skip to main content

H.R. 699: Email Privacy Act

Apr 27, 2016 at 3:37 p.m. ET. On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended in the House.

This was a vote to pass H.R. 699 (114th) in the House. This vote was taken under a House procedure called “suspension of the rules” which is typically used to pass non-controversial bills. Votes under suspension require a 2/3rds majority. A failed vote under suspension can be taken again.

The bill introduced during this Congress with the most cosponsors is theEmail Privacy Act, with 310 cosponsors, a bipartisan mix of 194 Republicans and 115 Democrats. In theory this bill — H.R. 699, introduced by Rep. Kevin Yoder (R-KS3) — should be a near-lock for passage. But when the same bill was introduced last session, it failed to pass. What will the result be this time?

Odds of passage

When the same bill was introduced in the last session of Congress, in 2013, it attracted 272 cosponsors, including a similar 174 Republican / 98 Democrat bipartisan breakdown. Yet it never received a vote after being referred to the House Judiciary Committee. However, Committee Chair Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-VA6) announced last week that the bill won’t languish this time around, and will receive a markup in March.

What the bill does

Under current law, as described by The Hill, the government may use subpoenas instead of warrants when forcing companies (such as Google, Yahoo, Facebook, Twitter, etc.) to turn over customers’ electronic communications, including emails, when those messages are more than 180 days old. While warrants require “probable cause,” subpoenas don’t, and they allow much more information to be collected. (The difference is important for several other reasons.)

As The Hill explained, “The [subpoena] provision is a holdover from an era in which it would have been largely impractical for an email service provider to store emails for more than six months and cloud storage was not yet available. It is universally accepted that the law has not kept up with current technology.” The Electronics Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), which created the subpoena power, was enacted in 1986.

The bill would end this loophole and require government agencies to seek warrants for digital communications older than 180 days.

Who supports the Email Privacy Act

To put the bill’s 310 cosponsors into perspective, the next most-cosponsored bills this session were 303 for a Congressional Gold Medal nomination and 301 for the Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans Act. For another perspective, a bill only needs 290 votes in the House to override a presidential veto.

President Obama’s administration has been supportive of policy changes in this area, writing in 2013 in response to a We the People petition that “The ECPA is outdated, and it should be reformed.” However, because bills can undergo significant modifications during the legislative process, the White House added, “We aren’t going to endorse a single ECPA-reform bill at this time.” It does not appear that Obama or the White House has weighed in on the current bill.

“The last time Congress updated our email privacy laws, we were two years removed from the release of the first Macintosh computer,” Yoder said when introducing the bill. “It’s time Congress modernized these outdated statutes to ensure that the rights protected by the Fourth Amendment extend to Americans’ email correspondence and digital storage.”

Politics makes strange bedfellows, as the New York Times Editorial Board came out in support of the bill introduced by a conservative Republican: “Internet users today store incredible amounts of private information online so they can have access to it from any connected device. That data should be just as protected as the photos, letters and other documents people keep at home.”

Who opposes it

Some federal agencies like the Securities and Exchange Commission have come out against the bill. The SEC does not have authority to obtain criminal warrants in their investigations, such as those into financial fraud. In testimony before the House Judiciary Committee in November, SEC Division of Enforcement Director Andrew Ceresney warned, “H.R. 699, in its current form, poses significant risks to the American public by impeding the ability of the SEC and other civil law enforcement agencies to investigate and uncover financial fraud and other unlawful conduct.”

Steven H. Cook, president of the National Association of Assistant United States Attorneys, also warned, “While the Email Privacy Act expands Fourth Amendment protections and imposes a warrant requirement to compel disclosure of stored email or text, the statute does not recognize any of the well-established exceptions to the warrant requirement that would be applicable in every other circumstance. I know of no other area of the law where this is the case.”

(American federal law recognizes six main exceptions to a warrant requirement for searches: a search incidental to a lawful arrest, a “plain view exception,” if the person being searched gives their consent, “stop and frisk,” an automobile exception, and in an emergency.)


All Votes R D
Yea 100%
Nay 0%
Not Voting

Passed. 2/3 Required. Source:

Ideology Vote Chart

Republican - Yea Democrat - Yea
Seat position based on our ideology score.

Cartogram Map

Each hexagon represents one congressional district. Dark shaded hexes are Yea votes.

What you can do

Vote Details

Notes: The Speaker’s Vote? “Aye” or “Yea”?
Download as CSV

Statistically Notable Votes

Statistically notable votes are the votes that are most surprising, or least predictable, given how other members of each voter’s party voted and other factors.

All Votes

Study Guide

How well do you understand this vote? Use this study guide to find out.

You can find answers to most of the questions below here on the vote page. For a guide to understanding the bill this vote was about, see here.

What was the procedure for this vote?

  1. What was this vote on?
  2. Not all votes are meant to pass legislation. In the Senate some votes are not about legislation at all, since the Senate must vote to confirm presidential nominations to certain federal positions.

    This vote is related to a bill. However, that doesn’t necessarily tell you what it is about. Congress makes many decisions in the process of passing legislation, such as on the procedures for debating the bill, whether to change the bill before voting on passage, and even whether to vote on passage at all.

    You can learn more about the various motions used in Congress at If you aren’t sure what the House was voting on, try seeing if it’s on this list.

  3. What is the next step after this vote?
  4. Take a look at where this bill is in the legislative process. What might come next? Keep in mind what this specific vote was on, and the context of the bill. Will there be amendments? Will the other chamber of Congress vote on it, or let it die?

    For this question it may help to briefly examine the bill itself.

What is your analysis of this vote?

  1. What trends do you see in this vote?
  2. Members of Congress side together for many reasons beside being in the same political party, especially so for less prominent legislation or legislation specific to a certain region. What might have determined how the roll call came out in this case? Does it look like Members of Congress voted based on party, geography, or some other reason?

    One tool that will be helpful in answering this question is the cartogram at the top of the page. A cartogram is a stylized map of the United States that shows each district as an identical hexagon. This view allows you to see the how the representatives from each district voted arranged by their geography and colored by their political party. What trends can you see in the cartogram for this vote?

  3. How did your representative vote?
  4. There is one vote here that should be more important to you than all the others. These are the votes cast by your representative, which is meant to represent you and your community. Do you agree with how your representative voted? Why do you think they voted the way they did?

    If you don’t already know who your Members of Congress are you can find them by entering your address here.

Each vote’s study guide is a little different — we automatically choose which questions to include based on the information we have available about the vote. Study guides are a new feature to GovTrack. You can help us improve them by filling out this survey or by sending your feedback to