skip to main content

H.R. 4296: To place requirements on operational risk capital requirements for banking organizations established by an appropriate Federal banking agency.

Feb 27, 2018 at 5:37 p.m. ET. On Passage of the Bill in the House.

This was a vote to pass H.R. 4296 (115th) in the House.

H.R. 4296 restricts banking regulators from establishing operational risk capital requirements (the amount of money and non-cash assets banks are required to hold in reserve) for banking organizations unless they:

  • Are sensitive to, and based on, an organization’s current activities or businesses;
  • Are determined by a forward-looking assessment of an organization’s potential losses and not based solely on its historic losses; and
  • Allow for adjustments based on qualifying operational risk mitigants.

In response to the 2008 financial crisis, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (Basel Committee) agreed to modify internationally negotiated bank regulatory standards known as the Basel Accords to increase bank capital requirements. The Basel Accords are international banking regulations negotiated between participating regulators, but they rely on local implementation to take effect in a nation’s financial regulatory regime. In the United States, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), with input from the Federal Reserve and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), determine domestic capital requirements that follow the Basel framework.

As defined by the Basel Committee, operational risk refers to “…the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events...[t]his definition includes legal risk, but excludes strategic and reputational risk.”[1] In other words, a bank’s own direct actions or relationships could lead to losses, and therefore should be accounted for by regulators when they seek to establish capital requirements to ensure financial stability.

In developing one such standard, known as the operational risk capital framework, the Basel Committee suggested that banks review a banking organization’s existing business operations as a representation of its future capital needs..

While all banking organizations should adopt policies and procedures to identify and manage operational risk that are appropriate based on their size, activities, and product offerings in order to ensure a stable and resilient financial industry, requiring them to “look back” and hold operational risk capital against discontinued business activities or products is not an appropriate way to determine capital requirements. The result of forcing banks to look back and hold capital against discontinued activities and products is harm to consumers through drastically reduced credit availability in the marketplace.

Because operational risk capital requirements substantially dictate a bank’s capital levels, it is important that any future Basel approach-turned-U.S. rule does not unnecessarily increase capital requirements at the expense of consumers’ credit needs. Unreliable and under-calibrated calculations could result in hundreds of billions of dollars in capital that could be more efficiently deployed to meet consumers’ credit needs.

As such, H.R. 4296 limits the imposition of operational risk capital requirements to a bank’s current activities and businesses and permits adjustments to mitigate operational risk. By instituting clear guardrails, this legislation ensures the imposition of forward-looking capital requirements that focus on a bank's current activities and businesses. Doing so will ensure that banks are holding more capital more efficiently, and expands the credit marketplace to meet consumer needs. This also incentivizes institutions to mitigate operational risk, which creates safer banks and a resilient financial system.

Source: Republican Policy Committee


All Votes R D
Yea 59%
Nay 41%
Not Voting

Passed. Simple Majority Required. Source:

Ideology Vote Chart

Republican - Yea Democrat - Yea Republican - Nay Democrat - Nay
Seat position based on our ideology score.

Cartogram Map

Each hexagon represents one congressional district. Solid hexes are Yea votes.

What you can do

Vote Details

Notes: The Speaker’s Vote? “Aye” or “Yea”?
Download as CSV

Statistically Notable Votes

Statistically notable votes are the votes that are most surprising, or least predictable, given how other members of each voter’s party voted and other factors.

All Votes

Study Guide

How well do you understand this vote? Use this study guide to find out.

You can find answers to most of the questions below here on the vote page. For a guide to understanding the bill this vote was about, see here.

What was the procedure for this vote?

  1. What was this vote on?
  2. Not all votes are meant to pass legislation. In the Senate some votes are not about legislation at all, since the Senate must vote to confirm presidential nominations to certain federal positions.

    This vote is related to a bill. However, that doesn’t necessarily tell you what it is about. Congress makes many decisions in the process of passing legislation, such as on the procedures for debating the bill, whether to change the bill before voting on passage, and even whether to vote on passage at all.

    You can learn more about the various motions used in Congress at If you aren’t sure what the House was voting on, try seeing if it’s on this list.

  3. What is the next step after this vote?
  4. Take a look at where this bill is in the legislative process. What might come next? Keep in mind what this specific vote was on, and the context of the bill. Will there be amendments? Will the other chamber of Congress vote on it, or let it die?

    For this question it may help to briefly examine the bill itself.

What is your analysis of this vote?

  1. What trends do you see in this vote?
  2. Members of Congress side together for many reasons beside being in the same political party, especially so for less prominent legislation or legislation specific to a certain region. What might have determined how the roll call came out in this case? Does it look like Members of Congress voted based on party, geography, or some other reason?

    One tool that will be helpful in answering this question is the cartogram at the top of the page. A cartogram is a stylized map of the United States that shows each district as an identical hexagon. This view allows you to see the how the representatives from each district voted arranged by their geography and colored by their political party. What trends can you see in the cartogram for this vote?

  3. How did your representative vote?
  4. There is one vote here that should be more important to you than all the others. These are the votes cast by your representative, which is meant to represent you and your community. Do you agree with how your representative voted? Why do you think they voted the way they did?

    If you don’t already know who your Members of Congress are you can find them by entering your address here.

Each vote’s study guide is a little different — we automatically choose which questions to include based on the information we have available about the vote. Study guides are a new feature to GovTrack. You can help us improve them by filling out this survey or by sending your feedback to