agent or toxin identified under—
section 331.3 of title 7, Code of Federal Regulations;
section 121.3 or section 121.4 of title 9, Code of Federal Regulations; or
section 73.3 or section 73.4 of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations.
The term covered facility means any facility of the Department of Defense that produces biological select agents and toxins.
Designation of Department of Defense senior official with principal responsibility for directed energy weapons
Designation of senior official
In general
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall designate a senior official already serving within the Department of Defense as the official with principal responsibility for the development and demonstration of directed energy weapons for the Department.
Development of strategic plan
In general
The senior official designated under paragraph (1) shall develop a detailed strategic plan to develop, mature, and transition directed energy technologies to acquisition programs of record.
Roadmap
Such strategic plan shall include a strategic roadmap for the development and fielding of directed energy weapons and key enabling capabilities for the Department, identifying and coordinating efforts across military departments to achieve overall joint mission effectiveness.
Acceleration of development and fielding of directed energy weapons capabilities
In general
To the degree practicable, the senior official designated under paragraph (1) shall use the flexibility of the policies of the Department in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act, or any successor policies, to accelerate the development and fielding of directed energy capabilities.
Engagement
The Secretary shall use the flexibility of the policies of the Department in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act, or any successor policies, to ensure engagement with defense and private industries, research universities, and unaffiliated, nonprofit research institutions.
Advice for exercises and demonstrations
The senior official designated under paragraph (1) shall, to the degree practicable, provide technical advice and support to entities in the Department of Defense and the military departments conducting exercises or demonstrations with the purpose of improving the capabilities of or operational viability of technical capabilities supporting directed energy weapons, including supporting military utility assessments of the relevant cost and benefits of directed energy weapon systems.
Support for development of requirements
The senior official designated under paragraph (1) shall coordinate with the military departments, Defense Agencies, and the Joint Directed Energy Transition Office to define requirements for directed energy capabilities that address the highest priority warfighting capability gaps of the Department.
Availability of information
The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the senior official designated under paragraph (1) has access to such information on programs and activities of the military departments and other defense agencies as the Secretary considers appropriate to coordinate departmental directed energy efforts.
Joint Directed Energy Transition Office
Redesignation
The High Energy Laser Joint Technology Office of the Department of Defense is hereby redesignated as the Joint Directed Energy Transition Office
(in this subsection referred to as the Office
), and shall report to the official designated under subsection (a)(1).
Additional functions
In addition to the functions and duties of the Office in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act, the Office shall assist the senior official designated under paragraph (1) of subsection (a) in carrying out paragraphs (2) through (5) of such subsection.
Funding
The Secretary may make available such funds to the Office for basic research, applied research, advanced technology development, prototyping, studies and analyses, and organizational support as the Secretary considers appropriate to support the efficient and effective development of directed energy systems and technologies and transition of those systems and technologies into acquisition programs or operational use.
Restructuring of the distributed common ground system of the Army
In general
Not later that April 1, 2017, the Secretary of the Army shall restructure versions of the distributed common ground system of the Army after Increment 1—
by discontinuing development of new software code, excluding the configuration and testing of system interfaces to commercial, open source, and existing Government off the shelf (GOTS) software, of any component of the system for which there is commercial, open source, or Government off the shelf software that is capable of fulfilling at least 80 percent of the system requirements applicable to such component; and
by conducting a review of the acquisition strategy of the program to ensure that procurement of commercial software is the preferred method of meeting program requirements for major system components.
Limitation
The Secretary of the Army shall not award any contract for the development of new component software capability for the distributed common ground system of the Army if such a capability is already a commercial item or open source, except for configuration of capabilities that are incidental to and necessary for the proper functioning of the system.
Report required
Requirement
Not later than March 1, 2018, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics, in consultation with the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the Increment 2 of the distributed common ground system of the Army.
Elements of report
The report required by paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum, the following:
The overall assessment of the system and each individual major component of the system.
The status of alignment with the Intelligence Community Information Technology Enterprise (IC-ITE).
The ease of use of Increment 2 as compared with Increment 1 for operators in deployed environments.
The extent to which a common, synchronized view of all system data is globally available to all system users, at all times.
The level of maturity of the technologies underlying core system components and application programming interfaces.
The extent to which program operators can move data seamlessly between different components of the system.
Limitation on availability of funds for the countering weapons of mass destruction system Constellation
Limitation
Not more than 50 percent of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the countering weapons of mass destruction situational awareness information system commonly known as Constellation
may be obligated or expended for research, development, or prototyping for such system until the report required by subsection (b)(4) has been delivered to the congressional defense committees.
Independent review and assessment
In general
The Secretary of Defense shall provide for an independent review and assessment of the requirements and implementation for research, development, and prototyping for the Constellation system prior to a Milestone A decision or other operational use.
Elements of independent review
The independent review provided for under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
A review of the major software components of the system and an explanation of the requirements of the Department of Defense with respect to each such component.
A review of the requirements validated in the Information System Initial Capabilities Document (ISICD) and capability gaps identified for duplication and redundancy with other validated information technology requirements and capability gaps.
Identification of elements and applications of the system that cannot be implemented using the existing technical infrastructure and tools of the Department of Defense or the infrastructure and tools in development.
An overview of a security plan to achieve an accredited cross-domain solution system, including security milestones and proposed security architecture to mitigate both insider and outsider threats.
Identification of the planned categories of end-users of the system, linked to organizations, mission requirements, and concept of operations, the expected total number of end-users, and the associated permissions granted to such users.
Entity conducting independent review and assessment
The Secretary shall ensure that—
the independent review and assessment provided for under paragraph (1) is conducted by a federally funded research and development center selected (or entered into an arrangement with) by the Secretary or such other entity as the Secretary considers appropriate; and
such center or entity provides periodic updates to the congressional defense committees on such independent review and assessment prior to the completion of the independent review and assessment.
Report on independent review and assessment
The Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing—
the findings of the center or entity selected (or entered into an arrangement with) under paragraph (3)(A) with respect to the independent review and assessment conducted by such center or entity pursuant to such paragraph; and
an assessment of the need to continue Constellation research, development, and prototyping.
Limitation on availability of funds for Defense Innovation Unit Experimental
Limitation
Operation and maintenance
Of the funds specified in subsection (c)(1), not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees the report under subsection (b).
Research, development, test, and evaluation
Of the funds specified in subsection (c)(2), not more than 25 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees the report under subsection (b).
Report required
The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the Defense Innovation Unit Experimental. Such report shall include the following:
The charter and mission statement of the Unit.
A description of—
the management and operations of the Unit, including—
the governance structure of the Unit;
the process for coordinating and deconflicting the activities of the Unit with similar activities of the Small Business Innovation Research Program, military departments, Defense Agencies, and other departments and agencies of the Federal Government, including activities carried out by In-Q-Tel, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, and Department of Defense laboratories;
the direct staffing requirements of the Unit, including a description of the desired skills and expertise of such staff at each location;
the number of civilian and military personnel provided by the military departments and Defense Agencies to support the Unit; and
any planned expansion to new sites, the metrics used to identify such sites, and an explanation of how such expansion will provide access to innovations of nontraditional defense contractors (as such term is defined in section 2302 of title 10, United States Code) that are not otherwise accessible; and
policies and practices that will enable the Unit to best support Department of Defense missions, including—
the metrics used to measure the effectiveness of the Unit;
how compliance with Department of Defense or Federal Government requirements could affect the ability of nontraditional defense contractors (as such term is defined in section 2302 of title 10, United States Code) to market products and obtain funding;
how to treat intellectual property that has been developed with little or no government funding;
detailed justification for the expansion of the mission of the Unit, including authority to use research and development agreements, contracts, and merit-based prize competitions to explore emerging technologies and additional physical locations;
a description of how existing Department of Defense agencies, services, entities, and other elements are authorized to better use streamlined acquisition procedures, research and development agreements, contracts, and merit-based prize competitions to explore emerging technologies, including modification of guidance and procedures to permit effective and streamlined implementation of authorities provided by Congress for rapid execution;
an account of the successes and failures of contracts already awarded by the unit;
recommendations on practices, policies, and authorities that will permit increased public-private partnership in financing and funding of research and technology development efforts; and
a description of technology transition strategies to ensure that research and technology programs funded by the Unit will be effectively and efficiently transitioned into operational use or acquisition programs, including a description of the role of Defense laboratories in such technology transition efforts.
Any other information the Secretary determines to be appropriate.
Funds specified
The funds specified in this subsection are as follows:
Funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for operation and maintenance, Defense-wide, for the Defense Innovation Unit Experimental.
Funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Defense-wide, for the Defense Innovation Unit Experimental.
Limitation on availability of funds for Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System (JSTARS) recapitalization program
In general
Except as provided in subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 or any other fiscal year for the Air Force may be made available for the Air Force’s Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System (JSTARS) recapitalization program unless the contract for engineering and manufacturing development uses a firm fixed-price contract structure.
National security waiver authority
The Secretary of Defense may waive the limitation in subsection (a) if the Secretary determines that such a waiver is in the national security interests of the United States.
Acquisition program baseline and annual reports on follow-on modernization program for F–35 Joint Strike Fighter
Limitation
The Secretary of Defense may not award any follow-on modernization development contracts for the F–35 Joint Strike Fighter until the Secretary has submitted the report required by subsection (b)(1) in accordance with such subsection.
Acquisition program baseline
In general
Not later than March 31, 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that contains the basic elements of an acquisition program baseline for Block 4 Modernization.
Elements
The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
Cost estimates for development, production, and modification.
Projected key schedule dates, including dates for the completion of—
a capabilities development document;
an independent cost estimate;
an initial preliminary design review;
a development contract award; and
a critical design review.
Technical performance parameters.
Technology readiness levels.
Annual funding profiles for development and procurement.
Review by Comptroller General of the United States
Not later than 60 days after the date on which the report required by subsection (b)(1) is submitted to the congressional defense committees in accordance with such subsection, the Comptroller General of the United States shall—
review such report; and
brief the congressional defense committees on the findings of the Comptroller General with respect to such review.
Annual reports by Secretary of Defense
Not later than one year after the date on which the Secretary awards a development contract for follow-on modernization of the F–35 Joint Strike Fighter and not less frequently than once each year thereafter until March 31, 2023, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the cost, schedule, and performance progress against the baseline set forth in the report submitted pursuant to subsection (b)(1).
Reports and other matters
Strategy for assured access to trusted microelectronics
Strategy
The Secretary of Defense shall develop a strategy to ensure that the Department of Defense has assured access to trusted microelectronics by not later than September 30, 2019.
Elements
The strategy under subsection (a) shall include the following:
Definitions of the various levels of trust required by classes of Department of Defense systems.
Means of classifying systems of the Department of Defense based on the level of trust such systems are required to maintain with respect to microelectronics.
Means by which trust in microelectronics can be assured.
Means to increase the supplier base for assured microelectronics to ensure multiple supply pathways.
An assessment of the microelectronics needs of the Department of Defense in future years, including the need for trusted, radiation-hardened microelectronics.
An assessment of the microelectronic needs of the Department of Defense that may not be fulfilled by entities outside the Department of Defense.
The resources required to assure access to trusted microelectronics, including infrastructure, workforce, and investments in science and technology.
A research and development strategy to ensure that the Department of Defense can, to the maximum extent practicable, use state of the art commercial microelectronics capabilities or their equivalent, while satisfying the needs for trust.
Recommendations for changes in authorities, regulations, and practices, including acquisition policies, financial management, public-private partnership policies, or in any other relevant areas, that would support the achievement of the goals of the strategy.
Submission and updates
Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees the strategy developed under subsection (a). The strategy shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
Not later than two years after submitting the strategy under paragraph (1) and not less frequently than once every two years thereafter until September 30, 2024, the Secretary shall update the strategy as the Secretary considers appropriate to support Department of Defense missions.
Directive required
Not later than September 30, 2019, the Secretary of Defense shall issue a directive for the Department of Defense describing how Department of Defense entities may access assured and trusted microelectronics supply chains for Department of Defense systems.
Report and certification
Not later than September 30, 2020, the Secretary of the Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees—
a report on—
the status of the implementation of the strategy developed under subsection (a);
the actions being taken to achieve full implementation of such strategy, and a timeline for such implementation; and
the status of the implementation of the directive required by subsection (d); and
a certification of whether the Department of Defense has an assured means for accessing a sufficient supply of trusted microelectronics, as required by the strategy developed under subsection (a).
Definitions
In this section:
The term assured refers, with respect to microelectronics, to the ability of the Department of Defense to guarantee availability of microelectronics parts at the necessary volumes and with the performance characteristics required to meet the needs of the Department of Defense.
The terms trust and trusted refer, with respect to microelectronics, to the ability of the Department of Defense to have confidence that the microelectronics function as intended and are free of exploitable vulnerabilities, either intentionally or unintentionally designed or inserted as part of the system at any time during its life cycle.
Pilot program on evaluation of commercial information technology
Pilot program
The Director of the Defense Information Systems Agency may carry out a pilot program to evaluate commercially available information technology tools to better understand the potential impact of such tools on networks and computing environments of the Department of Defense.
Activities
Activities under the pilot program may include the following:
Prototyping, experimentation, operational demonstration, military user assessments, and other means of obtaining quantitative and qualitative feedback on the commercial information technology products.
Engagement with the commercial information technology industry to—
forecast military requirements and technology needs; and
support the development of market strategies and program requirements before finalizing acquisition decisions and strategies.
Assessment of novel or innovative commercial technology for use by the Department of Defense.
Assessment of novel or innovative contracting mechanisms to speed delivery of capabilities to the Armed Forces.
Solicitation of operational user input to shape future information technology requirements of the Department of Defense.
Limitation on availability of funds
Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for research, development, test, and evaluation, Defense-wide, for each of fiscal years 2017 through 2022, not more than $15,000,000 may be expended on the pilot program in any such fiscal year.
Pilot program for the enhancement of the research, development, test, and evaluation centers of the Department of Defense
Pilot program required
In general
The Secretary of Defense and the secretaries of the military departments shall jointly carry out a pilot program to demonstrate methods for the more effective development of technology and management of functions at eligible centers.
Eligible centers
For purposes of the pilot program, the eligible centers are—
the science and technology reinvention laboratories, as specified in section 1105(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note);
the test and evaluation centers which are activities specified as part of the Major Range and Test Facility Base in Department of Defense Directive 3200.11; and
the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.
Selection
In general
The secretaries described in subsection (a) shall ensure that participation in the pilot program includes—
the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency; and
in accordance with paragraph (2)—
five additional eligible centers described in subparagraph (A) of subsection (a)(2) from each of the military departments; and
five additional eligible centers described in subparagraph (B) of such subsection from each of the military departments.
Selection procedures
The head of an eligible center described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of subsection (a)(2) seeking to participate in the pilot program shall submit to the appropriate reviewer an application therefor at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the appropriate reviewer shall specify.
Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, each appropriate reviewer shall—
evaluate each application received under subparagraph (A); and
approve or disapprove of the application.
If the head of an eligible center submits an application under subparagraph (A) in accordance with the requirements specified by the appropriate reviewer for purposes of such subparagraph and the appropriate reviewer neither approves nor disapproves such application pursuant to subparagraph (B)(ii) on or before the date that is 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, such eligible center shall be considered a participant in the pilot program.
For purposes of this paragraph, the appropriate reviewer is—
in the case of an eligible center described in subparagraph (A) of subsection (a)(2), the Laboratory Quality Enhancement Program; and
in the case of an eligible center described in subparagraph (B) of such subsection, the Director of the Test Resource Management Center.
Participation in program
In general
Subject to paragraph (2), the head of each eligible center selected under subsection (b)(1) shall propose and implement alternative and innovative methods of effective management and operations of eligible centers, rapid project delivery, support, experimentation, prototyping, and partnership with universities and private sector entities to—
generate greater value and efficiencies in research and development activities;
enable more efficient and effective operations of supporting activities, such as—
facility management, construction, and repair;
business operations;
personnel management policies and practices; and
intramural and public outreach; and
enable more rapid deployment of warfighter capabilities.
Implementation
The head of an eligible center described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of subsection (a)(2) shall implement each method proposed under paragraph (1) unless such method is disapproved in writing by the Assistant Secretary concerned within 60 days of receiving a proposal from an eligible center selected under subsection (b)(1) by such Assistant Secretary.
The Director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency shall implement each method proposed under paragraph (1) unless such method is disapproved in writing by the Chief Management Officer within 60 days of receiving a proposal from the Director.
In this paragraph, the term Assistant Secretary concerned means—
the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition, with respect to matters concerning the Air Force;
the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, with respect to matters concerning the Army; and
the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development, and Acquisition, with respect to matters concerning the Navy.
Waiver authority for demonstration and implementation
Until the termination of the pilot program under subsection (e), the head of an eligible center selected under subsection (b)(1) may waive any regulation, restriction, requirement, guidance, policy, procedure, or departmental instruction that would affect the implementation of a method proposed under subsection (c)(1), unless such implementation would be prohibited by a provision of a Federal statute or common law.
Termination
The pilot program shall terminate on September 30, 2022.
Report
In general
Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the pilot program.
Contents
The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
Identification of the eligible centers participating in the pilot program.
Identification of the eligible centers whose applications to participate in the pilot program were disapproved under subsection (b), including justifications for such disapprovals.
A description of the methods implemented pursuant to subsection (c).
A description of the methods that were proposed pursuant to paragraph (1) of subsection (c) but disapproved under paragraph (2) of such subsection.
An assessment of how methods implemented pursuant to subsection (c) have contributed to the objectives identified in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of paragraph (1) of such subsection.
Pilot program on modernization and fielding of electromagnetic spectrum warfare systems and electronic warfare capabilities
Pilot program
In general
The Secretary of Defense may carry out a pilot program on the modernization and fielding of electromagnetic spectrum warfare systems and electronic warfare systems.
Selection
If the Secretary carries out the pilot program under paragraph (1), the Electronic Warfare Executive Committee shall select from the list described in section 240(b)(4) a total of 10 electromagnetic spectrum warfare systems and electronic warfare systems across at least two military departments for modernization and fielding under the pilot program.
Termination
The pilot program authorized by subsection (a) shall terminate on September 30, 2023.
Funding
For the purposes of this pilot program, funds authorized to be appropriated for electromagnetic spectrum warfare and electronic warfare may be used for the development and fielding of electromagnetic spectrum warfare systems and electronic warfare capabilities.
Definitions
In this section:
The term electromagnetic spectrum warfare means electronic warfare that encompasses military communications and sensing operations that occur in the electromagnetic operational domain.
The term electronic warfare means military action involving the use of electromagnetic and directed energy to control the electromagnetic spectrum or to attack the enemy.
Pilot program on disclosure of certain sensitive information to federally funded research and development centers
In general
The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a pilot program on—
permitting officers and employees of the Department of Defense to disclose sensitive information to federally funded research and development centers of the Department for the sole purpose of the performance of administrative, technical, or professional services under and within the scope of the contracts with the parent organizations of such federally funded research and development centers; and
appropriately protecting proprietary information from unauthorized disclosure or use by such centers.
FFRDCs
The pilot program shall be carried out with one or more federally funded research and development centers of the Department selected by the Secretary for participation in the pilot program.
FFRDC personnel
Sensitive information may be disclosed to personnel of a federally funded research and development center under the pilot program only if such personnel and contractors agree to be subject to, and comply with, appropriate ethics standards and requirements applicable to Government personnel, including the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, section 1905 of title 18, United States Code, and chapter 21 of title 41, United States Code.
Conditions on disclosure
Sensitive information may be disclosed under the pilot program only if the federally funded research and development center concerned and its parent organization agree to and acknowledge in the parent organization's contract with the Department of Defense that—
sensitive information furnished to the federally funded research and development center will be accessed and used only for the purposes stated in the contract between the parent organization of the federally funded research and development center and the Department of Defense;
the federally funded research and development center will take all precautions necessary to prevent disclosure of the sensitive information furnished to anyone not authorized access to the information in order to perform the applicable contract;
sensitive information furnished under the pilot program shall not be used by the federally funded research and development center or parent organization to compete against a third party for a Government or non-Government contract or funding, or to support other current or future research or technology development activities performed by the federally funded research and development center; and
any personnel of a federally funded research and development center participating in the pilot program may not disclose or use any trade secrets or any nonpublic information accessed under the pilot program, unless specifically authorized by this section.
Duration
The pilot program may commence at any time after the review and issuance of policy guidance, updated appropriately, pertaining to the identification, mitigation, and prevention of potentially unfair competitive advantage conferred to federally funded research and development center personnel with access to sensitive information who serve as technical advisors to acquisition programs.
The pilot program shall terminate on the date that is three years after the date of the commencement of the pilot program.
Assessment
Not later than two years after the commencement of the pilot program, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the pilot program, including an assessment of the effectiveness of activities under the pilot program in improving acquisition processes and the effectiveness of protections of private-sector intellectual property in the course of such activities.
Sensitive information defined
In this section, the term sensitive information means confidential commercial, financial, or proprietary information, technical data, contract performance, contract performance evaluation, management, and administration data, or other privileged information owned by other contractors of the Department of Defense that is exempt from public disclosure under section 552(b)(4) of title 5, United States Code, or which would otherwise be prohibited from disclosure under section 1832 or 1905 of title 18, United States Code.
Pilot program on enhanced interaction between the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and the service academies
In general
The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, shall carry out a pilot program to enhance interaction between the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and the service academies to promote technology transition, education, and training in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields that are relevant to the Department of Defense.
Awards of funds
In carrying out the pilot program, the Secretary, acting through the Director, shall provide funds to contractors and grantees of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency in order to encourage such contractors and grantees to develop research partnerships with the service academies to support more efficient and effective technology transition of research programs and products.
It shall be the responsibility of the Director to ensure that such funds are used effectively and that sufficient efforts are made to build appropriate partnerships.
Service academy technology transition networks
In carrying out the pilot program, the Director shall prioritize the leveraging of—
the technology transition networks that service academies maintain among their academic departments and resident research centers; and
partnerships with Department of Defense laboratories, other Federal degree granting institutions, academia, and industry.
Termination
The authority to carry out the pilot program shall terminate on September 30, 2020.
Service academies defined
In this section, the term service academies means the following:
The United States Military Academy.
The United States Naval Academy.
Th United States Air Force Academy.
The United States Coast Guard Academy.
The United States Merchant Marine Academy.
Independent review of F/A–18 physiological episodes and corrective actions
Independent review required
The Secretary of the Navy shall conduct an independent review of the plans, programs, and research of the Department of the Navy with respect to—
physiological events affecting aircrew of the F/A–18 Hornet and the F/A–18 Super Hornet aircraft during the covered period; and
the efforts of the Navy and Marine Corps to prevent and mitigate the affects of such physiological events.
Conduct of review
In conducting the review under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Navy shall—
designate an appropriate senior official in the Office of the Secretary of the Navy to oversee the review; and
consult experts from outside the Department of Defense in appropriate technical and medical fields.
Review elements
The review under subsection (a) shall include an evaluation of—
any data of the Department of the Navy relating to the increased frequency of physiological events affecting aircrew of the F/A–18 Hornet and the F/A–18 Super Hornet aircraft during the covered period;
aircraft mishaps potentially related to such physiological events;
the cost and effectiveness of all material, operational, maintenance, and other measures carried out by the Department of the Navy to mitigate such physiological events during the covered period;
material, operational, maintenance, or other measures that may reduce the rate of such physiological events in the future; and
the performance of—
the onboard oxygen generation system in the F/A–18 Super Hornet;
the overall environmental control system in the F/A–18 Hornet and F/A–18 Super Hornet; and
other relevant subsystems of the F/A–18 Hornet and F/A–18 Super Hornet, as determined by the Secretary.
Report required
Not later than December 1, 2017, the Secretary of Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the results of the review under subsection (a).
Covered period
In this section, the term covered period
means the period beginning on January 1, 2009, and ending on the date of the submission of the report under subsection (d).
B–21 bomber development program accountability matrices
Submittal of matrices
Concurrent with the President's annual budget request submitted to Congress under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2018, the Secretary of the Air Forces shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the Comptroller General of the United States the matrices described in subsection (b) relating to the B–21 bomber aircraft program.
Matrices described
The matrices described in this subsection are the following:
EMD goals
A matrix that identifies, in six month increments, key milestones, development events, and specific performance goals for the EMD phase of the B–21 bomber aircraft program, which shall be subdivided, at a minimum, according to the following:
Technology readiness levels of major components and key demonstration events.
Design maturity.
Software maturity.
Manufacturing readiness levels for critical manufacturing operations and key demonstration events.
Manufacturing operations.
System verification and key flight test events.
Reliability.
Cost
A matrix expressing, in six month increments, the total cost for the Air Force service cost position for the EMD phase and low initial rate of production lots of the B–21 bomber aircraft and a matrix expressing the total cost for the prime contractor’s estimate for such EMD phase and production lots, both of which shall be phased over the entire EMD period and subdivided according to the costs of the following:
Air vehicle.
Propulsion.
Mission systems.
Vehicle subsystems.
Air vehicle software.
Systems engineering.
Program management.
System test and evaluation.
Support and training systems.
Contract fee.
Engineering changes.
Direct mission support, including Congressional General Reductions.
Government testing.
Semiannual update of matrices
In general
Not later than 180 days after the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits the matrices required by subsection (a), concurrent with the submittal of each annual budget request to Congress under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, thereafter, and not later than 180 days after each such submittal, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the Comptroller General of the United States updates to the matrices described in subsection (b).
Elements
Each update submitted under paragraph (1) shall detail progress made toward the goals identified in the matrix described in subsection (b)(1) and provide updated cost estimates.
Treatment of initial matrices as baseline
The matrices submitted pursuant to subsection (a) shall be treated as the baseline for the full EMD phase and low rate initial production of the B–21 bomber aircraft program for purposes of the updates submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) of this subsection.
Assessment by Comptroller General of the United States
Not later than the date that is 45 days after the date on which the Comptroller General of the United States receives an update to a matrix under subsection (d)(1), the Comptroller General shall review the sufficiency of such matrix and submit to the congressional defense committees an assessment of such matrix, including by identifying cost, schedule, or performance trends.
Study on helicopter crash prevention and mitigation technology
Study required
The Secretary of Defense shall seek to enter into a contract with a federally funded research and development center to conduct a study on technologies with the potential to prevent and mitigate helicopter crashes.
Elements
The study required under subsection (a) shall include the following:
Identification of technologies with the potential—
to prevent helicopter crashes (such as collision avoidance technologies and battle space and terrain situational awareness technologies); and
to improve survivability among individuals involved in such crashes (such as adaptive flight control technologies and improved energy absorbing technologies).
A cost-benefit analysis of each technology identified under paragraph (1) that takes into account the cost of developing and deploying the technology compared to the potential of the technology to prevent casualties or injuries.
A list that ranks the technologies identified under paragraph (1) based on—
the results of the cost-benefit analysis under paragraph (2); and
the readiness level of each technology.
An analysis of helicopter crashes that—
compares the casualty rates of cockpit occupants to the casualty rates of occupants of cargo compartments and troop seats; and
identifies the root causes of the casualties described in subparagraph (A).
Briefing
Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives (and the other congressional defense committees on request) a briefing that includes—
the results of the study required under subsection (a); and
the list described in subsection (b)(3).
Strategy for Improving Electronic and Electromagnetic Spectrum Warfare Capabilities
Strategy required
Not later than April 1, 2017, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics, acting through the Electronic Warfare Executive Committee, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a strategy on the electronic and electromagnetic spectrum warfare capabilities of the Department of Defense.
Elements
The strategy required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
A strategy for advancing and accelerating research, development, test, and evaluation, and fielding, of electronic warfare capabilities to meet current and projected requirements, including intra-service ground and air interoperabilities, as well as recommendations for streamlining acquisition processes with respect to such capabilities.
A methodology for synchronizing and overseeing electronic warfare strategies, operational concepts, and programs across the Department of Defense, including electronic warfare programs that support or enable cyber operations.
A description of the training and operational support required for fielding and sustaining current and planned investments in electronic warfare capabilities, including the requirements for conducting large-scale simulated exercises and training in contested electronic warfare environments.
A comprehensive list of investments of the Department of Defense in electronic warfare capabilities, including the capabilities to be developed, procured, or sustained in—
the budget of the President for fiscal year 2018 submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code; and
the future-years defense program submitted to Congress under section 221 of title 10, United States Code, for that fiscal year.
A description of the threat environment for electromagnetic spectrum for current and future warfare needs.
An assessment of progress on increasing interoperability between Services and Agencies, as well as increasing application of innovative electromagnetic spectrum warfighting methods and operational concepts that provide advantages within the electromagnetic spectrum operational domain.
Specific attributes needed in future electronic and electromagnetic spectrum warfare capabilities, such as networking, adaptability, agility, multifunctionality, and miniaturization, and progress toward incorporating such attributes in new electronic warfare systems.
Capability gaps with respect to asymmetric and near-peer adversaries identified pursuant to a capability gap assessment.
A joint strategy on achieving near real-time system adaption to rapidly advancing modern digital electronics.
Any other information the Secretary determines to be appropriate.
Form
The strategy required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
Electronic Warfare Executive Committee defined
In this section the term Electronic Warfare Executive Committee means the committee established on March 17, 2015, and chartered on August 11, 2015, by the Deputy Secretary of Defense to serve as the principal forum within the Department of Defense to inform, coordinate, and evaluate electronic warfare matters to maintain a strong technological advantage in United States capabilities.
Sense of Congress on development and fielding of fifth generation airborne systems
Findings
Congress makes the following findings:
The term fifth generation
, with respect to airborne systems, means those airborne systems capable of operating effectively in highly contested battle spaces defined by the most capable currently fielded threats, and those reasonably expected to be operational in the foreseeable future.
Continued modernization of Department of Defense airborne systems such as fighters, bombers, and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) aircraft with fifth generation capabilities is required because—
adversary integrated air defense systems (IADS) have created regions where fourth generation airborne systems may be limited in their ability to effectively operate;
adversary aircraft, air-to-air missiles, and airborne electronic attack or electronic protection systems are advancing beyond the capabilities of fourth generation airborne systems; and
fifth generation airborne systems provide a wider variety of options for a given warfighting challenge, preserve the technological advantage of the United States over near-peer threats, and serve as a force multiplier by increasing situational awareness and combat effectiveness of fourth generation airborne systems.
Sense of Congress
It is the sense of Congress that development and fielding of fifth generation airborne system systems should include the following:
Multispectral (radar, infrared, visual, emissions) low observable (LO) design features, self-protection jamming, and other capabilities that significantly delay or deny threat system detection, tracking, and engagement.
Integrated avionics that autonomously fuse and prioritize onboard multispectral sensors and offboard information data to provide an accurate realtime operating picture and data download for postmission exploitation and analysis.
Resilient communications, navigation, and identification techniques designed to effectively counter adversary attempts to deny or confuse friendly systems.
Robust and secure networks linking individual platforms to create a common, accurate, and highly integrated picture of the battle space for friendly forces.
Advanced onboard diagnostics capable of monitoring system health, accurately reporting system faults, and increasing overall system performance and reliability.
Integrated platform and subsystem designs to maximize lethality and survivability while enabling decision superiority.
Maximum consideration for the fielding of unmanned platforms either employed in concert with fifth generation manned platforms or as standalone unmanned platforms, to increase warfighting effectiveness and reduce risk to personnel during high risk missions.
Advanced air-to-air, air-to-ground, and other weapons able to leverage fifth generation capabilities.
Comprehensive and high-fidelity live, virtual, and constructive training systems, updated range infrastructure, and sufficient threat-representative adversary training assets to maximize fifth generation force proficiency, effectiveness, and readiness while protecting sensitive capabilities.
Operation and Maintenance
Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations
Sec. 301. Authorization of appropriations.
Subtitle B—Energy and Environment
Sec. 311. Modified reporting requirement related to installations energy management.
Sec. 312. Waiver authority for alternative fuel procurement requirement.
Sec. 313. Utility data management for military facilities.
Sec. 314. Alternative technologies for munitions disposal.
Sec. 315. Report on efforts to reduce high energy costs at military installations.
Sec. 316. Sense of Congress on funding decisions relating to climate change.
Subtitle C—Logistics and Sustainment
Sec. 321. Revision of deployability rating system and planning reform.
Sec. 322. Revision of guidance relating to corrosion control and prevention executives.
Sec. 323. Pilot program for inclusion of certain industrial plants in the Armament Retooling and Manufacturing Support Initiative.
Sec. 324. Repair, recapitalization, and certification of dry docks at naval shipyards.
Sec. 325. Private sector port loading assessment.
Sec. 326. Strategy on revitalizing Army organic industrial base.
Subtitle D—Reports
Sec. 331. Modifications to Quarterly Readiness Report to Congress.
Sec. 332. Report on average travel costs of members of the reserve components.
Sec. 333. Report on HH–60G sustainment and Combat Rescue Helicopter program.
Subtitle E—Other Matters
Sec. 341. Air navigation matters.
Sec. 342. Contract working dogs.
Sec. 343. Plan, funding documents, and management review relating to explosive ordnance disposal.
Sec. 344. Process for communicating availability of surplus ammunition.
Sec. 345. Mitigation of risks posed by window coverings with accessible cords in certain military housing units.
Sec. 346. Access to military installations by transportation companies.
Sec. 347. Access to wireless high-speed Internet and network connections for certain members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 348. Limitation on availability of funds for Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence.
Sec. 349. Limitation on development and fielding of new camouflage and utility uniforms.
Sec. 350. Plan for improved dedicated adversary air training enterprise of the Air Force.
Sec. 351. Independent review and assessment of the Ready Aircrew Program of the Air Force.
Sec. 352. Study on space-available travel system of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 353. Evaluation of motor carrier safety performance and safety technology.
Authorization of Appropriations
Authorization of appropriations
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2017 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in the funding table in section 4301.
Energy and Environment
Modified reporting requirement related to installations energy management
Subsection (a) of section 2925 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
in the subsection heading, by inserting , resiliency, and mission assurance
after Annual report related to installations energy management
;
by striking paragraphs (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), and (10);
by redesignating paragraphs (9) and (11) as paragraphs (3), and (4), respectively; and
by inserting after paragraph (1), the following:
A description of the energy savings, return on investment, and enhancements to installation mission assurance realized by the fulfillment of the goals described in paragraph (1).
.
Waiver authority for alternative fuel procurement requirement
In general
The Secretary of Defense may waive the requirement under section 526 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (Public Law 110–140; 42 U.S.C. 17142) if the Secretary determines it is in the national security interest of the United States.
Notification requirement
The Secretary of Defense shall notify the congressional defense committees not later than 15 days after exercising the waiver authority under subsection (a).
Utility data management for military facilities
Pilot program
The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Energy, may carry out a pilot program to investigate the use of utility data management services to perform utility bill aggregation, analysis, third-party payment, storage, and distribution for the Department of Defense.
Use of funds
Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for operation and maintenance, Navy, for enterprise information, not more than $250,000 may be obligated or expended to carry out the pilot program under subsection (a).
Alternative technologies for munitions disposal
In carrying out the disposal of munitions in the stockpile of conventional munitions awaiting demilitarization and disposal, the Secretary of the Army may use cost-competitive technologies that minimize waste generation and air emissions as alternatives to disposal by open burning, open detonation, direct contact combustion, and incineration.
Report on efforts to reduce high energy costs at military installations
Report
Report required
Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, in conjunction with the assistant secretaries responsible for installations and environment for the military services and the Defense Logistics Agency, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report detailing the efforts to achieve cost savings at military installations with high levels of energy intensity.
Elements
The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:
A comprehensive, installation-specific assessment of feasible and mission-appropriate energy initiatives supporting energy production and consumption at military installations with high levels of energy intensity.
An assessment of current sources of energy in areas with high energy costs and potential future sources that are technologically feasible, cost-effective, and mission-appropriate for military installations.
A comprehensive implementation strategy to include required investment for feasible energy efficiency options determined to be the most beneficial and cost-effective, where appropriate, and consistent with Department of Defense priorities.
An explanation of how military services are working collaboratively in order to leverage lessons learned on potential energy efficiency solutions.
An assessment of the extent to which activities administered under the Federal Energy Management Program could be used to assist with the implementation strategy.
An assessment of State and local partnership opportunities that could achieve efficiency and cost savings, and any legislative authorities required to carry out such partnerships or agreements.
Coordination with State and local and other entities
In preparing the report required under paragraph (1), the Under Secretary may work in conjunction and coordinate with the States containing areas of high levels of energy intensity, local communities, and other Federal departments and agencies.
Definitions
In this section, the term high levels of energy intensity means costs for the provision of energy by kilowatt of electricity or British thermal unit of heat or steam for a military installation in the United States that is in the highest 20 percent of all military installations for a military department.
Sense of Congress on funding decisions relating to climate change
It is the sense of Congress that—
decisions relating to the funding of the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2017 should prioritize the support and enhancement of the combat capabilities of the Department, in addition to seeking efficiency and efficacy;
funds should be allocated among the programs of the Department in the manner that best serves the national security interests of the United States; and
decisions relating to energy efficiency, energy use, and climate change should adhere to the principles described in paragraphs (1) and (2).
Logistics and Sustainment
Revision of deployability rating system and planning reform
Deployment prioritization and readiness
In general
Chapter 1003 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 10102 the following new section:
Deployment prioritization and readiness of Army components
Deployment prioritization
The Secretary of the Army shall maintain a system for identifying the priority of deployment for units of all components of the Army.
Deployability readiness rating
The Secretary of the Army shall maintain a readiness rating system for units of all components of the Army that provides an accurate assessment of the deployability of a unit and those shortfalls of a unit that require the provision of additional resources. The system shall ensure—
that the personnel readiness rating of a unit reflects—
both the percentage of the overall personnel requirement of the unit that is manned and deployable and the fill and deployability rate for critical occupational specialties necessary for the unit to carry out its basic mission requirements; and
the number of personnel in the unit who are qualified in their primary military occupational specialty; and
that the equipment readiness assessment of a unit—
documents all equipment required for deployment;
reflects only that equipment that is directly possessed by the unit;
specifies the effect of substitute items; and
assesses the effect of missing components and sets on the readiness of major equipment items.
.
Clerical amendment
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1003 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 10102 the following new item:
10102a. Deployment prioritization and readiness of Army components.
.
Repeal of superseded provisions of law
Sections 1121 and 1135 of the Army National Guard Combat Readiness Reform Act of 1992 (title XI of Public Law 102–484; 10 U.S.C. 10105 note) are repealed.
Revision of guidance relating to corrosion control and prevention executives
In general
Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, in coordination with the Director of Corrosion Policy and Oversight for the Department of Defense, shall revise guidance relating to corrosion control and prevention executives to—
clarify the role of each such executive with respect to assisting the Office of Corrosion Policy and Oversight in holding the appropriate project management office in each military department accountable for submitting the annual report required under section 903(b)(5) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 10 U.S.C. 2228 note); and
ensure that corrosion control and prevention executives emphasize the reduction of corrosion and the effects of corrosion on the military equipment and infrastructure of the Department of Defense, as required in the long-term strategy of the Department of Defense under section 2228(d) of title 10, United States Code.
Corrosion control and prevention executive defined
In this section, the term corrosion control and prevention executive
means the employee of a military department designated as the corrosion control and prevention executive of the department under section 903(a) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 10 U.S.C. 2228 note).
Pilot program for inclusion of certain industrial plants in the Armament Retooling and Manufacturing Support Initiative
During the five-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense may treat a Government-owned, contractor-operated industrial plant of the Department of Defense as an eligible facility under section 4551(2) of title 10, United States Code.
Repair, recapitalization, and certification of dry docks at naval shipyards
Special authority to transfer authorizations
In addition to the authority to transfer funds provided under section 1001, the Secretary of Defense may transfer not more than $250,000,000 of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this Act for fiscal year 2017 to the Department of the Navy for the repair, recapitalization, and certification of dry docks at Government-owned, Government-operated shipyards of the Navy.
Notice to Congress
The Secretary shall promptly notify Congress of each transfer made under subsection (a).
Terms and conditions
In general
Except as provided in paragraph (2), transfers under this section shall be subject to the same terms and conditions as transfers under section 1001.
Effect on dollar limit
A transfer of funds under this section shall not be counted toward the dollar limitation described in section 1001(a)(2).
Private sector port loading assessment
Assessments required
During the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on the date of the final briefing under subsection (c), the Secretary of the Navy shall conduct quarterly assessments of naval ship maintenance and loading activities carried out by private sector entities at each covered port.
Elements of assessments
Each assessment under subsection (a) shall include, with respect to each covered port, the following:
Resources per day, including daily ship availabilities and the workforce available to carry out maintenance and loading activities, for the fiscal year preceding the quarter covered by the assessment through the end of such quarter.
Projected resources per day, including daily ship availabilities and the workforce available to carry out maintenance and loading activities, through the end of the second fiscal year beginning after the quarter covered by the assessment.
A description of the methods by which the Secretary communicates projected workloads to private sector entities engaged in ship maintenance activities and ship loading activities.
A description of any processes that have been implemented to allow for timely feedback from private sector entities engaged in ship maintenance activities and ship loading activities.
Briefings required
Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and on a quarterly basis thereafter until September 30, 2021, the Secretary shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives (and other congressional defense committees on request)—
a briefing on the results of the assessments conducted under subsection (a); and
a chart depicting the information described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (b) with respect to each covered port.
Covered ports
In this section, the term covered ports
means port facilities used by the Department of Defense in each of the following locations:
Mayport, Florida.
Norfolk, Virginia.
Pearl Harbor, Hawaii.
Puget Sound, Washington.
San Diego, California.
Strategy on revitalizing Army organic industrial base
Strategy
Not later than October 1, 2017, the Secretary of Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees a strategy to revitalize the organic industrial base of the Army.
Elements
The strategy under subsection (a) shall include, with respect to the organic industrial base of the Army, the following:
A plan to ensure the long-term viability of the organic industrial base.
An assessment of legacy items of the Army that are sustained by the Defense Logistics Agency.
A description of how the organic industrial base may be used to address diminishing manufacturing sources and material shortages.
A description of critical capabilities that are required across the organic industrial base.
An assessment of infrastructure across the organic industrial base.
An assessment of manufacturing sources in the organic industrial base and the private sector.
An explanation of how contracting may be used to meet organic industrial base requirements.
An assessment of current and future workloads across the organic industrial base.
An assessment of the processes used to identify critical capabilities for the organic industrial base and the methods used to determine workloads.
An assessment of existing labor rates.
A description of manufacturing skills that are needed to sustain readiness.
A description of how public-private partnerships may be used to improve the organic industrial base.
A description of how working capital funds may be used to improve the organic industrial base.
An assessment of operating expenses and the potential for reducing or recovering such expenses.
Identification of the tooling, equipment, and facilities upgrades necessary for a facility in the organic industrial base to manufacture the legacy items of the Defense Logistics Agency, including items described in section 333(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 792).
An assessment of the suitability of manufacturing the legacy items of the Defense Logistics Agency in a facility in the organic industrial base.
Definitions
In this section:
Legacy items
The term legacy items
means manufactured items that are no longer produced by the private sector but continue to be used for weapons systems of the Department of Defense, but does not include information systems and information technology (as those terms are defined in section 11101 of title 40, United States Code).
Organic industrial base
The term organic industrial base
means United States military facilities, including arsenals, depots, munition plants and centers, and storage sites, that advance a vital national security interest by producing, maintaining, repairing, and storing materiel, munitions, and hardware.
Reports
Modifications to Quarterly Readiness Report to Congress
Deadline for report
Subsection (a) of section 482 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking Not later than 45 days after the end of each calendar-year quarter
and inserting Not later than 30 days after the end of each calendar-year quarter
.
Elimination of reporting requirements related to prepositioned stocks and national guard civil support mission readiness
Such section is further amended—
in subsection (a), by striking subsections (b), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), and (i)
and inserting subsections (b), (d), (e), (f), and (g)
;
by striking subsections (d) and (e); and
by redesignating subsections (f), (g), (h), (i), and (j) as subsections (d), (e), (f), (g), and (i) respectively.
Inclusion of information on cannibalization rates
Such section, as amended by subsection (b), is further amended by inserting after subsection (g), as redesignated by paragraph (3) of such subsection (b), the following new subsection:
Cannibalization rates
Each report under this section shall include a separate unclassified report containing the information collected pursuant to section 117(c)(7) of this title.
.
Report on average travel costs of members of the reserve components
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the travel expenses of members of reserve components associated with performing active duty service, active service, full-time National Guard duty, active Guard and Reserve duty, and inactive-duty training, as such terms are defined in section 101(d) of title 10, United States Code. Such report shall include the average annual cost for all travel expenses for a member of a reserve component.
Report on HH–60G sustainment and Combat Rescue Helicopter program
Report on sustainment plan
Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that sets forth a plan to modernize, sustain training, and conduct depot-level maintenance and repair for all components of the HH–60 helicopter fleet until total force combat rescue units have been fully equipped with HH–60W Combat Rescue Helicopters.
Elements
The report required by subsection (a) shall include a description of the plans of the Air Force—
to modernize legacy HH–60G combat rescue helicopters;
to maintain the training pipeline for the HH–60G aircrew and the maintenance force required to maintain full readiness through the end of fiscal year 2029; and
to carry out depot-level maintenance and repair (as that term is defined in section 2460 of title 10, United States Code) to ensure the legacy HH–60G fleet of helicopters is maintained to meet readiness rates through the end of fiscal year 2029.
Form
The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
Other Matters
Air navigation matters
Expansion of definition of structures interfering with air commerce and national defense
Notice
Section 44718(a) of title 49, United States Code, is amended—
in paragraph (1), by striking and
at the end;
in paragraph (2), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; or
; and
by adding at the end the following:
the interests of national security, as determined by the Secretary of Defense.
.
Studies
Section 44718(b) of title 49, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
Studies
In general
Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary, if the Secretary decides that constructing or altering a structure may result in an obstruction of the navigable airspace, an interference with air navigation facilities and equipment or the navigable airspace, or, after consultation with the Secretary of Defense, an adverse impact on military operations and readiness, the Secretary of Transportation shall conduct an aeronautical study to decide the extent of any adverse impact on the safe and efficient use of the airspace, facilities, or equipment. In conducting the study, the Secretary shall—
consider factors relevant to the efficient and effective use of the navigable airspace, including—
the impact on arrival, departure, and en route procedures for aircraft operating under visual flight rules;
the impact on arrival, departure, and en route procedures for aircraft operating under instrument flight rules;
the impact on existing public-use airports and aeronautical facilities;
the impact on planned public-use airports and aeronautical facilities;
the cumulative impact resulting from the proposed construction or alteration of a structure when combined with the impact of other existing or proposed structures; and
other factors relevant to the efficient and effective use of navigable airspace; and
include the finding made by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (f).
Report
On completing the study, the Secretary of Transportation shall issue a report disclosing the extent of the—
adverse impact on the safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace that the Secretary finds will result from constructing or altering the structure; and
unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States, as determined by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (f).
Severability
A determination by the Secretary of Transportation on hazard to air navigation under this section shall remain independent of a determination of unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (f).
.
National security finding; definitions
Section 44718 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
National security finding
As part of an aeronautical study conducted under subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense shall—
make a finding on whether the construction, alteration, establishment, or expansion of a structure or sanitary landfill included in the study would result in an unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States; and
transmit the finding to the Secretary of Transportation for inclusion in the report required under subsection (b)(2).
Definitions
In this section, the following definitions apply:
Adverse impact on military operations and readiness
The term adverse impact on military operations and readiness
has the meaning given the term in section 211.3 of title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect on January 6, 2014.
Unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States
The term unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States
has the meaning given the term in section 211.3 of title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect on January 6, 2014.
.
Conforming amendments
Section heading
Section 44718 of title 49, United States Code, is amended in the section heading by inserting or national security
after air commerce
.
Clerical amendment
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 447 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 44718 and inserting the following:
44718. Structures interfering with air commerce or national security.
.
Performance-based navigation
Section 213(c) of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (Public Law 112–95; 49 U.S.C. 40101 note) is amended by adding at the end the following:
Notifications and consultations
Not later than 90 days before applying a categorical exclusion under this subsection to a new procedure at an OEP airport, the Administrator shall—
notify and consult with the operator of the airport at which the procedure would be implemented; and
consider consultations or other engagement with the community in the which the airport is located to inform the public of the procedure.
Review of certain categorical exclusions
In general
The Administrator shall review any decision of the Administrator made on or after February 14, 2012, and before the date of the enactment of this paragraph to grant a categorical exclusion under this subsection with respect to a procedure to be implemented at an OEP airport that was a material change from procedures previously in effect at the airport to determine if the implementation of the procedure had a significant effect on the human environment in the community in which the airport is located.
Content of review
If, in conducting a review under subparagraph (A) with respect to a procedure implemented at an OEP airport, the Administrator, in consultation with the operator of the airport, determines that implementing the procedure had a significant effect on the human environment in the community in which the airport is located, the Administrator shall—
consult with the operator of the airport to identify measures to mitigate the effect of the procedure on the human environment; and
in conducting such consultations, consider the use of alternative flight paths that do not substantially degrade the efficiencies achieved by the implementation of the procedure being reviewed.
Human environment defined
In this paragraph, the term human environment
has the meaning given such term in section 1508.14 of title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this paragraph).
.
Contract working dogs
Required contract clause
In general
Chapter 141 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Contract working dogs: requirement to transfer animals to 341st Training Squadron after service life
In general
Each contract entered into by the Secretary of Defense for the provision of a contract working dog shall require that the dog be transferred to the 341st Training Squadron after the service life of the dog has terminated as described in subsection (b) for reclassification as a military animal and placement for adoption in accordance with section 2583 of this title.
Service life
The service life of a contract working dog has terminated and the dog is available for transfer to the 341st Training Squadron pursuant to a contract under subsection (a) only if the contracting officer concerned has determined that—
the final contractual obligation of the dog preceding such transfer is with the Department of Defense; and
the dog cannot be used by another department or agency of the Federal Government due to age, injury, or performance.
Contract working dog
In this section, the term contract working dog
means a dog—
that performs a service for the Department of Defense pursuant to a contract; and
that is trained and kenneled by an entity that provides such a dog pursuant to such a contract.
.
Clerical amendment
The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
2410r. Contract working dogs: requirement to transfer animals to 341st Training Squadron after service life.
.
Inclusion in definition of military animal
Paragraph (1) of section 2583(h) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
A military working dog, which may include a contract working dog (as such term is defined in section 2410r) that has been transferred to the 341st Training Squadron.
.
Plan, funding documents, and management review relating to explosive ordnance disposal
Plan required
In general
The Secretary of Defense shall develop a plan to establish an explosive ordnance disposal program in the Department of Defense to ensure close and continuous coordination among the military departments on matters relating to explosive ordnance disposal.
Roles, responsibilities, and authorities
The plan under paragraph (1) shall include provisions under which—
the Secretary of Defense shall—
assign responsibility for the coordination and integration of explosive ordnance disposal to a joint office or entity in the Office of the Secretary of Defense; and
designate the Secretary of the Navy (or a designee of the Secretary of the Navy) as the executive agent for the Department of Defense to coordinate and integrate research, development, test, and evaluation activities and procurement activities of the military departments relating to explosive ordnance disposal; and
the Secretary of each military department shall assess the needs of the military department concerned with respect to explosive ordnance disposal and may carry out research, development, test, and evaluation activities and procurement activities to address such needs.
Annual explosive ordnance disposal funding documents
In general
The Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress, as a part of the defense budget materials for each fiscal year after fiscal year 2017, a consolidated funding display, in classified and unclassified form, that identifies the funding source for all explosive ordnance disposal activities within the Department of Defense.
Elements
The funding display under paragraph (1) for a fiscal year shall include a single program element from each military department for each of the following:
Research, development, test, and evaluation.
Procurement.
Operation and maintenance.
Any other program element used to fund explosive ordnance disposal activities (but not including any program element relating to military construction).
Management review and assessment
In general
The Secretary of Defense shall review and assess the effectiveness of current management structures in supporting the explosive ordnance disposal needs of the combatant commands and the military departments.
Elements
The review and assessment under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
A review of the organizational structures and responsibilities within the Office of the Secretary of Defense that provide policy and oversight of the policies, programs, acquisition activities, and personnel of the military departments relating to explosive ordnance disposal.
A review of the organizational structures and responsibilities within the military departments that—
man, equip, and train explosive ordnance disposal forces; and
support such forces with manpower, technology, equipment, and readiness.
A review of the organizational structures and responsibilities of the Secretary of the Navy as the executive agent for explosive ordnance disposal technology and training.
Budget displays for each military department that support research, development, test, and evaluation; procurement; and operation and maintenance, relating to explosive ordnance disposal.
An assessment of the adequacy of the organizational structures and responsibilities and the alignment of funding within the military departments in supporting the needs of the combatant commands and the military departments with respect to explosive ordnance disposal.
Briefing
Not later than March 1, 2017, the Secretary shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a briefing that includes—
details of the plan required under subsection (a);
the results of the review and assessment under subsection (c);
a description of any measures undertaken to improve joint coordination, oversight, and management of programs relating to explosive ordnance disposal;
recommendations to the Secretary to improve the capabilities and readiness of explosive ordnance disposal forces; and
an explanation of the advantages and disadvantages of assigning responsibility for the coordination and integration of explosive ordnance disposal to a single joint office or entity in the Office of the Secretary of Defense.
Definitions
In this section:
Explosive ordnance
The term explosive ordnance
means any munition containing explosives, nuclear fission or fusion materials, or biological or chemical agents, including—
bombs and warheads;
guided and ballistic missiles;
artillery, mortar, rocket, and small arms munitions;
mines, torpedoes, and depth charges;
demolition charges;
pyrotechnics;
clusters and dispensers;
cartridge and propellant actuated devices;
electro-explosive devices; and
clandestine and improvised explosive devices.
Disposal
The term disposal
means, with respect to explosive ordnance, the detection, identification, field evaluation, defeat, disablement, or rendering safe, recovery and exploitation, and final disposition of the ordnance.
Process for communicating availability of surplus ammunition
In general
The Secretary of Defense shall implement a formal process to provide Federal Government agencies outside the Department of Defense with information on the availability of surplus, serviceable ammunition from the Department of Defense for the purpose of reducing costs relating to the storage and disposal of such ammunition.
Implementation deadline
The Secretary shall implement the process described in subsection (a) beginning not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
Mitigation of risks posed by window coverings with accessible cords in certain military housing units
Removal of certain window coverings
Not later than three years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall remove and replace disqualified window coverings from—
military housing units owned by the Department of Defense in which children under the age of 9 may reside; and
military housing units leased by the Department of Defense in which children under the age of 9 may reside if the lease for such units requires the Department to provide window coverings.
Prohibition on disqualified window coverings in military housing units acquired or constructed by contract
All contracts entered into by the Secretary of Defense after September 30, 2017, for the acquisition or construction of military family housing, including military family housing acquired or constructed pursuant to subchapter IV of chapter 169 of title 10, United States Code, shall prohibit the use of disqualified window coverings in such housing.
Disqualified window covering defined
In this section, the term disqualified window covering
means—
a window covering with an accessible cord that exceeds 8 inches in length; or
a window covering with an accessible continuous loop cord that does not have a cord tension device that prevents operation when the cord is not anchored to the wall.
Access to military installations by transportation companies
In general
Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall establish policies under which covered drivers may be authorized to access military installations.
Elements
The policies established under subsection (a)—
shall include the terms and conditions under which a covered driver may be authorized to access a military installation;
may require a transportation company and a covered driver to enter into a written agreement with the Department of Defense as a precondition for obtaining authorization to access a military installation;
shall be consistent across military installations, to the extent practicable;
shall be designed to promote the expeditious entry of covered drivers onto military installations for purposes of providing commercial transportation services;
shall place appropriate restrictions on entry into sensitive areas of military installations;
shall be designed, to the extent practicable, to give covered drivers access to barracks areas, housing areas, temporary lodging facilities, hospitals, and community support facilities;
shall require transportation companies—
to track, in real-time, the location of the entry and exit of covered drivers onto and off of military installations; and
to provide, on demand, the information described in subparagraph (A) to appropriate personnel and agencies of the Department; and
shall take into account force protection requirements and ensure the protection and safety of members of the Armed Forces, civilian employees of the Department of Defense, and the families of such members and employees.
Confidentiality of information
The Secretary shall ensure that any information provided to the Department by a transportation company under subsection (b)(7)—
is treated as confidential and proprietary information of the company that is exempt from public disclosure pursuant to section 552 of title 5, United States Code (commonly known as the Freedom of Information Act
); and
except as provided in subsection (b)(7), is not disclosed to any person or entity without the express written consent of the company unless disclosure of such information is required by a court order.
Definitions
In this section:
Transportation company
The term transportation company
means a corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, or other entity outside of the Department of Defense that provides a commercial transportation service to a rider, including a company that uses a digital network to connect riders to covered drivers for the purpose of providing such transportation service.
Covered driver
The term covered driver
—
means an individual—
who is an employee of a transportation company or who is affiliated with a transportation company; and
who provides a commercial transportation service to a rider; and
includes a vehicle operated by such individual for the purpose of providing such service.
Access to wireless high-speed Internet and network connections for certain members of the Armed Forces
In general
In providing members of the Armed Forces with access to high-speed wireless Internet and network connections at military installations outside the United States, the Secretary of Defense may provide such access without charge to the members and their dependents.
Contract authority
The Secretary may enter into contracts for the purpose of carrying out subsection (a).
Limitation on availability of funds for Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence
Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for Operation and Maintenance, Defense-wide, for the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, not more than 90 percent may be obligated or expended until the Secretary of Defense issues guidance on the process by which members of the Armed Forces may carry an appropriate firearm on a military installation, as required by section 526 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 813; 10 U.S.C. 2672 note).
Limitation on development and fielding of new camouflage and utility uniforms
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to develop or field new camouflage uniforms, new utility uniforms, or new families of uniforms until the date that is one year after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees notice of the intent of the Secretary to develop or field such uniforms.
Plan for improved dedicated adversary air training enterprise of the Air Force
In general
The Chief of Staff of the Air Force shall develop a plan for an improved dedicated adversary air training enterprise for the Air Force—
to maximize warfighting effectiveness and synergies of the current and planned fourth and fifth generation combat air forces through optimized training and readiness;
to harness intelligence analysis, emerging live-virtual-constructive training technologies, range infrastructure improvements, and results of experimentation and prototyping efforts in operational concept development;
to challenge the combat air forces of the Air Force with threat representative adversary-to-friendly aircraft ratios, known and emerging adversary tactics, and high fidelity replication of threat airborne and ground capabilities; and
to achieve training and readiness goals and objectives of the Air Force with demonstrated institutional commitment to the adversary air training enterprise through the application of Air Force policy and resources, partnering with the other Armed Forces, allies, and friends, and employing the use of industry contracted services.
