S. 1174 (95th): Critical Lands Resource Conservation Act

Introduced:
Mar 29, 1977 (95th Congress, 1977–1978)
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee)
Sponsor
Robert Dole
Senator from Kansas
Party
Republican
Related Bills
H.R. 2729 (identical)

Referred to Committee
Last Action: Jan 31, 1977

 
Status

This bill was introduced on March 29, 1977, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced Mar 29, 1977
Referred to Committee Mar 29, 1977
 
Full Title

A bill entitled the Critical Lands Resource Conservation Act of 1977.

Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
3 cosponsors (2D, 1R) (show)
Committees

Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

S. stands for Senate bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


3/29/1977--Introduced.
Critical Lands Resource Conservation Act - Directs the Secretary of Agriculture to enter into agreements, for two years initially and thereafter annually renewable, with owners and operators of land in the Great Plains area to promote conservation of soil and water resources through conversion of cropland from soil depleting uses to conserving uses including the production of soil conserving cover crops.
Requires an owner or operator, among other things:
(1) to devote to a soil conserving cover crop up to 50 percent of a farm's cropland acreage which had been planted to soil depleting crops in any of the two years preceding;
(2) to plant a legume, or an annual, biennial, or a perennial cover crop;
(3) to divert from production a designated portion of one or more crops;
(4) not to harvest any crop from or graze the designated acreage, unless the Secretary determines otherwise in order to alleviate disaster-caused distress;
(5) to give assurance that the land was not acquired in order to put it in this program;
(6) to forfeit all rights to further payments and to refund past payments upon violation of the agreement, or upon transfer of right and interest in the farm unless the transferee assumes all obligations; and
(7) not to adopt any practice which would tend to defeat the purposes of the agreement.
Requires the Secretary in consideration of such agreement to pay to the owner or operator an annual adjustment payment at a rate not in excess of $30 per acre.
Directs the Secretary to use the services of local, county, and State committees and the technical services of the Soil Conservation Service and soil and water conservation districts.
Requires adequate safeguards to protect the interests of tenants and sharecroppers for sharing in annual adjustment payments.
Authorizes the Secretary to use the facilities, services and authorities of the Commodity Credit Corporation in discharging the responsibilities of this program, including payment of costs of administration.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of S. 1174 (95th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus