skip to main content

H.R. 840: Veterans’ Access to Child Care Act

Feb 8, 2019 at 11:34 a.m. ET. On Passage of the Bill in the House.

This was a vote to pass H.R. 840 in the House.

Could expanded taxpayer-funded childcare options help more veterans access their VA medical appointments?


42 percent of women veterans report finding childcare as “very hard” or “somewhat hard,” according to a 2015 Department of Veterans Affairs study. 62 percent said they would find on-site childcare at VA-run medical centers to be “very helpful.”

This barrier prevents some veterans from accessing their medical appointments — a particularly salient issue when an average of 20 veterans commit suicide per day.

A 2011 pilot program created by Congress tested providing free childcare at a select number of VA sites, with over 10,000 children using it to date. The program was supposed to be temporary but has been reauthorized four times, with the current reauthorization scheduled to expire in October.

What the bill does

The Veterans’ Access to Child Care Act would do what its name implies on a permanent level: _permanently _provide childcare services to veterans while receiving receiving health care services at a VA facility.

That can include either on-site childcare, or a stipend or direct payment for private childcare. The bill would only apply to childcare offered during the time the parent or caregiver is receiving or accessing VA healthcare, and not at any other time.

It was introduced on January 29 as bill number H.R. 840, by Rep. Julia Brownley (D-CA26), the Chair of House Veterans’ Affairs Health Subcommittee.

What supporters say

Supporters argue the bill makes permanent a program which has already worked on a temporary level, and helps female veterans who otherwise might face more barriers than their male counterparts.

“The lack of affordable and convenient child care should never be a barrier for veterans trying to access the VA healthcare they’ve earned and deserve,” Rep. Brownley said in a press release. “This is especially important for the growing population of women veterans, who are more often taking care of young children. I look forward to continuing to work with… all of our colleagues to see this important program finally become permanent and nationwide.”

Odds of passage

The bill passed the House on February 8 by a 400–9 vote. Every Democrat voted in favor, as did almost every Republican except nine.

Interestingly, even though most House Republicans ended up supporting the legislation, all 22 original cosponsors were Democrats, usually more typical of highly partisan legislation.

The nine House Republicans who voted against it were: Reps. Justin Amash (R-MI3), Andy Biggs (R-AZ5), Mo Brooks (R-AL5), Ted Budd (R-NC13), Warren Davidson (R-OH8), Paul Gosar (R-AZ4), Alex Mooney (R-WV2), James Sensenbrenner (R-WI5), and Mark Walker (R-NC6).

A previous version also introduced by Rep. Brownley similarly passed the House by voice vote in July 2017, but never received a vote in the Senate. It’s possible the same fate could befall the legislation this time around too.

What opponents say

None of the nine opponents spoke up to offer their reasoning during House floor debate on the legislation. However, those nine are known for being among the biggest Republican spending hawks in Congress, and the Congressional Budget Office estimated the bill would cost $96 million over its first five years.


All Votes D R
Aye 98%
No 2%
Not Voting

Passed. Simple Majority Required. Source:

Ideology Vote Chart

Democrat - Aye Republican - Aye Republican - No
Seat position based on our ideology score.

Cartogram Map

Each hexagon represents one congressional district. Solid hexes are Aye votes.

What you can do

Vote Details

Notes: The Speaker’s Vote? “Aye” or “Yea”?
Download as CSV

Statistically Notable Votes

Statistically notable votes are the votes that are most surprising, or least predictable, given how other members of each voter’s party voted and other factors.

All Votes