skip to main content

H.R. 1119: SENSE Act
On Passage of the Bill in the House

This was a vote to pass H.R. 1119 (115th) in the House.

H.R. 1119 addresses the application of the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) rule, the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards, issued pursuant to section 112 of the Clean Air Act, to electric generating units that utilize coal refuse to generate electricity. The bill would provide for limited modifications with respect to the Mercury and Air Toxics Rule for these coal refuse facilities by providing for alternative compliance options with respect to sulfur dioxide and hydrogen chloride emissions standards.

According to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, this legislation seeks to ensure that facilities that use coal refuse as fuel can continue to operate and will not be forced to shut down, due to unachievable requirements included in the Environmental Protection Agency’s Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS). Coal refuse is the aboveground waste product of coal mining found near many abandoned mines. Coal refuse piles pose a number of environmental and safety threats and create significant costs for government and industry.

Coal refuse-to-energy facilities are specialized power plants developed to recycle the coal refuse by using it as an energy source to generate electricity. There are 19 coal refuse-to-energy facilities, including 14 in Pennsylvania. In addition to creating an estimated 3,600 jobs, many of which are in economically distressed communities, these facilities create an average of $26 million per year in environmental value for the State of Pennsylvania alone.

Some have suggested that coal refuse-to-energy facilities can meet the requirements of the MATS rule, citing the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decision in White Stallion v. Environmental Protection Agency. In that case, the agency had the authority to create a separate subcategory for coal refuse plants, but declined to do so in part because there were some such plants that could achieve the HCL and SO2 standards in the MATS rule. Notwithstanding the court’s holding that EPA had acted within its discretion, Mr. Vincent Brisini testified earlier this year on behalf of the Anthracite Region Independent Power Producers Association (ARIPPA) at the Subcommittee on Energy’s September 13, 2017 hearing that a number of bituminous coal refuse fired units cannot meet the MATS rule’s acid gas limits and face a threat of imminent closure absent passage of H.R. 1119.

Source: Republican Policy Committee

(About Ads | Hide These Ads)

Totals

All Votes R D
Aye 50%
 
 
215
210
 
5
 
No 44%
 
 
189
14
 
175
 
Not Voting 6%
 
 
26
13
 
13
 

Passed. Simple Majority Required. Mar 8, 2018 at 10:44 a.m. ET. Source: house.gov.

Ideology Vote Chart

Key: R Aye D Aye R No D No
Seat position based on our ideology score.

Cartogram Map

Each hexagon represents one congressional district.

What you can do

Vote Details

Notes: The Speaker’s Vote?
The Speaker of the House is not required to vote in “ordinary legislative proceedings, except when such vote would be decisive.” In practice, this means the Speaker of the House rarely votes and only does so when it is politically useful. When the Speaker declines to vote, he or she is simply omitted from the roll call by the House Clerk. (See House Rules, Rule I(7).)
“Aye” or “Yea”?

“Aye” and “Yea” mean the same thing, and so do “No” and “Nay”. Congress uses different words in different sorts of votes.

The U.S. Constitution says that bills should be decided on by the “yeas and nays” (Article I, Section 7). Congress takes this literally and uses “yea” and “nay” when voting on the final passage of bills.

All Senate votes use these words. But the House of Representatives uses “Aye” and “No” in other sorts of votes.

Download as CSV

Statistically Notable Votes

Statistically notable votes are the votes that are most surprising, or least predictable, given how other members of each voter’s party voted and other factors.

All Votes