Elements
The plan under subsection (a) shall include, with respect to an improved dedicated adversary air training enterprise, the following:
Goals and objectives.
Concepts of operations.
Timelines for the phased implementation of the enterprise.
Analysis of readiness improvements that may result from the enterprise.
Prioritized resource requirements.
Such other matters as the Chief of Staff considers appropriate.
Written plan and briefing
Not later than March 3, 2017, the Chief of Staff shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives—
a written version of the plan developed under subsection (a); and
a briefing on such plan.
Independent review and assessment of the Ready Aircrew Program of the Air Force
Independent review and assessment
The Secretary of the Air Force shall enter into a contract with an independent entity with appropriate expertise—
to conduct a review and assessment of—
the assumptions underlying the annual continuation training requirements of the Air Force; and
the overall effectiveness of the Ready Aircrew Program of the Air Force in managing aircrew training requirements; and
to make recommendations for the improved management of such training requirements.
Report
In general
Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the review and assessment conducted under subsection (a).
Elements
The report under paragraph (1) shall include an examination of the following:
For the aircrews of each type of combat aircraft and by mission type—
the number of sorties required to reach minimum and optimal levels of proficiency, respectively;
the optimal mix of live and virtual training sorties; and
the optimal mix of experienced aircrews versus inexperienced aircrews.
The availability of assets and infrastructure to support the achievement of aircrew proficiency levels and an explanation of any requirements relating to such assets and infrastructure.
The accumulated flying hours or other measurements used to determine if an aircrew qualifies for designation as an experienced aircrew, and whether different measurements should be used.
Any actions taken or planned to be taken to implement recommendations resulting from the independent review and assessment under subsection (a), including an estimate of the resources required to implement such recommendations.
Any other matters the Secretary determines are appropriate to ensure a comprehensive review and assessment.
Comptroller general review
In general
The Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a review of the report described in subsection (b). Such review shall include an assessment of—
the extent to which the report addressed the elements described in paragraph (2) of such subsection;
the adequacy and completeness of the assumptions reviewed to establish the annual training requirements of the Air Force;
any actions the Air Force plans to carry out to incorporate the results of the report into annual training documents; and
any other matters the Comptroller General determines are relevant.
Briefing
Not later than 60 days after the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits the report under subsection (b) and prior to submitting the review required under paragraph (1), the Comptroller General shall provide a briefing to the congressional defense committees on the preliminary results of the review conducted under such paragraph.
Study on space-available travel system of the Department of Defense
Study required
Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall seek to enter into a contract with a federally funded research and development center to conduct an independent study on the space-available travel system of the Department of Defense.
Report required
Not later than 180 days after entering into a contract with a federally funded research and development center under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report summarizing the results of the study conducted under such subsection.
Elements
The report under subsection (b) shall include, with respect to the space-available travel system, the following:
A determination of—
the capacity of the system as of the date of the enactment of this Act;
the projected capacity of the system for the 10-year period following such date of enactment; and
the projected number of reserve retirees, active duty retirees, and dependents of such retirees that will exist by the end of such 10-year period.
Estimates of system capacity based the projections described in paragraph (1).
A discussion of the efficiency of the system and data regarding the use of available space with respect to each category of passengers eligible for space-available travel under existing regulations.
A description of the effect on system capacity if eligibility for space-available travel is extended to—
drilling reserve component personnel and dependents of such personnel on international flights;
dependents of reserve component retirees who are less than 60 years of age;
retirees who are less than 60 years of age on international flights;
drilling reserve component personnel traveling to drilling locations; and
members or former members of the Armed Forces who have a disability rated as total, if space-available travel is provided to such members on the same basis as such travel is provided to members of the Armed Forces entitled to retired or retainer pay.
A discussion of logistical and management problems, including congestion at terminals, waiting times, lodging availability, and personal hardships experienced by travelers.
An evaluation of the cost of the system and whether space-available travel is and can remain cost-neutral.
An evaluation of the feasibility of expanding the categories of passengers eligible for space-available travel to include—
in the case of overseas travel, retired members of an active or reserve component, including retired members of reserve components, who, but for being under the eligibility age applicable to the member under section 12731 of title 10, United States Code, would be eligible for retired pay under chapter 1223 of such title;
unremarried widows and widowers of active or reserve component members of the Armed Forces; and
members or former members of the Armed Forces who have a disability rated as total, if space-available travel is provided to such members on the same basis as such travel is provided to members of the Armed Forces entitled to retired or retainer pay.
Such other factors relating to the efficiency and cost of the system as the Secretary determines to be appropriate.
Additional responsibilities
In addition to carrying out subsections (a) through (c), the Secretary of Defense shall—
analyze the methods used to prioritize among the categories of individuals eligible for space-available travel and make recommendations for—
re-ordering the priority of such categories; and
adding additional categories of eligible individuals; and
collect data on travelers who request but do not obtain available travel spaces under the space-available travel system.
Disability rated as total defined
In this section, the term disability rated as total
has the meaning given the term in section 1414(e)(3) of title 10, United States Code.
Evaluation of motor carrier safety performance and safety technology
In general
The Secretary of Defense shall evaluate the need for proven safety technology in vehicles transporting shipments under the Transportation Protective Services program of the United States Transportation Command, including—
electronic logging devices;
roll stability control;
forward collision avoidance systems;
lane departure warning systems; and
speed limiters.
Considerations
In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary shall—
consider the need to avoid catastrophic accidents and exposure of security-sensitive materials; and
take into the account the findings of the Government Accountability Office report numbered GAO–16–82 and titled Defense Transportation; DoD Needs to Improve the Evaluation of Safety and Performance Information for Carriers Transporting Security-Sensitive Materials
.
Military Personnel Authorizations
Subtitle A—Active Forces
Sec. 401. End strengths for active forces.
Sec. 402. Revisions in permanent active duty end strength minimum levels.
Subtitle B—Reserve Forces
Sec. 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve.
Sec. 412. End strengths for reserves on active duty in support of the reserves.
Sec. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status).
Sec. 414. Fiscal year 2017 limitation on number of non-dual status technicians.
Sec. 415. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty for operational support.
Sec. 416. Technical corrections to annual authorization for personnel strengths.
Subtitle C—Authorization of Appropriations
Sec. 421. Military personnel.
Active Forces
End strengths for active forces
The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for active duty personnel as of September 30, 2017, as follows:
The Army, 476,000.
The Navy, 323,900.
The Marine Corps, 185,000.
The Air Force, 321,000.
Revisions in permanent active duty end strength minimum levels
Section 691(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking paragraphs (1) through (4) and inserting the following new paragraphs:
For the Army, 476,000.
For the Navy, 323,900.
For the Marine Corps, 185,000.
For the Air Force, 321,000.
.
Reserve Forces
End strengths for Selected Reserve
In general
The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for Selected Reserve personnel of the reserve components as of September 30, 2017, as follows:
The Army National Guard of the United States, 343,000.
The Army Reserve, 199,000.
The Navy Reserve, 58,000.
The Marine Corps Reserve, 38,500.
The Air National Guard of the United States, 105,700.
The Air Force Reserve, 69,000.
The Coast Guard Reserve, 7,000.
End strength reductions
The end strengths prescribed by subsection (a) for the Selected Reserve of any reserve component shall be proportionately reduced by—
the total authorized strength of units organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such component which are on active duty (other than for training) at the end of the fiscal year; and
the total number of individual members not in units organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such component who are on active duty (other than for training or for unsatisfactory participation in training) without their consent at the end of the fiscal year.
End strength increases
Whenever units or individual members of the Selected Reserve for any reserve component are released from active duty during any fiscal year, the end strength prescribed for such fiscal year for the Selected Reserve of such reserve component shall be increased proportionately by the total authorized strengths of such units and by the total number of such individual members.
End strengths for reserves on active duty in support of the reserves
Within the end strengths prescribed in section 411(a), the reserve components of the Armed Forces are authorized, as of September 30, 2017, the following number of Reserves to be serving on full-time active duty or full-time duty, in the case of members of the National Guard, for the purpose of organizing, administering, recruiting, instructing, or training the reserve components:
The Army National Guard of the United States, 30,155.
The Army Reserve, 16,261.
The Navy Reserve, 9,955.
The Marine Corps Reserve, 2,261.
The Air National Guard of the United States, 14,764.
The Air Force Reserve, 2,955.
End strengths for military technicians (dual status)
In general
The authorized number of military technicians (dual status) as of September 30, 2017, for the reserve components of the Army and the Air Force (notwithstanding section 129 of title 10, United States Code) shall be the following:
For the Army National Guard of the United States, 25,507.
For the Army Reserve, 7,570.
For the Air National Guard of the United States, 22,103.
For the Air Force Reserve, 10,061.
Variance
Notwithstanding section 115 of title 10, United States Code, the end strength prescribed by subsection (a) for a reserve component specified in that subsection may be increased—
by 3 percent, upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is in the national interest; and
by 2 percent, upon determination by the Secretary of the military department concerned that such action would enhance manning and readiness in essential units or in critical specialties or ratings.
Fiscal year 2017 limitation on number of non-dual status technicians
Limitations
National guard
Within the limitation provided in section 10217(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code, the number of non-dual status technicians employed by the National Guard as of September 30, 2017, may not exceed the following:
For the Army National Guard of the United States, 1,600.
For the Air National Guard of the United States, 350.
Army reserve
The number of non-dual status technicians employed by the Army Reserve as of September 30, 2017, may not exceed 420.
Air force reserve
The number of non-dual status technicians employed by the Air Force Reserve as of September 30, 2017, may not exceed 90.
Non-dual status technicians defined
In this section, the term non-dual status technician
has the meaning given that term in section 10217(a) of title 10, United States Code.
Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty for operational support
During fiscal year 2017, the maximum number of members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces who may be serving at any time on full-time operational support duty under section 115(b) of title 10, United States Code, is the following:
The Army National Guard of the United States, 17,000.
The Army Reserve, 13,000.
The Navy Reserve, 6,200.
The Marine Corps Reserve, 3,000.
The Air National Guard of the United States, 16,000.
The Air Force Reserve, 14,000.
Technical corrections to annual authorization for personnel strengths
Section 115 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
in subsection (b)(1)—
in subparagraph (B), by striking 502(f)(2)
and inserting 502(f)(1)(B)
; and
in subparagraph (C), by striking 502(f)(2)
and inserting 502(f)(1)(B)
; and
in subsection (i)(7), by striking 502(f)(1)
and inserting 502(f)(1)(A)
.
Authorization of Appropriations
Military personnel
Authorization of appropriations
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2017 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the funding table in section 4401.
Construction of authorization
The authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) supersedes any other authorization of appropriations (definite or indefinite) for such purpose for fiscal year 2017.
Military Personnel Policy
Subtitle A—Officer Personnel Policy
Sec. 501. Reduction in number of general and flag officers on active duty and authorized strength after December 31, 2022, of such general and flag officers.
Sec. 502. Repeal of statutory specification of general or flag officer grade for various positions in the Armed Forces.
Sec. 503. Number of Marine Corps general officers.
Sec. 504. Promotion eligibility period for officers whose confirmation of appointment is delayed due to nonavailability to the Senate of probative information under control of non-Department of Defense agencies.
Sec. 505. Continuation of certain officers on active duty without regard to requirement for retirement for years of service.
Sec. 506. Equal consideration of officers for early retirement or discharge.
Sec. 507. Modification of authority to drop from rolls a commissioned officer.
Sec. 508. Extension of force management authorities allowing enhanced flexibility for officer personnel management.
Sec. 509. Pilot programs on direct commissions to cyber positions.
Sec. 510. Length of joint duty assignments.
Sec. 510A. Revision of definitions used for joint officer management.
Subtitle B—Reserve Component Management
Sec. 511. Authority for temporary waiver of limitation on term of service of Vice Chief of the National Guard Bureau.
Sec. 512. Rights and protections available to military technicians.
Sec. 513. Inapplicability of certain laws to National Guard technicians performing active Guard and Reserve duty.
Sec. 514. Extension of removal of restrictions on the transfer of officers between the active and inactive National Guard.
Sec. 515. Extension of temporary authority to use Air Force reserve component personnel to provide training and instruction regarding pilot training.
Sec. 516. Expansion of eligibility for deputy commander of combatant command having United States among geographic area of responsibility to include officers of the Reserves.
Subtitle C—General Service Authorities
Sec. 521. Matters relating to provision of leave for members of the Armed Forces, including prohibition on leave not expressly authorized by law.
Sec. 522. Transfer of provision relating to expenses incurred in connection with leave canceled due to contingency operations.
Sec. 523. Expansion of authority to execute certain military instruments.
Sec. 524. Medical examination before administrative separation for members with post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury in connection with sexual assault.
Sec. 525. Reduction of tenure on the temporary disability retired list.
Sec. 526. Technical correction to voluntary separation pay and benefits.
Sec. 527. Consolidation of Army marketing and pilot program on consolidated Army recruiting.
Subtitle D—Member Whistleblower Protections and Correction of Military Records
Sec. 531. Improvements to whistleblower protection procedures.
Sec. 532. Modification of whistleblower protection authorities to restrict contrary findings of prohibited personnel action by the Secretary concerned.
Sec. 533. Availability of certain Correction of Military Records and Discharge Review Board information through the Internet.
Sec. 534. Improvements to authorities and procedures for the correction of military records.
Sec. 535. Treatment by discharge review boards of claims asserting post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury in connection with combat or sexual trauma as a basis for review of discharge.
Sec. 536. Comptroller General of the United States review of integrity of Department of Defense whistleblower program.
Subtitle E—Military Justice and Legal Assistance Matters
Sec. 541. United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.
Sec. 542. Effective prosecution and defense in courts-martial and pilot programs on professional military justice development for judge advocates.
Sec. 543. Inclusion in annual reports on sexual assault prevention and response efforts of the Armed Forces of information on complaints of retaliation in connection with reports of sexual assault in the Armed Forces.
Sec. 544. Extension of the requirement for annual report regarding sexual assaults and coordination with release of Family Advocacy Program report.
Sec. 545. Metrics for evaluating the efforts of the Armed Forces to prevent and respond to retaliation in connection with reports of sexual assault in the Armed Forces.
Sec. 546. Training for Department of Defense personnel who investigate claims of retaliation.
Sec. 547. Notification to complainants of resolution of investigations into retaliation.
Sec. 548. Modification of definition of sexual harassment for purposes of investigations by commanding officers of complaints of harassment.
Sec. 549. Improved Department of Defense prevention of and response to hazing in the Armed Forces.
Subtitle F—National Commission on Military, National, and Public Service
Sec. 551. Purpose, scope, and definitions.
Sec. 552. Preliminary report on purpose and utility of registration system under Military Selective Service Act.
Sec. 553. National Commission on Military, National, and Public Service.
Sec. 554. Commission hearings and meetings.
Sec. 555. Principles and procedure for Commission recommendations.
Sec. 556. Executive Director and staff.
Sec. 557. Termination of Commission.
Subtitle G—Member Education, Training, Resilience, and Transition
Sec. 561. Modification of program to assist members of the Armed Forces in obtaining professional credentials.
Sec. 562. Inclusion of alcohol, prescription drug, opioid, and other substance abuse counseling as part of required preseparation counseling.
Sec. 563. Inclusion of information in Transition Assistance Program regarding effect of receipt of both veteran disability compensation and voluntary separation pay.
Sec. 564. Training under Transition Assistance Program on career and employment opportunities associated with transportation security cards.
Sec. 565. Extension of suicide prevention and resilience program.
Sec. 566. Congressional notification in advance of appointments to service academies.
Sec. 567. Report and guidance on Job Training, Employment Skills Training, Apprenticeships, and Internships and SkillBridge initiatives for members of the Armed Forces who are being separated.
Sec. 568. Military-to-mariner transition.
Subtitle H—Defense Dependents' Education and Military Family Readiness Matters
Sec. 571. Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that benefit dependents of members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense civilian employees.
Sec. 572. One-year extension of authorities relating to the transition and support of military dependent students to local educational agencies.
Sec. 573. Annual notice to members of the Armed Forces regarding child custody protections guaranteed by the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act.
Sec. 574. Requirement for annual Family Advocacy Program report regarding child abuse and domestic violence.
Sec. 575. Reporting on allegations of child abuse in military families and homes.
Sec. 576. Repeal of Advisory Council on Dependents’ Education.
Sec. 577. Support for programs providing camp experience for children of military families.
Sec. 578. Comptroller General of the United States assessment and report on Exceptional Family Member Programs.
Sec. 579. Impact aid amendments.
Subtitle I—Decorations and Awards
Sec. 581. Posthumous advancement of Colonel George E. Bud
Day, United States Air Force, on the retired list.
Sec. 582. Authorization for award of medals for acts of valor during certain contingency operations.
Sec. 583. Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor to Gary M. Rose and James C. McCloughan for acts of valor during the Vietnam War.
Sec. 584. Authorization for award of Distinguished-Service Cross to First Lieutenant Melvin M. Spruiell for acts of valor during World War II.
Sec. 585. Authorization for award of the Distinguished Service Cross to Chaplain (First Lieutenant) Joseph Verbis LaFleur for acts of valor during World War II.
Sec. 586. Review regarding award of Medal of Honor to certain Asian American and Native American Pacific Islander war veterans.
Subtitle J—Miscellaneous Reports and Other Matters
Sec. 591. Repeal of requirement for a chaplain at the United States Air Force Academy appointed by the President.
Sec. 592. Extension of limitation on reduction in number of military and civilian personnel assigned to duty with service review agencies.
Sec. 593. Annual reports on progress of the Army and the Marine Corps in integrating women into military occupational specialities and units recently opened to women.
Sec. 594. Report on feasability of electronic tracking of operational active-duty service performed by members of the Ready Reserve of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 595. Report on discharge by warrant officers of pilot and other flight officer positions in the Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force currently discharged by commissioned officers.
Sec. 596. Body mass index test.
Sec. 597. Report on career progression tracks of the Armed Forces for women in combat arms units.
Officer Personnel Policy
Reduction in number of general and flag officers on active duty and authorized strength after December 31, 2022, of such general and flag officers
Reduction in number of general and flag officers by December 31, 2022
Required reduction
Except as otherwise provided by an Act enacted after the date of the enactment of this Act that expressly modifies the requirements of this paragraph, by not later than December 31, 2022, the Secretary of Defense shall reduce the number of general and flag officers on active duty by 110 from the aggregate authorized number of general and flag officers authorized by sections 525 and 526 of title 10, United States Code, as of December 31, 2015.
Distribution of authorized positions
Effective as of December 31, 2022, and reflecting the reduction required by paragraph (1), authorized general and flag officer positions shall be distributed among the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and joint pool as follows:
The Army is authorized 220 positions in the general officer grades.
The Navy is authorized 151 positions in the flag officer grades.
The Air Force is authorized 187 positions in the general officer grades.
The Marine Corps is authorized 62 positions in the general officer grades.
The joint pool is authorized 232 positions in the general or flag officer grades, to be distributed as follows:
82 positions in the general officer grades from the Army.
60 positions in the flag officer grades from the Navy.
69 positions in the general officer grades from the Air Force.
21 positions in the general officer grades from the Marine Corps.
Temporary additional joint pool allocation
In addition to the positions authorized by paragraph (2), the 30 general and flag officer positions designated for overseas contingency operations are authorized as an additional maximum temporary allocation to the joint pool.
Plan to achieve required Reduction and distribution
Plan required
Utilizing the study conducted under subsection (c), the Secretary of Defense shall develop a plan to achieve, by the date specified in subsection (a)(1)—
the reduction required by such subsection in the number of general and flag officers; and
the distribution of authorized positions required by subsection (a)(2).
Submission of plan
When the budget for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2019 is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth the plan developed under this subsection.
Progress reports
The Secretary of Defense shall include with the budget for the Department of Defense for each of fiscal years 2020, 2021, and 2022 a report describing and assessing the progress of the Secretary in implementing the plan developed under this subsection.
Study for purposes of plan
Study required
For purposes of complying with subsection (a) and preparing the plan required by subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense shall conduct a comprehensive and deliberate global manpower study of requirements for general and flag officers with the goal of identifying—
the requirement justification for each general or flag officer position in terms of overall force structure, scope of responsibility, command and control requirements, and force readiness and execution;
an additional 10 percent reduction in the aggregate number of authorized general officer and flag officer positions after the reductions required by subsection (a); and
an appropriate redistribution of all general officer and flag officer positions within the reductions so identified.
Submission of study results
Not later than April 1, 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth the results of the study conducted under this subsection, including the justification for general and flag officer position to be retained and the reductions identified by general and flag officer position.
Interim report
If practicable before the date specified in paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives an interim report describing the progress made toward the completion of the study under this subsection, including—
the specific general and flag officer positions that have been evaluated;
the results of that evaluation; and
recommendations for achieving the additional 10 percent reduction in the aggregate number of authorized general officer and flag officer positions to be identified under paragraph (1)(C) and recommendations for redistribution of general and flag officer positions that have been developed to that point.
Exclusions
Related to joint duty assignments
For purposes of complying with subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may exclude—
a general or flag officer released from a joint duty assignment, but only during the 60-day period beginning on the date the officer departs the joint duty assignment, except that the Secretary may authorize the Secretary of a military department to extend the 60-day period by an additional 120 days, but not more than three officers on active duty from each Armed Force may be covered by the additional extension at the same time; and
the number of officers required to serve in joint duty assignments for each Armed Force as authorized by the Secretary under section 526a(b) of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (h) of this section.
Related to relief from Chief of Staff duty
For purposes of complying with subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may exclude an officer who continues to hold the grade of general or admiral under section 601(b)(5) of title 10, United States Code, after relief from the position of Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Chief of Staff of the Army, Chief of Naval Operations, Chief of Staff of the Air Force, or Commandant of the Marine Corps.
Related to retirement, separation, release, or relief
For purposes of complying with subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may exclude the following officers:
An officer of an Armed Force in the grade of brigadier general or above or, in the case of the Navy, in the grade of rear admiral (lower half) or above, who is on leave pending the retirement, separation, or release of that officer from active duty, but only during the 60-day period beginning on the date of the commencement of such leave of such officer.
An officer of an Armed Force who has been relieved from a position designated under section 601(a) of title 10, United States Code, or by law to carry one of the grades specified in such section, but only during the 60-day period beginning on the date on which the assignment of the officer to the first position is terminated or until the officer is assigned to a second such position, whichever occurs first.
Secretarial authority to grant exceptions to limitations
In general
Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense may alter the reduction otherwise required by subsection (a)(1) in the number of general and flag officer or the distribution of authorized positions otherwise required by subsection (a)(2) in the interest of the national security of the United States.
Notice to Congress of exceptions
Not later than 30 days after authorizing a number of general or flag officers in excess of the number required as a result of the reduction required by subsection (a)(1) or altering the distribution of authorized positions under subsection (a)(2), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives written notice of such exception, including a statement of the reason for such exception and the anticipated duration of the exception.
Orderly transition for officers recently assigned to positions to be eliminated
Covered officers
In order to provide an orderly transition for personnel in general or flag officer positions to be eliminated pursuant to the plan prepared under subsection (b), any general or flag officer who has not completed, as of December 31, 2022, at least 24 months in a position to be eliminated pursuant to the plan may remain in the position until the last day of the month that is 24 months after the month in which the officer assumed the duties of the position.
Report to Congress on covered officers
The Secretary of Defense shall include in the annual report required by section 526(j) of title 10, United States Code, in 2020 a description of the positions in which an officer will remain pursuant to paragraph (1), including the latest date on which the officer may remain in such position pursuant to that paragraph.
