H.J.Res. 694 (93rd): Nonpartisan Commission on Campaign Reform Act

Introduced:
Jul 31, 1973 (93rd Congress, 1973–1974)
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee)
Sponsor
Robert Price
Representative for Texas's 13th congressional district
Party
Republican
Related Bills
H.J.Res. 559 (identical)

Referred to Committee
Last Action: May 17, 1973

 
Status

This resolution was introduced on July 31, 1973, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced Jul 31, 1973
Referred to Committee Jul 31, 1973
 
Full Title

Joint resolution to establish a nonpartisan commission on political campaign reform.

Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
none
Committees

House House Administration

The committee chair determines whether a resolution will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

H.J.Res. stands for House joint resolution.

A joint resolution is often used in the same manner as a bill. If passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and signed by the president, it becomes a law. Joint resolutions are also used to propose amendments to the Constitution.

The resolution’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


7/31/1973--Introduced.
Nonpartisan Commission on Campaign Reform Act - Establishes an independent Nonpartisan Commission on Campaign Reform. Directs the Commission to conduct an extensive and exhaustive study of the practices engaged in by political parties and individuals in the course of Federal political campaigns including, but not limited to:
(1) the adequacy of procedures for the enforcement of existing laws relating to political campaigns and campaign financing;
(2) the existing and alternative methods of financing political campaigns;
(3) the purpose for which money is expended in political campaigns, such as development of campaign organizations, campaign advertising, voter registration, and polling;
(4) the interrelationship of Federal, State, and local campaigns and Federal, State, and local laws relating to campaigns and campaign financing;
(5) the methods and procedures by which candidates are nominated for national office by political parties;
(6) the adequacy of safeguards against unethical, disruptive, fraudulent, violent, or otherwise wrongful campaign tactics; and
(7) the length of the period over which candidates are required to campaign for nomination and election to national office.
Directs the Commission to make recommendations for such legislation or other reforms as its findings indicate, and in its judgment are needed to revise and control the practices and procedures of political parties, organizations, and individuals participating in the Federal electoral process.
Sets forth powers of the Commission. Requires that the Commission submit to Congress and the President appropriate interim reports and a final report describing the results of the study together with its findings and such legislative proposals as it deems necessary or desirable, not later than January 1, 1974.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.J.Res. 694 (93rd) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus