S. 3553 (94th): Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act

Jun 10, 1976 (94th Congress, 1975–1976)
Enrolled Bill
See Instead:

H.R. 11315 (same title)
Signed by the President — Oct 21, 1976

Roman Hruska
Senator from Nebraska
Related Bills
H.R. 11315 (Related)
Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act

Signed by the President
Oct 21, 1976


This bill was passed by Congress on October 1, 1976 but was not enacted before the end of its Congressional session. (It is possible this bill is waiting for the signature of the President.)

Introduced Jun 10, 1976
Referred to Committee Jun 10, 1976
Reported by Committee Sep 27, 1976
Passed Senate Sep 30, 1976
Passed House Oct 01, 1976
Full Title

A bill to define the jurisdiction of U.S. courts in suits against foreign states, the circumstances in which foreign states are immune from suit and in which execution may not be levied on their property.


No summaries available.

2 cosponsors (1D, 1R) (show)

Senate Judiciary

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.


Get a bill status widget for your website »


Click a format for a citation suggestion:


S. stands for Senate bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.

9/27/1976--Reported to Senate amended.
(Reported to Senate from the Committee on the Judiciary with amendment, S. Rept. 94-1310) Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act - Grants United States district courts original jurisdiction without regard to the amount in controversy in any nonjury civil action against a foreign state as to any claim for relief in personam with respect to which the foreign state is not entitled to immunity.
Stipulates that, in all such cases, district courts shall have personal jurisdiction over a foreign state where the prescribed service is made.
Stipulates that a foreign state is not immune from the jurisdiction of U.S. courts if:
(1) the state has waived its immunity either explicitly or by implication;
(2) the action is based upon specified commercially related activities;
(3) the action is based upon rights in specified property, connected with commercial activity, taken in violation of international law;
(4) the issue is rights in U.S. property acquired by succession or gift or rights in immovable U.S. property; or
(5) money damages are sought against a foreign state for personal injury or death, or damage to or loss of property, occurring in the U.S. and caused by the tortious act or omission of the foreign state or its official or employee acting within the scope of his office or employment.
Exempts from the latter category claims based upon discretionary functions and claims arising out of malicious prosecution, abuse of process, libel, slander, misrepresentation, deceit, or interference with contract rights.
Stipulates that foreign states are not immune from jurisdiction of U.S. courts in the case of admiralty suits brought to enforce a maritime lien against a foreign state's vessel or cargo, which lien is based upon the state's commercial activity.
Requires that proper notice be given to the person, or his agent, having possession of the vessel or cargo against which the lien is asserted and to the foreign state.
Directs that the lien thereafter be deemed an in personam claim against the foreign state and that the court may not award judgement greater than the value of the vessel or cargo.
Denies a foreign state, which brings or intervenes in an action in a U.S. court, immunity with respect to any counterclaim:
(1) where it would not otherwise be entitled to immunity under this Act had such claim been brought in a separate action against the foreign state;
(2) arising out of the transaction or occurence that is the subject matter of the foreign state's claim; or
(3) to the extent that the counterclaim does not seek relief exceeding in amount or differing in kind from that sought by the foreign state.
Sets forth procedures for service of process, time to answer, and default.
Stipulates that, subject to existing international agreements to which the U.S. is a party at the time of enactment of this Act, property of a foreign state in the U.S. shall be immune from attachment, arrest, and execution except as permitted under this Act. Includes within such exceptions specified U.S. property used by a foreign state for commercial activity and any property in the U.S. of an agency or instrumentality of a foreign state which engages in commercial activity in the U.S., subject to enumerated restrictions and conditions.
Exempts from attachment or any other judicial process the property of those organizations designated by the President as entitled to fall within the provisions of the International Organizations Immunities Act. Exempts from attachment and execution, property:
(1) of a foreign central bank or monetary authority held for its own account, unless it, or its parent government, has waived such immunity; and
(2) used, or intended for use, in connection with a military activity where the property is of a military character and is under the control of a military authority or defense agency.
Specifies the proper district for bringing civil actions against a foreign state.
Authorizes removal of such cases from State to U.S. district courts by the foreign state.
Adds 28 U.S.C. 1330, 1602-11; Amends 28 U.S.C. 1332, 1391, 1441

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.

No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of S. 3553 (94th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus