skip to main content

H.R. 737: Shark Fin Sales Elimination Act of 2019

Nov 20, 2019 at 5:03 p.m. ET. On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended in the House.

This was a vote to pass H.R. 737 (116th) in the House. This vote was taken under a House procedure called “suspension of the rules” which is typically used to pass non-controversial bills. Votes under suspension require a 2/3rds majority. A failed vote under suspension can be taken again.

Should shark fins, a delicacy in many food items, be banned?


One of the most valuable parts of a shark are its fins, which are often used for foods such as soups. About 73 million shark fins are sold per year, but this comes at a cost. After getting de-finned, the shark is often thrown back into the water to drown or bleed to death.

About 100 million sharks are killed annually, causing a number of shark species to be classified as vulnerable or endangered.

Some policy moves have been made to ban the practice. Since 2000, it’s been illegal to de-fin a shark in U.S. waters. Plus 12 states have banned the sale of shark fins within their borders. But the sale of shark fins isn’t illegal on a federal level.

What the bill does

The Shark Fin Sales Elimination Act would ban the selling or buying of shark fins nationwide, with a fine of up to $100,000. (That’s the maximum fine for each offense in section 307 of the Magnuson Act, the law under which buying or selling shark fins would now be classified.)

The bill would still permit sharks to be caught for either subsistence purposes — for example some indigenous island populations who traditionally eat the animal — or for scientific research.

It was introduced in the House on January 23 as bill number H.R. 737, by Rep. Gregorio Sablan (D-MP0) of the Northern Mariana Islands.

Congress members from such U.S. territories are allowed to introduce and cosponsor legislation, but cannot cast binding votes for laws.

What supporters say

Supporters say the move is environmentally friendly, protects an endangered species, and ends a form of animal cruelty.

“Destroying millions of sharks simply for their fins is a wasteful practice that our indigenous Chamorro and Rafaluwasch cultures in the Marianas would never have allowed,” Rep. Sablan said in a press release. “We would have used as much of the shark as possible for food, tools, and other purposes.”

“The strong, bipartisan support for this legislation sends a clear message that we have to pay more attention to protecting the Earth’s oceans and the life within those oceans,” Rep. Sablan continued. “Banning the sale of shark fins is important, but just a small step towards giving the oceans the full respect they must have in federal law.”

What opponents say

Opponents counter that a shark fin ban could raise its value and would likely prove ineffective in practice.

“It’s expensive and difficult to enforce a ban. Making it illegal to serve shark’s fin will just push the product into the black market, raising its value even higher,” journalist Anna Ling Kaye wrote. “This has been an issue with a number of banned animal products, such as bear gall bladder and rhinoceros horn.”

“Also worrisome is the fact that… bans are often not effective. A telling example is Chicago’s 2006 attempt to ban foie gras (fattened goose liver), which resulted in an explosion of secret restaurants willing to serve the delicacy,” Kaye continued. “The ban was repealed within two years.”

Odds of passage

The bill has attracted 215 bipartisan House cosponsors: 159 Democrats and 56 Republicans. It awaits a potential vote in the House Natural Resources Committee.

While that’s one of the highest cosponsors of any bill in this Congress, it’s actually several dozen less than the previous version introduced last Congress. That iteration attained 262 bipartisan House cosponsors: 177 Democrats and 85 Republicans. Yet that version failed to receive a vote.


All Votes D R I
Yea 74%
Nay 26%
Not Voting

Passed. 2/3 Required. Source:

Ideology Vote Chart

Democrat - Yea Republican - Yea Democrat - Nay Republican - Nay
Seat position based on our ideology score.

Cartogram Map

Each hexagon represents one congressional district. Dark shaded hexes are Yea votes.

What you can do

Vote Details

Notes: The Speaker’s Vote? “Aye” or “Yea”?
Download as CSV

Statistically Notable Votes

Statistically notable votes are the votes that are most surprising, or least predictable, given how other members of each voter’s party voted and other factors.

All Votes

Study Guide

How well do you understand this vote? Use this study guide to find out.

You can find answers to most of the questions below here on the vote page. For a guide to understanding the bill this vote was about, see here.

What was the procedure for this vote?

  1. What was this vote on?
  2. Not all votes are meant to pass legislation. In the Senate some votes are not about legislation at all, since the Senate must vote to confirm presidential nominations to certain federal positions.

    This vote is related to a bill. However, that doesn’t necessarily tell you what it is about. Congress makes many decisions in the process of passing legislation, such as on the procedures for debating the bill, whether to change the bill before voting on passage, and even whether to vote on passage at all.

    You can learn more about the various motions used in Congress at If you aren’t sure what the House was voting on, try seeing if it’s on this list.

  3. What is the next step after this vote?
  4. Take a look at where this bill is in the legislative process. What might come next? Keep in mind what this specific vote was on, and the context of the bill. Will there be amendments? Will the other chamber of Congress vote on it, or let it die?

    For this question it may help to briefly examine the bill itself.

What is your analysis of this vote?

  1. What trends do you see in this vote?
  2. Members of Congress side together for many reasons beside being in the same political party, especially so for less prominent legislation or legislation specific to a certain region. What might have determined how the roll call came out in this case? Does it look like Members of Congress voted based on party, geography, or some other reason?

    One tool that will be helpful in answering this question is the cartogram at the top of the page. A cartogram is a stylized map of the United States that shows each district as an identical hexagon. This view allows you to see the how the representatives from each district voted arranged by their geography and colored by their political party. What trends can you see in the cartogram for this vote?

  3. How did your representative vote?
  4. There is one vote here that should be more important to you than all the others. These are the votes cast by your representative, which is meant to represent you and your community. Do you agree with how your representative voted? Why do you think they voted the way they did?

    If you don’t already know who your Members of Congress are you can find them by entering your address here.

Each vote’s study guide is a little different — we automatically choose which questions to include based on the information we have available about the vote. Study guides are a new feature to GovTrack. You can help us improve them by filling out this survey or by sending your feedback to