skip to main content

S. 84: A bill to provide for an exception to a limitation against appointment of persons as Secretary of Defense within seven years of relief from active duty as a regular commissioned officer of the Armed Forces.

Jan 12, 2017 at 2:47 p.m. ET. On Passage of the Bill in the Senate.

This was a vote to pass S. 84 (115th) in the Senate.

Secretary of Defense James Mattis, appointed on President Trump's first day in office, was a four-star Marine general. Mattis’s recent service upends the traditional separation where the Defense Secretary — the official in charge of the Pentagon and most of the American military — is a non-uniformed civilian, while the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is the the nation’s top-ranking military official.

To maintain that separation, Congress passed a law decades ago stipulating that nobody can serve as Defense Secretary within seven years after leaving the service. Mattis has only been out of the service for just shy of four years.

A law enacted on the President’s first day in office, S. 84, granted Mattis a waiver from the law.

What the bill does

The bill was introduced by Senate Armed Services Committee Chair John McCain (R-AZ). The legislation doesn’t do away with the “seven years out” requirement. It just creates a one-time waiver for Mattis specifically. (Technically the legislation refers to “the first person appointed… as Secretary of Defense after the date of the enactment of this Act,” but in practice everybody knows that’s clearly referring to Mattis.)

This was only the second time such a waiver had ever passed, following the1950 waiver for George Marshall’s appointment in the middle of the Korean War. A number of other Defense Secretaries had served in the military, buthad been retired long enough by the time of their appointment that they already met the qualification under law.

What supporters say

Supporters say Mattis is a qualified candidate during a time of great national security and defense challenges for America, who commands bipartisan support and deserves to be confirmed without delay.

“I have had the privilege of knowing General Mattis for many years. He is without a doubt one of the finest military officers of his generation and an extraordinary leader who inspires a rare and special admiration of his troops,” McCain said in a statement after the nomination was announced. “General Mattis has a clear understanding of the many challenges facing the Department of Defense, the U.S. military, and our national security.”

(McCain was rumored to be a possible Defense Secretary pick himself had another Republican candidate for president won the election, but not for President Trump who had declared McCain, a former prisoner of war, “not a war hero” and did not initially endorse McCain’s 2016 Senate reelection bid.)

The bill passed, but why the lone Mattis dissenter voted no

The waiver bill passed 81–17 in the Senate, with Senate Republicans unanimously supporting while even Senate Democrats largely supported it 30–16. The House passed it later that same day 268–151, with all but one Republican — Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI3) — in support. Unlike for their Senate counterparts, however, House Democrats largely opposed the measure, voting strongly against by 36–150.

With the waiver passed, Mattis was confirmed on what many considered a surprisingly bipartisan vote, 98–1. The lone dissenter was Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), who had previously written in a New York Times op-ed: “Our American democracy was built around the concept of civilian control of the military… New presidents are typically allowed latitude to appoint their cabinet members. But President-elect Trump is not entitled to ignore our laws and change the fundamental government constructs that have enabled our country’s success.”


All Votes R D I
Yea 83%
Nay 17%
Not Voting

Bill Passed. 3/5 Required. Source:

The Yea votes represented 84% of the country’s population by apportioning each state’s population to its voting senators.

Ideology Vote Chart

Republican - Yea Democrat - Yea Democrat - Nay
Seat position based on our ideology score.

What you can do

Vote Details

Notes: *Senate Minority Whip/President Pro Tempore of the Senate/President Pro Tempore of the Senate’s Vote “Aye” or “Yea”?
Download as CSV

Statistically Notable Votes

Statistically notable votes are the votes that are most surprising, or least predictable, given how other members of each voter’s party voted and other factors.

All Votes

Study Guide

How well do you understand this vote? Use this study guide to find out.

You can find answers to most of the questions below here on the vote page. For a guide to understanding the bill this vote was about, see here.

What was the procedure for this vote?

  1. What was this vote on?
  2. Not all votes are meant to pass legislation. In the Senate some votes are not about legislation at all, since the Senate must vote to confirm presidential nominations to certain federal positions.

    This vote is related to a bill. However, that doesn’t necessarily tell you what it is about. Congress makes many decisions in the process of passing legislation, such as on the procedures for debating the bill, whether to change the bill before voting on passage, and even whether to vote on passage at all.

    You can learn more about the various motions used in Congress at If you aren’t sure what the Senate was voting on, try seeing if it’s on this list.

  3. What is the next step after this vote?
  4. Take a look at where this bill is in the legislative process. What might come next? Keep in mind what this specific vote was on, and the context of the bill. Will there be amendments? Will the other chamber of Congress vote on it, or let it die?

    For this question it may help to briefly examine the bill itself.

What is your analysis of this vote?

  1. What trends do you see in this vote?
  2. Members of Congress side together for many reasons beside being in the same political party, especially so for less prominent legislation or legislation specific to a certain region. What might have determined how the roll call came out in this case? Does it look like Members of Congress voted based on party, geography, or some other reason?

  3. How did your senators vote?
  4. There are two votes here that should be more important to you than all the others. These are the votes cast by your senators, which are meant to represent you and your community. Do you agree with how your senators voted? Why do you think they voted the way they did?

    If you don’t already know who your Members of Congress are you can find them by entering your address here.

  5. How much of the United States population is represented by the yeas?
  6. GovTrack displays the percentage of the United States population represented by the yeas on some Senate votes just under the vote totals. We do this to highlight how the people of the United States are represented in the Senate. Since each state has two senators, but state populations vary significantly, the individuals living in each state have different Senate representation. For example, California’s population of near 40 million is given the same number of senators as Wyoming’s population of about 600,000.

    Do the senators who voted yea represent a majority of the people of the United States? Does it matter?

Each vote’s study guide is a little different — we automatically choose which questions to include based on the information we have available about the vote. Study guides are a new feature to GovTrack. You can help us improve them by filling out this survey or by sending your feedback to