skip to main content

H.R. 1333: NO BAN Act

Apr 21, 2021 at 4:47 p.m. ET. On Passage of the Bill in the House.

This was a vote to pass H.R. 1333 in the House.

The president couldn’t even discriminate against the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

Context

President Donald Trump instituted a travel ban on eight countries: Chad, Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Syria, Venezuela, and Yemen. The Supreme Court upheld the travel ban 5–4 in the 2018 decision Trump v. Hawaii, largely by noting the wide latitude that the president has when setting such policies.

Trump’s travel ban was popularly nicknamed “the Muslim ban” by its Democratic critics since most of the countries it applied to were majority Muslim, and because Trump as a 2016 candidate had indeed proposed a Muslim ban. However, the final policy itself wasn’t actually a ban on Muslims themselves from setting foot in the U.S. Regardless, President Joe Biden rescinded the policy on his first day in office.

Currently, federal law bans any person from being discriminated against — or, vice versa, receiving preferential treatment — when entering the U.S. on the basis of five characteristics: race, sex, nationality, place of birth, or place of residence.

What the legislation does

The NO BAN (National Origin-Based Antidiscrimination for Nonimmigrants) Act would add another category: religion. This would eliminate the president’s ability to restrict a class of entrants from the U.S. based on their religion — or, vice versa, to give a certain religion preferential treatment.

Again, it’s unclear that this would have actually stopped an executive order such as Trump’s, since it wasn’t *explicitly *a ban on Muslims.

The legislation’s partisanship may seem counterintuitive. It’s a Democratic-led proposal to rein in the president, who’s currently a Democrat. The opposition is largely Republican, thereby seeking to preserve the powers of the president — who, again, is currently a Democrat.

The House version was introduced on February 25 as H.R. 1333, by Rep. Judy Chu (D-CA27). The Senate version was introduced three months later on May 27 as S. 1891, by Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE).

What supporters say

Supporters argue that the legislation would be in keeping with America’s pluralistic values — indeed, the Pilgrims came to Plymouth back in 1620 primarily for purposes of religious freedom.

“The Muslim ban was a hateful stain on our nation. Inspired only by bigotry and not any genuine national security concerns, the ban served only to separate families while stoking bigotry, xenophobia, and Islamophobia,” Rep. Chu said in a press release. “We cannot risk letting prejudice become policy again. By requiring actual evidence of a threat before there can be any such broad-based bans like this, the [legislation] ensures that future presidents will not be able to ban people solely because of their religion.”

“The Muslim ban senselessly upended lives — separating thousands of Americans from their families and stripping fundamental protections from those with every right to be in the United States,” Sen. Coons said in a separate press release. “We’ve turned the page on this hateful policy, but we must ensure that no president can ever again act through fear and prejudice to discriminate based on religion or nationality. The [legislation would] establish new guardrails to ensure our immigration policies are rooted in our values, not in fear.”

What opponents say

Opponents counter that the legislation poses a threat to national security.

“President Trump invoked this authority against countries that were hotbeds of international terrorism and that were not cooperating with the United States in providing basic information about travelers coming from these countries. The left called it a ‘Muslim ban.’ What nonsense,” Rep. Tom McClintock (R-CA4) said on the House floor. “His orders affected only a tiny fraction of Muslim majority countries and a sizeable number of non-Muslim countries. The Supreme Court acknowledged this obvious truth when it upheld the president’s actions.”

“Without this authority, the president would have been powerless to take simple, prudent precautions against terrorists and criminals from entering the United States,” Rep. McClintock continued. “The president’s ability to protect against threats, negotiate security protocols and when necessary to retaliate against discriminatory actions by other countries depends on having this power at his immediate disposal.”

Votes and odds of passage

Rep. Chu’s prior House version attracted 219 cosponsors, all Democrats. It was folded into a larger bill called the FUTURE Act, which the Democratic-led House passed in July 2020 on a nearly party-line vote, though it never received a vote in the Republican-led Senate.

The current House version attracted a smaller — but still large — 159 cosponsors, all Democrats. The chamber passed it on April 21 on a 218–208 party-line vote, with Democrats unanimously in favor and Republicans almost unanimously opposed, with only Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA1) crossing party lines.

The Senate version has attracted 40 cosponsors: 38 Democrats and two independents. As of 2021, Democrats now control the chamber.

Totals

All Votes D R
Yea 51%
 
 
218
217
 
1
 
Nay 49%
 
 
208
0
 
208
 
Not Voting
 
 
3
0
 
3
 

Passed. Simple Majority Required. Source: house.gov.

Ideology Vote Chart

Key:
Democrat - Yea Republican - Yea Republican - Nay
Seat position based on our ideology score.

Cartogram Map

Each hexagon represents one congressional district. Solid hexes are Yea votes.

What you can do

Vote Details

Notes: The Speaker’s Vote? “Aye” or “Yea”?
Download as CSV

Statistically Notable Votes

Statistically notable votes are the votes that are most surprising, or least predictable, given how other members of each voter’s party voted and other factors.

All Votes

Study Guide

How well do you understand this vote? Use this study guide to find out.

You can find answers to most of the questions below here on the vote page. For a guide to understanding the bill this vote was about, see here.

What was the procedure for this vote?

  1. What was this vote on?
  2. Not all votes are meant to pass legislation. In the Senate some votes are not about legislation at all, since the Senate must vote to confirm presidential nominations to certain federal positions.

    This vote is related to a bill. However, that doesn’t necessarily tell you what it is about. Congress makes many decisions in the process of passing legislation, such as on the procedures for debating the bill, whether to change the bill before voting on passage, and even whether to vote on passage at all.

    You can learn more about the various motions used in Congress at EveryCRSReport.com. If you aren’t sure what the House was voting on, try seeing if it’s on this list.

  3. What is the next step after this vote?
  4. Take a look at where this bill is in the legislative process. What might come next? Keep in mind what this specific vote was on, and the context of the bill. Will there be amendments? Will the other chamber of Congress vote on it, or let it die?

    For this question it may help to briefly examine the bill itself.

What is your analysis of this vote?

  1. What trends do you see in this vote?
  2. Members of Congress side together for many reasons beside being in the same political party, especially so for less prominent legislation or legislation specific to a certain region. What might have determined how the roll call came out in this case? Does it look like Members of Congress voted based on party, geography, or some other reason?

    One tool that will be helpful in answering this question is the cartogram at the top of the page. A cartogram is a stylized map of the United States that shows each district as an identical hexagon. This view allows you to see the how the representatives from each district voted arranged by their geography and colored by their political party. What trends can you see in the cartogram for this vote?

  3. How did your representative vote?
  4. There is one vote here that should be more important to you than all the others. These are the votes cast by your representative, which is meant to represent you and your community. Do you agree with how your representative voted? Why do you think they voted the way they did?

    If you don’t already know who your Members of Congress are you can find them by entering your address here.

Each vote’s study guide is a little different — we automatically choose which questions to include based on the information we have available about the vote. Study guides are a new feature to GovTrack. You can help us improve them by filling out this survey or by sending your feedback to hello@govtrack.us.