skip to main content

S. 1353 (117th): Advancing American AI Act


The text of the bill below is as of Dec 19, 2022 (Reported by Senate Committee). The bill was not enacted into law.


II

Calendar No. 669

117th CONGRESS

2d Session

S. 1353

[Report No. 117–270]

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

April 22, 2021

(for himself and Mr. Portman) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

December 19, 2022

Reported by , with an amendment

Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic

A BILL

To promote United States values and fulfill agency missions through the use of innovative applied artificial intelligence technologies, and for other purposes.

1.

Short title

This Act may be cited as the Advancing American AI Act.

2.

Purpose

The purposes of this bill are to—

(1)

promote adoption of modernized business practices and advanced technologies across the Federal Government that align with the values of the United States, including the protection of privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties;

(2)

encourage agency artificial intelligence-related programs and initiatives that enhance the competitiveness of the United States and foster an approach to artificial intelligence that builds on the strengths of the United States in innovation and entrepreneurialism;

(3)

enhance Government venues to translate research advances into artificial intelligence applications to modernize systems and assist agency leaders in fulfilling their missions;

(4)

test applied artificial intelligence to drive agency productivity efficiencies in predictive supply chain and logistics; and

(5)

test applied artificial intelligence to accelerate investment return for agencies, such as for portfolio management, workforce development and upskilling, and for other purposes.

3.

Definitions

In this Act:

(1)

Agency

The term agency has the meaning given the term in section 3502 of title 44, United States Code.

(2)

Appropriate congressional committees

The term appropriate congressional committees means—

(A)

the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate; and

(B)

the Committee on Oversight and Reform of the House of Representatives.

(3)

Artificial intelligence

The term artificial intelligence has the meaning given the term in section 238(g) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note).

(4)

Director

The term Director means the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.

4.

Principles and policies for use of artificial intelligence in Government

(a)

Continual review

(1)

In general

The Director shall—

(A)

establish mechanisms to continually refine the guidance issued to the head of each agency under section 104(a) of the AI in Government Act of 2020 (title I of division U of Public Law 116–260) as best practices evolve; and

(B)

not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act and every year thereafter, brief the appropriate congressional committees on the mechanisms established under subparagraph (A).

(2)

Considerations

In developing updates to the guidance described in paragraph (1)(A), the Director shall consider the input of—

(A)

the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board;

(B)

other governmental and nongovernmental privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties experts; and

(C)

and any other individual or entity the Director determines to be appropriate.

(3)

Amendment to AI in Government Act of 2020

Section 104(d) of the AI in Government Act of 2020 (title I of division U of Public Law 116–260) is amended to read as follows:

(d)

Updates

The Director shall—

(1)

continually issue updates to the memorandum required under subsection (a); and

(2)

in any event, issue updates to the memorandum required under subsection (a)—

(A)

not later than 2 years after the date on which the Director issues the memorandum; and

(B)

not less frequently than annually thereafter for 10 years.

.

(b)

Legal and approval processes for procurement and use of AI-Enabled systems

Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act—

(1)

the Secretary of Homeland Security, with the participation of the Chief Privacy Officer and the Officer for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties of the Department of Homeland Security, shall revise the legal and approval processes for the procurement and use of artificial intelligence-enabled systems, including associated data of machine learning systems, to ensure that full consideration is given to the privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties impacts of artificial intelligence-enabled systems; and

(2)

the Chief Privacy Officer and the Officer for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties of the Department of Homeland Security shall report to Congress on any additional staffing or funding resources that may be required to carry out the requirements of this subsection.

(c)

Inspector General

Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Inspector General of the Department of Homeland Security shall identify any training needed to enable employees of the Office of the Inspector General to continually advance their understanding of—

(1)

rapidly evolving artificial intelligence technologies;

(2)

best practices for governance, oversight, and audits of the use of those technologies; and

(3)

how the Office of the Inspector General is using artificial intelligence to enhance audit and investigative capabilities, including actions to—

(A)

ensure the integrity of audit and investigative results; and

(B)

guard against bias in the selection and conduct of audits and investigations.

(d)

Artificial intelligence hygiene and protection of privacy and government information

(1)

Establishment

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy and the Chief Acquisition Officers Council (in this subsection referred to as the Council) or working group thereof shall develop a process to—

(A)

ensure that contracts involving artificial intelligence—

(i)

align with the guidance issued to the head of each agency under section 104(a) of the AI in Government Act of 2020 (title I of division U of Public Law 116–260);

(ii)

address protection of privacy; and

(iii)

the ownership and security of data and other information obtained, processed, stored, transmitted, or otherwise handled by a contractor or subcontractor; and

(B)

address any other issue or concern determined to be relevant by the Administrator of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy and the Council to ensure appropriate use and protection of privacy and Government data and other information.

(2)

Review

Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act and every 2 years thereafter, the Council shall update the process developed under paragraph (1).

(3)

Briefing

The Council shall brief the appropriate congressional committees—

(A)

not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act and thereafter on a quarterly basis until the Council first implements the process developed under paragraph (1); and

(B)

annually thereafter on the implementation of the process developed under paragraph (1).

(4)

Sunset

This subsection shall cease to be effective on the date that is 10 years after the date of enactment of this Act.

5.

Agency inventory and artificial intelligence use cases

(a)

In general

Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director, in consultation with the Federal Chief Information Officer and the Chief Information Officers Council, shall issue a memorandum to the head of each agency that shall articulate the method by which the agency shall make public information about the use of artificial intelligence by the agency, including the publication criteria, publication format, and method of publication.

(b)

Inventory

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for a period of 10 years, the head of each agency shall—

(1)

prepare an inventory of the artificial intelligence use cases of the agency, including current and planned uses, consistent with the memorandum issued under subsection (a);

(2)

identify, review, and assess existing artificial intelligence deployed and operating in support of agency missions for any inconsistencies with the guidance issued under section 104 of the AI in Government Act of 2020 (title I of division U of Public Law 116–260) and any additional guidance issued by the Director;

(3)

develop and implement plans to achieve consistency with the guidance issued under section 104 of the AI in Government Act of 2020 (title I of division U of Public Law 116–260) and any additional guidance from the Director for each AI application or to retire AI applications found to be developed or used in a manner that is not consistent with guidance issued by the Director;

(4)

share agency inventories with other agencies, to the extent practicable and consistent with applicable law and policy, including those concerning protection of privacy and of sensitive law enforcement, national security, and other protected information; and

(5)

make agency inventories available to the public, in a manner determined by the Director, and to the extent practicable and in accordance with applicable law and policy, including those concerning the protection of privacy and of sensitive law enforcement, national security, and other protected information.

(c)

Sharing

The sharing of agency inventories described in subsection (b)(4) may be coordinated through the Chief Information Officers Council, the Chief Data Officers Council, the Chief Financial Officers Council, the Chief Acquisition Officers Council, or other interagency bodies to improve interagency coordination and information sharing for common use cases.

(d)

Central inventory

The Director shall designate a host entity and ensure the creation and maintenance of an online public directory in order to—

(1)

make agency artificial intelligence use case information available to the public and those wishing to do business with the Government; and

(2)

identify common use cases across agencies.

6.

Rapid pilot, deployment, and scale of applied artificial intelligence capabilities to demonstrate modernization activities related to use cases

(a)

Identification of use cases

Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director shall identify not fewer than 5 new use cases for the application of cross-enterprise artificial intelligence-enabled systems to support modernization initiatives across agencies, including interagency or intra-agency initiatives that require linking multiple siloed internal and external data sources.

(b)

Pilot program

(1)

Purposes

The purposes of the pilot program under this section are—

(A)

to enable agencies to operate cross-enterprise, coordinating between existing established programs and silos to improve delivery of the agency mission; and

(B)

to demonstrate the circumstances under which artificial intelligence can be used to modernize or assist in modernizing legacy agency systems.

(2)

Deployment and pilot

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director, in coordination with the heads of relevant agencies and other officials as the Director determines to be appropriate, shall ensure the initiation of the piloting of 5 new cross-enterprise technology use case applications that leverage commercially available technologies and systems to demonstrate scalable artificial intelligence-enabled capabilities to support the use cases identified under subsection (a).

(3)

Prioritization

In carrying out paragraph (2), the Director shall prioritize modernization projects that would benefit from commercially available privacy-preserving machine learning and artificial intelligence techniques, such as use of differential privacy, federated learning, and secure multiparty computing.

(4)

Use case modernization application areas

Use case modernization application areas described in paragraph (2) shall include not fewer than 1 from each of the following categories:

(A)

Applied artificial intelligence to drive agency productivity efficiencies in predictive supply chain and logistics, such as—

(i)

predictive food demand and optimized supply;

(ii)

predictive medical supplies and equipment demand and optimized supply; or

(iii)

predictive logistics to accelerate disaster recovery.

(B)

Applied artificial intelligence to accelerate agency investment return and address mission-oriented challenges, such as—

(i)

applied artificial intelligence portfolio management for agencies;

(ii)

workforce development and upskilling;

(iii)

redundant and laborious analyses;

(iv)

determining compliance with Government requirements, such as with grants management; or

(v)

outcomes measurement to measure economic and social benefits.

(5)

Requirements

Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director, in coordination with the heads of relevant agencies and other officials as the Director determines to be appropriate, shall establish an artificial intelligence capability that—

(A)

solves data access and usability issues with automated technology and eliminate or minimize the need for manual data cleansing and harmonization efforts;

(B)

continuously and automatically ingests data and updates domain models in near real-time to help identify new patterns and predict trends to help agency personnel to make better decisions and take faster actions;

(C)

organizes data for meaningful data visualization and analysis so the Government has predictive transparency for situational awareness to improve use case outcomes;

(D)

is rapidly configurable to support multiple applications and automatically adapts to dynamic conditions and evolving use case requirements;

(E)

enables knowledge transfer and collaboration across agencies; and

(F)

preserves intellectual property rights to the data and output for benefit of the Federal Government and agencies.

(6)

Technology modernization fund

(A)

In general

The activities required under this section shall be an allowable use under the Technology Modernization Fund established under section 1078 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (40 U.S.C. 11301 note) (in this paragraph referred to as the Fund).

(B)

Prioritization

The Director may prioritize the activities in this section for implementation and funding by the Fund, in which case the Director is encouraged to take steps to ensure that agencies are able to rapidly and effectively implement the pilots under this subsection, including by removing reimbursement requirements for funding from the Fund.

(c)

Briefing

Not earlier than 270 days but not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for 3 years, the Director shall brief the appropriate congressional committees on the activities carried out under this section and results of those activities.

7.

Enabling entrepreneurs and values

(a)

Innovative commercial items

Section 880 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (41 U.S.C. 3301 note) is amended—

(1)

in subsection (c), by striking $10,000,000” and inserting $25,000,000; and

(2)

by amending subsection (f) to read as follows:

(f)

Definitions

In this section—

(1)

the term commercial product has the meaning given the term commercial item in section 2.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation; and

(2)

the term innovative means—

(A)

any new technology, process, or method, including research and development; or

(B)

any new application of an existing technology, process, or method.

; and

(3)

in subsection (g), by striking 2022 and insert 2027.

(b)

DHS other transaction authority

Section 831 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 391) is amended—

(1)

in subsection (a)—

(A)

in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking September 30, 2017 and inserting September 30, 2024; and

(B)

by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows:

(2)

Prototype projects

The Secretary—

(A)

may, under the authority of paragraph (1), carry out prototype projects under section 2371b of title 10, United States Code; and

(B)

in applying the authorities of such section 2371b, the Secretary shall perform the functions of the Secretary of Defense as prescribed in such section.

;

(2)

in subsection (c)(1), by striking “September 30, 2017” and inserting September 30, 2024; and

(3)

in subsection (d), by striking section 845(e) and all that follows and inserting section 2371b(e) of title 10, United States Code..

8.

Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated such sums as the necessary to carry out the requirements of this Act and the amendments made by this Act.

1.

Short title

This Act may be cited as the Advancing American AI Act.

2.

