S. 1852 (98th): Defense Production Act Amendments of 1984

Introduced:
Sep 19, 1983 (98th Congress, 1983–1984)
Status:
Signed by the President
Slip Law:
This bill became Pub.L. 98-265.
Sponsor
Paul Trible Jr.
Senator from Virginia
Party
Republican
Text
Read Text »
Last Updated
Apr 17, 1984
Length
Related Bills
H.R. 3959 (Related)
Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1984

Signed by the President
Nov 30, 1983

 
Status

This bill was enacted after being signed by the President on April 17, 1984.

Progress
Introduced Sep 19, 1983
Referred to Committee Sep 19, 1983
Reported by Committee Sep 29, 1983
Passed Senate Sep 30, 1983
Passed House with Changes Oct 06, 1983
Conference Report Agreed to by Senate Apr 05, 1984
Signed by the President Apr 17, 1984
 
Full Title

A bill to extend the expiration date of the Defense Production Act of 1950.

Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
none
Committees

Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

S. stands for Senate bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


4/5/1984--Conference report filed in House.
(Conference report filed in House, H. Rept. 98-651) Defense Production Act Amendments of 1984 - Amends the Defense Production Act of 1950 to extend its expiration date for two and one-half years, from March 30, 1984, to the end of FY 1986.
Sets forth the criteria under which the President may authorize the guarantee of loans to defense contractors, including:
(1) the essentiality of the material or service to the national defense;
(2) industry's need for such a guarantee before providing the necessary capability;
(3) the cost-effectiveness of the guarantee, considering the alternatives; and
(4) that defense demand is equal to or greater than the output of domestic industrial capability which is reasonably determined to be available for national defense.
Sets forth similar criteria for loans to private business enterprises and the purchase of raw materials under such Act. (The criteria set forth are the existing Department of Defense criteria for evaluating project proposals under title III of the Defense Production Act.) Eliminates the legislative veto provisions from such Act requiring instead that Congress approve proposed loan guarantees, loans, or purchases through the authorization and budget process with established thresholds for appropriations.
Authorizes appropriations for FY 1985 and 1986.
Directs the President to make annual reports to the appropriate congressional committees on the impact of offsets on the defense preparedness, industrial competitiveness, employment, and trade of the United States.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of S. 1852 (98th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus