skip to main content

H.R. 6691: Community Safety and Security Act of 2018

Sep 7, 2018 at 10:49 a.m. ET. On Passage of the Bill in the House.

This was a vote to pass H.R. 6691 (115th) in the House.

H.R. 6691 amends the definition of the term “crime of violence” in the U.S. Code. Specifically:

Under subsection (a)(1), the term is defined by enumerating offenses that would qualify as crimes of violence. Subsection (a)(2) maintains the current definition of crime of violence that includes offenses that have “as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another.” Additionally, subsection (a)(3) clarifies that any inchoate offense involving the listed offenses also are included in the definition.

Subsection (b) defines the offenses in the enumerated list provided in subsection (a)(1) for the purposes of this section. It offers definitions for “abusive sexual contact,” “aggravated sexual abuse” and “sexual abuse,” “assault,” “arson,” “burglary,” “carjacking,” “child abuse,” “communication of threats,” “coercion,” “domestic violence,” “extortion,” “firearms use,” “fleeing,” “force,” “hostage taking,” “human trafficking,” “interference with flight crew members and attendants,” “kidnapping,” “murder,” “robbery,” “stalking,” “weapon of mass destruction,” and “voluntary manslaughter.”

Subsection (c) provides that when a definition under subsection (b) references the federal code, an offense under state, tribal, or UCMJ law that would be a crime under the federal statute, but for the federal jurisdiction elements (such as interstate commerce), will qualify as a crime of violence under the definition.

Finally, Subsection (d) provides that the term “conspiracy” includes offenses that are conspiracies to commit other offenses under both Federal and State law, regardless of whether proof of an overt act is required.

Under 18 USC § 16, the term “crime of violence” is currently defined as “(a) an offense that has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another, or (b) any other offense that is a felony and that, by its nature, involves a substantial risk that physical force against the person or property of another may be used in the course of committing the offense.”

On April 17, 2017, in Sessions v. Dimaya, the Supreme Court ruled that the second clause of the definition of “crime of violence” is unconstitutionally void for vagueness. The Court’s decision will have ramifications throughout the criminal code. For example, certain burglary, indecent assault and battery, stalking, and manslaughter convictions may no longer qualify as crimes of violence under this new framework, though they are clearly dangerous crimes.

Source: Republican Policy Committee


All Votes R D
Yea 58%
Nay 35%
Present 0%
Not Voting 7%

Passed. Simple Majority Required. Source:

Ideology Vote Chart

Republican - Yea Democrat - Yea Republican - Nay Democrat - Nay
Seat position based on our ideology score.

Cartogram Map

Each hexagon represents one congressional district. Solid hexes are Yea votes.

What you can do

Vote Details

Notes: The Speaker’s Vote? “Aye” or “Yea”?
Download as CSV

Statistically Notable Votes

Statistically notable votes are the votes that are most surprising, or least predictable, given how other members of each voter’s party voted and other factors.

All Votes