S. 2645 (97th): Military Construction Codification Act

Introduced:
Jun 17, 1982 (97th Congress, 1981–1982)
Status:
Died (Reported by Committee)
See Instead:

H.R. 6451 (same title)
Signed by the President — Jul 12, 1982

Sponsor
Strom Thurmond
Senator from South Carolina
Party
Republican
Related Bills
H.R. 6451 (identical)

Signed by the President
Jul 12, 1982

S. 1990 (Related)
Military Construction Codification Act

Referred to Committee
Last Action: Dec 16, 1981

 
Status

This bill was introduced on May 20, 1982, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Reported by Committee May 20, 1982
Introduced Jun 17, 1982
 
Full Title

An original bill to amend title 10, United States Code, to revise and codify the permanent provisions of law relating to military construction and military family housing.

Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
none
Committees

Senate Armed Services

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

S. stands for Senate bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


6/17/1982--Introduced.
Military Construction Codification Act - Codifies provisions concerning military construction and military family housing.
Permits the expenditure of funds for planning and administration within the authority to construct or convert any Reserve facility.
Permits the advance of public moneys for such purpose.
Permits permanent or temporary improvements on lands to which title is not yet approved and on lands which are held temporarily.
Increases from $175,000 to $200,000 the ceiling on Reserve facilities requiring notification of the appropriate congressional committees.
Reduces the period of notification from 30 to 21 days.
Expands the exemption from such requirements to include projects whose location, purpose, scope, and cost remain the same or within prescribed limits as when authorized.
Requires annual authorization of appropriations for military construction of Reserve facilities, architectural and engineering services and construction design for all military constuction projects, and advances for the construction of defense access roads.
Expands the authority to acquire real property to include authority to make surveys and acquire interests through gift, purchase, or exchange.
Limits the amount of increase in cost for land acquisition for unusual, unanticipated variations in cost or reduction in scope of the project.
Permits an exemption with the approval of the congressional committees after 21 days notice or upon receipt of approval.
Codifies other permanent provisions of law concerning the use and development of energy resources on military lands.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of S. 2645 (97th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus