skip to main content

H.R. 1761: Protecting Against Child Exploitation Act of 2017

May 25, 2017 at 11:40 a.m. ET. On Passage of the Bill in the House.

This was a vote to pass H.R. 1761 (115th) in the House.

More than half of teens have sent sexually explicit images or “sexted” before age 18–54 percent to be exact, according to researchers at Drexel University. But they should be treated as sex offenders? Many worry that a bill which recently passed the House could do just that.

Context and what the bill does

The Protecting Against Child Exploitation Act, labelled H.R. 1761 in the House, would close a loophole in federal child pornography laws. It would eliminate the requirement that a defendant had “specific intent” to create or distribute child pornography. This stems from a controversial 2015 court decision when a 19-year-old male was able to escape prosecution after having sex with a 7-year-old female neighbor, due to a loophole.

After a photo of the sex act was found on the cell phone of the man, Anthony Palomino-Coronado of Maryland, he was convicted of intentionally coercing a minor into sexual conduct in order to produce a photo. He was sentenced to 30 years in prison. But on appeal, while not denying sex with the child, Palomino-Coronado contended that federal law requires “intent” in order to prosecute for child pornography. He claimed the government had failed to prove that he had sex with a minor in order to take the photos of act.

It might sound like a minor distinction, but the appeals court agreed and reversed his conviction. Noting “It is not enough to say ‘the photo speaks for itself,’” the three-judge panel — while not condoning the act of sex with children — ruled that “The single photo is not evidence that Palomino-Coronado engaged in sexual activity with [the child] _to _take a picture, only that he engaged in sexual activity with [the child] _and _took a picture.”

What supporters say

Supporters argue the bill ensures that those who commit one of the most heinous of all crimes, child pornography, will be punished. They won’t be let loose as a result of “incidentally” rather than “intentionally” creating child pornography.

“”The first responsibility of any just government is to defend the defenseless. Among the most despicable criminals who deserve the full measure of our wrath are those who sexually abuse innocent children,” House lead sponsor Rep. Mike Johnson (R-LA4), who was first elected in November 2016, said in a press release.

“A court-created loophole in federal law allows a predator to ADMIT to sexually assaulting a child in many circumstances and still evade punishment. The Protection Against Child Exploitation Act will ensure any future perpetrators receive the justice they so rightly deserve.”

What opponents say

Opponents fear that the law’s overly broad language could potentially criminalize the behavior of millions of high schoolers who engage in consensual sexting — a practice often seen as something of a rite of passage in the digital age akin to losing one’s virginity.

Every state except North Carolina treats 16- and 17-year-olds as children when punishing for nonviolent crimes. And at least 20 states in the past five years have passed laws explicitly protecting minors from criminal charges when sexting. But this bill would move in the opposite direction, creating a mandatory minimum sentence of 15 years for child pornography — consensual teen sexting included.

“While the bill is well intended, it is overbroad in scope and will punish the very people it indicates it is designed to protect: our children,” Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX8) said on the House floor. “[It will also] exacerbate overwhelming concerns with the unfair and unjust mandatory minimum sentencing that contributes to the overcriminalization of juveniles and mass incarceration generally.”

An amendment fails

In fact, a mere eight minutes prior to the actual House vote on the bill itself, Rep. Jackson Lee introduced an amendment to guarantee that minors could not be punished as sex offenders, including for consensual teen sexting. The amendment failed 180–238, on an almost completely party-line vote, with all but seven Democrats in support and all but two Republicans opposed.

Only two Republicans supported: Reps. Justin Amash (R-MI3) and Raúl Labrador (R-ID1). Only seven Democrats opposed: Reps. Ami Bera (D-CA7), Jim Costa (D-CA16), Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ5), Jimmy Panetta (D-CA20), Scott Peters (D-CA52), Collin Peterson (D-MN7), and Kurt Schrader (D-OR5).

Key votes and odds of passage

The bill passed the House 368–51 on May 25, after receiving six cosponsors, all Republicans. All but two House Republicans voted in favor: Reps. Justin Amash (R-MI3) and Thomas Massie (R-KY4). Democrats also voted overwhelmingly in favor, though with more dissenting votes: 137–49.

The bill now goes to the Senate, where it has yet to receive a vote in the Judiciary Committee. Given the large margins by which it passed in the House, Senate passage seems probable.


All Votes R D
Aye 88%
No 12%
Not Voting

Passed. Simple Majority Required. Source:

Ideology Vote Chart

Republican - Aye Democrat - Aye Republican - No Democrat - No
Seat position based on our ideology score.

Cartogram Map

Each hexagon represents one congressional district. Solid hexes are Aye votes.

What you can do

Vote Details

Notes: The Speaker’s Vote? “Aye” or “Yea”?
Download as CSV

Statistically Notable Votes

Statistically notable votes are the votes that are most surprising, or least predictable, given how other members of each voter’s party voted and other factors.

All Votes

Study Guide

How well do you understand this vote? Use this study guide to find out.

You can find answers to most of the questions below here on the vote page. For a guide to understanding the bill this vote was about, see here.

What was the procedure for this vote?

  1. What was this vote on?
  2. Not all votes are meant to pass legislation. In the Senate some votes are not about legislation at all, since the Senate must vote to confirm presidential nominations to certain federal positions.

    This vote is related to a bill. However, that doesn’t necessarily tell you what it is about. Congress makes many decisions in the process of passing legislation, such as on the procedures for debating the bill, whether to change the bill before voting on passage, and even whether to vote on passage at all.

    You can learn more about the various motions used in Congress at If you aren’t sure what the House was voting on, try seeing if it’s on this list.

  3. What is the next step after this vote?
  4. Take a look at where this bill is in the legislative process. What might come next? Keep in mind what this specific vote was on, and the context of the bill. Will there be amendments? Will the other chamber of Congress vote on it, or let it die?

    For this question it may help to briefly examine the bill itself.

What is your analysis of this vote?

  1. What trends do you see in this vote?
  2. Members of Congress side together for many reasons beside being in the same political party, especially so for less prominent legislation or legislation specific to a certain region. What might have determined how the roll call came out in this case? Does it look like Members of Congress voted based on party, geography, or some other reason?

    One tool that will be helpful in answering this question is the cartogram at the top of the page. A cartogram is a stylized map of the United States that shows each district as an identical hexagon. This view allows you to see the how the representatives from each district voted arranged by their geography and colored by their political party. What trends can you see in the cartogram for this vote?

  3. How did your representative vote?
  4. There is one vote here that should be more important to you than all the others. These are the votes cast by your representative, which is meant to represent you and your community. Do you agree with how your representative voted? Why do you think they voted the way they did?

    If you don’t already know who your Members of Congress are you can find them by entering your address here.

Each vote’s study guide is a little different — we automatically choose which questions to include based on the information we have available about the vote. Study guides are a new feature to GovTrack. You can help us improve them by filling out this survey or by sending your feedback to