S. 3747 (94th): A bill to eliminate a restriction relating to certain lands granted to the State of Montana.

Introduced:
Aug 10, 1976 (94th Congress, 1975–1976)
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee)
Sponsor
Michael “Mike” Mansfield
Senator from Montana
Party
Democrat
 
Status

This bill was introduced on August 10, 1976, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced Aug 10, 1976
Referred to Committee Aug 10, 1976
 
Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
1 cosponsors (1D) (show)
Committees

Senate Energy and Natural Resources

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

S. stands for Senate bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


8/10/1976--Introduced.
Renders specified restrictions on the disposition of certain lands by the State of Montanna inapplicable to any transfer of the penitentiary at Deer Lodge to the city of Deer Lodge.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of S. 3747 (94th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus