H.R. 7568 (95th): Federal Correctional Ombudsman Act

Jun 02, 1977 (95th Congress, 1977–1978)
Died (Referred to Committee)
Ralph Metcalfe
Representative for Illinois's 1st congressional district
Related Bills
H.R. 8848 (93rd) was a previous version of this bill.

Referred to Committee
Last Action: Jun 20, 1973

H.R. 550 (identical)

Referred to Committee
Last Action: Jan 04, 1977


This bill was introduced on June 2, 1977, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Introduced Jun 02, 1977
Referred to Committee Jun 02, 1977
Full Title

A bill to amend title 18 of the United States Code to establish an Office of the United States Correctional Ombudsman.


No summaries available.

Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.


Get a bill status widget for your website »


Click a format for a citation suggestion:


H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.

Federal Correctional Ombudsman Act - Establishes an office of the United States Correctional Ombudsman. Authorizes the Chief Ombudsman to investigate in such manner as he sees fit, either upon complaint or upon his own initiative, any administrative act of the Bureau of Prisons or the Board of Parole, pertaining to:
(1) the treatment of any Federal prisoner or parolee; or
(2) the conditions in any Federal penal or correctional institution or any institution which has contracted for the care or employment of any Federal prisoner.
Sets forth procedures relative to such investigations.
Directs the Chief Ombudsman to consult with the appropriate official or employee upon finding that any administrative act is
(1) contrary to law;
(2) unreasonable, unfair, oppressive, or unnecessarily discriminatory;
(3) based on mistaken ascertainment of fact;
(4) based on improper or irrelevant grounds;
(5) performed in an inefficient manner;
(6) unclear or inadequately explained when reasons should have been revealed; or
(7) otherwise objectionable.
States that if the Chief Ombudsman believes that an administrative act has been dictated by laws whose results are unfair or otherwise objectionable, he shall notify the appropriate committees of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives. Provides that no information disclosed to any ombudsman or to any staff or employee of the Office in connection with an investigation under this Act shall be disclosed to any other person except to the extent the Chief Ombudsman determines necessary to carry out the purpose of this Act. Requires the Chief Ombudsman to report annually to the Congress on the operations of the Office.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.

No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.R. 7568 (95th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus