S. 869 (97th): El Salvador Assistance Act of 1981

Introduced:
Apr 02, 1981 (97th Congress, 1981–1982)
Status:
Died (Reported by Committee)
Sponsor
Christopher Dodd
Senator from Connecticut
Party
Democrat
Related Bills
H.R. 3009 (identical)

Referred to Committee
Last Action: Apr 02, 1981

S. 1196 (Related)
International Security and Development Cooperation Act of 1981

Signed by the President
Dec 29, 1981

 
Status

This bill was introduced on May 14, 1981, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced Apr 02, 1981
Referred to Committee Apr 02, 1981
Reported by Committee May 14, 1981
 
Full Title

A bill to place restrictions on military assistance and sales to El Salvador.

Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
1 cosponsors (1D) (show)
Committees

Senate Foreign Relations

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

S. stands for Senate bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


4/2/1981--Introduced.
El Salvador Assistance Act of 1981 - Authorizes the obligation of funds for military and economic assistance under specified Federal laws for El Salvador only if prior to each such grant of assistance the President certifies to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that El Salvador's Government:
(1) is not engaged in consistently violating internationally recognized human rights;
(2) has achieved substantial control over its armed forces;
(3) is making progress in implementing essential economic and political reforms;
(4) is committed to holding free elections; and
(5) has demonstrated its willingness to negotiate a political resolution of the conflict.
Directs the President, if such certification is not made or if such certification is made but does not take effect, to:
(1) suspend specified military assistance and military education and training for El Salvador;
(2) withhold approvals for use of certain credits and guarantees for El Salvador;
(3) suspend deliveries of certain defense articles, defense services, and design and construction services; and
(4) withdraw all U.S. armed forces performing specified functions from El Salvador. Prohibits such certification from taking effect until 30 days after Congress receives the certification.
Requires it to take effect only if Congress does not adopt a concurrent resolution objecting to the provision of military assistance to El Salvador. Prohibits the President from making such certification until the President certifies that El Salvador's Government has made good faith efforts to investigate the murders of six U.S. citizens in El Salvador and to bring those responsible for the murders to justice.
Includes the drawdown of defense articles or services in an unforeseen military emergency within the obligation of funds for military assistance which can be made only after such certification.
Prohibits the waiver of such certification requirement.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of S. 869 (97th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus