skip to main content

H.R. 6729: Empowering Financial Institutions to Fight Human Trafficking Act of 2018

Sep 26, 2018 at 5:50 p.m. ET. On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass in the House.

This was a vote to pass H.R. 6729 (115th) in the House. This vote was taken under a House procedure called “suspension of the rules” which is typically used to pass non-controversial bills. Votes under suspension require a 2/3rds majority. A failed vote under suspension can be taken again.

H.R. 6729 instructs the Secretary of the Treasury to establish a mechanism for non-profit organizations to qualify for safe harbor when sharing specific information with financial institutions that facilitates their duties of customers due diligence and the reporting of suspicious activities relating to human trafficking.

Specifically, the bill grants the Secretary the authority to develop regulations to:

  • Register non-profit organizations that meet certain qualifications before qualifying to be protected through this mechanism
  • Determine what information may be shared under this protection, which financial institutions may receive information, and how financial institutions may share information received through currently regulated and protected information sharing programs
  • Make the processes outlined in the bill coexistent with current information sharing mechanism and use existing guidance or regulations as necessary.

Human trafficking is recognized by Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) as inherently connected to the offense of money laundering by and through the transacting of revenues and profits from the business of exploitation. During the last few years, the connection between human trafficking to the banking industry has received increasing attention, first by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), and more recently by United Nations Security Council Resolution 2331.

The International Labor Organization (ILO) estimates that approximately $150 billion is generated in profit from human trafficking. Modern labor and sex trafficking are intrinsically linked to private sector business and therefore to the banking system. The financial industry has increasingly sought to reduce their exposure to the problem. There have been significant private sector developments in the efforts to gather better data and intelligence about human trafficking, with support of the private sector. However, lack of liability protections is too great a risk factor for those with information to share to our financial and law enforcement communities, and current methods of providing information through other channels clash against the time sensitive needs of investigators. Without liability protections, outside groups are open to defamation suits by those they report on, pursuit under FOIA, and other potentially dangerous attacks.

While financial institutions are given safe harbor for performing information sharing roles, non-profit organizations—which lack the resources for extensive court proceedings—are unprotected from defamation suits and other actions brought by those who do not want to see their crimes unveiled. Non-profit organizations include small organizations that do not have the ability to defend themselves against the burden of multiple lawsuits from well-funded adversaries. It is in a non-profit organization’s interest to provide the best and most accurate analysis of the available information. Non-profit organizations are often the key sources of intelligence for law enforcement as they are the primary points of contact for reports of abuse. They also play a crucial role in fighting human trafficking and the financial flows that derive from it, and they can ensure that essential information, including on who is profiting from the trafficking, reaches financial institutions and authorities as victims are often fearful of reaching out to the authorities themselves.

Source: Republican Policy Committee

Totals

All Votes R D
Yea 71%
 
 
297
202
 
95
 
Nay 29%
 
 
124
29
 
95
 
Not Voting
 
 
7
4
 
3
 

Passed. 2/3 Required. Source: house.gov.

Ideology Vote Chart

Key:
Republican - Yea Democrat - Yea Republican - Nay Democrat - Nay
Seat position based on our ideology score.

Cartogram Map

Each hexagon represents one congressional district. Solid hexes are Yea votes.

What you can do

Vote Details

Notes: The Speaker’s Vote? “Aye” or “Yea”?
Download as CSV

Statistically Notable Votes

Statistically notable votes are the votes that are most surprising, or least predictable, given how other members of each voter’s party voted and other factors.

All Votes

Study Guide

How well do you understand this vote? Use this study guide to find out.

You can find answers to most of the questions below here on the vote page. For a guide to understanding the bill this vote was about, see here.

What was the procedure for this vote?

  1. What was this vote on?
  2. Not all votes are meant to pass legislation. In the Senate some votes are not about legislation at all, since the Senate must vote to confirm presidential nominations to certain federal positions.

    This vote is related to a bill. However, that doesn’t necessarily tell you what it is about. Congress makes many decisions in the process of passing legislation, such as on the procedures for debating the bill, whether to change the bill before voting on passage, and even whether to vote on passage at all.

    You can learn more about the various motions used in Congress at EveryCRSReport.com. If you aren’t sure what the House was voting on, try seeing if it’s on this list.

  3. What is the next step after this vote?
  4. Take a look at where this bill is in the legislative process. What might come next? Keep in mind what this specific vote was on, and the context of the bill. Will there be amendments? Will the other chamber of Congress vote on it, or let it die?

    For this question it may help to briefly examine the bill itself.

What is your analysis of this vote?

  1. What trends do you see in this vote?
  2. Members of Congress side together for many reasons beside being in the same political party, especially so for less prominent legislation or legislation specific to a certain region. What might have determined how the roll call came out in this case? Does it look like Members of Congress voted based on party, geography, or some other reason?

    One tool that will be helpful in answering this question is the cartogram at the top of the page. A cartogram is a stylized map of the United States that shows each district as an identical hexagon. This view allows you to see the how the representatives from each district voted arranged by their geography and colored by their political party. What trends can you see in the cartogram for this vote?

  3. How did your representative vote?
  4. There is one vote here that should be more important to you than all the others. These are the votes cast by your representative, which is meant to represent you and your community. Do you agree with how your representative voted? Why do you think they voted the way they did?

    If you don’t already know who your Members of Congress are you can find them by entering your address here.

Each vote’s study guide is a little different — we automatically choose which questions to include based on the information we have available about the vote. Study guides are a new feature to GovTrack. You can help us improve them by filling out this survey or by sending your feedback to hello@govtrack.us.