S. 2775 (99th): A bill to suspend for a three year period the duty on 3-Ethylamino-p-cresol.

Introduced:
Aug 15, 1986 (99th Congress, 1985–1986)
Status:
Died (Referred to Committee)
Sponsor
Russell Long
Senator from Louisiana
Party
Democrat
 
Status

This bill was introduced on August 15, 1986, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.

Progress
Introduced Aug 15, 1986
Referred to Committee Aug 15, 1986
 
Summary

No summaries available.

Cosponsors
none
Committees

Senate Finance

The committee chair determines whether a bill will move past the committee stage.

 
Primary Source

THOMAS.gov (The Library of Congress)

GovTrack gets most information from THOMAS, which is updated generally one day after events occur. Activity since the last update may not be reflected here. Data comes via the congress project.

Widget

Get a bill status widget for your website »

Citation

Click a format for a citation suggestion:

Notes

S. stands for Senate bill.

A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate in identical form and then be signed by the president to become law.

The bill’s title was written by its sponsor.

GovTrack’s Bill Summary

We don’t have a summary available yet.

Library of Congress Summary

The summary below was written by the Congressional Research Service, which is a nonpartisan division of the Library of Congress.


8/15/1986--Introduced.
Amends the Tariff Schedules of the United States to suspend, through December 31, 1989, the duty on 3-Ethylamino-p-cresol.

House Republican Conference Summary

The summary below was written by the House Republican Conference, which is the caucus of Republicans in the House of Representatives.


No summary available.

House Democratic Caucus Summary

The House Democratic Caucus does not provide summaries of bills.

So, yes, we display the House Republican Conference’s summaries when available even if we do not have a Democratic summary available. That’s because we feel it is better to give you as much information as possible, even if we cannot provide every viewpoint.

We’ll be looking for a source of summaries from the other side in the meanwhile.

Use the comment space below for discussion of the merits of S. 2775 (99th) with other GovTrack users.
Your comments are not read by Congressional staff.

comments powered by Disqus