Purpose

The purposes of this Act are to—

(1)

encourage agency artificial intelligence-related programs and initiatives that enhance the competitiveness of the United States and foster an approach to artificial intelligence that builds on the strengths of the United States in innovation and entrepreneurialism;

(2)

enhance the ability of the Federal Government to translate research advances into artificial intelligence applications to modernize systems and assist agency leaders in fulfilling their missions;

(3)

promote adoption of modernized business practices and advanced technologies across the Federal Government that align with the values of the United States, including the protection of privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties; and

(4)

test and harness applied artificial intelligence to enhance mission effectiveness and business practice efficiency.

3.

Definitions

In this Act:

(1)

Agency

The term agency has the meaning given the term in section 3502 of title 44, United States Code.

(2)

Appropriate congressional committees

The term appropriate congressional committees means—

(A)

the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate; and

(B)

the Committee on Oversight and Reform of the House of Representatives.

(3)

Artificial intelligence

The term artificial intelligence has the meaning given the term in section 238(g) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note).

(4)

Artificial intelligence system

The term artificial intelligence system

(A)

means any data system, software, application, tool, or utility that operates in whole or in part using dynamic or static machine learning algorithms or other forms of artificial intelligence, whether—

(i)

the data system, software, application, tool, or utility is established primarily for the purpose of researching, developing, or implementing artificial intelligence technology; or

(ii)

artificial intelligence capability is integrated into another system or agency business process, operational activity, or technology system; and

(B)

does not include any common commercial product within which artificial intelligence is embedded, such as a word processor or map navigation system.

(5)

Department

The term Department means the Department of Homeland Security.

(6)

Director

The term Director means the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.

4.

Principles and policies for use of artificial intelligence in Government

(a)

Guidance

The Director shall, when developing the guidance required under section 104(a) of the AI in Government Act of 2020 (title I of division U of Public Law 116–260), consider—

(1)

the considerations and recommended practices identified by the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence in the report entitled Key Considerations for the Responsible Development and Fielding of AI, as updated in April 2021;

(2)

the principles articulated in Executive Order 13960 (85 Fed. Reg. 78939; relating to promoting the use of trustworthy artificial intelligence in Government); and

(3)

the input of—

(A)

the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board;

(B)

relevant interagency councils, such as the Federal Privacy Council, the Chief Information Officers Council, and the Chief Data Officers Council;

(C)

other governmental and nongovernmental privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties experts; and

(D)

any other individual or entity the Director determines to be appropriate.

(b)

Department policies and processes for procurement and use of artificial intelligence-enabled systems

Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act—

(1)

the Secretary of Homeland Security, with the participation of the Chief Procurement Officer, the Chief Information Officer, the Chief Privacy Officer, and the Officer for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties of the Department and any other person determined to be relevant by the Secretary of Homeland Security, shall issue policies and procedures for the Department related to—

(A)

the acquisition and use of artificial intelligence; and

(B)

considerations for the risks and impacts related to artificial intelligence-enabled systems, including associated data of machine learning systems, to ensure that full consideration is given to—

(i)

the privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties impacts of artificial intelligence-enabled systems; and

(ii)

security against misuse, degradation, or rending inoperable of artificial intelligence-enabled systems; and

(2)

the Chief Privacy Officer and the Officer for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties of the Department shall report to Congress on any additional staffing or funding resources that may be required to carry out the requirements of this subsection.

(c)

Inspector General

Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Inspector General of the Department shall identify any training and investments needed to enable employees of the Office of the Inspector General to continually advance their understanding of—

(1)

artificial intelligence systems;

(2)

best practices for governance, oversight, and audits of the use of artificial intelligence systems; and

(3)

how the Office of the Inspector General is using artificial intelligence to enhance audit and investigative capabilities, including actions to—

(A)

ensure the integrity of audit and investigative results; and

(B)

guard against bias in the selection and conduct of audits and investigations.

(d)

Artificial intelligence hygiene and protection of government information, privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties

(1)

Establishment

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director, in consultation with a working group consisting of members selected by the Director from appropriate interagency councils, shall develop an initial means by which to—

(A)

ensure that contracts for the acquisition of an artificial intelligence system or service—

(i)

align with the guidance issued to the head of each agency under section 104(a) of the AI in Government Act of 2020 (title I of division U of Public Law 116–260);

(ii)

address protection of privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties;

(iii)

address the ownership and security of data and other information created, used, processed, stored, maintained, disseminated, disclosed, or disposed of by a contractor or subcontractor on behalf of the Federal Government; and

(iv)

include considerations for securing the training data, algorithms, and other components of any artificial intelligence system against misuse, unauthorized alteration, degradation, or rendering inoperable; and

(B)

address any other issue or concern determined to be relevant by the Director to ensure appropriate use and protection of privacy and Government data and other information.

(2)

Consultation

In developing the considerations under paragraph (1)(A)(iv), the Director shall consult with the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, and the Director of National Intelligence.

(3)

Review

The Director—

(A)

should continuously update the means developed under paragraph (1); and

(B)

not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act and not less frequently than every 2 years thereafter, shall update the means developed under paragraph (1).

(4)

Briefing

The Director shall brief the appropriate congressional committees—

(A)

not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act and thereafter on a quarterly basis until the Director first implements the means developed under paragraph (1); and

(B)

annually thereafter on the implementation of this subsection.

(5)

Sunset

This subsection shall cease to be effective on the date that is 5 years after the date of enactment of this Act.

5.

Agency inventories and artificial intelligence use cases

(a)

Inventory

Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, and continuously thereafter for a period of 5 years, the Director, in consultation with the Chief Information Officers Council, the Chief Data Officers Council, and other interagency bodies as determined to be appropriate by the Director, shall require the head of each agency to—

(1)

prepare and maintain an inventory of the artificial intelligence use cases of the agency, including current and planned uses;

(2)

share agency inventories with other agencies, to the extent practicable and consistent with applicable law and policy, including those concerning protection of privacy and of sensitive law enforcement, national security, and other protected information; and

(3)

make agency inventories available to the public, in a manner determined by the Director, and to the extent practicable and in accordance with applicable law and policy, including those concerning the protection of privacy and of sensitive law enforcement, national security, and other protected information.

(b)

Central inventory

The Director is encouraged to designate a host entity and ensure the creation and maintenance of an online public directory to—

(1)

make agency artificial intelligence use case information available to the public and those wishing to do business with the Federal Government; and

(2)

identify common use cases across agencies.

(c)

Sharing

The sharing of agency inventories described in subsection (a)(2) may be coordinated through the Chief Information Officers Council, the Chief Data Officers Council, the Chief Financial Officers Council, the Chief Acquisition Officers Council, or other interagency bodies to improve interagency coordination and information sharing for common use cases.

6.

Rapid pilot, deployment and scale of applied artificial intelligence capabilities to demonstrate modernization activities related to use cases

(a)

Identification of use cases

Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director, in consultation with the Chief Information Officers Council, the Chief Data Officers Council, and other interagency bodies as determined to be appropriate by the Director, shall identify 4 new use cases for the application of artificial intelligence-enabled systems to support interagency or intra-agency modernization initiatives that require linking multiple siloed internal and external data sources, consistent with applicable laws and policies, including those relating to the protection of privacy and of sensitive law enforcement, national security, and other protected information.

(b)

Pilot program

(1)

Purposes

The purposes of the pilot program under this subsection include—

(A)

to enable agencies to operate across organizational boundaries, coordinating between existing established programs and silos to improve delivery of the agency mission; and

(B)

to demonstrate the circumstances under which artificial intelligence can be used to modernize or assist in modernizing legacy agency systems.

(2)

Deployment and pilot

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director, in coordination with the heads of relevant agencies and other officials as the Director determines to be appropriate, shall ensure the initiation of the piloting of the 4 new artificial intelligence use case applications identified under subsection (a), leveraging commercially available technologies and systems to demonstrate scalable artificial intelligence-enabled capabilities to support the use cases identified under subsection (a).

(3)

Risk evaluation and mitigation plan

In carrying out paragraph (2), the Director shall require the heads of agencies to—

(A)

evaluate risks in utilizing artificial intelligence systems; and

(B)

develop a risk mitigation plan to address those risks, including consideration of—

(i)

the artificial intelligence system not performing as expected;

(ii)

the lack of sufficient or quality training data; and

(iii)

the vulnerability of a utilized artificial intelligence system to unauthorized manipulation or misuse.

(4)

Prioritization

In carrying out paragraph (2), the Director shall prioritize modernization projects that—

(A)

would benefit from commercially available privacy-preserving techniques, such as use of differential privacy, federated learning, and secure multiparty computing; and

(B)

otherwise take into account considerations of civil rights and civil liberties.

(5)

Use case modernization application areas

Use case modernization application areas described in paragraph (2) shall include not less than 1 from each of the following categories:

(A)

Applied artificial intelligence to drive agency productivity efficiencies in predictive supply chain and logistics, such as—

(i)

predictive food demand and optimized supply;

(ii)

predictive medical supplies and equipment demand and optimized supply; or

(iii)

predictive logistics to accelerate disaster preparedness, response, and recovery.

(B)

Applied artificial intelligence to accelerate agency investment return and address mission-oriented challenges, such as—

(i)

applied artificial intelligence portfolio management for agencies;

(ii)

workforce development and upskilling;

(iii)

redundant and laborious analyses;

(iv)

determining compliance with Government requirements, such as with grants management; or

(v)

outcomes measurement to measure economic and social benefits.

(6)

Requirements

Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director, in coordination with the heads of relevant agencies and other officials as the Director determines to be appropriate, shall establish an artificial intelligence capability within each of the 4 use case pilots under this subsection that—

(A)

solves data access and usability issues with automated technology and eliminates or minimizes the need for manual data cleansing and harmonization efforts;

(B)

continuously and automatically ingests data and updates domain models in near real-time to help identify new patterns and predict trends, to the extent possible, to help agency personnel to make better decisions and take faster actions;

(C)

organizes data for meaningful data visualization and analysis so the Government has predictive transparency for situational awareness to improve use case outcomes;

(D)

is rapidly configurable to support multiple applications and automatically adapts to dynamic conditions and evolving use case requirements, to the extent possible;

(E)

enables knowledge transfer and collaboration across agencies; and

(F)

preserves intellectual property rights to the data and output for benefit of the Federal Government and agencies.

(c)

Briefing

Not earlier than 270 days but not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for 4 years, the Director shall brief the appropriate congressional committees on the activities carried out under this section and results of those activities.

(d)

Sunset

The section shall cease to be effective on the date that is 5 years after the date of enactment of this Act.

7.

Enabling entrepreneurs and agency missions

(a)

Innovative commercial items

Section 880 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (41 U.S.C. 3301 note) is amended—

(1)

in subsection (c), by striking $10,000,000” and inserting $25,000,000;

(2)

by amending subsection (f) to read as follows:

(f)

Definitions

In this section—

(1)

the term commercial product

(A)

has the meaning given the term commercial item in section 2.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation; and

(B)

includes a commercial product or a commercial service, as defined in sections 103 and 103a, respectively, of title 41, United States Code; and

(2)

the term innovative means—

(A)

any new technology, process, or method, including research and development; or

(B)

any new application of an existing technology, process, or method.

; and

(3)

in subsection (g), by striking 2022 and insert 2027.

(b)

DHS other transaction authority

Section 831 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 391) is amended—

(1)

in subsection (a)—

(A)

in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking September 30, 2017 and inserting September 30, 2024; and

(B)

by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows:

(2)

Prototype projects

The Secretary—

(A)

may, under the authority of paragraph (1), carry out prototype projects under section 2371b of title 10, United States Code; and

(B)

in applying the authorities of such section 2371b, the Secretary shall perform the functions of the Secretary of Defense as prescribed in such section.

;

(2)

in subsection (c)(1), by striking “September 30, 2017” and inserting September 30, 2024; and

(3)

in subsection (d), by striking section 845(e) and all that follows and inserting section 2371b(e) of title 10, United States Code..

(c)

Commercial off the shelf supply chain risk management tools

The General Services Administration is encouraged to pilot commercial off the shelf supply chain risk management tools to improve the ability of the Federal Government to characterize, monitor, predict, and respond to specific supply chain threats and vulnerabilities that could inhibit future Federal acquisition operations.

December 19, 2022

Reported with an amendment