S. 2743 (98th): A bill to designate a portion of 16th Street, Northwest, Washington, D.C., on which the Embassy of the Union of Soviet Socialists Republics is located, as “Andrei Sakharov Avenue”.

Introduced:
Jun 08, 1984 (98th Congress, 1983–1984)
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee)
Sponsor
Charles “Chuck” Grassley
Senator from Iowa
Party
Republican
Related Bills
H.R. 5784 (identical)

Referred to Committee
Last Action: Jun 06, 1984

 
Status

This bill was introduced on June 8, 1984, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced Jun 08, 1984
Referred to Committee Jun 08, 1984
 
Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
23 cosponsors (14R, 9D) (show)
Committees

Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

S. stands for Senate bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


6/8/1984--Introduced.
Designates the portion of 16th Street, Northwest, in the District of Columbia, between L and M Streets, as Andrei Sakharov Avenue.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of S. 2743 (98th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus