H.R. 10359 (95th): National Product Liability Act

Introduced:
Dec 15, 1977 (95th Congress, 1977–1978)
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee)
Sponsor
Ronald Sarasin
Representative for Connecticut's 5th congressional district
Party
Republican
Related Bills
H.R. 6300 (identical)

Referred to Committee
Last Action: Apr 19, 1977

 
Status

This bill was introduced on December 15, 1977, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced Dec 15, 1977
Referred to Committee Dec 15, 1977
 
Full Title

A bill to improve the safety of products manufactured and sold in interstate commerce, to reduce the number of deaths and injuries caused by such products.

Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
7 cosponsors (4D, 3R) (show)
Committees

House Energy and Commerce

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


12/15/1977--Introduced.
National Product Liability Act - Declares that the purpose of this Act is to establish a substantive law of product liability for damages resulting from harm caused by products affecting interstate commerce and to establish a product liability action therefor.
States that such product liability action preempts all existing causes and laws for the same purpose.
Subjects whomever is engaged in interstate commerce and manufactures or sells:
(1) a product which is in a defective condition; or
(2) any product and fails to warn or protect against a dangerous condition in the use or reasonably foreseeable misuse or unintended use of the product or fails to provide proper instructions for the intended use of that product, to liability for the harm caused despite the fact that the manufacturer or seller has exercised all possible care in the preparation and/or sale of the product.
Allows any person harmed by a product who is a reasonably anticipated user or consumer of the product to bring an action in "product liability" against the manufacturer or seller of the product.
Allows any person against whom a product liability action is brought to bring an action for indemnification or other appropriate relief against any third party whose misconduct has caused or contributed to the harm for which damages are sought.
Limits the time for commencing a product liability action to two years from the date when the harm is first sustained, discovered, or in the exercise of reasonable care should have been discovered.
Stipulates that a product shall be deemed in defective condition only if it is unreasonably dangerous for its intended use at the time the product left the control of the party against whom the action is being brought.
Prohibits the awarding of punitive or exemplary damages unless the trier of fact finds that the accused acted out of malice or willfully or wantonly acted in flagrant disregard of public health and safety.
Allows the primary forum for trying cases brought under this Act to remain in the State courts.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.R. 10359 (95th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus