H.R. 3132 (99th): Law Enforcement Officers Protection Act of 1985

Introduced:
Jul 31, 1985 (99th Congress, 1985–1986)
Status:
Signed by the President
Slip Law:
This bill became Pub.L. 99-408.
Sponsor
Mario Biaggi
Representative for New York's 19th congressional district
Party
Democrat
Text
Read Text »
Last Updated
Aug 28, 1986
Length
Related Bills
H.R. 953 (98th) was a previous version of this bill.

Referred to Committee
Last Action: Jan 26, 1983

H.R. 4 (Related)
Law Enforcement Officers Protection Act of 1985

Referred to Committee
Last Action: Jan 03, 1985

 
Status

This bill was enacted after being signed by the President on August 28, 1986.

Progress
Introduced Jul 31, 1985
Referred to Committee Jul 31, 1985
Reported by Committee Sep 10, 1985
Passed House Dec 17, 1985
Passed Senate with Changes Mar 06, 1986
Signed by the President Aug 28, 1986
 
Full Title

A bill to amend chapter 44, of title 18, United States Code, to regulate the manufacture, importation, and sale of armor piercing ammunition, and for other purposes.

Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
113 cosponsors (93D, 20R) (show)
Committees

House Judiciary

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

H.R. stands for House of Representatives bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


3/6/1986--Passed Senate amended.
(Measure passed Senate, amended, in lieu of S. 104, roll call #28 (97-1)) Amends the Federal criminal code to define "armor-piercing ammunition as projectiles constructed from specified material which may be used in handguns.
Excludes from the definition:
(1) shotgun shot required by Federal or State regulations for hunting;
(2) frangible projectiles for target shooting; or
(3) projectiles that the Secretary of the Treasury determines are primarily intended for sporting purposes or industrial use.
Makes it unlawful for any person to manufacture or import armor-piercing ammunition.
Allows for:
(1) the manufacture or importation of armor-piercing ammunition for the use of the United States or any State or local government;
(2) the manufacture for the sole purpose of exportation; and
(3) the manufacture or importation for testing or experimentation authorized by the Secretary. Allows for the sale and delivery of armor-piercing ammunition for these purposes.
Establishes a licensing fee of $1,000 per year for manufacturers and importers of armor-piercing ammunition.
Authorizes the Secretary to revoke any license issued to a dealer if such dealer willfully transfers armor-piercing ammunition.
Requires licensed importers and manufacturers to specially mark all armor-piercing projectiles and packages.
Imposes an additional mandatory sentence of not less than five years for any person who uses or carries a firearm and is in possession of armor-piercing ammunition during the commission of a crime of violence.
Provides that such sentence shall not be suspended or probation or parole be granted.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of H.R. 3132 (99th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus