S. 3322 (95th): A bill to consent to the Historic Chattahoochee Compact between the States of Alabama and Georgia.

Introduced:
Jul 19, 1978 (95th Congress, 1977–1978)
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee)
Sponsor
James Allen
Senator from Alabama
Party
Democrat
 
Status

This bill was introduced on July 19, 1978, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced Jul 19, 1978
Referred to Committee Jul 19, 1978
 
Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
3 cosponsors (3D) (show)
Committees

Senate Judiciary

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

S. stands for Senate bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


7/19/1978--Introduced.
Interstate Compact - Grants the consent of Congress to the Historic Chattahoochee Compact between Alabama and Georgia, for the purpose of promoting the cooperative development of the Chattahoochee Valley's potential for historic preservation and tourism, and to establish a joint Historic Chattahoochee Commission to assist in such efforts.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of S. 3322 (95th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus