skip to main content

S. 2740: Over-the-Counter Monograph Safety, Innovation, and Reform Act of 2019

Dec 10, 2019 at 3:15 p.m. ET. On Passage of the Bill in the Senate.

This was a vote to pass S. 2740 (116th) in the Senate.

Many hands make light work. At 335 pages, March’s $2 trillion Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act only came together so quickly by incorporating provisions of 29 other bills pending before Congress. So what were some of these other bills?

Rapid Coverage for Coronavirus Vaccines Act

This requires private health insurance plans to cover any covid-19 treatments or vaccines.

It was previously introduced in the Senate on March 17 as bill number S. 3505, by Sen. Doug Jones (D-AL).

“We have to do everything we can to mitigate the spread of covid-19. This bill will allow Americans to rapidly access vaccines for this novel coronavirus as soon as they are available,” Sen. Jones said in a press release upon introduction. “Congress should immediately pass [it] as part of a robust response to this virus.”

Commission on America’s Medical Security Act

This forms a commission to study and make recommendations regarding America’s reliance on foreign drugs, medicines, and medical equipment such as ventilators. Their recommendations are to include best options to increase domestic medicine and medical equipment manufacturing.

The Senate version has been introduced on March 12 as bill number S. 3478, by Sen. Richard Durbin (D-IL). The House version was introduced the next day on March 13 as bill number H.R. 6282, by Rep. Raul Ruiz (D-CA36).

“We have a real dependence when it comes to developing medicines and drugs on these two countries [China and India] and many others… and it raised a question in my mind as to whether we should do something thoughtful and prospective in terms of dealing with global dependence on medicine, medical devices, and medical supplies,” Sen. Durbin said on the Senate floor upon introduction. “So I’m introducing legislation this week calling for the creation of a commission to look at this dependence, to measure it today.”

COVID-19 Funding Accountability Act

This establishes a committee to oversee the roughly $2 trillion in spending from the CARES Act, the most expensive single spending bill in American history.

It was previously introduced in the Senate on March 24 as bill number S. 3578, by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA).

“My proposal would impose strict congressional oversight over the Treasury Department fund that is tasked with extending lending and other assistance to air carriers and American companies that have been hard hit by the coronavirus pandemic,” Sen. Grassley said on the Senate floor upon introduction. “It mirrors closely the language that this chamber adopted in 2008, during consideration of the Troubled Asset Relief Program [commonly referred to as the bailouts].”

GovTrack Insider recently covered a bill that would allow for the reinstatement of Glenn Fine as the committee’s chair, after President Trump demoted him shortly following his appointment.

Improving Care in Rural America Reauthorization Act

This increases the annual funding for certain rural health programs by more than +75%, from $45 million a year to $79.5 million a year.

It was previously introduced in the Senate on March 11 as bill number S. 3437, by Sen. Kelly Loeffler (R-GA).

“We must ensure Americans have access to quality health care services regardless of their background or zip code,” Sen. Loeffler said in a press release upon introduction. “For a state like Georgia, where 120 of 159 counties are considered rural by the Georgia Department of Community Health, these programs are critically important.”

“Through these grant programs, we’re working to close the health care services gap by connecting medical professionals with rural patients, streamlining innovation, removing barriers to competition and increasing access to services and technology.

United States Public Health Service Modernization Act

This establishes a “Ready Reserve Corps” within the existing 6,000+ member U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS) Commissioned Corps. Though relatively little-known, the group is one of America’s eight uniformed services along with the Army, Navy, Air Force, Coast Guard, Marines, and Space Force.

The officers work full-time for other federal agencies and departments, but could be deployed (like soldiers) during national emergencies. However, when that occurred, that left the existing full-time positions temporarily vacant. This new law ends that problem by creating a reserve system such as the Army has.

It was previously introduced in the Senate on October 17 as bill number S. 2629, by Sen. Mike Rounds (R-SD). It had passed the Senate on January 9 by voice vote, a procedure for relatively noncontroversial bills in which no record of individual votes is cast.

“We must make certain vital healthcare services remain available to our citizens when Commissioned Corps Officers are called away from their duty stations,” Sen. Rounds said in a press release upon introduction. “By creating a Ready Reserve Corps within USPHS, we’ll be better equipped to fill these vital positions, such as doctors and nurses at IHS facilities, when the Regular Corps Officers need to respond to a national emergency.”

Protecting Jessica Grubb’s Legacy Act

This changes confidentiality rules for substance abuse disorder patients’ medical records. The records can now be shared with the prior written consent of the patient, a change intended to prevent physicians from accidentally prescribing opioids to patients who are in recovery from opioid addiction.

It had previously been introduced in the Senate on March 3 as bill number S. 3374, by Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV).

“By making changes to the existing regulations regarding the medical records of patients with substance use disorder, we can save thousands of lives,” Sen. Manchin said in a press release upon introduction. “No one should go to the doctor expecting to receive help and instead be thrown back into the nightmare of addiction. We must do more to combat this crisis as a country. The [bill] will help make sure we are combatting this epidemic, not contributing to it.”

Over-the-Counter Monograph Safety, Innovation, and Reform Act

This reformats the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory process for approving new over-the-counter drugs and medicines, a process which previously often took years.

It was previously introduced on October 30 by former Sen. Johnny Iskason (R-GA), who retired in December for health reasons. It then passed the Senate by 91–2 in December, with only Sens. Richard Burr (R-NC) and Rick Scott (R-FL) opposing.

“It is past time to modernize and overhaul our woefully outdated over-the-counter drug approval process,” former Sen. Isakson said in a press release upon introduction. “I’m reintroducing the [bill] to help ensure that the health products in Americans’ medicine cabinets and on supermarket shelves are effective and accessible for patients, that innovations can be made well into the future, and that we promote competition to bring down costs for consumers.”

Which types of bills were incorporated into the CARES Act?

Some other quick stats about the 29 bills incorporated into the CARES Act:

  • Party of sponsor: 21 (72%) had a Democrat as lead sponsor, versus eight (28%) with a Republican as lead sponsor.
  • Partisanship of cosponsors: by GovTrack’s count, 20 (69%) had largely bipartisan cosponsorship, four (14%) had entirely or almost-entirely Democratic cosponsorship, two (7%) had entirely or almost-entirely Republican cosponsorship, and three (10%) had no cosponsors at all.
  • Dates introduced: 16 (55%) were introduced on March 11 or later, approximately the time that most quarantine orders were put into effect.
  • Status before the CARES Act: 22 (76%) had not yet received a committee vote, four (14%) had passed a congressional committee, and three (10%) had passed either the House or Senate.
Vote Outcome
All Votes R D I
Yea 98%
Nay 2%
Not Voting

Bill Passed. Simple Majority Required. Source:

The Yea votes represented 95% of the country’s population by apportioning each state’s population to its voting senators.

Ideology Vote Chart
Republican - Yea Democrat - Yea Republican - Nay

Seat position based on our ideology score.

What you can do

Vote Details

Notes: “Aye” or “Yea”?
Download as CSV

Statistically Notable Votes

Statistically notable votes are the votes that are most surprising, or least predictable, given how other members of each voter’s party voted and other factors.

All Votes

Study Guide

How well do you understand this vote? Use this study guide to find out.

You can find answers to most of the questions below here on the vote page. For a guide to understanding the bill this vote was about, see here.

What was the procedure for this vote?

  1. What was this vote on?
  2. Not all votes are meant to pass legislation. In the Senate some votes are not about legislation at all, since the Senate must vote to confirm presidential nominations to certain federal positions.

    This vote is related to a bill. However, that doesn’t necessarily tell you what it is about. Congress makes many decisions in the process of passing legislation, such as on the procedures for debating the bill, whether to change the bill before voting on passage, and even whether to vote on passage at all.

    You can learn more about the various motions used in Congress at If you aren’t sure what the Senate was voting on, try seeing if it’s on this list.

  3. What is the next step after this vote?
  4. Take a look at where this bill is in the legislative process. What might come next? Keep in mind what this specific vote was on, and the context of the bill. Will there be amendments? Will the other chamber of Congress vote on it, or let it die?

    For this question it may help to briefly examine the bill itself.

What is your analysis of this vote?

  1. What trends do you see in this vote?
  2. Members of Congress side together for many reasons beside being in the same political party, especially so for less prominent legislation or legislation specific to a certain region. What might have determined how the roll call came out in this case? Does it look like Members of Congress voted based on party, geography, or some other reason?

  3. How did your senators vote?
  4. There are two votes here that should be more important to you than all the others. These are the votes cast by your senators, which are meant to represent you and your community. Do you agree with how your senators voted? Why do you think they voted the way they did?

    If you don’t already know who your Members of Congress are you can find them by entering your address here.

  5. How much of the United States population is represented by the yeas?
  6. GovTrack displays the percentage of the United States population represented by the yeas on some Senate votes just under the vote totals. We do this to highlight how the people of the United States are represented in the Senate. Since each state has two senators, but state populations vary significantly, the individuals living in each state have different Senate representation. For example, California’s population of near 40 million is given the same number of senators as Wyoming’s population of about 600,000.

    Do the senators who voted yea represent a majority of the people of the United States? Does it matter?

Each vote’s study guide is a little different — we automatically choose which questions to include based on the information we have available about the vote. Study guides are a new feature to GovTrack. You can help us improve them by filling out this survey or by sending your feedback to