skip to main content

S. 1094: Department of Veterans Affairs Accountability and Whistleblower Protection Act of 2017

Jun 13, 2017 at 4:35 p.m. ET. On Passage of the Bill in the House.

This was a vote to pass S. 1094 (115th) in the House.

A string of scandals hit the Department of Veterans Affairs in the past few years, including dozens of veterans dying while waiting for care within the required 14 days at VA hospitals, forcing President Obama’s VA Secretary to resign. A new bill that recently passed the Senate aims to crack down on such neglect. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) introduced the Department of Veterans Affairs Accountability and Whistleblower Protection Act, S. 1094, to crack down.

The context and what the bill does

A series of exposes and reports in 2013–14 revealed the extent of neglect and coverup at veterans’ hospitals. They not only showed that veterans were often not getting the care they were entitled to under the law within the amount of time required, but also that staff would falsify reports to mislead and create the impression that everything was fine.

This culminated in an FBI criminal investigation, the resignation of VA Secretary Eric Shinseki, and enactment of legislation. However, many believe that the original legislation enacted did not fulfill its promise. VA employees who have since been caught stealing prescription drug medications, committing armed robbery, and viewing pornography on work computers were not dismissed.

What the bill does

As three Congress members wrote in a joint op-ed for the Military Times, “It was a good step toward reform, but unfortunately, our efforts to ensure accountability were watered down to placate government unions and further weakened by court rulings. Unions have rigged the system, and as a consequence, incompetence and corruption are still prevalent at the VA and few bad employees have been fired.”

This bill aims to close such loopholes through several measures. It allows the VA Secretary to fire incompetent or rule-breaking employees through an expedited appeals process, speeding up a process that has allowed guilty employees to remain on the job for years. It also expands the secretary’s authority to fire lower level staff, not just senior managers as the previous law allowed. And it makes it easier to take away such employees’ pensions or bonuses.

What supporters say

Supporters argue that the bill fixes unintended consequences of the 2014 legislation, and will help ensure that American veterans receive the health care and support they deserve.

“To fully reform the VA and provide our nation’s veterans with the quality care they were promised and deserve, we must ensure the department can efficiently dismiss employees who are not able or willing to do their jobs,” Senate lead sponsor Rubio said in a press release. “We must make real changes that put the well-being of our service members before the best interests of bureaucrats.”

President Trump also supports the legislation. “Senate passed the VA Accountability Act. The House should get this bill to my desk ASAP!” he tweeted. “We can’t tolerate substandard care for our vets.” (Trump used the shorthand name for the bill, presumably to fit within the 140 character limit.)

Trump’s VA Secretary David Shulkin also expressed his support, calling it necessary. “I wish today I could tell you I have the tools to do the right thing, to be able to remove those employees. I do not.,” Shulkin said in a Senate subcommittee hearing. “So unfortunately, I need a new set of tools if I’m going to be held accountable for turning this system around and doing what we all want to do to serve veterans.

Odds of passage

The bill passed the Senate on June 6 by a voice vote, meaning no recording of individual votes was made and usually indicating a lack of significant opposition. The original 2014 reform law — the Veterans Access to Care through Choice, Accountability, and Transparency Act of 2014 — passed almost unanimously: by 91–3 in the Senate and 420–5 in the House before being signed by President Obama.

The current bill attracted 39 Senate cosponsors, 31 Republicans and seven Democrats. It next moves to the House.


All Votes R D
Yea 87%
Nay 13%
Not Voting

Passed. Simple Majority Required. Source:

Ideology Vote Chart

Republican - Yea Democrat - Yea Republican - Nay Democrat - Nay
Seat position based on our ideology score.

Cartogram Map

Each hexagon represents one congressional district. Dark shaded hexes are Yea votes.

What you can do

Vote Details

Notes: The Speaker’s Vote? “Aye” or “Yea”?
Download as CSV

Statistically Notable Votes

Statistically notable votes are the votes that are most surprising, or least predictable, given how other members of each voter’s party voted and other factors.

All Votes

Study Guide

How well do you understand this vote? Use this study guide to find out.

You can find answers to most of the questions below here on the vote page. For a guide to understanding the bill this vote was about, see here.

What was the procedure for this vote?

  1. What was this vote on?
  2. Not all votes are meant to pass legislation. In the Senate some votes are not about legislation at all, since the Senate must vote to confirm presidential nominations to certain federal positions.

    This vote is related to a bill. However, that doesn’t necessarily tell you what it is about. Congress makes many decisions in the process of passing legislation, such as on the procedures for debating the bill, whether to change the bill before voting on passage, and even whether to vote on passage at all.

    You can learn more about the various motions used in Congress at If you aren’t sure what the House was voting on, try seeing if it’s on this list.

  3. What is the next step after this vote?
  4. Take a look at where this bill is in the legislative process. What might come next? Keep in mind what this specific vote was on, and the context of the bill. Will there be amendments? Will the other chamber of Congress vote on it, or let it die?

    For this question it may help to briefly examine the bill itself.

What is your analysis of this vote?

  1. What trends do you see in this vote?
  2. Members of Congress side together for many reasons beside being in the same political party, especially so for less prominent legislation or legislation specific to a certain region. What might have determined how the roll call came out in this case? Does it look like Members of Congress voted based on party, geography, or some other reason?

    One tool that will be helpful in answering this question is the cartogram at the top of the page. A cartogram is a stylized map of the United States that shows each district as an identical hexagon. This view allows you to see the how the representatives from each district voted arranged by their geography and colored by their political party. What trends can you see in the cartogram for this vote?

  3. How did your representative vote?
  4. There is one vote here that should be more important to you than all the others. These are the votes cast by your representative, which is meant to represent you and your community. Do you agree with how your representative voted? Why do you think they voted the way they did?

    If you don’t already know who your Members of Congress are you can find them by entering your address here.

Each vote’s study guide is a little different — we automatically choose which questions to include based on the information we have available about the vote. Study guides are a new feature to GovTrack. You can help us improve them by filling out this survey or by sending your feedback to