Notice to Congress on detachment of covered officers
The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a notice on the date on which each officer covered by paragraph (1) is detached from the officer's position pursuant to such paragraph.
Relation to subsequent general or flag nominations
Notice to Senate with nomination
In order to help achieve the requirements of the plan required by subsection (b), effective 30 days after the commencement of the implementation of the plan, the Secretary of Defense shall include with each nomination of an officer to a grade above colonel or captain (in the case of the Navy) that is forwarded by the President to the Senate for appointment, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, a certification to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate that the appointment of the officer to the grade concerned will not interfere with achieving the reduction required by subsection (a)(1) in the number of general and flag officer positions or the distribution of authorized positions required by subsection (a)(2).
Implementation
Not later than 120 days after the date of the submission of the plan required by subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense shall revise applicable guidance of the Department of Defense on general and flag officer authorizations in order to ensure that—
the achievement of the reductions required pursuant to subsection (a) is incorporated into the planning for the execution of promotions by the military departments and for the joint pool;
to the extent practicable, the resulting grades for general and flag officer positions are uniformly applied to positions of similar duties and responsibilities across the military departments and the joint pool; and
planning achieves a reduction in the headquarters functions and administrative and support activities and staffs of the Department of Defense and the military departments commensurate with the achievement of the reductions required pursuant to subsection (a).
Authorized strength after December 31, 2022, of general and flag officers on active duty
In general
Chapter 32 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 526 the following new section:
Authorized strength after December 31, 2022: general officers and flag officers on active duty
Limitations
The number of general officers on active duty in the Army, Air Force, and Marine Corps, and the number of flag officers on active duty in the Navy, after December 31, 2022, may not exceed the number specified for the armed force concerned as follows:
For the Army, 220.
For the Navy, 151.
For the Air Force, 187.
For the Marine Corps, 62.
Limited exclusion for joint duty requirements
In general
The Secretary of Defense may designate up to 232 general officer and flag officer positions that are joint duty assignments for purposes of chapter 38 of this title for exclusion from the limitations in subsection (a).
Minimum number
Unless the Secretary of Defense determines that a lower number is in the best interest of the Department of Defense, the minimum number of officers serving in positions designated under paragraph (1) for each armed force shall be as follows:
For the Army, 75.
For the Navy, 53.
For the Air Force, 68.
For the Marine Corps, 17.
Exclusion of certain officers pending separation or retirement or between senior positions
The limitations of this section do not apply to—
an officer of an armed force in the grade of brigadier general or above or, in the case of the Navy, in the grade of rear admiral (lower half) or above, who is on leave pending the retirement, separation, or release of that officer from active duty, but only during the 60-day period beginning on the date of the commencement of such leave of such officer; or
an officer of an armed force who has been relieved from a position designated under section 601(a) of this title or by law to carry one of the grades specified in such section, but only during the 60-day period beginning on the date on which the assignment of the officer to the first position is terminated or until the officer is assigned to a second such position, whichever occurs first.
Temporary exclusion for assignment to certain temporary billets
In general
The limitations in subsection (a) do not apply to a general officer or flag officer assigned to a temporary joint duty assignment designated by the Secretary of Defense.
Duration of exclusion
A general officer or flag officer assigned to a temporary joint duty assignment as described in paragraph (1) may not be excluded under this subsection from the limitations in subsection (a) for a period of longer than one year.
Exclusion of officers departing from joint duty assignments
The limitations in subsection (a) do not apply to an officer released from a joint duty assignment, but only during the 60-day period beginning on the date the officer departs the joint duty assignment. The Secretary of Defense may authorize the Secretary of a military department to extend the 60-day period by an additional 120 days, except that not more than three officers on active duty from each armed force may be covered by the additional extension at the same time.
Active-Duty baseline
Notice and wait requirements
If the Secretary of a military department proposes an action that would increase above the baseline the number of general officers or flag officers of an armed force under the jurisdiction of that Secretary who would be on active duty and would count against the statutory limit applicable to that armed force under subsection (a), the action shall not take effect until after the end of the 60-calendar day period beginning on the date on which the Secretary provides notice of the proposed action, including the rationale for the action, to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives.
Baseline defined
In paragraph (1), the term baseline for an armed force means the lower of—
the statutory limit of general officers or flag officers of that armed force under subsection (a); or
the actual number of general officers or flag officers of that armed force who, as of January 1, 2023, counted toward the statutory limit of general officers or flag officers of that armed force under subsection (a).
Joint duty assignment baseline
Notice and wait requirement
If the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, or the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff proposes an action that would increase above the baseline the number of general officers and flag officers of the armed forces in joint duty assignments who count against the statutory limit under subsection (b)(1), the action shall not take effect until after the end of the 60-calendar day period beginning on the date on which such Secretary or the Chairman, as the case may be, provides notice of the proposed action, including the rationale for the action, to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives.
Baseline defined
In paragraph (1), the term baseline means the lower of—
the statutory limit on general officer and flag officer positions that are joint duty assignments under subsection (b)(1); or
the actual number of general officers and flag officers who, as of January 1, 2023, were in joint duty assignments counted toward the statutory limit under subsection (b)(1).
Annual report
Not later than March 1 each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report specifying the following:
The numbers of general officers and flag officers who, as of January 1 of the calendar year in which the report is submitted, counted toward the service-specific limits of subsection (a).
The number of general officers and flag officers in joint duty assignments who, as of such January 1, counted toward the statutory limit under subsection (b)(1).
.
Conforming amendment
Section 526 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
Cessation of applicability
The provisions of this section shall not apply to number of general officers and flag officers in the armed forces after December 31, 2022. For provisions applicable to the number of such officers after that date, see section 526a of this title.
.
Clerical amendment
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 32 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 526 the following new item:
526a. Authorized strength after December 31, 2022: general officers and flag officers on active duty.
.
Repeal of statutory specification of general or flag officer grade for various positions in the Armed Forces
Assistants to CJCS for NG matters and Reserve matters
In general
Section 155a of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.
Clerical amendment
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 5 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 155a.
Legal counsel to CJCS
Section 156 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
by striking subsection (c); and
by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (c).
Director of Test Resource Management Center
Section 196(b)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the second and third sentences.
Director of Missile Defense Agency
In general
Section 203 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.
Clerical amendment
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 8 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 203.
Joint 4-Star positions
Section 604(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking paragraph (3).
Senior members of Military Staff Committee of UN
Section 711 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the second sentence.
Chief of Staff to President
In general
Section 720 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.
Clerical amendment
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 41 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 720.
Attending physician to Congress
In general
Section 722 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.
Clerical amendment
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 41 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 722.
Physician to White House
In general
Section 744 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.
Clerical amendment
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 43 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 744.
Chief of Legislative Liaison of the Army
Section 3023(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the second sentence.
Chiefs of branches of the Army
Section 3036(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended in the flush matter following paragraph (2)—
by striking the first sentence; and
in the second sentence, by striking , and while so serving, has the grade of lieutenant general
.
Judge Advocate General of the Army
Section 3037(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the last two sentences.
Chief of Army Reserve
Section 3038(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
in the subsection heading, by striking ; grade
;
by striking (1)
; and
by striking paragraph (2).
Deputy and assistant chiefs of branches of the Army
In general
Section 3039 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.
Clerical amendment
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 305 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 3039.
Chief of Army Nurse Corps
Section 3069(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the second sentence.
Assistant chiefs of Army Medical Specialist Corps
In general
Section 3070 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
in subsection (a), by striking and assistant chiefs
;
by striking subsection (c); and
by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (c).
Conforming amendment
The heading of such section is amended to read as follows:
Army Medical Specialist Corps: organization; Chief
.
Clerical amendment
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 307 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 3070 and inserting the following new item:
3070. Army Medical Specialist Corps: organization; Chief.
.
Judge Advocate General's Corps of the Army
Section 3072 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
by striking paragraph (3); and
by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively.
Chief of Veterinary Corps of the Army
In general
Section 3084 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the second sentence.
Conforming amendment
The heading of such section is amended to read as follows:
Chief of Veterinary Corps
.
Clerical amendment
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 307 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 3084 and inserting the following new item:
3084. Chief of Veterinary Corps.
.
Army aides
In general
Section 3543 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.
Clerical amendment
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 343 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 3543.
Principal Military Deputy to Assistant Secretary of the Navy for RD&A
Section 5016(b)(4)(B) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking a vice admiral of the Navy or a lieutenant general of the Marine Corps
and inserting an officer of the Navy or the Marine Corps
.
Chief of Naval Research
Section 5022 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
by striking (1)
; and
by striking paragraph (2).
Chief of Legislative Affairs of the Navy
Section 5027(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the second sentence.
Director for Expeditionary Warfare
Section 5038 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
by striking subsection (b); and
by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as subsections (b) and (c), respectively.
SJA to Commandant of the Marine Corps
Section 5046(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the last sentence.
Legislative Assistant to Commandant of the Marine Corps
Section 5047 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the second sentence.
Bureau Chiefs of the Navy
In general
Section 5133 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.
Clerical amendment
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 513 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 5133.
Chief of Dental Corps of the Navy
Section 5138 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
in subsection (a), by striking not below the grade of rear admiral (lower half)
; and
in subsection (c), by striking the first sentence.
Bureau of Naval Personnel
In general
Section 5141 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
in subsection (a), by striking the first sentence; and
in subsection (b), by striking the first sentence.
Conforming amendment
The heading of such section is amended to read as follows:
Chief of Naval Personnel; Deputy Chief of Naval Personnel
.
Clerical amendment
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 513 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 5141 and inserting the following new item:
5141. Chief of Naval Personnel; Deputy Chief of Naval Personnel.
.
Chief of Chaplains of the Navy
Section 5142 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (e).
Chief of Navy Reserve
Section 5143(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
in the subsection heading, by striking ; grade
;
by striking (1)
; and
by striking paragraph (2).
Commander, Marine Forces Reserve
Section 5144(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
in the subsection heading, by striking ; grade
;
by striking (1)
; and
by striking paragraph (2).
Judge Advocate General of the Navy
Section 5148(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the last sentence.
Deputy and Assistant Judge Advocates General of the Navy
Section 5149 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
in subsection (a)(1)—
in the first sentence, by striking , by and with the advice and consent of the Senate,
; and
by striking the second sentence; and
in each of subsections (b) and (c), by striking the second and last sentences.
Chiefs of staff corps of the Navy
Section 5150 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
in subsection (b)(2), by striking Subject to subsection (c), the Secretary
and inserting The Secretary
; and
by striking subsection (c).
Principal Military Deputy to Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition
Section 8016(b)(4)(B) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking a lieutenant general
and inserting an officer
.
Chief of Legislative Liaison of the Air Force
Section 8023(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the second sentence.
Judge Advocate General and Deputy Judge Advocate General of the Air Force
Section 8037 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
in subsection (a), by striking the last sentence; and
in subsection (d)(1), by striking the last sentence.
Chief of the Air Force Reserve
Section 8038(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
in the subsection heading, by striking ; grade
;
by striking (1)
; and
by striking paragraph (2).
Chief of Chaplains of the Air Force
Section 8039 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
in subsection (a)(1)—
by striking subparagraph (A); and
by redesignating subparagraphs (B) and (C) as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively; and
by striking subsection (c).
Chief of Air Force Nurses
In general
Section 8069 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
in subsection (a)—
in the subsection heading, by striking Positions of Chief and assistant chief
and inserting Position of chief
; and
by striking and assistant chief
;
in subsection (b), by striking the second sentence; and
by striking subsection (c).
Conforming amendment
The heading of such section is amended to read as follows:
Air Force nurses: Chief; appointment
.
Clerical amendment
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 807 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 8069 and inserting the following new item:
8069. Air Force nurses: Chief; appointment.
.
Assistant Surgeon General for Dental Services of the Air Force
<