H.R. 4210 (98th): A bill to designate the United States Post Office and Courthouse Building in Greensboro, North Carolina, as the “L. Richardson Preyer Federal Building”.

Oct 25, 1983 (98th Congress, 1983–1984)
Died (Passed House)
Charles Britt
Representative for North Carolina's 6th congressional district

This bill was introduced in a previous session of Congress and was passed by the House on November 18, 1983 but was never passed by the Senate.

Introduced Oct 25, 1983
Referred to Committee Oct 25, 1983
Passed House Nov 18, 1983

No summaries available.

129 cosponsors (101D, 28R) (show)

House Transportation and Infrastructure

Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.


Get a bill status widget for your website »


Click a format for a citation suggestion:


H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.

Designates the United States Post Office and Courthouse Building in Greensboro, North Carolina, as the L. Richardson Preyer Federal Building.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.

No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.R. 4210 (98th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus